Il giorno ven, 30/11/2012 alle 06.16 +, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
On Qui, 2012-11-29 at 12:28 -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
Sounds like a plan, hopefully it won't be too difficult to figure out.
I was just out of space in Hard Disk, correctly writes package
foo needs 100M etc
But
Hi,
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I have an Nvidia GeForce GT220. When I upgraded from f14 to f16 and then
to f17 I had to go through a lot of trouble, because Anaconda gave me a
black screen every time between 1 and 5 minutes. I had to do many
reboots to continue the
I also have a nvidia device in fc17x86_64. Using fedup-cli to update I have
issues;
[root@fedora17desk ~]# fedup-cli --network 18 --debuglog fedupdebug.log
--instrepo
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/test/18-Beta/Fedora/x86_64/os
setting up repos...
instrepo
On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi,
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I have an Nvidia GeForce GT220. When I upgraded from f14 to f16 and then to
f17 I had to go through a lot of trouble, because Anaconda gave me a black
screen every time
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to be
fixed?
On Nov 30, 2012 12:10 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi,
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I have an Nvidia GeForce
On 30 November 2012 11:34, Andreas Tunek andreas.tu...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to be
fixed?
On Nov 30, 2012 12:10 PM, Ian Malone ibmal...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 November 2012 10:58, Erwin Waterlander water...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Hi,
Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
For details including search syntax, please see:
http://www.pixelbeat.org/docs/fedora_source.html
thanks,
Pádraig.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Op 30-11-2012 12:34, Andreas Tunek schreef:
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to
be fixed?
No I haven't reported a bug, sorry. I upgraded from f14 to f17 (via
f16). I searched the internet for solutions and found that this problem
exists since f15.
Hello list,
what is the expected way of handling X11 keyboard layouts in Fedora 18?
I don't use xorg.conf, the configuration was autodetected from
/etc/sysconfig/keyboard (probably) till F17 and it worked just fine. After
upgrading to F18 using yum method, my keyboard layout stopped working.
On 11/30/2012 01:33 PM, Jan Včelák wrote:
Hello list,
what is the expected way of handling X11 keyboard layouts in Fedora 18?
I don't use xorg.conf, the configuration was autodetected from
/etc/sysconfig/keyboard (probably) till F17 and it worked just fine. After
upgrading to F18 using yum
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.80-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
0c9239e... Update to 1.80
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.80-1.fc19' was created pointing to:
0c9239e... Update to 1.80
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Fri Nov 30 09:15:40 UTC 2012
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.2-3.fc18
gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-6.fc18.x86_64 requires gcc =
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break
some packages but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide.
The changes in Ogre API aren't extensive enough for this to be a real risk and
we can always revert. The most common break is
On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
For details including search syntax, please see:
I managed to copypaste a UTF8 BOM onto the end of the previous URL.
Not sure
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 08:29:52 -0500,
Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I want to push Ogre 1.8.1 into rawhide next week. This will most likely break some packages
but we have a lots and lots of time to fix it all up in rawhide. The changes in Ogre API
aren't extensive enough
On Friday 30 of November 2012 14:06:03, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I guess now is used /etc/vconsole.conf. Could you add it into upgrade
page if it works for you?
Imho it's related to my previous question:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/963
OK, I added an additional step to the
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components. If I yum remove the main package it will be erased first by
yum prior to erasing the dependent packages. When the uninstall scripts
for the
On 30 November 2012 12:33, Jan Včelák jvce...@redhat.com wrote:
If 'localectl' is the only supported way, we should add this information to
Upgrading Fedora using yum instructions on the wiki. The same with old
kernel options. (I do not know how is this handled in the other upgrade
methods.)
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I can't answer the _detailed_ part of your question, but, F18
has version 1.0.4 of the open source Nouveau driver, where as F17 shipped
with a git snapshot named
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:11:54 -0500,
Mark Bidewell mbide...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components. If I yum remove the main package it will be erased first by
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:38:29PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
For details including search syntax, please see:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:38:36 -0500,
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:11:54AM -0500, Mark Bidewell wrote:
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
On 11/30/2012 07:30 AM, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Op 30-11-2012 12:34, Andreas Tunek schreef:
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to
be fixed?
No I haven't reported a bug, sorry. I upgraded from f14 to f17 (via
f16). I searched the internet for solutions and
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Why are you creating these directories in %post in the firs place?
If you create them in %install (empty) and own them regularly in %file and
do the same on
the other packages that install thins on it, they will
On Friday 30 of November 2012 14:15:11, Mary Ellen Foster wrote:
For what it's worth, I just upgraded with fedup and my keyboard went from
UK English to US English. Just used system-config-keyboard to change it and
that seemed to work ...
I tried that and the change was not persistent. At
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Lacks clarification on what's considered an feature.
The proposal continues to use the current wide definition - it only
treats some differently.
Arguably it should be mandatory for feature owners to
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I think we do need more clarity on system-wide/defaults changing features or
critical path components. What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a
specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Well fair enough, but at the moment these have to go through the
feature process, which is extremely cumbersome for a routine upgrade.
Take a look at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GHC741
That's a huge
Quoting Mark Bidewell (2012-11-30 16:21:20)
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Fernando Nasser fnas...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Why are you creating these directories in %post in the firs place?
If you create them in %install (empty) and own them regularly in %file and
do the same on
the
Il giorno gio, 29/11/2012 alle 17.21 +, Frank Murphy ha scritto:
I used fedup earlier today, to successfully upgrade from F17+
3rd Party repos to F18 as described here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
My f17 test system, on a kvm/qemu virtual machine, is install into a LVM
encrypted
Hi,
FESCo on 2012-11-28 meeting agreed to initially target an end-of-May
release with an end-of-February branch date, but may adjust outwards
depending on submitted features [1].
The Feature Submission Deadline is now set to 2013-01-29 and the F19
submission period window is open [2].
Schedule
Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components.
You need to create those directories in %install and have your package own
them in
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
I think we do need more clarity on system-wide/defaults changing features
or
critical path components. What's the threshold for defaults? (LVM, for a
specific example.) What's the threshold for a change to a critical path
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 03:28:52PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'd love to see the feature process to be turned opposite, i.e. make
the feature auto-approved as default. It could look like:
In general, features _have_ been approved by default, so in practice, this
isn't a major change. It
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 04:37:47PM +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
%file
...
%dif /opt/companydirs
%files
...
%dir
:-)
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
I think we do need more clarity on system-wide/defaults changing
features or critical path components. What's the threshold for
defaults? (LVM, for a specific example.) What's the threshold for a
change to a critical path
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 01:38:29PM +, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 11/30/2012 12:09 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
Benjamin Boyter has recently indexed the entire Fedora Source code.
I.E. all 2 billion lines, 11K packages, 132 GB of it.
For details including search syntax, please see:
I managed
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Nikos Roussos
comzer...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
**
Hi,
I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version though
depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original library, since the idjc
upstream developer wanted some extra functionality on
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote:
Hi,
I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version
though depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original library, since
the idjc upstream developer wanted some extra functionality on libshout
and didn't want
Bill Peck schreef, Op 30-11-2012 16:00:
I did. :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881846
My problem is more like this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818291
regards,
--
Erwin Waterlander
http://waterlan.home.xs4all.nl/
--
devel mailing list
I have created new Fedora 18 Beta repo. This repo has both x86_64
and i686 in it. You can install via my repo rpm
yum install
http://www.edmann.com/Enlightenment/repo/Fedora/18/enlightenment-repo-0.0.3-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
And then try out enlightenment. I tested the x86_64 i just have not
had
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 12:21 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 05:42:15AM -0500, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
I think we do need more clarity on system-wide/defaults changing
features or critical path components. What's the threshold for
defaults? (LVM, for a specific
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 13:30 +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Op 30-11-2012 12:34, Andreas Tunek schreef:
Have you reported any bugs? Otherwise, how do you expect problems to
be fixed?
No I haven't reported a bug, sorry. I upgraded from f14 to f17 (via
f16). I searched the internet
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 09:35 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Has the Nvidia driver been improved in f18?
I can't answer the _detailed_ part of your question, but, F18
has version 1.0.4 of the open source Nouveau driver, where as
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 17:24 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Ven 30 novembre 2012 15:11, Mark Bidewell a écrit :
I have been working on packaging software into RPMs for my company. These
RPMs create directories in %post into which dependent RPMs install
components.
You need to create
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 16:52 +0100, Dario Lesca wrote:
Il giorno gio, 29/11/2012 alle 17.21 +, Frank Murphy ha scritto:
I used fedup earlier today, to successfully upgrade from F17+
3rd Party repos to F18 as described here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp
My f17 test system, on
On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 22:13 +0100, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
Bill Peck schreef, Op 30-11-2012 16:00:
I did. :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881846
My problem is more like this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818291
Ha, just as I guessed. As I just
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882180
Bug ID: 882180
Summary: perl-IO-Socket-IP-0.18 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IO-Socket-IP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
commit 9edd093fdce09d0ca384f0a3cb49e382360c073e
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 30 11:58:39 2012 +0100
Restore epoch value broken in 5.73 bump
perl-Digest-SHA.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Digest-SHA.spec
commit 7e6efce697f6808da43dc199011e906c9fd053e5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 30 11:58:39 2012 +0100
Restore epoch value broken in 5.73 bump
perl-Digest-SHA.spec |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Digest-SHA.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-IP:
f0634ca10cfbe9d3a9408a4754a12762 IO-Socket-IP-0.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5b15cff5117c5f042914bbe5681cd224c0e2fd60
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Nov 30 12:57:06 2012 +0100
0.18 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-IO-Socket-IP.spec |8 ++--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=882180
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL:
cf5aeb949c4d403eb380b8f22a6b19bf IO-Socket-SSL-1.80.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0c9239ef2cc2ed52f4bc317d2587b30659d8446e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Nov 30 12:47:19 2012 +
Update to 1.80
- New upstream release 1.80
- Removed some warnings in test (missing SSL_verify_mode = 0), which
caused
tests to hang on Windows
Summary of changes:
0c9239e... Update to 1.80 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4cf08b012ca7534065cb762558f33d7d36bc5639
Author: Tom Callaway s...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Nov 30 11:20:54 2012 -0500
add manually generated provides
perl-Gtk2.spec | 231 +---
1 files changed, 221 insertions(+), 10
Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879957
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package perl-Digest-SHA-5.74-2.fc18:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror
59 matches
Mail list logo
