Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by wujiegao:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/UserPreferences
--
+
The Struts Action Framework 1.3.4 Test Build is available to evaluate
for release quality.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
The test build, including checksums and signatures, has been deployed to:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
--
I don't see a license file in either the root directory or META-INF, they're
'hidden' away down next in org/apache/struts/build.
Also, the notice.txt includes:
This product includes the ANTLR parsing library,
developed by JGuru.com (http://www.antlr.org and
http://www.jguru.com).
Which I
+1. Thanks for all your hard work on this build stuff :-)
Greg
On May 10, 2006, at 3:24 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
In advance of a Struts Action 1.3.x release, we need to release
version 1.0.1 of the struts-build jar. A test build has been deployed
here:
*
GA - This looks really good Wendy, thanks again for the hard work!
Don
Wendy Smoak wrote:
The Struts Action Framework 1.3.4 Test Build is available to evaluate
for release quality.
The release plan is available on the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease134
The test
+1 too, while there are always improvements to be made, this looks
good enough for a release. Thanks again!
Don
On 5/10/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1. Thanks for all your hard work on this build stuff :-)
Greg
On May 10, 2006, at 3:24 AM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
In advance of a
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by GeorgeDinwiddie:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/UserPreferences
--
-
We will be having an unofficial Struts BOF at JavaOne with the purpose of
discussing the technical directions of the Struts project. I intend this to be
more of a working group meeting and discussion than a presentation, so please
come prepared to discuss roadmaps and hammer out feature ideas
Sounds like a lot of fun. Unfortunately I can't make it. :-(
Is it possible to post a summary about what has been discussed and the
conclusion arrived at. That would really help people who can't make it
catch-up. Thx
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes
struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar.
I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade notes wiki page
refers to struts-action:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpgradeNotes12to13
Like Wendy, I've
Yep, I'll post a recap. However, don't worry, all decisions will discussed and
possibly voted on on the list for them to be official.
Don
tm jee wrote:
Sounds like a lot of fun. Unfortunately I can't make it. :-(
Is it possible to post a summary about what has been discussed and the
I didn't know we decided to change that, as it has repercussions all throughout
the Maven build. I'm fine with us changing it for the next release, but I
certainly don't think it should stand in the way of this one.
Don
Joe Germuska wrote:
This seems like the smallest of things, but the
On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes
struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar.
I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade notes wiki page
refers to struts-action:
At 11:21 AM -0700 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes
struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar.
I thought we'd decided to change that? The upgrade notes wiki page
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Struts Wiki for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsMaintenanceMaven
The comment on the change is:
Note that the instructions apply to snapshots and
On 5/9/06, A. Alonso Dominguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there!
I'm trying to use the new struts-action framework, version 1.3.3 with
tiles
and faces. I'm following the example applications but I found possibly a
bug
when rendering a struts-based FormBean.
The jsp code that I was using is
On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 11:21 AM -0700 5/10/06, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 5/10/06, Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like the smallest of things, but the distribution includes
struts-core-1.3.4.jar and not struts-action-1.3.4.jar.
I thought we'd decided
In the past we've made a new version available for people to check out
for a period of time (my preference is at least a week) before calling
a vote.
I'm against this process of publishing and calling a vote immediately
as I believe it increases the chance of a build with problems being
voted
Normally, I'd agree with you but:
a) This is the latest in a succession of very recent releases so little
has changed (last one was Sunday)
b) Theoretically people test during that week, but in practice few do.
Seems people don't pay attention until a vote is called
We can always recall a
I am using struts 1.1.
I have two fields in a form: pwd, retypePwd. I use validwhen to validate
whether these two fields are exactly same. It works fine. But I want to
highlight these two fields in case validation fails. I use a javascript
function to get failed fields from session, but it
On 5/10/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I missed the discussion where the 1.3 dtd was added - seems like its
actually identical to the 1.1 dtd - which IMO serves no purpose. I
would rather it was removed.
I remember being involved -- it had to do with the version numbers not
24 matches
Mail list logo
