The license same as Perl was changed to ISC (compatible with BSD 2
clause) since release 1.120.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
The graphviz license changed to EPL (from CPL) since graphviz-2.28 (rawhide)
Jaroslav
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Compose started at Mon May 16 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-10.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit)
Dne 14.5.2011 23:23, Andreas Tunek napsal(a):
If I understand correctly, my computer (2011 27 inch iMac) has an
integrated intel GPU, but Fedora is using the Radeon GPU. Is there any
way what GPU you use? I did not find any documentation regarding this,
but maybe I looked at the wrong places?
Hi
I made a spec file for torrent-search source and then I build it using
koji [0] and it successfully build but package is noarch and I used
hard coding (/usr/lib) instead of macro. I asked on IRC then one
fellow told me that split that applet to different arch and then build
and also gave me a
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 12:47, Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 14.5.2011 23:23, Andreas Tunek napsal(a):
If I understand correctly, my computer (2011 27 inch iMac) has an
integrated intel GPU, but Fedora is using the Radeon GPU. Is there any
way what GPU you use? I did not find any
2) does systemd have support for conditions in service files? It seem
it's not supported right now. Is there any plan for this?
I am not entirely sure what you understand by condition,
for example condition based on string/variable in file, so:
a) EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/something;
There has been an amendment to the requirements for candidates to
elected (and appointed) roles in Fedora's Community, including (but not
limited to) the Fedora Board, Fedora Engineering Steering Committee, and
the Fedora Ambassadors Steering Committee.
Specifically, candidates must not be a
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The latest version 1.2.0 is now complaining with:
ERROR: Fflas-Ffpack not found!
and I gave up, because linbox is quite hacky.
Maybe it would be better to use the sage sourcepackage of linbox and
not packaging it
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for this important meeting,
Tuesday, May 17, 2011, at 21:00 UTC (17:00 US-Eastern, 14:00 US-Pacific).
Before each public release Development, QA, and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This
Hey all, Currently docutils is unable to update in Fedora 15 because of bugs
in the python3 compatibility. Is there anyone who cares about python3 here
who is willing to take a look at fixing it? Otherwise, we're stuck on the
current version of docutils (for both python2 and python3) and the
Hi,
There was an error in License tag in UpTools package it was wrongly
mislabeled as BSD with advertisement, it was replaced by BSD with
attribution. Fixed on 8.5.4-15 and newer releases.
Greets.
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2
On Mon, 16.05.11 14:32, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
2) does systemd have support for conditions in service files? It seem
it's not supported right now. Is there any plan for this?
I am not entirely sure what you understand by condition,
for example condition based
On 05/14/2011 06:10 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
It used to be a module, but was converted to built-in as we were always
loading it in the network scripts. A lot of the decisions made in
those '5 second boot' days seem a bit boneheaded in hindsight.
For f16, we should do a good re-review of such
On 05/14/2011 08:35 PM, Henrik Nordström wrote:
lör 2011-05-14 klockan 19:33 +0200 skrev Xose Vazquez Perez:
default is 24010, but it was reduced to 1024 by
user(included root) in: /etc/security/limits.d/90-nproc.conf
to prevent accidental fork bombs(see rhbz #432903).
Is it still worth
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
the F15 repo. It probably shouldn't be. There are at least a few other
gnome-applet related packages
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
the F15 repo. It probably shouldn't be. There are at
Notably, this re-adds the RPC API to glibc's exported interface, so
please test that rebuilding your applications still works, or works
again.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glibc-2.13.90-12
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ok, thanks!
Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
I just means anybody who would like to take this package should
recognize that it is such a minor package that few people would ever
install it.
Robin
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net wrote:
Without doing any research
On 5/16/11 1:07 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
On 5/15/11 1:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sun, 15.05.11 13:08, Philip Prindeville
(philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com) wrote:
Lennart
Ok, then I'm unclear. Should rsyslog be running?
Because chkconfig rsyslog --list doesn't show any
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 14:00 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
the F15 repo. It probably shouldn't be.
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 11:59 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
I did an install from the RC3 live CD (on USB) and it went well.
However F15 remains very unstable, I don't think I will be able to use
it. The main problem is that it will lock up spontaneously (then heats
up if left as if in a tight
Hi,
Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and
make build a newer version of X but
keep the old ones for f13 and f14. Is that similar to upload a new
package, I mean for each branch:
1. fedpkg import package.srpm
2. fedpkg commit
3 fedpkg build
And
4. fedpkg
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 18:11:15 -0300,
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and
make build a newer version of X but
keep the old ones for f13 and f14. Is that similar to upload a new
package, I mean for each branch:
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 21:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
When upgrading at the wrong time the conversion from sysv to systemd
might not work properly and the service is not enabled after the
upgrade. This should not be a problem however in the final release of
F15.
The fix for rsyslogd
Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said:
We blocked orphans, not FTBFS.
With respect to the packages obsoleted by gnome-panel, until that package
is in F-15 final, we can't really block them. (And at this stage of
the release, that may not happen by GA.)
I believe some applets
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 13:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
I've also observed before that, if you can manage it, disabling the
'faster' chipset and using the Intel one permanently is almost always
going to be the best approach on Linux, because the proprietary drivers
don't work with these
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
What you might want to
do is try fallback mode, or a desktop other than GNOME, and see how that
goes; the problem here may be that there's bugs in the 3D / compositing
support for your graphics adapter that become
2011/5/16 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:15 -0300
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and
make build a newer version of X but
For rawhide/master?
Hmmm, yes, is it not mandatory?:
Be sure that
On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:51:35 -0300
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/16 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:15 -0300
Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1
and make build a newer
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:08:07AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hey all, Currently docutils is unable to update in Fedora 15 because of bugs
in the python3 compatibility. Is there anyone who cares about python3 here
who is willing to take a look at fixing it? Otherwise, we're stuck on the
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 22:44 +0100, Camilo Mesias wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
What you might want to
do is try fallback mode, or a desktop other than GNOME, and see how that
goes; the problem here may be that there's bugs in the
Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com writes:
how efficient would software rendering be, compared to that?
Probably less. Depends entirely on what your host drivers implement,
and how well, and on what the guest drivers demand, and how well they're
implemented, and so forth. But assuming all
commit 904fa523cd20d52d09722320d6f870a2fa6ddf11
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Tue May 17 00:00:56 2011 +0100
Update to 0.35.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Nagios-Plugin.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+),
The lightweight tag 'perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.35-1.el6' was created pointing to:
904fa52... Update to 0.35.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:02:27PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:08:07AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Hey all, Currently docutils is unable to update in Fedora 15 because of bugs
in the python3 compatibility. Is there anyone who cares about python3 here
who is
Compose started at Mon May 16 13:15:23 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-Table:
d5b8c43c76ec95392ca048694c13034e Text-Table-1.120.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704715
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit d8a8647d1a921187a87cb18610be6b569d54c87b
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon May 16 08:55:27 2011 +0200
1.120 bump
- clean deffattr
- license changed since 1.120 to ISC = BSD (2 clause)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Text-Table.spec | 26
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-1.116 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705000
Summary: perl-Perl-Critic-1.116 is available
Product: Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic:
75b24983cde08329800d814ef7033ca9 Perl-Critic-1.116.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 311f21ae61d9861dd4047cfd7f144467a8bc6d41
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon May 16 12:49:32 2011 +0100
Update to 1.116
- New upstream release 1.116:
- BuiltInFunctions::ProhibitLvalueSubstr does not report violations if the
document contains an
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl-Critic-1.116-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
311f21a... Update to 1.116
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705000
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571192
--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org
2011-05-16 20:56:26 EDT ---
perl-SOAP-Lite-0.712-3.fc14 has
47 matches
Mail list logo
