On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:37PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/17/2013 07:57 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
In my view these expectations imply that a packager has some
involvement with upstream. I think that the level of involvement is
going to depend on the packager and the package.
Hi,
On 06/17/2013 10:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 22:33 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:11:42PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 05:38 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 08:24:33AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:55:57PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Because if you cannot properly maintain the component in the
distribution the community is better of without it.
...
Then you should not be maintaining that component
...
We do not need unresponsive or poor
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:37:19 +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
Let me be more specific:
* If upstream uses a modern autotools, than autoreconf should be preferred
(IMO).
* If not, we should advise them to modernize (and if we can, try to help
them).
IIRC, that has been suggested in the many
On 17.06.2013 21:26, Dan Mashal wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
On 17.06.2013 17:18, Heiko Adams wrote:
From my point of view the java-plugin is a big security hole and should be
kicked from default installations ASAP.
Then,
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 08:26 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 06/17/2013 10:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 22:33 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:11:42PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-16 at 05:38 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On 06/18/2013 06:24 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:49:37PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
From my point of view If you are not involved with upstream ( at
least subscribed to their mailing list and have a account in their
upstream tracker ) you should not be
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote:
Hey, fun times!
I'm not the roundcubemail maintainer, but as a user and provenpackager I
more or less co-maintain it with Jon. I was just doing a 'routine' bump
to 0.9.2 and noticed the license situation was rather
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:13:23AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 06/18/2013 06:24 AM, David Tardon wrote:
Agreed but at least they should know how to debug their own
components which when I started the how to debug initiative a while
back in QA revealed many of them did not even
Compose started at Tue Jun 18 08:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[PyQwt]
PyQwt-5.2.0-20.fc19.2.i686 requires sip-api(9) = 0:9.1
PyQwt-5.2.0-20.fc19.2.x86_64 requires sip-api(9) = 0:9.1
[aries-blueprint]
On Mon, 17.06.13 19:50, Jean-Marc Pigeon (j...@safe.ca) wrote:
I just understood I need Requires= instead of After= as the application
require the data-base daemon to be up and running in order to be
operational.
Requirement dependencies and ordering dependencies in systemd are
orthogonal,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/17/2013 06:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:03:26AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
The one issue I can see with removing it is that the plugin
finder you then get in Firefox if you hit a Java site doesn't
work to
Compose started at Tue Jun 18 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Compose finished at Tue Jun 18 12:49:06 UTC 2013
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello lennart,
Lets forget about question#1 (conditionnal dependancy) for now
About question#2 (systemctl within ExecStartPre script).
You really shouldn't do stuff like that as part of the normal boot
process. Starting and then restarting things in the same boot process is
really the wrong
can someone lokk at this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975273
why are the hardening-macros not respected with rpmbuild?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:58:04 +0800
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to add a virtual team for each package(or some
packages with a lot of bugs)?
yes, we have done so for a number of places. Currently the 'teams' are
just an alias however. Hopefully in pkgdb2.0 we will
MT == Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz writes:
MT For example, right now the easiest way to become a Fedora packager
MT is still to learn RPM packaging (only) and add a new package (which
MT will, by now, fairly often be something obscure with a few hundred
MT of users),
That is actually quite
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:01:06 +
Fedora Branched Report rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Compose started at Tue Jun 18 09:15:03 UTC 2013
Compose finished at Tue Jun 18 12:49:06 UTC 2013
No broken deps! Hurray!
But seriously, the reason for this was that the langtable update that
anaconda
On 06/18/2013 04:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can someone lokk at this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975273
why are the hardening-macros not respected with rpmbuild?
Because of this (from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975273#c3):
[builduser@buildserver64:~]$
On Jun 17, 2013 9:03 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
...
I think given all the trouble this plugin has caused recently, it
wouldn't
be wise to install it for everyone. If you need it, great, install it,
but
if a users doesn't need it, it's really just creating a level of
Is java environment the only security flawed software distributed in
Fedora by default? I don't think so. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.
Does it mean Fedora should drop about 1/3 of packages because they have
security bugs? What about Linux Kernel? It's also buggy. Should it be not
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
We cannot really remove installed packages after the release, so I'm
wondering if we still can fix this prior to release.
We could, I suppose. What do people think? (It's just one line in comps.)
When I needed a
Am 18.06.2013 19:18, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On 06/18/2013 04:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can someone lokk at this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975273
why are the hardening-macros not respected with rpmbuild?
Because of this (from
On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:41:37 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 18.06.2013 19:18, schrieb Panu Matilainen:
On 06/18/2013 04:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
can someone lokk at this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975273
why are the hardening-macros not
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2013-06-19 18:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On 06/18/2013 02:59 PM, Ismael Olea wrote:
When I needed a java plugin (particularly for some government
websites) I always should got to install the Sun/Oracle one. In those
cases icedtea-web has been 100% useless to me :-/
The plugin used to be problematic before but have you tried it
Compose started at Tue Jun 18 17:12:36 UTC 2013
Broken deps for x86_64
--
[avgtime]
avgtime-0-0.5.git20120724.fc19.x86_64 requires
libphobos-ldc.so.60()(64bit)
[derelict]
derelict-ogg-3-13.20130516gitd8aa11d.fc19.i686
It feels like time for a status summary mail again!
Fedora 19 Final TC5 is the current compose: it contains most of the
final churn for F19, change should be fairly restricted from here on
out. So this is a good time to take stock of where we are and get all
testing done.
tl;dr summary
# F19 Final Blocker Review meeting #7
# Date: 2013-06-19
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
F19 final freeze has set in and it's once again time to review blocker
and freeze exception bugs!
We'll be running through the final blockers
On 06/18/13 at 01:50pm, Josh Bressers wrote:
Is java environment the only security flawed software distributed in
Fedora by default? I don't think so. Please, correct me if I'm
wrong. Does it mean Fedora should drop about 1/3 of packages
because they have security bugs? What about Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971721
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.26-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971726
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-Reporter-1.59-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971725
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Term-UI-0.36-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957931
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
commit 7efddc19e9d38350ec9fc0d9ca73cda5c7bf
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jun 14 12:58:56 2013 +0200
Remove bundled CPANPLUS-Dist-Build
perl.spec |5 +
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index
commit e7d6490e40037d9c16c85098247775ee4e1e5859
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 11 16:39:12 2013 +0200
Move CPAN-Meta-Requirements files from CPAN-Meta
perl.spec | 31 ++-
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 45c089c0c000d8b7bd1c287f89891e83f6dba40f
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 11 17:11:48 2013 +0200
Add perl-Scalar-List-Utils to perl-core dependencies
perl.spec |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
commit 93f3edbb0c973ab9d55e5987de1d826079350fc8
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 11 15:40:07 2013 +0200
Move CPANPLUS-Dist-Build files from perl-CPANPLUS
perl.spec | 34 ++
1 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 16fe23a87f79cc839c032168b270dd2b678c6f3c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jun 14 11:15:16 2013 +0200
Do not distribute File::Spec::VMS
perl.spec |6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec b/perl.spec
index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973713
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-5.16.3-265.fc19,perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.70-2.fc19,perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.38-1.fc19
has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory in Fedora devel is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Package perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory in Fedora 19 is now owned by ppisar
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 5e41237a9ab54427f90b5f1d8c808c215a82b069
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 18 16:49:30 2013 +0200
Modernize spec file
perl-Gtk2-Ex-FormFactory.spec | 81 -
1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-17.fc19.noarch requires
perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq)
Please resolve this
perl-Bio-SamTools has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(Bio::SeqFeature::Lite)
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(Bio::PrimarySeq)
On i386:
perl-Bio-SamTools-1.35-2.fc19.i686 requires
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971714
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.40-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=971714
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.40-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
In an Winsync setup AD-DS (oneWay: fromWindows) we have the problem that the
uniquemember attribute of groups will not updated if a user moved from on OU to
an other.
Winsync will only update the user itself and not the groups where it is
memberof.
This behaviour is similar like described in
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47389
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47389/0001-Ticket-47389-Non-directory-manager-can-change-the-in.patch
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
52 matches
Mail list logo
