Congratulations Máté! A great addition to the ZooKeeper PMC ;)
- Norbert
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 5:09 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté
wrote:
> Thank you all! :)
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 3:38 PM Jordan Zimmerman <
> jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats!!!
> >
> > > On Mar 28, 2022, at
m doing something wrong here or if this needs
> to be fixed? If this needs to be fixed, I would like to try. Thanks for the
> help.
>
> Regards,
> Dinesh Singla
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 1:49 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
>
> > Hi Dinesh,
> >
> > Welcome to
Hi Dinesh,
Welcome to the ZooKeeper community, we are always happy to see interest in
the project.
Please attach logs so we can help pinpointing the problem.
You can find a lot of useful howto posts on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/
Mainly:
+1 (non-binding)
Checked on macOS: licenses, build and test passed, ran ZK and few standard
commands, signature.
Also built and run unit tests on ubuntu.
Thanks Arshad!
- Norbert
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 10:34 AM Damien Diederen
wrote:
>
> Hi Arshad, all,
>
> LGTM! +1 (advisory):
>
> *
dependency check is green now with
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1675
We do backport security fixes to 3.5 branch, correct? I will create a
separate PR for that due to ant support.
- Norbert
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 2:19 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> Please don't forget to upd
Please don't forget to update the license files also in zookeeper-server
resources folder!
But better yet I can create the jira and have a PR up soon.
- Norbert
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:50 PM Andor Molnar wrote:
> Good catch Mate!
>
> Jetty has to be upgraded.
>
> Andor
>
>
>
>
> > On 2021.
+1 (non-binding)
- Built source (including running tests)
- Run and tested with basic commands from built source and also from bin
tarball
- Checked files included in tarballs
Minor side note: I had 2 failed tests on MacOS (ReadOnlyModeTest
and RequestPathMetricsCollectorTest), after re-running
)
Máté Szalay-Bekő +0 (non-binding)
Norbert Kalmar -1 (non-binding, and tentative)
Thanks for putting together the release Damien, everything looks flawless
on that part :)
- Norbert
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:17 PM Damien Diederen
wrote:
>
> Greetings, all,
>
> I have seen your rep
Please disregard my last email, I had ZooKeeper running in the background,
killing it solved that test, the fork issue is not caused by that.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:26 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> Sorry, the linked test is just an assertion error, no exception there.
> I had anothe
tory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:186)
at
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.(QuorumPeer.java:1253)
at
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.CnxManagerTest.testCnxManagerListenerThreadConfigurableRetry(CnxManagerTest.java:309)
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 5:20 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> -1 (non-
-1 (non-binding!)
- built the source, run locally, gave a few basic commands
- run tests on macOS 10.13.6, openjdk 1.8.0_242 - issues found, see below
- checked files in tarball
- checked signatures
I had the same problem as Máté. unit tests did not pass on MacOS. Nothing
has changed in my
ion listed the zk ticket:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3467. I think this is
> what I'm looking for: reads/s and writes/s for per client. The feature
> is not yet available. I wonder if there is a timeline for it. Thanks!
>
>
> -Huizhi
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 a
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3243
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:19 AM Norbert Kalmar
wrote:
> Hi Huizhi,
>
> You might be looking for ZOOKEEPER-3243, it is available from 3.6.0.
>
> Regards,
> Norbert
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:49 AM Huizhi Lu wr
Hi Huizhi,
You might be looking for ZOOKEEPER-3243, it is available from 3.6.0.
Regards,
Norbert
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:49 AM Huizhi Lu wrote:
> Hey ZK Experts,
>
> I am actively looking into the request throttling/quota feature. I
> recalled that at the zookeeper meetup, Facebook
Congratulations Maoling! Well-deserved!
- Norbert
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:43 AM Andor Molnar wrote:
> Congrats Maoling!
>
>
>
>
> > On 2021. Jan 18., at 11:09, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache ZooKeeper
> >
> > has invited Justin Mao Long to
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.5.9
ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed
applications. It exposes common services - such as naming,
configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a
simple interface so
,
> - run full unit tests suite on Ubuntu 20.10 (Java+C),
> - run rat check
> - run checkstyle
> - run smoketest/latencies test against non-SSL cluster,
> - verified SSL quorum + simple commands with SSL CLI
>
> Andor
>
>
>
> > On 2021. Jan 6., at 21:09, Norbert Ka
; > * Smoke-tested a 3-ensemble with the Java client and SASL/GSSAPI,
> > including a quick run of YCSB;
> >
> > I did not spot anything amiss.
> >
> > Cheers, -D
> >
> >
> > Norbert Kalmar writes:
> > > This is a bugfix release candidate fo
I'd say there are quite a few tasks aimed at 4.0. I just answered a thread
about jute.maxbuffer error, which could be improved for example. Or better
yet, throw jute out and use a standardized serialization library.
But there's also the issue of separating client and server code. And I'm
sure
We see a lot of issues (even on prod systems) around jute.maxbuffer. I
agree it is not the "cleanest" of errors. If ZK is involved in some issue,
usually we always check first for signs of requests being too big (a.k.a.
jute.maxbuffer issue).
But if we wan't to improve on this, we have to make
> > https://github.com/symat/zk-rolling-upgrade-test)
> > >
> > > The only thing I found was 4 unit tests, failed first (when I executed
> > all
> > > tests in docker) but succeeded second time running them on my mac:
> > > - QuorumPeerMainTest -> testLeaderOutOfV
This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.9. It contains 25 fixes,
including CVE fixes.
(Note: rc1 had a third party CVE which was only noticed during the last
check of the release, so it never made it for vote)
The full release notes is available at:
Sorry for missing the notification. I did an rc1 but totally missed one CVE
and only realized when doing my final checks. So I will have an rc2 instead
shortly.
- Norbert
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 5:23 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il giorno mar 5 gen 2021 alle ore 15:48 Norbert Kalmar
&g
It failed due to the CVE, and the fix was not a clean cherry-pick to 3.5.
Then Holidays hit, and I didn't do RC2. Picking it up now, and checking
what needs to be backported and doing an RC2.
- Norbert
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:26 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> What's the status of this VOTE ?
>
Author: Enrico Olivelli
> > Date: Tue Oct 20 16:21:30 2020 +0200
> >
> > ZOOKEEPER-3980: Fix Jenkinsfiles with new tool names
> >
> >
> > On the other hand, and just FYI, the following tickets mentioned in the
> > release notes do not ha
This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.5.9. It contains 24 fixes,
including 2 CVE fix.
The full release notes is available at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801=12348201
*** Please download, test and vote by December 4th 2020, 23:59 UTC+0. ***
Source
Starting the branching process for 3.5.9
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 7:13 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il Mer 25 Nov 2020, 20:26 Norbert Kalmar ha
> scritto:
>
> > Owasp CVE has been backported to 3.5.
> > There is still no backport for ZOOKEEPER-3911 (possible inconsistency d
along with releasing
3.5.9?
Regards,
Norbert
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 6:43 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> I reverted the patch from 3.5, it seems even after fixing up the code
> issues the test on inconsistency fails due to the leader not seeing the
> same znodes.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov
I reverted the patch from 3.5, it seems even after fixing up the code
issues the test on inconsistency fails due to the leader not seeing the
same znodes.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:51 AM Norbert Kalmar
wrote:
> The patch broke 3.5 branch btw, I'm already looking into it. Sorry.
>
&g
The patch broke 3.5 branch btw, I'm already looking into it. Sorry.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:48 AM Norbert Kalmar
wrote:
> Sure, here is the 3.5.9 labeled jiras:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ZOOKEEPER/versions/12348201
>
> Or tweak this search as you see fi
dor
>
>
>
> > On 2020. Nov 12., at 16:12, Norbert Kalmar
> wrote:
> >
> > ZOOKEEPER-3911 merged to all 3 active branches.
> > 3.5 did not pick clean, I will do further testing to verify the patch.
> > After that I will start the release process for 3.5.9,
ZOOKEEPER-3911 merged to all 3 active branches.
3.5 did not pick clean, I will do further testing to verify the patch.
After that I will start the release process for 3.5.9, as no request has
arrived for anything else to be included.
-Norbert
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote
Correction, Michael's patch for ZOOKEEPER-3911 would be also good to
backport to 3.5 IMHO. Any thoughts on this?
PR: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1445
-Norbert
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 12:02 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> Hello fellow ZK contributors and enthusiasts!
>
> L
Hello fellow ZK contributors and enthusiasts!
Looks like the time has come for a new release on the 3.5 branch. Currently
it has 4 blocker (1 which is a CVE) and 2 critical fixes completed.
There are 31 major patch in progress. I checked them, looks like all of
them are pushed to the next
; in mind.
> >>
> >> But on the other hand, I don't want to prevent you from cutting a
> >> release using the new flow, for a change. Moreover, cutting a 3.7.0
> >> seems a bit overly ambitious for somebody who just dropped in…
> >>
> >> Whi
+plugin
And if you have any questions let us know, it is also a good feedback if
this 2 guide is well written or there are areas of improvement :)
Let us know which release you would like to drive. I can drive the other.
- Norbert
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 2:52 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> Hi
Hi all,
I can drive the 3.5.9 release, it's been a while since I did one :)
- Norbert
On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:06 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Rajini,
> Sorry for so late reply.
>
> Do you have a way to update to 3.6.2? If you want to upgrade to 3.5.9 the
> effort would be very like updating
Congratulations Damien!
- Norbert
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 4:48 PM Damien Diederen
wrote:
>
> Thank you, everybody!
>
> I hope to make good use of this newly gained trust to contribute useful
> efforts and patches to this very hospitable community. One thing is for
> sure: it is not lacking in
I created one: ZOOKEEPER-3968
When running commit script we can add this to the commit message.
- Norbert
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 2:03 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il Ven 9 Ott 2020, 13:51 Norbert Kalmar ha
> scritto:
>
> > We could create an umbrella jira for the ones tha
> >> > >
> >> > > I hope this activity will help in growing Zookeeper project
> both
> >> > in code
> >> > > quality and with more contributions, that is to help the
> >> > community to grow.
> >
Thanks Enrico, it's merged.
- Norbert
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 7:25 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> This is the PR for the website
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1468
>
> please anyone merge
> IMO there is no need for a JIRA
>
> Enrico
>
> Il giorno lun 21 set 2020 alle ore 16:56 Enrico
Hello Tom,
+1 on the initiative, thanks for bringing this to our attention.
If I understand correctly, there will be no disclosed security issues which
cannot be found with open source static analyzers.
Regards,
Norbert
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 8:23 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté
wrote:
> Hello Guys,
>
Thanks Enrico, +1 (non-binding)from me.
- Built the source, run tests
- Run ZK and tried basic commands using zkCli
- files check in tarball
About website issue: generareted website can be fixed manually, we did this
earlier, I don't think it's a blocker.
Changelog, same, it should be fixed
set Coveralls.io report as blocker for merging a patch.
>
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Lun 7 Set 2020, 22:29 Norbert Kalmar ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just a quick email to raise awareness to code coverage in ZK.
> > We've seen demand for it, also found an old ti
Hi all,
Just a quick email to raise awareness to code coverage in ZK.
We've seen demand for it, also found an old ticket about it: ZOOKEEPER-2266
I did a quick patch to integrate jacoco:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1451
My question is, do you think this is useful, something we
Hi Sankalp,
How are you trying to access zk to run 4lw commands? AFAIK nc(telnet) does
not support ssl.
You need something that supports ssl, like openssl s_clien [1] (but I
haven't actually tested this) or by invoking the java client.
But as you use secure communication, I would recommend using
Hi Pratyush,
Node size (more precisely jute-maxbuffer size) has quite a debate.
Currently it is 1MB by default. I've seen it used in production as high as
1GB! That is insane, and definitely not recommended, but if you up it to a
few MB it's fine IMHO. But these high numbers are mainly due to
Hi, that't the last transaction applied to the datatree. It is a committed
proposal.
Regards,
Norbert
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 6:30 AM hack 4096 wrote:
> hi all, how to understand lastProcessedZxid in Zookeeper's code? is it
> committed proposal or uncommitted proposal?
> can anyone help on it?
Great, thanks Máté!
+1 (non-binding)
Did my usual build and testing, verified signature (new public key in
KEYS), compared src release with git repository, checked license files -
all looks good to me.
I'm rooting for an RC0 release! :)
Regards,
Norbert
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 6:22 PM
Sure, I'll do the update today.
+1 (non-binding) from me (see my testing in my previous mail)
Thanks Enrico!
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:20 AM Enrico Olivelli
wrote:
> Il giorno mer 22 apr 2020 alle ore 16:14 Norbert Kalmar
> ha scritto:
>
> > Only thing I found is that the bin
Only thing I found is that the bin has netty-codec-4.1.49 license file
while the jar included is 4.1.48. I think the license version has a typo in
the bugfix version. Not sure if it's a showstopper.
Otherwise LGTM:
- Signatures OK
- Compared to git and 3.6.0
- Compiled both on Mac (without C
Hi Enrico,
Thanks for driving this!
I managed to build HBase with ZooKeeper 3.5.7 having cherry-picked the
getRevision() patch. I know it's not 3.6.x, but I found the problem with
this 3.5.7 and fixed it according to this on 3.6 as well. So it should be
fine now.
- Norbert
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020
Hi Christopher,
Yes, moving (most, not all actually) contrib projects to it's own repo is a
long standing discussion. As far as I can tell/remember, the community
agrees that we should move it.
Want to take up the task? :)
- Norbert
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 9:36 AM Christopher wrote:
> Hi ZK
Well, for a long time we only had 1 line maintained, 3.4 basically. It is
just right now we have 3 lines, which is I think one too many. (Plus we
also have master to maintain additional to the active release lines, that's
4 active branches. Well, more or less, 3.4 is pretty inactive already).
I
1 Apr 2020, 13:09 Norbert Kalmar ha
> scritto:
>
> > I'll create a jira and the PR. I guess we should just return -1, that's
> > what 3.5.5 did anyway:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob/branch-3.5.5/zookeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/zook
t; Kind regards,
> Mate
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:18 PM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > We should restore it as we did for ZKUtils#delete
> >
> > Both in 3.5x and in 3.6
> > We just ensure smooth upgrade
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
&
Hi all,
We removed the getRevision() [1] function in 3.5.6 [2].
I just tried updating to ZooKeeper 3.5.7 in our system, but HBase is not
happy with this. It gets ZooKeeper's revision using this method. It is true
HBase could just move to using getRevisionHash, but they are still using
3.4.x, and
+1
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 7:35 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Maybe this is the death of 3.4...
>
> Enrico
>
> Il Mer 1 Apr 2020, 07:29 Jaikiran Pai (Jira) ha scritto:
>
> > Jaikiran Pai created ZOOKEEPER-3779:
> > ---
> >
> > Summary: Zookeeper
alle ore 18:43 Patrick Hunt
> > > ha scritto:
> > > >
> > > > p3 is fine with me. Trying to maintain multiple can be a hassle and
> p2
> > is
> > > > EOL already.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick
> > > >
+1 for v3 only (I have both v2/v3 interpreters, but as you mentioned, we
should only need to maintain 1 script).
- Norbert
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:35 PM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il giorno lun 30 mar 2020 alle ore 13:33 Andor Molnar
> ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have a nice PR
I just saw the discussion here on ZOOKEEPER-3739, which I committed about a
minute ago. But please do check if anyone is interested in it (we can
always revert).
My very short take on the issue: Removed an unsupported api class that use
was *supposedly* to speed up file modification watch event on
Hi Sankalp,
I added you to the contributors, and assigned the jira ticket to you to see
if you have access now. From now on you can assign tickets to yourself.
- Norbert
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:11 PM Sankalp Bhatia
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to raise a PR for
>
I think it was not committed, there is no commit for it:
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commits/website
release.md was also missing 3.5.6, I added a very generic one when doing
3.5.7.
I can build 3.5.6 and add the missing documentation, probably tomorrow. If
anyone wants to do it before
Also, the apidocs are no longer linked correctly, I noticed after the 3.5.7
release.
Before the fix it pointed to:
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.6.0/api/index.html
The new current format:
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.6.0/apidocs/zookeeper-server/index.html
And, if we want to include
+1 (non-binding)
- unit tests pass (PurgeTxnTest as well)
- source tarball: compiled and started ZK + run few commands from source
tarball
- bin tarball: license files checked, started ZK + run few commands
- signatures OK.
- compared source tarball with git repository checked out at RC tag using
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version
3.5.7
ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed
applications. It exposes common services - such as naming,
configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a
simple interface so
; >
> > > - release notes are OK,
> > > - documentation looks good,
> > > - verified signatures, checksum,
> > > - Java & C unit tests passed,
> > > - verified 3-node cluster with zk-latencies.py (create, get, delete,
> > > setAcl, get
This is the third bugfix release candidate for 3.5.7. It fixes 25 issues,
including third party CVE fixes, potential data loss and potential split
brain if some rare conditions exists.
There are 4 additional patches compared to rc0 and rc1:
- ZOOKEEPER-3453: missing 'SET' in zkCli on windows
-
epo. I'd like to test with Curator.
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/
> <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/
> >
>
> -Jordan
>
> > On Feb
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 10:14 AM Norbert Kalmar
>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Damien!
> >
> > -1 from me for this rc1.
> >
> > I'll start working on rc2! Damien already fixed the mentioned issue, I'll
> > review and test.
>
Thanks Damien!
-1 from me for this rc1.
I'll start working on rc2! Damien already fixed the mentioned issue, I'll
review and test.
I tested my modification for the missing files (ZOOKEEPER-3718), my main
issue is to use apache-release profile just like in master, or fix up the
assembly for
Sorry for the name typo - *Enrico
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:24 PM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> p.s.: These are pretty easy fixes to include/exclude the files Eniroc
> mentioned, so on second thought probably worth fixing and do an rc2.
> I'll create a jira and start to work on it.
p.s.: These are pretty easy fixes to include/exclude the files Eniroc
mentioned, so on second thought probably worth fixing and do an rc2.
I'll create a jira and start to work on it. We'll see if anything else
comes up or how the vote goes.
- Norbert
On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 2:20 PM Norbert Kalmar
ere already present in 3.5.6 so I am not sure
> these are blocker issues for a release.
>
> I am still continuing my tests
> I just wanted to inform you about my findings, this way we can choose
> what do to as soon as possible.
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
> Il giorno ven
This is the second bugfix release candidate for 3.5.7. It fixes 21 issues,
including third party CVE fixes, potential data loss and potential split
brain if some rare conditions exists.
(I have signed rc0 with the wrong key - sorry for that). Everything else is
unchanged from rc0.
The full
+1 (non-binding)
- unit tests pass
- source tarball: compiled and started ZK + run few commands from source
tarball
- bin tarball: license files checked, started ZK + run few commands
- signature OK.
Tested on MacOS and Linux, openJDK 1.8.242.
Thanks Enrico!
- Norbert
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at
;
> > $gpg --import KEYS
> > ...
> > gpg: key 792D43153B5B5147: public key "Norbert Kalmar <
> nkal...@apache.org>"
> > imported
> >
> >
> > $ gpg --verify apache-zookeeper-3.5.7-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-zookee
:14 AM Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> So about the SSL tests failing... my hosts file was messed up, turns out
> localhost did not translate to 127.0.0.1 very well (it had a few strange
> entry).
> Probably something in the Docker image also around the hosts file, Máté is
> taking a lo
And there are a lot of kerberos related changes
> > after 8.232: see https://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/jdk )
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:54 PM Norbert Kalmar
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I tested with zulu 1.8.212 on the linux machine, and with zulu 1
I tested with zulu 1.8.212 on the linux machine, and with zulu 1.8.0_163 on
MacOS (whoops). I use sdkman on both machine. I upgraded to the newest 1.8
which is _242, at least with sdkman.
And sadly, the mentioned tests also fail for me after the upgrade.
So, something in the tests that the new
Norbert Kalmar wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> It's already committed:
> https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/commit/59337e7ec8ab67fecf7cfc1b8c5b76397c02bfd6
>
> Sorry I'm running a bit late with the release, I got a flu or some virus
> last week, wasn't too productive.
>
> Anyway,
+1 (non-binding)
- unit tests pass
- built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball
- checked bin tarball, license files, run ZK + few commands
- signature OK.
Tested on MacOS with openJDK 1.8, no problems
I also run the tests on a Linux machine, found the problem why SSL tests
Hi David,
Thanks for your contributions!
We consider the patch committed if it should be backported or not. In my
opinion if a contributor finds a bug/improvement to do, we can't expect
him/her to know what branches this should be committed to. Of course if the
author takes the time to dig
eaks the admin server. We have
> > been running a backport of 3638 (which just upgrades to a later version)
> > successfully on 3.5.6 here without issue.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Craig Condit
> >
> >
> >
> > F
)
And a few other nice to haves (like ZOOKEEPER-1105 C client WARN msg fix)
that also made it.
I started testing the 3.5 branch and I will create a release branch soon
(probably tomorrow).
Regards,
Norbert
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:30 AM Norbert Kalmar
wrote:
> Only blocker left for 3.5.7 is ZOOKEE
Kalmar
wrote:
> The patch fixed the CVE warning
> https://builds.apache.org/job/zookeeper-master-maven-owasp/339/
>
> Norbert
>
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:07 AM Norbert Kalmar
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Patrick, I'll review and preferably commit your patch, which
&g
The patch fixed the CVE warning
https://builds.apache.org/job/zookeeper-master-maven-owasp/339/
Norbert
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:07 AM Norbert Kalmar
wrote:
> Thanks Patrick, I'll review and preferably commit your patch, which should
> negate the CVE warning.
>
> Regard
Thanks Patrick, I'll review and preferably commit your patch, which should
negate the CVE warning.
Regards,
Norbert
On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:31 PM Patrick Hunt wrote:
> owasp is failing on branch-3.5,
> [ERROR] jackson-databind-2.9.10.1.jar: CVE-2019-20330
>
> seems the same as:
>
I also agree that branching for a release makes the process easier.
Especially if we are talking about the active branch. For example, I
wouldn't do a branch for a new 3.4 release, as it's pretty much EOL and
hardly anything makes it there.
My opinion, if it makes sense to branch out for a
Congratulations Enrico, well earned! :)
Regards,
Norbert
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 11:15 PM rammohan ganapavarapu <
rammohanga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations Enrico!!
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 1:41 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>
> > I'm pleased to announce that Enrico Olivelli recently
+1 on option A.
But!
I think we should have a page containing all the changes in all supported
line. So like option C.
Why? - I agree a specific release should only contain changes to that
version. If someone wants to see the changes that went into various
releases, he/she should check the
Kudos to everyone!
Also, nice to see so many contributions. And not just veterans, but plenty
of new community members! Thank you all!
Regards,
Norbert
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:00 PM Jordan Zimmerman
wrote:
> Fantastic
>
>
> Jordan Zimmerman
>
> > On Dec 12, 2019, at 3:49
Oh, wow, I didn't even notice that until now.
Makes sense, knowing a lot of the time ZK is used "standalone" (I mean
outside of any hadoop ecosystem).
Regards,
Norbert
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 2:52 PM Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Should we remove that Hadoop logo from the documentation? It has
Oh, and shouldn't we decommission branch-3.4? :)
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 12:45 PM Andor Molnar
wrote:
> Okay Enrico, go ahead please.
>
> Andor
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 10:42 AM Norbert Kalmar
> wrote:
>
> > +1 to create the 3.6 branch now. I don't
+1 to create the 3.6 branch now. I don't expect a whole lot of patches that
needs to be added to 3.6 and master as well. Only the few remaining tickets
that is planned and occasional bugfixes. But, imho, better to push out a
3.6.0 that no one will probably use because they'll just wait for a 3.6.1
Thanks Mate, committed to master, this fix will now be in 3.6.0!
(AdminServer NPE)
Regards,
Norbert
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 4:43 PM Mate Szalay-Beko
wrote:
> Sorry to extend the list :p
> here is a low risk / quite trivial bugfix I created based on the NPE
> problem reported yesterday on the
Hi Pierre,
As this is a critical bugfix IMO, I don't see why it shouldn't be
backported to 3.4. It hasn't been stated AFAIK that 3.4 is no longer
supported.
As for when there could be a new 3.4 release, that's a different question
though. Let's see what the PMCs think about it.
(I also added
+1 (non-binding)
- unit tests pass
- built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball
- checked bin tarball, license files, run ZK + few commands
- signature OK.
- git tag OK :)
Thanks Enrico!
Norbert
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:45 PM Andor Molnar wrote:
> +1
>
> Verified…
>
> -
files instead of 4.1.42.
>
> so -1 from my side.
>
> I am sorry this is taking so long.
>
> Fortunately ZK codebase is in good shape, we are only cancelling votes for
> third party dependencies and license files
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
>
>
> Il giorno lun 7 ott
+1 (non-binding) - once tag is fixed, which has the extra commit Andor
mentioned. I verified that the RC does not contain the commit, so it's just
the tag.
But the RC looks good to me!
- unit tests pass
- built and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball
- checked bin tarball, license
1 - 100 of 455 matches
Mail list logo
