On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/5/10 Orcan Ogetbil
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Chen Lei wrote:
swami(svn) now use gtk2, don't worry about this, it has a quite active
upstream.
I wonder where you got that information. The gtk2 port was stalled a
while ago
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 02:09 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Anyway, do we have a Fedora policy to remove software just because
they are old and unmaintained upstream? If there is a happy userbase
and a maintainer willing to take care of the package, what is the big
deal?
I still use an old
On 05/10/2010 01:23 AM, Léon Keijser wrote:
I still use an old nethack-like game that unfortunately depends on gtk
1.2. Since i'll never be able to get it into Fedora, i just install gtk
myself then i'm good to go again. I would regret it if my favorite
distro drops the package simply because
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 01:31 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
You should be pressuring the author of the game you use to use GTK 2.0.
If your game is no longer maintained, then you should update it yourself.
The game isn't maintained anymore, indeed. But unfortunately i'm not a C
programmer. I
2010/5/10 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com
Yeah that is one of the only two swami commits in the last 2 years.
Anyway, do we have a Fedora policy to remove software just because
they are old and unmaintained upstream? If there is a happy userbase
and a maintainer willing to take care of
On Mon 10 May 2010 12:01:01 am Chen Lei wrote:
Considering fedora 13 just remove ppc arch to secondary arch, it's
meaningful for fedora to retire some long dead upstream packages as well.
Maybe it's suitable to retire gtk 1.2 in F14 or F15, then remove it to
rpmfusion for a compatible reason
2010/5/10 Ryan Rix r...@n.rix.si
On Sun 9 May 2010 11:31:21 pm Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 05/10/2010 01:23 AM, Léon Keijser wrote:
I still use an old nethack-like game that unfortunately depends on gtk
1.2. Since i'll never be able to get it into Fedora, i just install
gtk
myself
On Sunday 09 May 2010 19:13:57 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
I think it would be better to drop ntp support completely from s-c-d once
chrony becomes default in Fedora. We aim to support default Fedora
configuration tools. Radek Novacek is now working on date/time DBus
Andreas Bierfert írta:
On Sat, 2010-05-08 at 12:20 +0200, drago01 wrote:
2010/5/8 Zoltan Boszormenyi zbos...@freemail.hu:
Hi,
the latest version of Wine found in koji is 1.1.38, which was released
in february this year. The latest mainstream Wine is 1.1.44.
Why isn't there a
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
I find that having NTP enabled in most cases for mobile systems is simply
unnecessary; there is a large (I would say upwards of 95% in my most
unscientific guessings) chance that these users aren't going to be doing
anything which
On 05/09/2010 02:28 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 09/05/10 13:34, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
If you have not see this at all, I've seen this frequently. Fedora
sucks in this area for many years. I've seen it, so whatever
arguments you bring; I KNOW that this bug IS very important and
should be
On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
--snip--
This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
but not others. The whole idea that Fedora is a distro for advanced
users therefore it should be hard to use is absurd.
How is it hard to use? excl. patented stuff.
I can
Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
multimedia working, too unstable (in the sense of low MTBF),
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
You will hear answers along the line of too much
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
U.S. citizen), you can also try to move Red Hat's headquarters outside
of U.S.
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
U.S. citizen),
On 05/10/2010 11:18 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 06:54, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
Have you ever talked to Ubuntu/openSUSE users and listened to their
replies when telling them you are using Fedora?
You will hear answers along the line of too much inconvenience to get
multimedia
Dne 10.5.2010 11:35, drago01 napsal(a):
I didn't say that we can fix it; just that it *is* easier in other
distributions.
Which don't have principal headquarters of their sponsor in US (but on
the Isle of Man, which was chosen exactly because of its lax legal and
especially tax, true,
On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/05/10 10:08, Andrew Haley wrote:
--snip--
This is a bad argument IMO. Many users are advanced in some areas,
but not others. The whole idea that Fedora is a distro for advanced
users therefore it should be hard to use is absurd.
How is
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 11:45:49AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar mlich...@redhat.com wrote:
With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to
NetworkManager and name resolving I think it is now good enough to
replace ntpd in
On 10/05/10 10:54, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 05/10/2010 10:16 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
--snip--
Look earlier in the thread,
how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
Yes, it has. And it's more difficult that installing from the repos.
Which was my point.
Andrew.
But there is no
On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:09:45 -0400, Orcan wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
As I mentoned below, some packges need update to the
lastest release badly to get rid of gtk+ 1.2. And some packages can safely
retire from fedora, e.g. xmms.
At that point you break a
Hi,
What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
controller in F12 and F13?
I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
at least for (stock) F12.
Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kernel
and/or will it be supported in F13?
Thanks,
--
--Jos
On So, 2010-05-09 at 11:45 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
[...]
1) Why chrony? Why not OpenNTPD [fill in the blank here]
Dunno if this is important for this discussion but the portable version
of OpenNTPD is stuck. The last portable version was made available in
May 2006 while the OpenBSD
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for example if you don't have your congressman because you are not a
U.S. citizen), you can also
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:23 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Mon, 10 May 2010 02:09:45 -0400, Orcan wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Chen Lei wrote:
As I mentoned below, some packges need update to the
lastest release badly to get rid of gtk+ 1.2. And some packages can safely
On 05/10/2010 12:38 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
controller in F12 and F13?
staging drivers are out of Fedora kernel, only crystalhd is
included.
see http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/rtl819x
--
«Allá muevan feroz guerra, ciegos reyes
Hi,
After I did yum update today morning(May 10'Th), I'm facing a weird login
problem. None of the authentications - gdm login, su - user, or ssh from a
remote host etc. are being resolved.
Even passwd(1) segfaluts while changing password.
I just can't login to the machine, in any way.
On 05/10/2010 02:46 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Look earlier in the thread,
how to mount a DVD as a repo has been demonstrated.
All it takes is adding method to wiki.
How to use DVD\CD as repo
Frank,
We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
process. It doesn't
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 16:25 +0530, P J P wrote:
Updated nss-softokn-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
Updated nss-softokn-devel-3.12.4-15.fc12.i686
Update 3.12.4-17.fc12.i686
Updated
On 10/05/10 12:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
All it takes is adding method to wiki.
How to use DVD\CD as repo
Frank,
We are trying to make the process easier by making it a click through
process.
It doesn't help if you insist that it can be done manually.
Everyone is already
Dne 10.5.2010 12:48, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
but that doesn't excuse us. Sorry to take a well-worn analogy, but if
two guys are trying to sell you cars, and one doesn't have an engine,
would the fact that the guy
On 05/10/2010 04:48 PM, Frank Murphy wrote
Hi Rahul,
Check my reply from 11:04
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
Should work for F13+
even for new users.
What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository and
there is no reason it should
Hello,
I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning it.
I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream moves very fast. Releases
happen weekly and there are always new features and sometimes new
bundled libs (yeah...).
Whoever picks this
On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
Should work for F13+
even for new users.
What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository
How is it not as easy?
fedora-release*rpm
contains repos and
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 13:21 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 12:48, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
but that doesn't excuse us. Sorry to take a well-worn analogy, but if
two guys are trying to sell you cars, and one
On 05/10/2010 05:06 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/05/10 12:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-May/135944.html
Should work for F13+
even for new users.
What you describe is not as easy as enabling any other repository
On 10/05/10 12:48, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
How is it not as easy?
It is not a click through process.
Rahul
How can you not click if it shows up in
gnome-packagekit-extra?
(admin/software/sources)
Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
They are on my tests.
On Mon, 10 May 2010 06:49:23 -0400, Orcan wrote:
At that point you break a cult. xmms still has a stubbornly loyal fan
base (just go to #fedora and start talking about it).
Why don't they take care of http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/xmms and
additional tickets that have been hidden by EOL
On 05/10/2010 05:22 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/05/10 1
How can you not click if it shows up in
gnome-packagekit-extra?
(admin/software/sources)
Will not the packages be availabel in add\remove?
They are on my tests.
No user intervention required.
(allow for the fact my test repo not
On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
it *will* show up in default
There are manual fiddling involved
in setting up
On 05/10/2010 05:36 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/05/10 13:02, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snipp--
DVD repo does NOT show up automatically in the repository listing when
you install gnome-packagekit-extras.
I said if DVD.repo is releases with fedora-release*
it *will* show up in
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello!
Not sure that people are still unaware of that issue, but, anyway,
here is my problem: I added RSS-filter to my blog, to properly sort
out off-topic or unappropriate content from my diary and make it
suitable for inclusion into
--- On Mon, 10/5/10, David Woodhouse dw...@infradead.org wrote:
Downgrade this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504949
Hey thanks, it worked.
Thank you.
---
Regards
-Prasad
PS: Please don't send me html/attachment/Fwd mails
--
devel mailing list
On 10/05/10 13:10, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
--snip--
DVD repo is clearly not part of fedora-release at the moment. We are
talking about the current reality. If you file a RFE and get
fedora-release updated, then it will become easier but that is not the
case now.
Rahul
Neither is fixing
On 05/10/2010 05:43 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
Neither is fixing the RFE for PK, as it's notabug.
But I firmly believe
creting a text file, is the easier\maybe safer challenge.
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
file is less flexible than the ability for PackageKit to handle media
dynamically. Meanwhile, you can
Compose started at Mon May 10 08:15:15 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11
almanah-0.7.2-1.fc13.i686 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.8
anjal-0.3.2-2.fc14.i686
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
controller in F12 and F13?
I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
at least for (stock) F12.
Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12
/*Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:11:13 PM +0450:
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
file is less flexible than
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or
by running the mount
On 10/05/10 14:28, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snip--
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root is able to mount a device either by calling mount system call or by
running the mount command,
/*Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com*/ wrote on 05/10/2010 3:18:06 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for
On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snipp--
http://omega.dgplug.org/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 12:38 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of support for the Realtek 8192se WiFi
controller in F12 and F13?
I see in some wiki page a reference to the Realtek website,
at least for (stock) F12.
Is this chipset in the meantime supported in the F12 kernel
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 00:04 -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
That doesn't mean we should throw it to the wayside. If it works, it works.
As
long as someone is there to maintain it, let them maintain it. If the
maintainer is willing to keep it going, who cares whether it's in the distro?
In fact,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Yaakov M. Nemoy
loupgaroubl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 01:15:03PM -0700, Ryan Rix wrote:
I find that having NTP enabled in most cases for mobile systems is simply
unnecessary; there is a large (I would say upwards of 95% in my most
unscientific
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
Author: itamarjp
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20463/EL-6
Modified Files:
import.log redir.spec
Log Message:
- fix building for EL-6
Index: import.log
mono requires bootstrapping ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
how to build it ?
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
mono requires bootstrapping ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
how to build it ?
Hopefully you can disable enough features on one package such that it will
build so it can then
On 05/10/2010 04:01 AM, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
I guess the legal problem(s) may come from the fact that
newer Wine has cut out its own MP3 decoder and instead,
it uses dlopened libmpg123. How does it differ from the
DVD playing situation? Xine, MPlayer, etc. uses libdvdcss
via dlopen if
On 05/10/2010 08:20 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
On ۱۰/۰۵/۱۰ 06:38, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 10/05/10 15:05, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snipp--
http://omega.dgplug.org/
Thanks, I thought that the project is dead (IIRC, it was not provided
for F11 last time I checked, but
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
What makes you think that no community input is considered?
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
but that doesn't excuse us.
You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
rest of the world so we can have an equally
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
but that doesn't excuse us.
You are right. The answer is clearly to
Jeff Spaleta (jspal...@gmail.com) said:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
That's the wrong argument. We all know why we _can't_ make it just work,
but that doesn't excuse us.
You are right. The answer is clearly to export US legal rules to the
Start End Name
Tue 04-May Tue 18-May Final Infrastructure Change Freeze
Tue 11-May Tue 11-May Fedora 13 Final Go/No-Go Meeting (20:00 EST)
Wed 12-May Wed 12-May Fedora 13 Final Release Readiness Meeting
Thu 13-May Thu 13-May Start Stage Sync RC to Mirrors
Thu 13-May Tue
On Mon, 10 May 2010 11:37:16 -0500
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
Author: itamarjp
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20463/EL-6
Modified Files:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Jeff Spaleta jspal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:36 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Fix what is broken and not break everything else so that you can
pretend that it isn't.
Think of that opening remark as a modern twitter-friendly version
Or you can just use:
BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals.
Paul.
seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in
yum appears to be more slow, I think only in build time should not be
a problem.
--
On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
mono requires bootstrapping ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
how to build it ?
No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then
there should be no bootstrapping
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown
snecklif...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 May 2010 17:50, Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
mono requires bootstrapping ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=172787
how to build it ?
No, if you build against the
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Module-Signature/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30480
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Module-Signature.spec sources
Log Message:
Update to 0.64
Index: .cvsignore
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-10
16:15:14 EDT ---
perl-X11-Protocol-0.56-5.el5,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574409
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574431
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-10
16:15:53 EDT ---
perl-Sys-SigAction-0.11-3.el5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574409
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-10
16:15:36 EDT ---
perl-Net-SSH-0.09-4.el5 has been
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=574431
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, 10 May 2010 16:40:24 -0300
Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
Or you can just use:
BuildRequires: /usr/include/tcpd.h
which works everywhere and you don't need conditionals.
Paul.
seems to be interesting, but using filenames instead package names in
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:08 PM, Christopher Brown
No, if you build against the mono.snk strong name key in /etc/pki then
there should be no bootstrapping required. This is provided by
mono-devel I think.
there are no mono-devel in EL-6,
EL-6 not inherited
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
hi,
Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to system*.
But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
redhat-rpm-config
Should they switch to system- ?
-thanks-
I think s/redhat/fedora/
On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to system*.
But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
redhat-rpm-config
Should they switch to system- ?
I
On 05/11/2010 02:20 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
If they aren't specific to only Fedora like fedora-release and
fedora-release-notes are, why put fedora in the package names at all?
Besides switching from Red Hat to Fedora is fairly pointless since both
names have trademark requirements.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation
= New Business =
#373 erlang provides/requires explosion
#374
/*Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com*/ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:59:56 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root is
On Mon, 10 May 2010 15:00:18 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
= Followups =
#351 Create a policy for updates - status report on
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
achieve a working compromise. (And input does not equal vote)
What makes you think that no community
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 11:37:16AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Monday 10 May 2010 11:18:26 am Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
Index: redir.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/redir/EL-6/redir.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
Fedora 13 has released Release Candidate stage. We have reached a state
where the known blockers were fixed and were able to make a release
candidate. This happened last Thursday, and almost immediately we found
a need to spin a second release candidate. From this point on, only
items critical
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jon Masters jonat...@jonmasters.org wrote:
but conversely
there's some weirdness with the sound driver resulting in no sound (for
which I will collate some data before blindly filing a bug on that).
Ok then if no one does it (or my search skills suck...):
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 01:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:05 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 07:28 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
I do not agree that that working with zero community input is the way to
achieve a working compromise. (And input does
On Mon, 10 May 2010 14:25:02 +0300
Ionuț C. Arțăriși maple...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hello,
I don't have the time to maintain calibre any more so I'm orphaning
it. I fell behind on bugzilla, too.
Beware, it requires a lot of love. Upstream moves very fast. Releases
happen weekly and
Garrett Holmstrom gho...@fedoraproject.org writes:
On 5/10/2010 15:46, Casey Dahlin wrote:
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:10:18AM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
Long time ago, all *redhat* packages were renamed to system*.
But three of them are still alive: redhat-lsb, redhat-menus and
Compose started at Mon May 10 21:49:13 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
1:mojito-devel-0.21.7-3.fc13.i686 requires mojito = 0:0.21.7-3.fc13
Broken deps for x86_64
--
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 02:12 +, Branched Report wrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
1:mojito-devel-0.21.7-3.fc13.i686 requires mojito =
0:0.21.7-3.fc13
I've fixed this and have a new compose going.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora --
On 5/10/2010 22:23, Jesse Keating wrote:
(our?) Bugzilla already has a method for proposal and acceptance. This
is done via flags. We currently use this for package reviews and CVS
admin tasks. What I propose is that we introduce a new flag once we've
branched a release and created a
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 22:47 -0500, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
Fedora only has one branched, yet unreleased release at a time. Can we
recycle the same tag(s) for every release instead of creating new ones
every time?
We could probably name them such, just {alpha,beta,final}_blocker, and
only
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Class-ISA/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv22431
Modified Files:
perl-Class-ISA.spec
Log Message:
* Mon May 10 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 0.36-2
- fix of conflicting man pages
Index:
Author: mmaslano
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Class-ISA/devel
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv20822
Modified Files:
perl-Class-ISA.spec
Log Message:
* Mon May 10 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 0.36-2
- fix of conflicting man pages
Index:
100 matches
Mail list logo
