pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

I'm having all sorts of trouble getting PyLucene to run on Ubuntu 18.04, which has openjdk-8, openjdk-11, python 2.7.15. Has anyone had success, and if so, with which version of pylucene? Thanks, Jeff

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

To be a little more specific, here's what happens with version 4.9.0 which I've had good luck with in the past. The system contains the following shared libraries. /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-amd64/jre/lib/amd64/libjava.so It looks

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

And for what it is worth, python-setuptools claims to be version 39.0.1. I've probably spent about 10 to 12 hours trying to get something to work. It is not clear to me if it needs patching to not.

Re: 1.9 RC1

This week is pretty booked for me, so, barring major objections, I will make a 1.9 RC1 release next Monday, February 20th. If there are no problems discovered, I'll aim to make a 1.9 final release a week later, around the 27th. Has anyone tested if 1.9 can build with a Free Software

add multithread indexing sample?

Does it make sense to add a multithreaded indexing example to the samples directory? Mike McCandles has such fun graphs, and it would be fun to chase them in python. http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/05/265-indexing-speedup-with-lucenes.html

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1)

+1 On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 1:38 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 6.4.1 (rc1) release tracking today's release of > Apache Lucene 6.4.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/6.4.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.2.0 (rc2)

+1

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 6.5.0 (rc2) (now with Python 3 support)

+1.00 ± 0.01 On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > A few fixes were needed in JCC for better Windows support. > The PyLucene 6.5.0 rc1 vote is thus cancelled. > > I'm now calling for a vote on PyLucene 6.5.0 rc2. > > The PyLucene 6.5.0 (rc2) release tracking

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

> JCC monkeypatches as needed. I don't think monkey patching worked on Ubuntu 18.04, for any version of JCC that I tried. When running make, I ran into errors discussing how JCC was not built with shared support. > Does Lucene 4 even build and run with Java 11 ? No idea. I halted my efforts

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

Hi Andi, I am happy to report that I just got 4.10.1 working, using some extreme measures. Whew. Will give a clearer report after getting some sleep. Jeff

Re: pylucene on Ubuntu 18.04

I'd previously been using 4.9.0. Making a huge jump in release numbers is scary. Will it invalidate existing indexes? Has the Lucene API changed a lot? Will I be forced to migrate to python 3? That said, I was desperate and tried all the official releases (4.10.1, 6.2.0, 6.4.1, 6.5.0). It just so

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 7.2.0 (rc1)

+1 On Dec 21, 2017 4:50 AM, "Andi Vajda" wrote: The PyLucene 7.2.0 (rc1) release tracking the upcoming release of Apache Lucene 7.2.0 is ready. A release candidate is available from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/7.2.0-rc1/ PyLucene 7.2.0 is built

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 7.4.0 (rc1)

+1 On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 11:27 PM Marc Jeurissen wrote: > +1 > > > > Met vriendelijke groeten, > Marc Jeurissen > > [image: cid:image001.png@01D3F728.E95A0620] > > Bibliotheek UAntwerpen > Stadscampus – Ve35.303 > Venusstraat 35 – 2000 Antwerpen > marc.jeuris...@uantwerpen.be > T +32 3 265 49

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc2)

+1 On Sat, Jun 22, 2019, 5:17 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 8.1.1 (rc2) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.1.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.1.1-rc2/ > > PyLucene 8.1.1 is built

Re: Pylucene patch

+1

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.9.0

+1

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.8.1

+1 On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 6:35 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 8.8.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 8.8.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/8.8.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene 8.8.1 is built

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2

+1 On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 2:33 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The rc1 vote failed because of a bug fix in JCC that helps with detecting > the Temurin JDK - available from https://adoptium.net. > IIUC, the Temurin JDK supercedes AdoptOpenJDK. > > Please vote on PyLucene 8.11.0 rc2 instead. These

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.4.1

+1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2022, 3:50 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.4.1 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 9.4.1 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.4.1-rc1/ > > PyLucene 9.4.1 is built

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.7.0-rc1

+1 On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 5:39 PM Benjamin Trent wrote: > +1 > > I tested getting ann-benchmarks updated and it worked just fine. Was also > able to build locally and run some tests (non-exhaustive) on my M1 macbook. > > Hope everyone else has the same success! > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 3:47 

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.6.0-rc1

+1 On Mon, May 29, 2023, 4:44 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.6.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 9.6.0 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.6.0-rc1/ > > PyLucene 9.6.0 is built

Re: [VOTE] Release PyLucene 9.10.0-rc1

+1 On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 1:51 PM Andi Vajda wrote: > > The PyLucene 9.10.0 (rc1) release tracking the recent release of > Apache Lucene 9.10.0 is ready. > > A release candidate is available from: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/pylucene/9.10.0-rc1/ > > PyLucene 9.10.0 is

Re: The future of the PyLucene project

My excuse is I'm increasingly bad at reading email. Still using. Still encouraging. On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 9:32 PM Aric Coady wrote: > On Feb 28, 2024, at 2:29 PM, Andi Vajda wrote: > > Of course anyone can vote ! > > Anyone interested in this project can and should vote ! > > If no one