Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1172
@AhyoungRyu Made modifications and added screenshot
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/908
@cloverhearts I've got it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user cloverhearts opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1174
[ Improve ] Paragraph dynamic relationship executable form
### What is this PR for?
Through a dynamic form, you can execute the order in para graph.
There is a difference with
Github user cloverhearts closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1121
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1110
Merging if there is no more discussions
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
Build error has gone and working good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
@Leemoonsoo Tested,
Fix for the table after re-run confirmed.
For the second item, I would keep the solution used in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1078
Since
GitHub user anthonycorbacho opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1173
ZeppelinHub Realm
### What is this PR for?
Add a new Shiro Realm that lets users authenticate in Apache Zeppelin using
their ZeppelinHub credentials.
### What type of PR is
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1172
@AhyoungRyu No, that discussion was about the elapsed time.
Right, for long one, maybe we should show something else than seconds. I
will modify that.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user AhyoungRyu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1172
@corneadoug Wasn't it intended behaviour because of
[https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/862#issuecomment-221474937](https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/862#issuecomment-221474937)?
Github user cloverhearts commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/908
@jongyoul Task is waiting.
It has been delayed due to other work in progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1145
@Leemoonsoo Concerning `sql interpreter not found`, I'll fix that issue
with another one. I'll remove `jdbc` magic after I adopt this feature.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
I just confirmed it and created an issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1161
PR should be coming pretty quickly
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Sachin Janani
wrote:
> Ok will create a issue and if possible submit a patch for this
>
> Thanks,
> SJ
>
> On
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1171
[ZEPPELIN-1150] Table contents disappear 2nd run onwards
### What is this PR for?
Fix for
[ZEPPELIN-1150](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1150).
### What type of
GitHub user jongyoul reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
[MINOR] Add formatter
### What is this PR for?
Unifying the format of codes
### What type of PR is it?
[Feature]
### Todos
* [x] - Add formatter
* [x] -
Github user jongyoul closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Yesha Vora created ZEPPELIN-1160:
Summary: Add an option to serially execute all paragraphs
Key: ZEPPELIN-1160
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1160
Project: Zeppelin
Yesha Vora created ZEPPELIN-1159:
Summary: Livy interpreter gets "404 not found" error
Key: ZEPPELIN-1159
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1159
Project: Zeppelin
Issue
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1170
Great contribution, thank you!
Couple of questions on top of few one already raised above:
- will you be willing to add some tests as well? Looking at other
interpreters impl like #1164
It looks like not mismatched versions. I tried local[*] mode and got the same
error again just for Spark SQL (SQLContext).
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
org.apache.spark.sql.hive.client.ClientWrapper.conf(ClientWrapper.scala:205)
at
Hi,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1153
I have created an Interpreter for BigQuery for Apache Zeppelin.
The code is currently in my local dev environment and I would like to
review and push the changes out.
Above is the Jira that I created for this project.
Please let me know
GitHub user babupe opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1170
BigQuery Interpreter for Apazhe Zeppelin[ZEPPELIN-1153]
### What is this PR for?
Google BigQuery is a popular no-ops datawarehouse. This commit will enable
Apache Zeppelin users to perform BI
Shraddha Sumit created ZEPPELIN-1158:
Summary: Use "zeppelin-${cluster_name}@${realm}" instead of
"zeppelin/${cluster-name}{realm}" for identity in kerberos.json
Key: ZEPPELIN-1158
URL:
As you are no doubt already aware, we will be holding ApacheCon in
Seville, Spain, the week of November 14th, 2016. The call for papers
(CFP) for this event is now open, and will remain open until
September 9th.
The event is divided into two parts, each with its own CFP. The first
part of the
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1145
Another behavior change i found from this PR is,
When no interpreter is binded to a notebook, (e.g. incase of
conf/interpreter.json is removed)
When user open a notebook, Zeppelin
Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1145
@jongyoul
Regarding `Prefix Not found`,
Thought it was coming from this PR but found that `Prefix Not found`
message looks like coming after
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
@rja1 Sure, attaching both screenshot and json. I have tested this for hive
and phoenix.
Github user rja1 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
@prabhjyotsingh would you mind sharing your jdbc interpreter settings
please? I must be missing something.. Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user voyageth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1144
Change catch SQLException to Exception. I think connection.close() can
throw other Exception.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1144
@voyageth Could you please change the title including [ZEPPELIN-1128]?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/908
What's the status of this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1144
LGTM. Merging if there's no more discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user Leemoonsoo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1169
[WIP] [ZEPPELIN-759] Spark 2.0 support
### What is this PR for?
This PR implement spark 2.0 support based on #747.
This PR has approach from #980 which is reimplementing code in scala.
Ok will create a issue and if possible submit a patch for this
Thanks,
SJ
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Hyung Sung Shim wrote:
> Yea. It seems you're right.
> You can create issue for this.
>
> 2016-07-12 23:26 GMT+09:00 Sachin Janani :
>
> > But i
Yea. It seems you're right.
You can create issue for this.
2016-07-12 23:26 GMT+09:00 Sachin Janani :
> But i think this changes are overridden by
> https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/862 and the number of seconds are
> not visible now
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:48
But i think this changes are overridden by
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/862 and the number of seconds are
not visible now
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Hyung Sung Shim wrote:
> Hi.
> Yes it's a known behaviour maybe since
>
Hi.
Yes it's a known behaviour maybe since
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/848.
2016-07-12 21:49 GMT+09:00 Sachin Janani :
> Hi All,
> In the latest release of zeppelin it seems that the actual task execution
> time is not displayed on the paragraph which was
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1166
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
Ready to review. Could you please check Eclipse's one? Open
ZeppelinServer.java and reformat it and check if something's different or not.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1168
[MINOR] Add formatter
### What is this PR for?
Unifying the format of codes
### What type of PR is it?
[Feature]
### Todos
* [x] - Add formatter
* [x] - Convert
Hi All,
In the latest release of zeppelin it seems that the actual task execution
time is not displayed on the paragraph which was previously working
properly.
After looking into the code I found that it has been replaced with
Moment.js which shows length of time as string ,something like "Took a
Github user prabhjyotsingh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
Yes fair point, let me do a quick test and do it right away.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user onkarshedge commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
@bzz right now I am working on Bittorrent support. I am using the
[jlibtorrent](https://github.com/frostwire/frostwire-jlibtorrent) which uses
libtorrent. The past week I spent time on using
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
@jongyoul i think this suggestion makes sense. Its possible that other jdbc
data sources may have security setup via ACL and don't need Kerberos.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
@jongyoul here are some reference - http://linux.die.net/man/1/kinit &
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/unix_commands/kinit.htm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
And It's not necessary to have hadoop dependencies in case not to depend on
hadoop environment like mysql and postresql. I think we need different way to
deal with it. I think it's better to
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1157
Doesn't it become potential problem to set hadoop version as 2.7.2? Is
there a way to fit the version of hadoop globally?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1110
@astroshim Can you rebase it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user astroshim commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1110
Is this PR going to be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user corneadoug commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1160
![screen shot 2016-07-12 at 5 42 56
pm](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/710411/16760930/f0a79850-4858-11e6-95e3-7aa1462f47fe.png)
I made a dropdown for the revisions, so
Github user davidtzoor commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1135
@corneadoug so is my PR ok?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1117
@astroshim looks awesome, thank you for implementing!
How do you think, would it improve user experience with this feature if we
could remove from suggestion list things, that are not
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1161
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/989
ping, @onkarshedge are there any updates for the past week?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
François Rosière created ZEPPELIN-1157:
--
Summary: Upgrade Angular and related libraries to a newer version
Key: ZEPPELIN-1157
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZEPPELIN-1157
Project:
Hi Canan,
the best architecture documentation we have so far is "How to write an
interpreter" [1].
Hope this helps, and we are always looking for contributions especially in
the documentation area [2], so please do no hesitate to share your
discoveries!
1.
Github user bzz commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/747
Looks ð ð¯ to me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1147
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1158
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1166
It's very simple PR and I'm merging it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user jongyoul opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1166
Added another location of metastore_db in .gitignore
### What is this PR for?
Avoiding tracking from metastore_db when you run ZeppelinServer in you IDE
### What type of PR is it?
Github user rconline commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1163
@felixcheung over a period of time, each interpreter will start to have
their own Keytab's. I think we should have separate keytabs for different
interpreters. We will ofcourse have to invest on
Github user jongyoul commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/zeppelin/pull/1145
Merging if there's no more discussion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
64 matches
Mail list logo