it this week. Nothing else on the agenda so
far as I know - do add any topics I forgot.
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please add any topic
suggestions to the meeting wiki page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20130722
The current proposed agenda is included below
On 22 July 2013 07:03, Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com wrote:
For Java-related reviews you are welcome to block Java SIG tracker bug
(FE-JAVASIG, rhbz #652183). This way members of Java SIG can easily see
that there is a new review and take care of it.
Good to know, thanks, I will do
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote:
It's a vastly safer initial setup than leaving it wide open, by
default. this applies to many tools such as Nagios and cacti, that may
share information about your system that you really should review
before exposing.
On 07/20/2013 06:36 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
When a shutdown task isn't proceeding as planned on Fedora 19/rawhide,
am I the only one that feels like I'm staring down the monocle of a
Cylon and should be preparing to die? That or it's the hood from Kit
off of Knight Rider...
Hi Doug,
The
On 20/07/13 17:30, Lars Kiesow wrote:
As first package I submitted the python-xmp module. You can find the
review request at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986550 That said, I'm
seeking a sponsor for this.
Regards, Lars
A warm welcome here. When looking through your bugzilla
Looking at Koji from Russian Fedora, I noticed some plugins for Gimp
missing in the current Fedora repository.
I am interested to port them which bring some questions, do I keep the
original changelog and notify ported from Russian Fedoraor
do I start the new spec with the statement based from
On 21 Jul 2013 16:07, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
No problem. OpenOffice 4 is already on mirrors and will be announced in a
couple of days, so I've put the exact release date on the wiki page, thus
revealing a very badly kept secret...
Nice to see a release at long last - I'll
Hello A;;.
2013/7/22 Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org:
Looking at Koji from Russian Fedora, I noticed some plugins for Gimp missing
in the current Fedora repository.
I am interested to port them which bring some questions, do I keep the
original changelog and notify ported from
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:21:12PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) said:
I don't think we're anywhere near the point in time where such an
approach is worth the pain it will inflict on people. As above,
I'm pretty sceptical that maintainence of
On 07/16/2013 12:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Can we please use a different name, like webdata? The term asset
seems to scare some people.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
Hello,
I'd like to grep through all specfiles (and preferably also patches and
sources in git) for rawhide, this time related to the unversioned docdirs
F20 feature, and sometimes for other reasons. Hopefully there's a better
way than to fedpkg clone all packages one at a time... does anyone know
On 07/22/2013 11:39 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
I'd like to grep through all specfiles (and preferably also patches and
sources in git) for rawhide, this time related to the unversioned
docdirs F20 feature, and sometimes for other reasons. Hopefully there's
a better way than to fedpkg clone all
Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/16/2013 12:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Can we please use a different name, like webdata? The term asset
seems to scare some people.
At least the directory in
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
Can we please use a different name, like webdata? The term asset seems
to scare some people.
Huh? It's a pretty common industry term for static bits used as
dependencies for websites. I've never heard of anyone being scared
of
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Björn Persson
bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Florian Weimer wrote:
On 07/16/2013 12:54 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Web Assets =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets
Can we please use a different name, like
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 12:31, T.C. Hollingsworth a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
Can we please use a different name, like webdata? The term asset
seems
to scare some people.
Huh? It's a pretty common industry term for static bits used as
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 00:40 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
Looking at Koji from Russian Fedora, I noticed some plugins for Gimp
missing in the current Fedora repository.
I am interested to port them which bring some questions, do I keep
the
original changelog and notify ported from Russian
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote:
SkyX is taken, too.
Swap again with sstp-client, Microsoft Secure Socket Tunneling
Protocol (SSTP) Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976770
I've taken sstp-client, I'll get started on it later
On 07/22/2013 12:31 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
Can we please use a different name, like webdata? The term asset seems
to scare some people.
Huh? It's a pretty common industry term for static bits used as
dependencies for
Hello,
I've pushed new DNF version to F19 [1] and Rawhide today. There's only
little changes but the default value for repos' skip_if_unavailable has
changed and is enabled now. This is because recently an ailing Dropbox
repo has made many fine DNF processes end too soon for no good reason
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 11:24:22AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Hi all,
as a new Fedora Python maintainer, I have set myself a goal of moving Fedora
to Python 3 as a default. This is going to be a multirelease
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
berra...@redhat.com wrote:
Far better to encourage people to explicitly use /usr/bin/python2 and
/usr/bin/python3 explicitly and discourage any use of plain /usr/bin/python,
but definitely not change the semantics of the latter.
Right,
This is a draft of the proposal I'm presenting at Flock, An Architecture
for a More Agile Fedora (http://sched.co/19ugKGM). It represents a big
change to how we as the Fedora project put together our distribution. I've
gone through several drafts of this and talked to a few people, and I'd
really
On 07/22/2013 01:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
So there we have it. Comments and discussion, please!
It does not mention which components the core is made out of, no
dropping the defaults or even moving epel out of Fedora and into their
own infrastructure bits downstream distribution to us
Thanks Igor!
Currently we'll need to bundle their dependencies prior to the main package.
I'm just about done with stout, but I could use some help with their
(libprocess https://github.com/3rdparty) library prior to mundging the mesos
package.
of course the main mesos package too, but
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:16:30AM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote:
I do agree that the .rpmnew thing is annoying, and I wish there was a
better way to handle that.
I think in general, packaging webapps into RPM is of low value. I've tried
to use these packages in production several times over the
Thanks Mikolaj,
That is good to know, b/c I know some folks in their community would like to
bring it to EPEL, but my first step will be Fedora, then let the community
drive.
Cheers,
Tim
- Original Message -
From: Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com
To:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 04:09:32PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
the problem i see is when things like MTA and rsyslog are
removed from the defualt install many pakcgers will less
care about them in the future nor test how
Le 22/07/2013 15:38, Matthew Miller a écrit :
Wait, did you just say Fedora _Core_?
Yes I did.
But, this is not a return to the old Core + Extras, because the line is
drawn based on _what_ and _how_ rather than on who works for what company.
Whatever explanation which can be
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:49:08PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So there we have it. Comments and discussion, please!
It does not mention which components the core is made out of, no
Correct; that is to be determined, and not just by me. At Flock, I will
include pictures of a couple of
Am 21.07.2013 19:39, schrieb drago01:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm missing anything here, but is it intended that
webapps should not be
Change in ownership over the last 168 hours
===
0 packages were orphaned
4 packages unorphaned
-
cheeselee unorphaned : perl-Net-ARP [EL-5,EL-6,devel,f17,f18,f19]
dvratil unorphaned : akonadi
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:38:54AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
* E.g.: Everything in @standard, plus the toolchains to build it
How about, like RHEL, the toolchains to build it goes into an
RHEL-Optional-like separate place? If it has to be in the core ring
then either the core ring has to
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:28:52PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What better time to move epel out of Fedora since is really not
related to Fedora et all but is strictly for downstream distribution
based upon us to use ( like RHEL and it's clones )
I'm not sure what you think needs to
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:38:54 -0400,
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Obviously, no-bundled-libs is a crucial part of the packaging guidelines
today. As a sysadmin, I know why it's important. This is not just a noble
goal, but also something that pragmatically makes systems
Am 22.07.2013 16:37, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le lundi 22 juillet 2013 à 00:02 +0200, Reindl Harald a écrit :
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
is a good idea to bring it to a
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
is a good idea to bring it to a broader userbase!
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 10:43:36AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I suspect this would be better if we made it much easier to automate
cpan2spec-style mass importing of packages to RPM. So that, for
example, you didn't need
1) Please participate in the 'Proposal for a more agile Fedora.next
discussion.
2) Please stop using the word platform and say very precisely what
you mean. I've seen at least the following meanings recently.
- a platform for applications = deployment target = API: e.g.
when saying This
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:39:06 +0300
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to grep through all specfiles (and preferably also patches
and sources in git) for rawhide, this time related to the unversioned
docdirs F20 feature, and sometimes for other reasons. Hopefully
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:06:12PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
But, this is not a return to the old Core + Extras, because the line is
drawn based on _what_ and _how_ rather than on who works for what company.
Whatever explanation which can be given, Core is just the worst name
to be
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
This is a draft of the proposal I'm presenting at Flock, An Architecture
for a More Agile Fedora (http://sched.co/19ugKGM). It represents a big
change to how we as the Fedora project put together our distribution.
On 07/22/2013 02:06 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 01:49:08PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
So there we have it. Comments and discussion, please!
It does not mention which components the core is made out of, no
Correct; that is to be determined, and not just by me.
Remi Collet wrote:
[...] Ex : I'm so disgusted that I don't ever have desire to read
the rest of the doc.
Please don't - that part is easily renamed (Fedora Kernel, or
Fedora Standard Base or Fedora Platform or something) if people
are still offended by some aspect of the the core/extras
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:38:54AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
* E.g.: Everything in @standard, plus the toolchains to build it
How about, like RHEL, the toolchains to build it goes into an
RHEL-Optional-like separate
Le lundi 22 juillet 2013 à 00:02 +0200, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Hi
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
is a good idea to bring it to a broader userbase!
Hello,
(more technical / process questions below; high-level comments will be
sent separately.)
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup
company, their developers are inevitably using a
Le lundi 22 juillet 2013 à 09:38 -0400, Matthew Miller a écrit :
And third, by increasing our engagement upstream, we can reduce our own
work. For example, right now RubyGems.org doesn't do any validation of
licenses, basic review for malware, or gem signing. If we knew that this
basic
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:15:50PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 03:25 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If python3 could just finally fix outputting text with
surrogateescaped bytes then it would finally clean up the last
portion of
Fixed a casting issue when reading the dse
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47427
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47427/0001-Ticket-47427-Overflow-in-nsslapd-disk-monitoring-thr.2.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:27, Matthew Miller a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:51:37AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm a bit worried about this. We really want bundled libs to
eventually go away (for any particular bundled lib). This seems like
it could encourage permanently bundled
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
This proposal is for a solid core which can be targeted by software stacks,
which can be targeted by developers.
Oh, initially I understood you were aiming for a fast-moving, highly
integrated core, following
#438: repoclosure test is failing due to change in behavior upstream
+--
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Package Update Acceptance Test Plan
Component:
Am 21.07.2013 21:20, schrieb Matthew Miller:
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 04:09:32PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
the problem i see is when things like MTA and rsyslog are
removed from the defualt install many pakcgers will less
care about them in the future nor test how well it works
That's a
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 13:25 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Plasma-nm =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plasma-nm
Change owner(s): Jan Grulich jgrul...@redhat.com, Lukáš Tinkl
lti...@redhat.com
Replace current network applet in KDE with a new one
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:51:37AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm a bit worried about this. We really want bundled libs to
eventually go away (for any particular bundled lib). This seems like
it could encourage permanently bundled libs. That is going to make
Upstream code is full of bundled
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 06:40:44 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
depcheck
363 runs ( 167 GOOD, 196 ERROR )
- 84 fc17 runs ( 84 GOOD, 0 ERROR )
- 151 fc18 runs ( 75 GOOD, 76 ERROR )
- 128 fc19 runs ( 8 GOOD, 120 ERROR )
repoclosure
48 runs ( 27
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:49, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 10:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:38:54 -0400, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Obviously, no-bundled-libs is a crucial part of the
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think
2013/7/22 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi:
I'd like to grep through all specfiles (and preferably also patches and
sources in git) for rawhide, this time related to the unversioned docdirs
F20 feature, and sometimes for other reasons. Hopefully there's a better way
than to fedpkg clone all
On Jul 22, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
* We need to be more than that
Why?
* Not widely used by RHEL users
RHEL and Fedora could hardly be more different from each other. It's not an
apple vs orange, it's fruit fly vs tortoise. In some ways RHEL
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:07, Robert Marcano a écrit :
Fonts has licenses, some of them require the license to be shown or the
copyright displayed, some fonts has the copyright added to their
metadata, I don't find for example that gnu-free-serif-fonts says on
it's metadata that is GPL+3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Wx-GLCanvas:
4f6475010bd6e4231e2dbb3fb52bc642 Wx-GLCanvas-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:37 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. lack of clearly defined LAN infra : Windows comes with AD and
local network sharing, our desktop comes with facebook clients.
Guess which one is actually useful to produce code. Linux for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:32 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
How do I package and ship an application that depends on
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
This is a draft of the proposal I'm presenting at Flock, An
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
This proposal doesn't seem to make rings 0 or 1 particularly more
integrated - just smaller; and it places a higher barrier to entry to
adding useful functionality to the core.
I didn't intend to say that.
Want to add new a
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:35:38AM -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote:
This proposal is for a solid core which can be targeted by software stacks,
which can be targeted by developers.
Oh, initially I understood you were aiming for a fast-moving, highly
integrated core, following systemd's lead.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:53 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:27, Matthew Miller a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:51:37AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm a bit worried about this. We really want bundled libs to
eventually go
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:40:14PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup
company, their developers are inevitably using a different (usually
proprietary)
On 07/22/2013 03:38 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:13:28PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 07/22/2013 02:52 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:28:52PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What better time to move epel out of Fedora since is
Summary of changes:
6212170... Initial import (#978010) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 22.07.2013 16:53, schrieb Miloslav Trmač:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
is a good idea to
On 07/22/2013 02:52 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:28:52PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What better time to move epel out of Fedora since is really not
related to Fedora et all but is strictly for downstream distribution
based upon us to use ( like RHEL and it's
On Jul 22, 2013, at 7:38 AM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
The Idea
---
Focus core distro as platform, include layers of modular enabling
technologies, and provide room for special interest groups to create
solutions within the Fedora circle.
OK, but I don't know
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:37, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
Desktop selection logic is no different. It's all about time/cost to be
operational. If you reduce this (perceived) time/cost, you'll see
startups adopting Fedora in droves, because startups only care about
getting profitable/bought
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
How do I package and ship an application that depends on two or more
stacks (e.g. uses a database, has a web frontend and perhaps also a
local GUI) if
On 07/19/2013 01:13 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Robert Marcano
rob...@marcanoonline.com wrote:
Not all fonts installed had the same licensing requirement, people install
fonts from other places that are not as careful as Fedora with the licenses.
It is
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 10:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:38:54 -0400, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Obviously, no-bundled-libs is a
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
This is a draft of the proposal I'm presenting at Flock, An Architecture
for a More Agile Fedora (http://sched.co/19ugKGM).
(The more
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:27:08 -0400,
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Running two instances to get two sets of services has been the best practice
since about 1995. :)
When you have money. For hobbiests that may not always apply.
--
devel mailing list
commit 62121700b7021760de0f5187caaed121865caa88
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Mon Jul 22 17:38:06 2013 +0200
Initial import (#978010)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Wx-GLCanvas.spec | 66 +
sources |1 +
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:53:19PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Well, obviously Someone is doing that quite a lot anyway. Fedora needs
to continue to avoid that. Here is where work with upstream comes in
-- if we put the same effort into reviewing packages in Fedora into
reviewing the
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:56, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:37 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
3. lack of clearly defined LAN infra : Windows comes with AD and
local network sharing, our desktop comes with facebook clients.
Guess
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup
company, their developers are inevitably using a different (usually
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:53:36PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
Hi
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
is a good idea to bring it to a broader userbase!
ReadOnlyDirectories=/etc
ReadOnlyDirectories=/usr
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 18:55 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Where is the desktop notification solution in Fedora? There is none able
to even remotely approach the capabilities of the cron + MTA bits you so
dislike.
You're ascribing emotions to a proposal where none exist. No-one said
they 'so
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 00:02, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Hi
has anybody considered to put the following as default in systemd-units of
network services? cross-posting to users-list intented because i think it
is a good idea to bring it to a broader userbase!
ReadOnlyDirectories=/etc
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:39:33PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
This proposal doesn't seem to make rings 0 or 1 particularly more
integrated - just smaller; and it places a higher barrier to entry to
adding useful
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:30:32PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup
company, their developers are inevitably using a different (usually
proprietary) desktop OS, plus a non-Fedora distribution on their code.
We're being left
On Fri, 19.07.13 19:37, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
However, having the /usr/sbin/sendmail API available to applications
is valuable - it brings a significant system administration benefit of
centralizing the SMTP configuration.
Sure it is valuable. However, it's also a pretty bad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:58 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Our Fedora infrastructure team should be using Fedora it's an
disgrace to the community for them not doing so.
That's something else that this policy could potentially addresses,
frankly. The
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 15:38, Matthew Miller a écrit :
Whenever I go to a tech meetup or talk to someone from a new startup
company, their developers are inevitably using a different (usually
proprietary) desktop OS, plus a non-Fedora distribution on their code.
And the main reason has
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:08:32 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:58 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Our Fedora infrastructure team should be using Fedora it's an
disgrace to the community for them not doing
Lots of interesting things here. But I just had a few things that triggered
off of Kevin's message so:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:21:39AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:38:54 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Some approaches may even move beyond RPM
On 07/22/2013 04:34 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:08:32 -0400
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:58 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Our Fedora infrastructure team should be using Fedora it's an
disgrace
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 09:47 -0700, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Adam Williamson
awill...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm missing anything here, but is it intended
that
webapps should not be accessible from anywhere but localhost
On Fri, 19.07.13 13:17, Billy Crook (billycr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Sendmail stays in Default unless there is compelling reason to switch to
postfix, exim, meta1, etc. Those users who wish to remove it are welcome
to do so. Nobody is stopping them. The default configuration of sendmail
poses
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 18:01, Stephen Gallagher a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/22/2013 11:53 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 22 juillet 2013 17:27, Matthew Miller a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:51:37AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
I'm a bit worried
1 - 100 of 313 matches
Mail list logo
