Re: [CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-11 Thread Flavio Junqueira
Good catch, Enrico... > On 11 Feb 2020, at 09:43, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > -1 > I saw that 3.6 servers are not able to join a 3.5 cluster, this make > it difficult or rather impossible to have a graceful rolling upgrade. > > In a separate thread on this list we discussed about this problem

[CANCELLED] Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-11 Thread Enrico Olivelli
-1 I saw that 3.6 servers are not able to join a 3.5 cluster, this make it difficult or rather impossible to have a graceful rolling upgrade. In a separate thread on this list we discussed about this problem and we decided to work on adding support for this scenario (rolling upgrade without

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-09 Thread Jordan Zimmerman
The CURATOR-549-zk36-updates branch tests pass +1 (non binding) -Jordan > On Feb 5, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is the third release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most notably: > - Built-in data

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-08 Thread Brian Nixon
+1 - verified tests pass on both MacOS and Windows - verified documentation Note that the branch-3.6 proper does not compile and needs the fix of https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1239 (for the same reasons). On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 2:43 PM Michael Han wrote: > +1. > > - verified

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-08 Thread Michael Han
+1. - verified checksum/sig - verified release notes. - verified regenerated documentations. - verified both java and c unit tests pass. - verified with a few jetty admin commands and zk cli commands. On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 10:22 AM Flavio Junqueira wrote: > +1 binding > > - Built from

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-08 Thread Flavio Junqueira
+1 binding - Built from sources and ran tests (some tests fail intermittently) - Checked SHA 512 and signature - Checked license and notice - Ran local smoke tests -Flavio > On 7 Feb 2020, at 10:04, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > - unit tests pass > - source tarball: compiled

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-07 Thread Damien Diederen
+1 (non-binding) Unit tests pass on NixOS 19.09. Built SSL-enabled C clients on NixOS and Windows 10, and smoke-tested them against a (non-SSL enabled) NixOS-hosted server. Cheers, -D

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-07 Thread Norbert Kalmar
+1 (non-binding) - unit tests pass - source tarball: compiled and started ZK + run few commands from source tarball - bin tarball: license files checked, started ZK + run few commands - signature OK. Tested on MacOS and Linux, openJDK 1.8.242. Thanks Enrico! - Norbert On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-05 Thread Patrick Hunt
+1 - sig/xsum verified, rat ran clean, I compiled and ran various tests and they passed. Patrick On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 11:34 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > This is the third release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most >

[VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

2020-02-05 Thread Enrico Olivelli
This is the third release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most notably: - Built-in data consistency check inside ZooKeeper - Allow Followers to host Observers - Authentication enforcement - Pluggable metrics system for ZooKeeper