Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Having a quick look at the link and at the steps to reproduce the bug
gave me shivers. Are we really sure that systemd is ready? I mean, I
don't even call my code alpha if it can't parse a slash correctly.
How is it systemd's fault that the user's fstab is invalid?
On Sun, 12.06.11 18:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:56, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald
Am 13.06.2011 05:58, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
and even on a new setup this should be a decision of the user
at the very beginning what init-system he wants to us
No, the choice of this kind of core under-the-hood system components should
be a decision of the
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:08:02 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote:
How is it systemd's fault that the user's fstab is invalid?
A trailing slash in the mountpoint is not too common, but valid.
Michal
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 13.06.2011 08:48, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:14:27 -0400 Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Having a quick look at the link and at the steps to reproduce the bug
gave me shivers. Are we really sure that systemd is ready? I mean, I
don't even call my code alpha if it can't parse a
Chuck Anderson wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocp-0.1.20-8.fc15
bodhi says of my update:
bodhi - 2011-06-10 05:03:46
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now
if the maintainer wishes
But clicking the mark as stable button says:
This
Am 13.06.2011 09:13, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
systemd surpasses Upstart in every way. It's not in an early
state. Upstart is much more limited and hence in a much earlier state
feature-wise.
in theory
the problem is that you are frcing bringing your baby to the users
in a braindead way
On Monday 13 June 2011 08:09:48 Honza Horak wrote:
I think bodhi behaves correctly, but this auto-generated message is a
failure, while according https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy a
non critical package must spend at least one week in updates-testing.
I've reported the same
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no problem
* now see screenshot
* WTF is there to relabel if started with selinux=0-kernel-param
WHY IN THE WORLD ARE
Am 13.06.2011 09:25, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Stop the profanities and insults, or stop posting to this mailing
list.
sorry but for a answer like below form Kevin Kofler i have no other
words as idiot, really! where is defined taht it is invalid
and why only for systemd if it is so well designed
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:26:46 +0400 Lucas wrote:
Have you notice that they use Fedora like a toy, to play with, to
test a new ideas, to try new things on it. Developers do not count it
like anything serious - it is a toy for them. Today they decided that
upstart is wrong and they need systemd,
Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 05:58, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
No, the choice of this kind of core under-the-hood system components
should be a decision of the distribution.
thats freedom?
You have the freedom to fork Fedora. Good luck!
A distribution is about integration of different
On 06/13/2011 11:40 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 09:37, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:26:46 +0400 Lucas wrote:
Have you notice that they use Fedora like a toy, to play with, to
test a new ideas, to try new things on it. Developers do not count it
like anything
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 07:24:38PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
On Sunday 12 June 2011 18:26:25 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What is the graphics card?
It's ATI radeon RV635. Do you have the same graphics card?
I think so (but I think that are mixing the references :-) ):
# lspci |
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 08:54:40PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
2011/6/12 José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt:
On Sunday 12 June 2011 18:26:25 Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
What is the graphics card?
It's ATI radeon RV635. Do you have the same graphics card?
I think so (but I think that are
Reindl Harald wrote:
and some are not realizing that we are not speaking about a sound-daemon
stopping you hear music
we are speaking about the most important component of the system!
That's exactly why we shouldn't let users replace it at random.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
On Fri, 10.06.11 15:07, Denys Vlasenko (dvlas...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi Lennart,
systemd is eating a lot more memory than any other init process
I ever played with.
Granted, systemd does a bit more that typical init, but I think
using *eleven plus megabytes* of malloced space is a bit
On Fri, 10.06.11 18:58, Denys Vlasenko (dvlas...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:11 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/10/2011 03:59 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/10/2011 09:36 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
systemd does not take the system down when it crashes. It catches the
On 01:59:43 PM Monday, June 13, 2011 Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 05:58, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Reindl Harald wrote:
and even on a new setup this should be a decision of the user
at the very beginning what init-system he wants to us
No, the choice of this kind of core
Compose started at Mon Jun 13 08:15:26 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1
389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64
On 02:12:43 PM Monday, June 13, 2011 Lucas wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no problem
* now see screenshot
* WTF is there to relabel if
On Thursday 09 June 2011 15:54:14 Clément David wrote:
Hi,
My name is Clément DAVID (aka davidcl) and I'm a french software
developer. I'm currently working on Scilab [1].
Welcome to Fedora. :-)
I'm interested to become a packager for Scientific application or just
software toys :). My
Welcome to fedora,
I am glad that you managed to get jlatexmath into fedora.
If you are interested in mind-mapping there is a nice freemind plugin
[1] to include LaTeX formulas into mind-maps which makes use of jlatexmath.
If you are interested in packaging this little piece of software. I
* Steve Clark [13/06/2011 14:04] :
Maybe Fedora should adhere to Linus's rule that we don't have regressions
that break users stuff.
Linus has no such thing. Google the min/max incident and the amount of drivers
that were removed from the kernel tree before 2.4.0's release if you want proof.
On 06/13/2011 03:27 PM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
On 02:12:43 PM Monday, June 13, 2011 Lucas wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the system is running since years
* every dist-upgrade via yum was no problem
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir?
I guess because binaries shouldn't go in the library directory.
Now if you wanted to get rid of the {,/usr}/lib64 nonsense, *that*'s
something we can all get behind ...
Rich.
--
On 06/13/2011 04:33 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/11/2011 03:11 PM, Lucas wrote:
On 06/11/2011 11:00 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
Lucasmacachutoat gmail.com writes:
I use systemd-28-3.fc16.i686 and updated it when it became available,
but
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir?
I guess because binaries shouldn't go in the library directory.
Now if you wanted to get rid of the {,/usr}/lib64
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.comwrote:
Now you need to persuade Red Hat to fund a bigger ARM build server
than the one Canonical are building :-)
http://thetanktheory.squarespace.com/this-8-bit-life/2011/6/10/ubuntu-linux-pandabuilder.html
On 06/13/2011 05:28 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Maybe Fedora should adhere to Linus's rule that we don't have
regressions that break users stuff.
I get the impression Fedora doesn't care about users and is only
interested in pushing the agenda
of the developers. It is too bad that Fedora doesn't
Hi,
It seems that Debian has solved this by offering layouts from
xkeyboard-config during installation and then generating corresponding
console keymap based on the selection on the fly with console-setup [3].
This is the correct way to go, non xkeyboard-config layout databases need to
On 06/13/2011 06:10 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 06/13/2011 08:23 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Steve Clark [13/06/2011 14:04] :
Maybe Fedora should adhere to Linus's rule that we don't have regressions
that break users stuff.
Linus has no such thing. Google the min/max incident and the amount
Hi Lennart,
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:15 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 10.06.11 15:07, Denys Vlasenko (dvlas...@redhat.com) wrote:
I understand your desire to replace everything by systemd.
I have no such desire.
What is this then?
int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
...
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
because your fukcing holy cow
This type of language is inappropriate for a Fedora mailing list.
Please tone down the language.
--
Jared Smith
Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Mojolicious:
ec34749aae9fe2c23dc10504a0476655 Mojolicious-1.43.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c3a0bda9514b77669a41b2c0ea95bc7626d9930b
Author: Yanko Kaneti yan...@declera.com
Date: Mon Jun 13 18:06:41 2011 +0300
Upstream update 1.43
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Mojolicious.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:27:55PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:16:45PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 13.06.11 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What is
Am Montag, den 13.06.2011, 01:47 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 13.06.2011 00:54, schrieb Christoph Wickert:
Am Sonntag, den 12.06.2011, 23:23 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
systems
On Mon, 13.06.11 14:27, Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir?
I guess because binaries shouldn't go in the library directory.
But it isn't a library
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 03:30, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 13.06.2011 09:25, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Stop the profanities and insults, or stop posting to this mailing
list.
sorry but for a answer like below form Kevin Kofler i have no other
words as idiot, really! where is
I'm working on pushing my first bugfix to F15 (#711261), using the
guides I found in the wiki[1][2]. For a non-critical-path package, the
Update Policy says that it needs to meet the positive karma threshold
set by the submitter, but does not indicate what that threshold should
be or guidance for
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:39:02AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I do not regularly agree with Kevin Kofler, but you can call him what
you want in private email til the days are done. At this point I am
going to ask for someone from the Community Working Group to step in
and see how we
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:55:02AM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
because your fukcing holy cow
This type of language is inappropriate for a Fedora mailing list.
Please tone down the language.
I'd go further than
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:41 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Mon, 13.06.11 14:27, Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) wrote:
It's a directory for arch-dependent stuff that should only exist once on
a system,
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:45:57 +0100
Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:39:02AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
I do not regularly agree with Kevin Kofler, but you can call him
what you want in private email til the days are done. At this point
I am
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
plymouth_running()? Plymouth? Systemd knows about plymouth? Why?
Because we need to constantly send updates to it. It's a trivial socket
operation. It's a trivial thing and spawning a separate process to send
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 13.06.11 15:27, Denys Vlasenko (dvlas...@redhat.com) wrote:
kmod_setup(); === ???
We load a couple of kernel modules which systemd needs, and are
sometimes compiled as module only and which cannot be
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 06:01:22PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We load a couple of kernel modules which systemd needs, and are
sometimes compiled as module only and which cannot be autoloaded for a
reason or another. This is
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.orgwrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 06:01:22PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
We load a couple of kernel modules which systemd needs, and are
sometimes compiled as
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:48:40 +,
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011-06-10, Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com wrote:
* Buildroot Override Management
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
I mean, I know what's buildroot in Koji and that it can be
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:13:39PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
The point of providing a platform is that developers can make certain
assumptions about available functionality. It's no longer reasonable
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:48:40 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011-06-10, Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com wrote:
* Buildroot Override Management
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
Excuse me for my low knowledge, what is good for?
I mean, I
On 06/13/2011 03:13 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
...
systemd surpasses Upstart in every way. It's not in an early
state. Upstart is much more limited and hence in a much earlier state
feature-wise.
...
Lennart
Superior design - yes I like it - but in practice there are still some
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 23:39 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 23:35, schrieb Josh Boyer:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
PLEASE give us a option for systems upgraded with yum
NOT USING systemd and force upstart as before
* the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 6:18 PM, Denys Vlasenko dvlas...@redhat.com wrote:
~11MB equals ~8 cents of RAM ... so meh.
Are you volunteering to buy more RAM for every Fedora user? ;)
Maybe if you send me the money first ;)
(Sorry for private spam, hit wrong button)
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 18:01 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
We invoke sethostname() from inside systemd since that is one of the
most trivial system calls known to men and doing this with a
separate
binary is just absurd. This way we also can ensure that the hostname
is
always initialised
On 06/13/2011 11:39 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
. At this point I am
going to ask for someone from the Community Working Group to step in
and see how we can better get along here. If you have a problem with
that, I think it would be better if you took some time off and did
something else
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:43:42 -0500
Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net wrote:
I'm working on pushing my first bugfix to F15 (#711261), using the
guides I found in the wiki[1][2]. For a non-critical-path package,
the Update Policy says that it needs to meet the positive karma
threshold set
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:37 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 18:01 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
We invoke sethostname() from inside systemd since that is one of the
most trivial system calls known to men and doing this with a
separate
binary is just absurd. This way we
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:48:40 + (UTC)
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2011-06-10, Luke Macken lmac...@redhat.com wrote:
* Buildroot Override Management
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bodhi/BuildRootOverrides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711261
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Excerpts from Stephen Gallagher's message of Mon Jun 13 13:02:29 -0400 2011:
This is a great feature. Is there a guide somewhere on how to use it?
If not, can you point me at the relevant upstream documentation and I'll
write up an SOP for doing this.
This is the closest thing to a guide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711261
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-13
13:08:07 EDT ---
ocaml-curl-0.5.3-3.fc15 has been
Excerpts from Kevin Fenzi's message of Mon Jun 13 12:49:43 -0400 2011:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:43:42 -0500
Michael Ekstrand mich...@elehack.net wrote:
I'm working on pushing my first bugfix to F15 (#711261), using the
guides I found in the wiki[1][2]. For a non-critical-path package,
the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 13:02:29 -0400,
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
If not, can you point me at the relevant upstream documentation and I'll
write up an SOP for doing this.
If you do something for this, you might want to point to it from
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 05:36:00PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
That is not really how it is. /lib is for arch-dependent stuff including
the libraries of the primary arch. Libraries for secondary archs are
then put in /usr/lib{64,arch}/.
Gentoo is the only distro which is so confused to
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 19:02 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:37 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 18:01 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
We invoke sethostname() from inside systemd since that is one of the
most trivial system calls known to men and doing
On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 20:02 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.06.2011 19:28, schrieb Lucas:
Strange, I did exactly the same thing with Fedora 14, I add new kernel,
changed xorg and intel driver.
But I have i686.
mhh - strange - an trying to update glibc results in chaos
Datei oder
On 6/13/11 12:18 PM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Sloppy attitude like this is the reason just about any daemon
(more and more of which pop up like mushrooms in every new release,
I must add) eats at least a few megabytes of RAM.
I'd have more empathy for your position if you'd made even a cursory
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:43:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir?
I guess because binaries shouldn't go in the library
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:43:42AM -0500, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
I'm working on pushing my first bugfix to F15 (#711261), using the
guides I found in the wiki[1][2]. For a non-critical-path package, the
Update Policy says that it needs to meet the positive karma threshold
set by the
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:25 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 11.6.2011 16:21, Gilboa Davara napsal(a):
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 16:25 +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 10/06/11 16:12, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
They are available, but I think you have to build
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:06, Petrus de Calguarium pguec...@gmail.com wrote:
John5342 wrote:
I forget which one exactly contains the mp3 plugin
gstreamer-plugins-ugly, I believe
i just install all of them and then i don't have to worry about any
other format i may one day come across.
first sorry for some bad words from mine, but this is how i feel in a situation
not
knowing how to act since upgraded short ago to F14 in the hope get my energy
refreshed staying there for some months and now realizing i will newer get new
intel
hardware well supportd on it
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 07:57:46PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:43:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM
so now i have the options of a upgrade to F15 while much work,
hughe health troubles and 2 weeks holidays are priority one
in my life this time
Maybe if you complained less on mailing lists you would have time to
try out F15. I have problems on my hardware as well
but they are forced to do this because they needed new hardware and if you
buy hardware
now which should work 5 years or longer you will take the latest generation
:-(
You always have a choice which hw to buy. Sometimes you have to buy hw
to support the sw you want to run. If you want to
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 20:36 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
first sorry for some bad words from mine, but this is how i feel in a
situation not
knowing how to act since upgraded short ago to F14 in the hope get my energy
refreshed staying there for some months and now realizing i will newer get
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Curious. I thought Dragon must use xine-lib, since both kdemultimedia and
kdebase-runtime require it in F15.
It used xine-lib directly, only because phonon lacked support for DVD menus
(until recently). kde-4.7 will (should!) fix that.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing
mån 2011-06-13 klockan 11:52 -0400 skrev Simo Sorce:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:41 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
That is not really how it is. /lib is for arch-dependent stuff including
the libraries of the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:33:19AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Uh, and even much healthier than Upstart, which you seem to be a big fan
of. Ohloh lists 3 patch authors. (But I figure that is out-of-date, it
cannot be that low)
I'm guessing its just ohloh having as much trouble operating
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713001
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: EPEL override bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713001
Summary: EPEL override bug
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:46 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Slide 14:
systemd is an Init System
systemd is a Platform
systemd is a platform? Really? What next? systemd is an Aircraft
Carrier? More to the point: Lennart can call his program whatever he
wants, even Nuclear Submarine. The
On 06/13/2011 02:10 PM, seth vidal wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:46 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Slide 14:
systemd is an Init System
systemd is a Platform
systemd is a platform? Really? What next? systemd is an Aircraft
Carrier? More to the point: Lennart can call his program whatever he
Lennart Poettering wrote:
What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir?
The distinction between stuff which belongs into %{_libdir}, which is
different for 32-bit vs. 64-bit, vs. stuff which always goes to the same
place and where only one copy should be installed.
Now it's possible to
Rex Dieter wrote:
It used xine-lib directly, only because phonon lacked support for DVD
menus (until recently). kde-4.7 will (should!) fix that.
Also note that the DVD menu hack in Dragon Player only works with phonon-
backend-xine.
Hopefully we'll soon have code which uses the new Phonon
Coming out of pure lurk mode - I think Seth's observations here are true
for a
many of the things that have gone on in Fedora recently (at the risk of
opening wounds... eg. gnome3). Your options are:
1) Complain
2) Get involved in the development to the point where you are one
of
Luke Macken wrote:
Yeah, we have yet to step back and really think about the defaults for
the karma thresholds, after having the +3/-3 defaults for so long. Some
maintainers set the values very low to decrease the amount of time their
update spends in testing, and some set the values really
Karl Misselt wrote:
Coming out of pure lurk mode - I think Seth's observations here
are true for a many of the things that have gone on in Fedora
recently (at the risk of opening wounds... eg. gnome3).
If GNOME 3 is your problem, try KDE Plasma or Xfce.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
José Matos wrote:
I am sorry not to have replied before but in the place (local network)
where I have been I had access to imap but not smtp (weird I know) and it
is klunky to answer using a webmail interface. :-(
And NNTP(S)?
This list is gatewayed as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel on
Am 14.06.2011 01:49, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
I also miss those kernel upgrades. I think we've become much too
conservative.
and the combination is which i really not understand
* kernel - conservative
* kde4/gnome3/systemd - go ahead with all consquences
and the kernel is really not a big
about language packs
in fedora we do
yum -y groupinstall development tools
but in portuguese
yum -y groupinstall ferramentas de desenvolvimento
and in spanish is another thing
its possible to change yum to accept both english and
internacionalized language ?
-
Itamar Reis
Reindl Harald wrote:
as KDE4.0 was anounced for F9 nobody did know if they are
ready and which state kde4 would have in the first release
We need to do some advance planning and development to provide a polished
release to our users, so we have to start importing prereleases of new
upstream
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 02:19:38AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 14.06.2011 01:49, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
I also miss those kernel upgrades. I think we've become much too
conservative.
and the combination is which i really not understand
* kernel - conservative
* kde4/gnome3/systemd -
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
about language packs
in fedora we do
yum -y groupinstall development tools
but in portuguese
yum -y groupinstall ferramentas de desenvolvimento
and in spanish is another thing
its possible to change yum to accept both english and
internacionalized
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 22:14:27 -0400 Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Having a quick look at the link and at the steps to reproduce the bug
gave me shivers. Are we really sure that systemd is ready? I mean, I
don't even call my code alpha if it can't
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
about language packs
in fedora we do
yum -y groupinstall development tools
but in portuguese
yum -y groupinstall ferramentas de desenvolvimento
and in spanish is another thing
its
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 22:46 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:30 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
What's the problem of having a specific hostname set up at boot time?
The problem with having specific hostname I had is when I boot many
dozens of diskless machines off the
On 06/13/2011 08:54 PM, Scott Schmit wrote:
Not addressing specifically the issue with the kernel updates, but at
least in part, the answer is simple:
* Within a release, updates should try very hard to avoid breaking
things.
* Between releases, upgrades can change a lot. These changes are
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
