On 22 Aug 2013 01:01, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
I looked a while back, and it is marked deprecated in the Fedora
package database. I'm not sure why it wasn't just orphaned, since AFAIK
it still works, still maintained, and there's no direct replacement.
Maybe it was deprecated due
Le 22/08/2013 02:01, Chris Adams a écrit :
it still works
Really ?
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEWbug_status=ASSIGNEDbug_status=ON_QAcomponent=mysql-workbenchlist_id=1639090
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 21/08 17.26, Ken Dreyer wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:54 AM, James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com
wrote:
When the switch was first proposed it was Oracle who was most vocal against
it to the point of them stating they'd take over package ownership and
filing #958131 to update to
Greetings,
This e-mail is intended to inform you about the upcoming Bugzilla changes
happening the week after August 20, 2013 (Rawhide bug rebase) and what you need
to do, if anything.
We will be automatically changing the version for most rawhide bugs to Fedora
20.
This will result in regular
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
modplugtools needs to be changed to not ship modplugplay anymore, but
modplug123 should still work.
Done in F-20+.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers
to what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that his slide where a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers to
what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that
On 08/22/2013 01:06 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I would like us to change our default to use long hostname instead as in
the fqdn or container01.ackme.com and would love any kind of feed back
in that regard ( why we should not
On 08/22/2013 09:10 AM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I perfectly understand the reasons for the change and I think we should
definitely change it at least on the login screen (I like the one
additional line idea from Simo). In the
On 08/22/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
snip
On cloud images we actually lock the root account so it's unusable. In
the case of cloud providers the standard deployment is generally along
the lines of either injecting ssh keys for root and unlocking it or
creating a standard user account,
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 10:39 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/22/2013 09:10 AM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I perfectly understand the reasons for the change and I think we should
definitely change it at least on the
On 08/22/2013 11:03 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 10:39 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/22/2013 09:10 AM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I perfectly understand the reasons for the change and I think we
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:09 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
You would just overwrite in in your own .bashrc if you have long
hostname and they get in your way.
Yes, the same applies in the opposite direction.
Long hostnames are far more practical for administrators to use then
Hi All,
Having a great interrest in combining both the qualities of SSD's
(speed) and the qualities of HDD's (capacity) I added the following
change: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSD_cache
Since this change was accepted, I now have to really do something :-) As
a result here's my
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
You would just overwrite in in your own .bashrc if you have long
hostname and they get in your way.
Long hostnames are far more practical for administrators to use then
short hostnames have ever been.
That's your opinion;
Anyone want to hazard a guess about what's going on here?
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1341/5841341/root.log
The package, which builds fine in f20 and rawhide, buildrequires
the following:
BuildRequires: /usr/bin/perldoc
BuildRequires: cpio
BuildRequires:
In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages
in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to
certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind of input. Also,
these test reveals some false warnings and other errors. Some are
detected and
Very interesting...
What's the possibility of parsing all the data and sending individual
reports to package-owner@ ?
I don't know that I'd want to get this type of thing frequently, but once
would be nice...
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl6-Caller:
d19ce32a9b7f7dfbb59aff7e38d476b9 Perl6-Caller-0.100.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9588ef99c2505a00c4a56934d92efd58fc416b71
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Aug 22 14:44:40 2013 +0100
Initial import (perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2)
By default, this module exports the caller function. This automatically
returns a new caller object. An
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone want to hazard a guess about what's going on here?
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1341/5841341/root.log
The package, which builds fine in f20 and rawhide, buildrequires
the following:
On 2013-08-22 15:41, Richard Shaw wrote:
Very interesting...
What's the possibility of parsing all the data and sending individual
reports to package-owner@ ?
I don't know that I'd want to get this type of thing frequently, but
once would be nice...
Richard
The data is already
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
The data is already parsed, I have tools to generate list of packages
failing a given test as well as all tests failing for a given package.
It's just that all this is quite a lot of data...
No way this will happen
On 2013-08-22 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
Yes... sorry I assumed you knew...
package-ow...@fedoraproject.org mailto:ow...@fedoraproject.org
Richard
No, I don't know much.
Well, it should basically be piece of cake to generate such an email for
all packages. Before doing such a thing I would
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 09:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone want to hazard a guess about what's going on here?
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1341/5841341/root.log
The package, which builds fine in
Summary of changes:
9588ef9... Initial import (perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:03:06PM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Thursday, August 22, 2013 09:58 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Anyone want to hazard a guess about what's going on here?
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 08:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
You would just overwrite in in your own .bashrc if you have long
hostname and they get in your way.
Long hostnames are far more practical for administrators to use then
Summary of changes:
a4d4beb... Initial import (perl-true-0.18-2) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999032
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo
meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle
for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger question of the 6-month
cycle overall, but just, right now, slowing down for a release to get
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
What things we do _now_ could be
improved with the investment of some effort?
Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect
the mass rebuild.
Apparently less so with all the new ARM builders, right?
- Original Message -
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
What things we do _now_ could be
improved with the investment of some effort?
Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect
the mass rebuild.
It's
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
What things we do _now_ could be
improved with the investment of some effort?
Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect
the mass rebuild.
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:23:55 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone want to hazard a guess about what's going on here?
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1341/5841341/root.log
The package, which builds fine in f20
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo
meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle
for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger question of
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47394
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47394/0001-Ticket-47394-remove-ds.pl-should-remove-var-lock-dir.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-true-0.18-2.fc20' was created pointing to:
a4d4beb... Initial import (perl-true-0.18-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-true-0.18-2.fc19' was created pointing to:
a4d4beb... Initial import (perl-true-0.18-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-true-0.18-2.fc21' was created pointing to:
a4d4beb... Initial import (perl-true-0.18-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:41:52PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton wi...@redhat.com wrote:
(1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) has
broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 install. Is
this the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:03:52 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the
FESCo meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer
release cycle for Fedora 21 --
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages
in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to
certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind of input. Also,
these test reveals some
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 17:19:09 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the
FESCo meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2.fc18' was created pointing to:
9588ef9... Initial import (perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2.el6' was created pointing to:
9588ef9... Initial import (perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2.el5' was created pointing to:
9588ef9... Initial import (perl-Perl6-Caller-0.100-2)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 22 August 2013 16:03, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo
meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle
for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger question of the
On 08/22/2013 05:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo
meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle
for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger question of the 6-month
cycle overall, but just,
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:03:22 +0200
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-08-22 15:54, Richard Shaw wrote:
Yes... sorry I assumed you knew...
package-ow...@fedoraproject.org mailto:ow...@fedoraproject.org
Richard
No, I don't know much.
Well, it should basically be piece
On 2013-08-22 17:45, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
In an attempt to test fedora-review we have run it on almost allpackages
in the complete rawhide distribution. Our primary objective is to
certify that fedora-review is stable for all this kind
On 08/22/2013 05:12 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
What things we do _now_ could be
improved with the investment of some effort?
Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect
the mass rebuild.
Apparently
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:00:54 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
...snip...
What Infrastructure projects would be helped by this?
A web infrastructure to
* ease package orphanage.
* launch AWOL/MIA requests
* a unified koji/bodhi/bugzilla Web-GUI
* much longer build.log
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:03:52 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the
FESCo meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer
release cycle for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger
question
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:17:32AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:23:55 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Anyone want to hazard a guess about what's going on here?
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:27:20 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
The issue with this perl rebuilt was the person conducting the
initial rebuild didn't manage to finish it. Don't get me wrong - He
did a good job, but his time frame simply was unrealistically short.
Well, I noticed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:00:54 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 08/22/2013 05:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the
FESCo meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea
On 08/22/2013 03:03 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo
meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle
for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger question of the 6-month
cycle overall, but just,
On 08/22/2013 06:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I noticed the rebuild was running only some times. I assume when
they were there to launch the builds in that batch?
Is there any way all the builds could be listed and just fired off and
queued all at once?
Peter queue honor build requires
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:10:12 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
Funny! I'm interested in hearing more about these,
| 347 CheckStaticLibs
|Static libs not in a -static package. Most are haskell packages
|which have an exception not handled by f-r. There are more,
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw .
The CheckSoFiles results might be .so plug-in libs (extension modules),
which are stored in private paths, i.e. outside run-time linker's search.
Or even non-versioned
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:03:52 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the
FESCo meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer
release cycle for Fedora 21 -- not (right now at least) the bigger
question
Miroslav Suchy wrote:
On 08/22/2013 06:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Well, I noticed the rebuild was running only some times. I assume
when they were there to launch the builds in that batch?
Is there any way all the builds could be listed and just fired off
and queued all at once?
Peter queue
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:38:38AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
In general most of our constraints are people related. We just don't
have enough developers and sysadmins to setup, deploy and maintain all
the things we might want to do.
I definitely know how that is. Of the list you give, maybe
On 08/22/2013 03:19 PM, drago01 wrote:
Given that most of this stuff can be done parallel to the release (it
is not like everyone is busy for full 6 months during the release
cycle) I doubt this gains us much if anything.
This is laughable response we in QA and I'm pretty sure it's the same
On 2013-08-22 19:20, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw .
The CheckSoFiles results might be .so plug-in libs (extension modules),
which are stored in private paths, i.e. outside
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/22/2013 03:19 PM, drago01 wrote:
Given that most of this stuff can be done parallel to the release (it
is not like everyone is busy for full 6 months during the release
cycle) I doubt this gains us much if
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-Tiny-1.54-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
534335f... Update to 1.54
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-Tiny-1.54-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
534335f... Update to 1.54
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
commit f6fd2cd1da5e06972c74e36f0f6f6c3a0f8d1175
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Aug 22 19:42:55 2013 +0100
Update to 1.13
- New upstream release 1.13
- Added missing abstract for kwalitee-metrics script
- No longer issuing a warning if the test is
Summary of changes:
2c4bf77... Initial import (perl-Carp-Fix-1_25-1.01-2) (*)
6123b32... Unbundle Test-Simple and use the system one (#998410) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/relnamef20
Is this thing for real?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/
says the End Date is 2013-08-23 23:59:59.
Where has it been announced this time?
There's nothing in the archives for announce and devel-announce list.
--
devel mailing list
On 22 August 2013 13:31, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/relnamef20
Is this thing for real?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/
says the End Date is 2013-08-23 23:59:59.
Where has it been announced this time?
There's nothing in
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:03:52AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
As we look at Fedora.next ideas and possibly decide to start implementation
in the F21 timeframe, we will likely find _new_ things that take specific
work. Let's not worry about that right now. What things we do _now_ could be
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:41:25AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:00:54 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
...snip...
What Infrastructure projects would be helped by this?
A web infrastructure to
* ease package orphanage.
* launch AWOL/MIA requests
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48/0001-Ticket-48-Active-Directory-has-certain-uids-which-ar.2.patch
git patch file (master) -- fixing Coverity CID 11943
Coverity CID 11943 - Logically dead code
Fix description: The following commit
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 August 2013 13:31, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/relnamef20
Is this thing for real?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/
says the End Date
On 22 August 2013 14:45, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
What happened to naming 20 in honor of Seth?
Dan
I believe that it was decided that like had been done in the past, this
release would be
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that it was decided that like had been done in the past, this
release would be dedicated to Seth Vidal, but not named after him as Seth
hated released names with a white hot passion of 10,000 supernovas. [Of
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 17:19 +0200, drago01 wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Based on discussion at Flock, on the devel mailing list, and in the FESCo
meeting, we are looking for feedback on the idea of a longer release cycle
for Fedora
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 1:31 PM, John C. Peterson j...@eskimo.com wrote:
I would like to edit comps.xml to add a new package group for the tools
that have already been packaged by the Formal Methods SIG.
I propose that the group be located under the Development category.
Id:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[Of course he would probably still laugh if the release was named Vidalia
Onion]
HEY! Why isn't Vidalia Onion one of the name options? That's way better than
any of the other options.
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing
On 8/22/2013 7:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[Of course he would probably still laugh if the release was named Vidalia
Onion]
HEY! Why isn't Vidalia Onion one of the name options? That's way better than
any of the
Il 23/08/2013 01:08, David ha scritto:
On 8/22/2013 7:03 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[Of course he would probably still laugh if the release was named Vidalia
Onion]
HEY! Why isn't Vidalia Onion one of the name options?
Il 22/08/2013 22:53, Dan Mashal ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that it was decided that like had been done in the past, this
release would be dedicated to Seth Vidal, but not named after him as Seth
hated released names with a
Il 23/08/2013 01:22, punto...@libero.it ha scritto:
Il 22/08/2013 22:53, Dan Mashal ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
smo...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe that it was decided that like had been done in the past, this
release would be dedicated to Seth Vidal, but
On 8/21/2013 5:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com said:
I fear a similar fate is going to befall mysql-workbench before too
long, since it's been orphaned for a while. Are the Oracle employees
still around?
I looked a while back, and it is marked
On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I believe that it was decided that like had been done in the past, this
release would be dedicated to Seth Vidal, but not named after him as Seth
On Aug 22, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
some of the things I would like to work on include, fully automating
the release process, today i have to do mutliple things from multiple
locations to trigger off the different pieces of the release. write a
tool like mash
On Fri, 2013-08-16 at 22:05 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
since i have enough of bugzilla-mails as response of bugreports
containing referecnes to any Fedora version but not the reported
i consider this as bug in the distribution itself
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998035
*at
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 11:57 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/17/2013 12:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
VLAN setup for installing! Yay! However, after rebooting,
NetworkManager wasn't able to bring it up, something about not knowing
the virtual interface name. Turned out to be the ethernet
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
*smack own forehead* I like that better than the other options also. For me,
one extra point for Vidalia onion over 20.
Heck I like Crazy Train based on a recent Matthew Miller assertion.
Assuming there can be no
On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
QA, releng and anaconda are on a more or less permanent iteration
treadmill from Alpha TC1 onwards, severely limiting the time we have to
work on anything else. We can only really get substantive work done on
'things
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
*smack own forehead* I like that better than the other options also. For me,
one extra point for Vidalia onion over 20.
Heck I like Crazy Train
On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 11:57 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/17/2013 12:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yeah, I've seen that kind of thing in some of my tests. A lot of my live
installs wind up with New York as the
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 18:11 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
QA, releng and anaconda are on a more or less permanent iteration
treadmill from Alpha TC1 onwards, severely limiting the time we have to
work on anything else.
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 18:16 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Aug 22, 2013, at 5:54 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 11:57 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 08/17/2013 12:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Yeah, I've seen that kind of thing in some of my tests. A
On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:05 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
How about no release name, just this one time. In his honor?
I'd back no release name for 20 with 8 points and 0 for everything else, if
it's an option, and in particular if the marketing includes to the effect of:
Fedora
On Aug 22, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
No, we're not talking about the bash prompt on tty2, but there's an
actual *login prompt* on like tty6 or something. So far as I and the OP
knows, there is no account with a known password for you log in as, and
you have
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com wrote:
The choices are what the community came up with. At this point, that
is what we have to chose from.
I'm not necessarily disagreeing, but there
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
