On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:11:36 Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet.
just note that update script needs some modifications for future usages. It
should
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:54:56PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/27 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de:
On 03/27/2011 11:22 AM, gia...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to rebuild a package with an autotools based toolchain and
it's failing because they use -Werror and gcc 4.6 spits out few
Joshua C. joshua...@googlemail.com writes:
Or maybe being on the edge isn't why we all use this distro?
Yeah maybe :-)
I like being as close as reasonable to the edge, but not closer.
--
Dodji
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Personally, I think we should just push the new stuff into updates
whenever it makes sense (i.e. not for something like KDE 3 to 4 or
GNOME 2 to 3 ;-) ).
Or we can encourage more people to use Rawhide proper. I know it might
sound too wild for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/28/2011 01:00 AM, Trever Fischer wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:53 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
Am Samstag, den 26.03.2011, 22:09 -0400 schrieb Trever Fischer:
Howdy, all.
As a weekend project, I created 'rippit', a super simple no-frills
command
On 03/24/2011 01:38 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 03/23/2011 08:36 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
Or you can simply
On Mon, 21.03.11 09:35, Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 16:22:59 +0200,
Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is simple: Given the fact that I rarely encrypt the root,
can I somehow delay the encrypted partition mount to right-before-gdm,
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-OneArgNew:
87675d2bb98525d787e7509e6d581f50 MooseX-OneArgNew-0.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 77b01f31c1dd51a2efbef536f717665e53064455
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:29:35 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#678195)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-OneArgNew.spec | 54
sources
Summary of changes:
77b01f3... initial import (rhbz#678195) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 21.03.11 13:17, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote:
On 03/21/2011 12:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Off the same topic, I'd love a way to have a key server on my
network that machines can grab their keys from at boot. Obviously I
would then work on physically
Summary of changes:
77b01f3... initial import (rhbz#678195) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
77b01f3... initial import (rhbz#678195) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a0c06a6... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
11cf72a... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*)
bd4c3c7... - Let META.yml require perl 5.006 (Fix perl-5.12.0 build br (*)
60a82e5... - Rebuild with perl-5.12.0. (*)
556a726... dist-git conversion (*)
558b178... -
commit d6558bdae69f5d4c8679443fe747bff30eee38d2
Merge: 2353809 d06e341
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:37:52 2011 +0200
Post-merge cleanup.
.gitignore|2 ++
File-Remove-1.49.diff | 28
commit e0020c7d6ae8bd58eb6d08c856b3fd12948a60bf
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:38:06 2011 +0200
Post-merge cleanup.
perl-File-Remove.spec | 13 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Remove.spec
Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 21:00 +0100, Karel Klíč wrote:
eu-readelf -winfo/-wline output is huge, so it takes several days to
make one attampt to check whole rawhide repository. This slows
development a bit.
eu-readelf does a lot more than you seem to need
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal with
all this:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=configure.ac;h=f1b56d2dbe9a118901f7426bcc176f624d841f63;hb=HEAD#l67
CHASM has similar logic for CMake (also clang
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:55:35 +0200, Karel Klíč wrote:
I have observed GDB displaying wrong source file lines when stepping through
a program several times, and I think such a check could discover some
issues.
Could you provide a reproducer? How it could be fixed by the package
maintainer?
If
On 03/28/2011 04:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal with
all this:
http://git.annexia.org/?p=libguestfs.git;a=blob;f=configure.ac;h=f1b56d2dbe9a118901f7426bcc176f624d841f63;hb=HEAD#l67
CHASM
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Rebuild required to work correctly with perl 5.012003.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691451
Summary: Rebuild required to work correctly with perl
On 03/19/2011 09:26 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
hi,
It was released one month ago, and adds support for more hardware.
Critical for some people!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654800
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625004
Updated for Rawhide and Fedora 15
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:28:50AM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Personally, I think we should just push the new stuff into updates
whenever it makes sense (i.e. not for something like KDE 3 to 4 or
GNOME 2 to 3 ;-) ).
Or we can encourage more
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:55:35 +0200, Karel Klíč wrote:
I have observed GDB displaying wrong source file lines when stepping through
a program several times, and I think such a check could discover some
issues.
Could you provide a reproducer?
I
On 03/28/2011 09:24 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
As long as packages for Rawhide are not signed, any recommendation to
use them on production systems is a step backwards for Fedora. Actually
there should be more prominent recommendations not to use Rawhide on
production systems.
Yah ... also
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:08:33 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/28/2011 04:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal
with all this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627032
There is an (unofficial) ongoing review for my w3c-linkchecker
submission, but for the reasons outlined there, I'm not going to finish
the review process as the submitter nor will be maintaining it in
Fedora. Feel free to pick it up as the
On 03/26/2011 05:59 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-26 at 11:03 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
IIRC you can set:
NM_CONTROLLED=no
in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX
Supposedly that will take ethX off the reservation and allow you to use the
ifup
script and ifconfig utility as
I've pushed an mdadm update for f15. Please test, as it's a critpath
update I can't simply push to stable. However, it is necessary for this
update to make it to stable if we want f15 to have an mdadm that works
properly with the new tmpfs /var/run and /var/lock.
Forwarded Message
Rolling on with the Fedora 15 Test Days, we have the Printing test day
this week:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-29_Printing
This event will focus on all aspects of printing; including printer
setup, printer sharing and printing jobs.
In previous Fedora releases the application
Xose Vazquez Perez (xose.vazq...@gmail.com) said:
wireless-tools is deprecated since time ago. iw/rfkill
should be used instead it.
Not to be entirely glib, but with this and the net-tools dependencies...
we're taking patches. Mere notification is not as useful as
contribution.
Bill
--
devel
Hey John.
Thanks a ton for the useful feedback!
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:57 PM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote:
Snag 1: Understanding what a resource was and how to name it.
Snag 2: auto-local makes assumptions about your tree
Snag 3: The tx client reported
Docs should be more
On Thu, 24.03.11 23:08, Liang Suilong (liangsuil...@gmail.com) wrote:
Fedora 15 switches to systemd as default init system. The developer still
works for coding and fixing the bugs. We should appreciate that developers
give us such a fast init system to improve boot time. However we do not
Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) said:
Right. This is exactly what I do on non-laptops. But I find NM useful
for WiFi sometimes so I keep it installed...but now it seems it's
becoming very difficult to just temporarily configure an interface that
won't be touched when I plug/unplug a
Compose started at Mon Mar 28 08:15:08 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
NetworkManager-openconnect-0.8.1-5.fc16.x86_64 requires
libnm-util.so.1()(64bit)
NetworkManager-openconnect-0.8.1-5.fc16.x86_64 requires
On 03/24/2011 02:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011, you wrote:
Hmm, I thought there'd be a catch. What's executable permission needed
for? Isn't that just reading/parsing? I can do some work but I am
totally unfamiliar with this area.
Files which aren't executable aren't
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:05 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 03/24/2011 02:49 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
On Thursday 24 March 2011, you wrote:
Hmm, I thought there'd be a catch. What's executable permission needed
for? Isn't that just reading/parsing? I can do some work but I am
totally
Files which aren't executable aren't even considered as candidates for being
ELF files to extract debuginfo from.
Without execute permission, you'd have to check EVERY SINGLE installed FILE
for being ELF, that might be a significant performance hit. It'd have to be
tried at least.
The
* build...@fedoraproject.org [28/03/2011 22:45] :
perl-WWW-Mechanize has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
0:1.00
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
0:1.038
I've
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691422
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hello Everyone!,
I am a Junior Undergraduate at BIT Mesra, one of the premier institutes in
the field of Engineering and Sciences in India, pursuing Computer Science
Engineering.
I am looking forward for a challenging project as a part of GSOC '11 under
Fedora Project during summers on the idea
Greetings,
Since I uploaded gtkpod version 2 to sourceforge, I thought it would be
helpful if I made available my unstable build version of the gtkpod spec
file to the fedora package maintainers. Anyway, please find it attached
and I hope its useful. I am quite happy to develop it further
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691574
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488262action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488270action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=488279action=edit
commit 366067a4a1a5ec30bbe005af5044f748210bb77a
Merge: 8f85069 b4f33d3
Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust janfr...@tanso.net
Date: Mon Mar 28 23:52:44 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'f14' into el6
amavisd-new-2.6.4-stdout.patch | 21 +
amavisd-new.spec |7 ++-
Is there any chance to get gparted package included in the Fedora Live
media for the next release?
I use it very much for solving partition problems with Fedora and
other operating systems too.
More than a year ago, I made a partition of 250MB for the /boot
partition according the what Fedora
Who? I need help on them for the new mediawiki packages.
I'm more than willing to help, the mediawiki packages appear to have
about a half dozen outstanding security bugs =(.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
--
Kurt Seifried
k...@seifried.org
skype: 1-703-879-3176
--
devel mailing list
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 13:04:37 +
Paul F. Johnson p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I'm going off for quite a bit as my new job dictates very little time
and having to endure the evils that is Win7. The Linux box will still
be on, just no time for much else on it.
Sorry to hear you
Compose started at Mon Mar 28 13:16:04 UTC 2011
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 16:57:33 +
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
collectd is a high performance monitoring / stats collection daemon.
It is quite widely used judging by the number of bugs and feedback we
get for it.
I just orphaned collectd in Fedora 15 Rawhide. I did the
I am interested in seeing Bugzilla #676945, VIPS package is out of date,
addressed before Fedora 15 is released. The reason for my interest is that
one of my packages, dmapd, requires the new version of VIPS. The new VIPS
provides additional functionality that can be used to efficiently create
On 03/28/2011 07:40 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 17:08:33 +0200
Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 03/28/2011 04:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Richard W.M. Jonesrjo...@redhat.com wrote:
In libguestfs we have some pretty complex autotools magic to deal
with all this:
On 03/27/2011 10:57 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
And how to tweak /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-* (and/or
/etc/sysconfig/network) for static IPs such that NM sets
hostname/domainname correctly?
I have never got this working correctly.
In all cases, I've tried either hostname -f or
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691360
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.009 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677888
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=677888
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691360
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Remove:
2a415ddbfaaaf8e94d842339ba1af196 File-Remove-1.49.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Update perl(Module::ScanDeps) to 1.01 or newer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691369
Summary: Update perl(Module::ScanDeps) to 1.01 or newer
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691369
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691360
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 557b967d66701c5ffc73684613071bb5b755d007
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 28 13:30:56 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
Add File-Remove-1.49.diff/Remove File-Remove-1.46.diff.
Spec file cleanup.
.gitignore |1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691360
--- Comment #1 from Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com 2011-03-28 07:29:44 EDT ---
Fedora lacks required dependencies.
Postponing
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-MethodMaker:
1362b94af75cdb1a1a29834a45175173 Class-MethodMaker-2.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f54d5253ea90213f84223869c5ebb50e5173aec4
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 28 15:16:20 2011 +0200
Upstream update.
Spec file cleanup.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-MethodMaker.spec | 19 ++-
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-Stash:
e6d4f70e30ccdd5f2b80f7d3c119f53d Package-Stash-0.27.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
6feb600... Update to 0.27 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.27-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
6feb600... Update to 0.27
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Package-Stash-0.27-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
6feb600... Update to 0.27
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL:
7273e6b416aae06966925350bbb536b1 Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL-0.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit fc3ced32f0321e174efdfadd7b6d61874fe5b9f3
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:05:26 2011 +0200
Import
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Perl-Critic-PetPeeves-JTRAMMELL.spec | 48 +
sources
Summary of changes:
558b178... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*)
0050a3b... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*)
0b1855e... - Upstream update. - Remove xt-tests's deps (Upstream doesn (*)
a69dbf4... Remove. (*)
557b967... Upstream
commit d06e3415d5d15c1a277b23c0b6052eaa34bd9d1d
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:11:20 2011 +0200
Post-merge spec cleanup.
perl-File-Remove.spec |8
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-File-Remove.spec
commit 37f521cf878c5bcec85134105a4a2bccfc0d781c
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 28 15:29:03 2011 -0400
rebuild for perl 5.12.3
perl-Devel-Cover.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Devel-Cover.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691451
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-28
15:33:18 EDT ---
perl-Devel-Cover-0.66-2.fc14 has
perl-WWW-Mechanize has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
0:1.00
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
0:1.038
On i386:
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Emmanuel Seyman
emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr wrote:
* build...@fedoraproject.org [28/03/2011 22:45] :
perl-WWW-Mechanize has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.66-3.fc15.noarch requires perl(HTML::Form) =
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690116
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
77 matches
Mail list logo
