Hi,
alright thanks for clarification. Then again I am wondering why there is
still the fc13 release in the repos even if it was rebuilt for f15.
Just curious.
Johannes
On 07/14/2011 04:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 07:30 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
I recently found that
Hi,
I have just released ownership of avl. It was unsuccesful attempt to
build forked-daapd in Fedora. Its upstream maintainer is just too weird,
using the most weird libraries (including Grand Central Dispatch), and I
would spend my life maintaining it. Switched to ushare instead.
Matěj
--
Folks,
We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual
Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 15th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern
Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the
bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware floating point).
Last week, we succeeded in
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 03:20 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Fedora15_HardFP_Bootstrap
Please note that this has been updated since last week. It now includes
all of the information you need for stage3 (current). Further, there
is an additional wiki
Dear All.
Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
[ 37.653381] =
[ 37.654015] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 37.654015] 3.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc16.i686 #1
[ 37.654015] -
[
Hi,
2011/7/15 Lucas macach...@gmail.com:
Dear All.
Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
It looks like a kernel bug.
[ 37.653381] =
[ 37.654015] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 37.654015]
Hi,
I don't know why, but since several days, I'm unable to switch branch.
[alain@phoenix git]$ rm -rf kicad
[alain@phoenix git]$ fedpkg clone kicad
Cloning into kicad...
Enter passphrase for key '/home/alain/.ssh/id_rsa':
remote: Counting objects: 498, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100%
Hi,
2011/7/15 Alain Portal alain.por...@univ-montp2.fr:
Hi,
I don't know why, but since several days, I'm unable to switch branch.
[alain@phoenix git]$ rm -rf kicad
[alain@phoenix git]$ fedpkg clone kicad
Cloning into kicad...
Enter passphrase for key '/home/alain/.ssh/id_rsa':
remote:
Alain Portal alain.por...@univ-montp2.fr writes:
Hi,
I don't know why, but since several days, I'm unable to switch branch.
[alain@phoenix git]$ rm -rf kicad
[alain@phoenix git]$ fedpkg clone kicad
Cloning into kicad...
Enter passphrase for key '/home/alain/.ssh/id_rsa':
remote: Counting
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
What
git show-branch -a
says?
Many things!
See the attached file.
Can you switch branch with git
git checkout f15
?
[alain@phoenix kicad]$ git show-branch -a show-branch.txt
[alain@phoenix kicad]$ git checkout f15
Branch
2011/7/15 Alain Portal alain.por...@univ-montp2.fr:
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
What
git show-branch -a
says?
Many things!
See the attached file.
! [origin/f15] Don't forget the file...
Can you switch branch with git
git checkout f15
Il giorno mar, 12/07/2011 alle 14.13 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
Hi, how to I can read in safe mode, from bash, the content
of /proc/locks?
On my system I have more than 7000/9000 line into /proc/locks and if I
read it with awk (or cat or grep or cp) the file change during the read
and
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 11:16:18, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
2011/7/15 Alain Portal alain.por...@univ-montp2.fr:
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
What
git show-branch -a
says?
Many things!
See the attached file.
! [origin/f15]
2011/7/14 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com:
If not claimed, the packages will be blocked on Monday, July 25.
Orphan man-pages-es
I've just took that one.
k.r.
Domingo Becker
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Orphan irda-utils
I've taken it. Comantainers welcome.
Dmitry Butskoy
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/DmitryButskoy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 15.07.11 12:11, Lucas (macach...@gmail.com) wrote:
Dear All.
Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
This is a kernel bug, please file a bug in rhbz against the kernel and
include this log fragment. Thanks!
[ 37.653381] =
[
I would like to retire Armangil's podcatcher:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/podcatcher
There has not been a release since 2009 and I don't use it any more.
Should I just release ownership from pkgdb or follow:
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:41:50PM +0200, Alain Portal wrote:
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 11:16:18, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
2011/7/15 Alain Portal alain.por...@univ-montp2.fr:
Le vendredi 15 juillet 2011 10:49:55, Michał Piotrowski a écrit :
What
git show-branch -a
says?
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 12:18 +1000, Brendan Jones wrote:
I can take this on - I use HL7 extensively at work. I will send
through
mine for review shortly.
regards,
Brendan
Thanks! :D
--
Regards,
Ankur: FranciscoD
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
causes legitimate specs to fail with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
found errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
%files are marked with trailing /, eg
%{_includedir}/mypkg works everywhere, but
Panu Matilainen wrote:
FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
causes legitimate specs to fail with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
found errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
%files are marked with trailing /, eg
I've updated Rawhide's vamp-plugin-sdk to 2.2.1; its changelog just
lists build fixes for OS/X. As such I'd not be pushing it to the
stable branches, and maintainers shouldn't need to rebuild their
packages.
Packages with build dependencies on vamp-plugin-sdk-devel:
$ repoquery --archlist=src
Rex Dieter wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
causes legitimate specs to fail with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
found errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
%files are marked with trailing /, eg
Jon Ciesla wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
Panu Matilainen wrote:
FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which
causes legitimate specs to fail with Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
found errors. This happens when recursively included directories in
%files are
On 07/15/2011 05:26 AM, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno mar, 12/07/2011 alle 14.13 +0200, Dario Lesca ha scritto:
Hi, how to I can read in safe mode, from bash, the content
of /proc/locks?
On my system I have more than 7000/9000 line into /proc/locks and if I
read it with awk (or cat or grep or
- Original Message -
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-07-15
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Just a reminder that the first Fedora 16 Alpha blocker bug review meeting
starts in under 1 hour.
Il giorno ven, 15/07/2011 alle 11.57 -0400, Przemek Klosowski ha
scritto:
I can't think of anything to lock all the other processes on your
system while your awk/cat is running, other than raising the priority
of your process high enough.
Perhaps if you explained what you are trying to
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copypaste
their configure.ac scripts together from examples or other projects without
understanding
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Has to be said that cmake just replaces one set of stupid with another
set of stupid. The world is still waiting for a build system that is
widely available and doesn't suck.
What's stupid about CMake?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 18:21 +0200, Dario Lesca wrote:
If I try copy it (cp /proc/locks /tmp/l or cat /proc/locks/tmp/l) two
times in succession, the result is always very different and the
abnormal line (more than 8 field) are like attachment of previous
message.
The thing is ANY processing
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
cmake CMakeLists.txt
FYI, that's the default file name, so:
cmake .
is sufficient. (You do have to give it a parameter, but the dot for the
current directory is sufficient.)
Also note that it's in general cleaner to build in a separate directory
(passing a relative path
Il giorno ven, 15/07/2011 alle 17.48 +0100, Dan Mills ha scritto:
The thing is ANY processing is inherently going to be racy, at least
some of the time.
The way to find out of part of a file is locked, is to try to take the
lock yourself (LOCK_NB as an argument to flock may be useful
How to get AR5523 based wireless card working in Fedora 14?
Do I need to compile new drivers from source? Is firmware missing?
Is the best way to use windows drivers via ndiswrapper and just ignore
linux based drivers for now?
I found this page: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ar5523
2011/7/12 Dario Lesca d.le...@solinos.it:
Hi, how to I can read in safe mode, from bash, the content
of /proc/locks?
On my system I have more than 7000/9000 line into /proc/locks and if I
read it with awk (or cat or grep or cp) the file change during the read
and my input is undefined and is
On 07/15/2011 11:43 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copypaste
their configure.ac scripts together from
Kevin Kofler writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-)
I do not see anything particularly bold about it. This seems to me like a
reasonable statement.
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-Alpha Blocker Review
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-07-15/f16-alpha-blocker.2011-07-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
On Fri, 2011-07-15 at 18:43 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copypaste
their configure.ac scripts
Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com writes:
Well, I just don't have that impression. What I do find a bit hard to
believe is that somebody else other than the package's developer group would
be in a better position to decide the merits of adopting a policy of
automatically rebuilding the
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
[...]
There's a big difference between having the upstream, who knows their
configure script inside and out,
That's a very bold assertion. ;-) Many upstream developers just copypaste
their configure.ac scripts together [...]
Yeah, autotools
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:11:43PM +0400, Lucas wrote:
Dear All.
Just updated and got the following in dmesg:
Thanks, I just reported this upstream.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=253031
* Fri Jul 15 2011 Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com - 3.2.2-5
- Merge rawhide mdadm to f15. Rawhide changelog preserved even though
- the referenced versions do not exist in f15, rawhide specific builds
- are from 3.2.1-1 through 3.2.2-4
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:39:13
From: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (v3)
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that
commit df10d0930a2c941d7854e0d97828cb729afb8992
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jul 14 11:59:01 2011 +0800
Remove circular BR to build in el6.
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-Catalyst.spec |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 97c938ee8d28b261bfb4e812110ac978da062915
Merge: 997d21d c2b99d9
Author: Jeroen van Meeuwen (Ergo Project) jeroen.van.meeu...@ergo-project.org
Date: Fri Jul 15 11:46:31 2011 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'fedora/f15' into el6
perl-Net-Netmask.spec | 14 +-
1 files
commit fc51613268e7d1db4a79645b16e552858d0743ff
Author: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:39:14 2011 +0800
Revert Remove circular BR to build in el6.
Those build dependencies are in EPEL6 now, so let's add them back to
improve test coverage.
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
f23872dd0431d0941b8832c90a4abc86 Fedora-Rebuild-v0.5.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f53892d3c37b7810090ab21515afcf5c0c5e85ca
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 15 15:06:03 2011 +0200
0.5.1 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
4b051a0... 0.5.0 bump (*)
f53892d... 0.5.1 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
4b051a0... 0.5.0 bump (*)
f53892d... 0.5.1 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721337
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-15
09:14:59 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.5.1-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721337
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716407
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-15
09:15:18 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.5.1-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715240
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-15
09:15:12 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.5.1-1.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715240
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-15
09:16:15 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.5.1-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721337
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-15
09:16:03 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.5.1-1.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716407
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-15
09:16:20 EDT ---
perl-Fedora-Rebuild-0.5.1-1.fc14
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
962f8094ddf8580910b5eadbc1c7db98 Fedora-Rebuild-v0.5.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit e33c57f33fb74c6f89cdf9b15e9240497ce30e2c
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Fri Jul 15 16:03:37 2011 +0200
restore circular deps and wrap with perl_bootstrap macro
perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Session.spec | 11 ---
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
Summary of changes:
e33c57f... restore circular deps and wrap with perl_bootstrap macro (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: please upgrade to HTML-Format-2.09
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722604
Summary: please upgrade to HTML-Format-2.09
Product: Fedora
61 matches
Mail list logo
