On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they
were
designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design
info
available online.
Please clarify 'dispatch' :-)
Kufi with Sans (masquerading as the Arabic
Looks like another week where we can skip the meeting - there's no
significant ongoing business besides the anaconda new UI testing, and
we've already discussed that. No-one proposed any topics. If anyone's
feeling terribly sad about missing meetings, do let me know...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora
On 07/15/2012 06:01 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
C. I tried to dispatch the Arabic variants in the Latin family they
were
designed to complement, but I may have misunderstood the design
info
available online.
Please clarify 'dispatch' :-)
Kufi with Sans (masquerading as the Arabic
Once again I've a number of small audio packages up for review that I'm
willing to swap. They are:
rtirq - realtime IRQ threading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839527
Add64 - an additive synthesizer for JACK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
samplv1 -A
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 19:58 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:37:26 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
you must start openoffice damned often that the benfit beats out
the overhead of the /etc/cron.daily/prelink
When you prelink it nightly on AC and run it at least once on
Hello!
2012/7/16 Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.com:
I took these:
Add64 - an additive synthesizer for JACK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830664
samplv1 -A polyphonic sampler synthesizer with stereo fx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829971
It would be
2012/6/27 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
I was looking briefly into packaging some Puppet modules, and I was
curious if anyone else has gone down this road.
[...]
Does anyone have suggestions for package naming conventions? It looks
like the upstream modules include the creators' names as
Hi all,
I'm about to upload PackageKit 0.8.2 which bumps soname due to some
removed API. I'll take care of rebuilding gnome-packagekit and apper.
Yell if you have any worries or questions. Thanks.
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Miloslav Trmač writes:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com
wrote:
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
Chris Adams writes:
Is there anything that actually does that and depends on the result?
You skipped
On 16 July 2012 06:19, Thomas Bendler m...@bendler-net.de wrote:
2012/6/27 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
I was looking briefly into packaging some Puppet modules, and I was
curious if anyone else has gone down this road.
[...]
Does anyone have suggestions for package naming conventions?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840453
Bug ID: 840453
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 08:46:06PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Chris Adams writes:
Once upon a time, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com said:
I would expect that /proc/self/exe symlink gives the name of the running
executable. I don't think it's an unreasonable expectation.
There
On 07/15/2012 09:20 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
I think that 99% of the problems that prelink is creating can be easily avoided
simply by having prelink automatically skip executables that are currently
running. This is something that should not be very difficult to do. All the
information is
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
That would mean that prelink would skip much of a running system, and a
full prelink could be done only by booting from separate media. Not going
to happen.
But now that Fedora will have reboot for updates...
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 15:45 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:19:23 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
time, when it couldn't stat its /proc/self/exe any more.
This is a bug of the daemon. While it is
Am 15.07.2012 19:58, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:37:26 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
you must start openoffice damned often that the benfit beats out
the overhead of the /etc/cron.daily/prelink
When you prelink it nightly on AC and run it at least once on battery, the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839909
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 09:30:47 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
Definitely not a bug. If it is a bug of anything then of the prelink
script that it does not check the battery status.
OK, it depends whether you want to make some configuration of cron which
scripts should or should not be run on battery or
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 09:41:26AM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2012, 7:25:15 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Perhaps it means that the file can't be in a supported executable format
such as ELF? Downloaded firmware often is in raw binary format, but
it's certainly conceivable
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
Non-existing /proc/self/exe file is a normal UNIX process state so a UNIX
process not being able to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:03:27AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-15 at 15:45 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:19:23 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
It took me a while to figure out why my daemon kept breaking all the
time, when it couldn't stat its
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831743
Maybe anyone knows how to contact the maintainer? (His mail
is not answer.)
--
Fl@sh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I was asked to send to send the status of the last run of the Upstream
Release Monitoring tool to this list. It would consist of all lines in
http://till.fedorapeople.org/tmp/cnucnu-last.log
that mention that a package is outdated. Would you welcome this or find
it disturbing?
I think it
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-07-16)
===
Meeting started by notting at 17:01:35 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-07-16/fesco.2012-07-16-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 08:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
In terms of how the Guidelines would look, FPC would probably need to either
work on the boilerplate that the collections code uses or link to them
for the benefit of maintainers that want to maintain rpms in EPEL 5 and
EPEL 6.
It
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:50:58PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 08:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
In terms of how the Guidelines would look, FPC would probably need to either
work on the boilerplate that the collections code uses or link to them
for the benefit of
Summary of changes:
7c60d96... Initial import (839701). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
6bac126... Initial import (839706). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Greetings.
Fedora infrastructure has been looking at moving from gitweb-caching to
cgit for git.fedorahosted.org and pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Some reasons:
gitweb-caching upstream is not very alive.
gitweb-caching needs manual clearing of it's cache from time to time.
gitweb-caching seems
On Monday, July 16 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
cgit is faster.
cgit seems great, but I am not sure it is faster.
sergio@psique /tmp $ time wget
Richard W.M. Jones writes:
I suspect there is still a small race window, even if you've got the
right %post hook.
Does it need to be the same executable? Isn't it sufficient to check
that it's the same user (ie. using SO_PEERCRED):
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=952805
Or perhaps
Gregory Maxwell writes:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
That would mean that prelink would skip much of a running system, and a
full prelink could be done only by booting from separate media. Not going
to happen.
But now that Fedora will
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
Non-existing /proc/self/exe file is a normal UNIX process state so a UNIX
Hi, list
I don't want too many updates so I disable the updates repo. But later
I found that fedora repo has no updates so I couldn't get any security
updates.
I think we can create a new repo called security like Debian. Push all
the security updates to it. I believe that there are people like
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:38:52PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not known to me.
Dear Fedora Devel,
I'm interested in becoming a packager for:
* fis-gtm: an open source implementation of the M/MUMPS language/database
* vista: The EHR of the Department of Veterans Affairs
I have been working recently with the upstream teams of these two projects
while packaging them for
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Mike Manilone wrote:
I think we can create a new repo called security like Debian. Push all
the security updates to it.
Uhm, we have that. It is called RHEL
Paul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
於 一，2012-07-16 於 18:00 -0700，Adam Williamson 提到：
Updates are already categorized as 'security', 'bugfix' or 'feature'.
You can isolate updates of each type in the GUI app, you can configure
the system to automatically install 'security' updates but not other
updates in the background.
Well. I
Scott Schmit writes:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 07:38:52PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Jan Kratochvil writes:
On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 22:42:00 +0200, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
And I wouldn't be so presumptions as to state authoritatively what
is or is not a bug, in something whose purpose is not
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Scott Schmit i.g...@comcast.net wrote:
And what's the pathname of a deleted file? Like it or not, that's a real
possibility (normal as opposed to the result of an error condition or
a bug), even if it's possibly not typical.
[details snipped]
It gives you your
Coincidentally I was looking at gtm this weekend.
One of the interesting points in re packaging it is that one must bootstrap
gtm from an existing gtm using the providing source.
I'm wondering a bit how that might be affected by the Fedora packaging
guidelines?
I also use Intersystems cache (non
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480129
Milos Malik mma...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|qe-baseos-security@redhat.c |mma...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840449
Bug ID: 840449
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840451
Bug ID: 840451
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840452
Bug ID: 840452
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC:
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-1.fc17.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Class-InsideOut has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
On i386:
perl-Class-InsideOut-1.10-6.fc17.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.14.2)
Please resolve this as soon as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840453
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839909
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Compile:
f3c853bb25452580860778cd6b2213fb Test-Compile-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit cc5120ab27cf2fffa9a3a90bf59ccb3ff3d7ec39
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jul 16 15:19:25 2012 +0200
Update to 0.18
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Test-Compile.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840453
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840451
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840523
Bug ID: 840523
Blocks: 840451
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: iarn...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
--- Comment #2 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Updated to address above comments:
Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-SQL-ReservedWords.spec
SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
--- Comment #2 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Updated to address above comments:
Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Time-Clock.spec
SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839742
--- Comment #2 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-Object.spec
SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-Object-0.859-4.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839744
--- Comment #1 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DateTime.spec
SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DateTime-0.537-3.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839751
--- Comment #1 from Bill Pemberton wf...@virginia.edu ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DB.spec
SRPM URL: http://wfp.fedorapeople.org/perl-Rose-DB-0.769-4.fc17.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
--- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Summary of changes:
6bac126... Initial import (839706). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
7c60d96... Initial import (839701). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
6bac126... Initial import (839706). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.fc16
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.fc17
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839701
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SQL-ReservedWords-0.7-4.el6
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc16
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.el6
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839706
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-Clock-1.02-4.fc17
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Config-Properties:
10012d80fbb6cd7ec4f1a0eec1ead45f Config-Properties-1.75.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5dd8ce9de707ad3ba71d95b1f5428fa32e2de254
Author: Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org
Date: Tue Jul 17 00:57:22 2012 +0200
update to 1.75
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Config-Properties.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840449
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
79 matches
Mail list logo
