On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:31:12 +0200
Dridi Boukelmoune dridi.boukelmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1].
During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that
adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstream dev is very patient
On 09/11/2013 12:31 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
I have my first packaging issue on the numatop package[1].
During the review it appeared that I forgot the %{optflags}, and that
adding them breaks the i686 build. The upstream dev is very patient
and willing to help me, but I feel I have wasted
On 09/10/2013 08:25 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most
used cmdline tool. So:
# yum install mc
... installing for dependencies:
gpm-libs (which I never ever use)
perl* (29 packages)...
Seriously? What does mc need perl for?
see
Hi,
In FESCo ticket #1115, it was decided to modify the privilege escalation
policy in order to allow local, active, admin user to update/remove/etc
signed software without requiring a password.
At this point, such an user can do pkcon install package to install
packages without being prompted
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Per:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1171
I have added a set of cols to the spins page for f20:
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Releases%2F20%2FSpinsdiff=352468oldid=340210
One each for Alpha Beta and
On 10 September 2013 17:58, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Just to confirm: this new file is only useful on fedora = 20 ?
Yup.
(so we need to not ship it in fedora 20, perhaps some Guildelines
about this could be useful)
Like Elad said, I think shipping it before that is fine.
Which package own /usr/share/appdata ?
At the moment it's gnome-software, which isn't exactly ideal. I'm
erring towards adding it to filesystem, but other ideas welcome.
Yes filesystem seems definively the good choice (as other dir as
/usr/share/applications, icons, ...).
Remi.
--
devel
On 11 September 2013 08:38, Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com wrote:
Yes filesystem seems definively the good choice (as other dir as
/usr/share/applications, icons, ...).
Okay, I've added this to filesystem-3.2-20 this morning. Thanks for
the reminder! :)
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
On 09/10/2013 06:59 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 10:04 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
and who controls for sure that bad software does not the same?
snip
The source of all this software is available to be looked at. So really,
you can verify that only the required ports are opened up.
*nobody* and *nothing* has to punch
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 18:41 +1000, Ankur Sinha wrote:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before
opening
ports in the firewall.
In light of the parallel discussion on too many password prompts, as
pointed out by Bochecha, I'd like to clarify:
- The software *must* inform
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before opening
ports in the firewall.
IMHO it should be the job of the firewall to inform the user about an
application that want's to open one or more ports and ask for permission
to open
On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before opening
ports in the firewall.
IMHO it should be the job of the firewall to inform the user about an
application that want's to open one or more
On 11 September 2013 08:05, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com wrote:
On 09/10/2013 08:25 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
I did a TC5 minimal install last night, which omitted mc, my most
used cmdline tool. So:
# yum install mc
... installing for dependencies:
gpm-libs (which I never ever use)
perl*
Le Mer 11 septembre 2013 11:23, Alec Leamas a écrit :
On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before
opening
ports in the firewall.
IMHO it should be the job of the firewall to inform the
Hello,
Some time ago I've packaged Xfoil, Avl and Xrotor (which are popular
codes for foil/fluid-dynamics related computations), but I never ended
up posting a package review for one reason: the plot window of those
programs needs BackingStore true set in xorg.conf, or otherwise the
contents
On 09/11/2013 12:16 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
- Question for anyone with Xorg knowledge: how feasible is it to patch
out of the plot window code the need for BackingStore? I.e. does it only
require some minor changes to the Xlib calls? For reference, the code is
here: [1]
[1]
Hi.
I'm going to update the openobex package in rawhide
to the latest version (1.7.1) in about two weeks.
Unfortunately this version breaks the API, so dependent
packages need to be patched in order to be build.
Needed changes should be small.
Since the rebase is from version 1.5 - 1.7.1
On 2013-09-11 12:02, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 11 septembre 2013 11:23, Alec Leamas a écrit :
On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before
opening
ports in the firewall.
IMHO it should
On ons, 2013-09-11 at 12:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello,
Some time ago I've packaged Xfoil, Avl and Xrotor (which are popular
codes for foil/fluid-dynamics related computations), but I never ended
up posting a package review for one reason: the plot window of those
programs needs
Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas:
That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the
application knows which port(s) to open and why, whereas only the
firewall can guarantee that it actually opens the ports requested by
user instead of something else.
So the
On 11.09.2013 12:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/11/2013 12:16 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
- Question for anyone with Xorg knowledge: how feasible is it to patch
out of the plot window code the need for BackingStore? I.e. does it only
require some minor changes to the Xlib calls? For reference,
On 09/11/2013 01:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Thanks for you quick reply, unfortunately the replot function is defined
nowhere.
Oooh. Perhaps try calling GWXFLUSH(), then? That should restore the
window contents from the stored pixmap. It won't work if client code
ever calls
hi,
requested review for libgssglue unretirement:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006837
can you, please, comment/review?
thanks
best regards
jiri kastner
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On 2013-09-11, 09:36 GMT, Ian Malone wrote:
Can someone explain what the consequences of a 'soft dependency' would
actually be and how it would be different from putting those files
into a sub-package? (Which may or may not work depending on whether mc
is able to cope dynamically with that.)
# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2013-09-11
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Go/No-Go will be on this Thursday, so it's time for what will hopefully
be the last blocker review meeting for F20 alpha.
We'll be running
On 11.09.2013 13:22, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 09/11/2013 01:07 PM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Thanks for you quick reply, unfortunately the replot function is defined
nowhere.
Oooh. Perhaps try calling GWXFLUSH(), then? That should restore the
window contents from the stored pixmap. It won't
W dniu 11.09.2013 09:05, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
So it is merely nice-to-have. Usually called soft-dependency, which
unfortunately our tools still does not know.
Does somebody knows when we can expect soft dependencies in rpm?
IIRC Mandriva had patches which added Suggests/Recommends to RPM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas:
That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the
application knows which port(s) to open and why, whereas only the
firewall can guarantee
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 03:10 AM, Dhiru Kholia wrote:
Hi,
In FESCo ticket #1115, it was decided to modify the privilege escalation
policy in order to allow local, active, admin user to update/remove/etc
signed software without requiring a password.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-09-11 14:46, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas:
That said, I see your
commit d2a2c75da6740174f8819a0cf1bea2be9e5115f2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Sep 11 14:58:54 2013 +0200
1.7001 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-App-cpanminus.spec | 45 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files
On 09/11/2013 08:23 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
#topic #1170 Working Group call for Volunteers
.fesco 1170
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170
Given that Matthew wanted me to come up with a concrete, positive
proposals [¹] surrounding Fedora as a platform, as essentially an tool
for
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas:
That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the
application knows which port(s) to open and why,
On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 06:35 AM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 12:30, schrieb Alec Leamas:
That said, I see your point. Seems to boil down to that only the
On 09/11/2013 03:32 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Asking her Do you want to make security changes to share directory
/home/phyllis/Share? Or
Do you want to make security
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
Random crap from the internet not a good idea.
Since firefox can out and crab stuff to install, and I would never no.
No one is that insane ;) This is all about signed packages.
--
devel mailing list
On 2013-09-11 15:41, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 03:32 PM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-09-11 15:20, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:46 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Asking her Do you want to make security changes to share directory
On 09/11/2013 06:30 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
On 2013-09-11 12:02, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mer 11 septembre 2013 11:23, Alec Leamas a écrit :
On 2013-09-11 11:11, Heiko Adams wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 10:41, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
- These software inform and take permission from the user before
On 09/11/2013 10:59 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
- The software*must* inform the user and take permission before opening
ports.
Hmm, can you use this feature?:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/186797.html
I.e. you will write script, which will ask admin and open the port.
On 09/11/2013 02:18 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
IIRC Mandriva had patches which added Suggests/Recommends to RPM over 5 years
ago.
Suse as well.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:18 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
IIRC Mandriva had patches which added Suggests/Recommends to RPM over 5 years
ago.
Suse as well.
Is there a bug opened for this enhancement?
I know it has been talked about for years, but nothing has come out of
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/11/2013 08:23 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
#topic #1170 Working Group call for Volunteers
.fesco 1170
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1170
Given that Matthew wanted me to come up with a concrete,
On 09/11/2013 01:24 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Debian apt* programs have either option to always follow/not-follow
these soft-dependencies, or they will just select for installation all
packages on which the selected package(s) Depends and then nicely ask
user whether she wants to install also
Once upon a time, Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com said:
On 09/11/2013 04:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Is there a bug opened for this enhancement?
I know it has been talked about for years, but nothing has come out of
mailing list discussions. A quick BZ search
turned up nothing.
On Sep 10, 2013 8:20 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
I think the benefit of encouraging more participation through voting is a
reasonable tradeoff for this particular bit of information (voted in a
particular election, possibly
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata:
191b97e1640f8de856fc4e88efb4ea2e Module-Metadata-1.17.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/11/2013 04:39 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Is there a bug opened for this enhancement?
I know it has been talked about for years, but nothing has come out of mailing
list discussions. A quick BZ search
turned up nothing.
You are correct! To my surprise.
But this can be easily fixed:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:50:58PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:24:28PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
What is under question is that it publishes a
Summary of changes:
49cd1ff... Update to 0.009 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/11/2013 05:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Sep 10, 2013 8:20 PM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de
mailto:rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 09/11/2013 12:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
I think the benefit of encouraging more participation through voting
is a
reasonable tradeoff for
On Sep 11, 2013 7:10 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
Random crap from the internet not a good idea.
Since firefox can out and crab stuff to install, and I would never no.
No one is that insane ;) This is all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/11/2013 09:18 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.09.2013 15:05, schrieb Daniel J Walsh:
On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Although this would work for both our wifes I'd hate it myself. There
need to be some way in the interface to
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:13:04PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
I would like to ask FESCO and other to hold of any work on the
ring proposal so I can build and present to the community and we
can have the community vote on both those proposal as an way forward
for the project for the
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2013-09-12 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2013-09-12 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2013-09-12 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2013-09-12
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Eric H. Christensen
spa...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:50:58PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
No. In what election where the votes cast are secret is the fact of
voting public? I can't recall ever participating in such an election
but maybe my
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.17-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
c12d050... Update to 1.17
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/11/2013 02:41 PM, drago01 wrote:
This would be a complete chaos from a users POV. We cannot equally
support 10 different workstation or server products. Claiming
otherwise is dishonest against our users.
?
For the first we dont support anything we only provide best effort
secondly we
commit 48e91b9c20012474f17f227be17c08042499e682
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 11 16:54:20 2013 +0100
Update to 1.005
- New upstream release 1.005
- Ensured no non-core test dependencies
- Various non-functional changes to files and metadata
On 09/10/2013 10:07 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
Empathy's People Nearby feature doesn't work out of the box because
the required ports are blocked by default by the firewall
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844308). It's a similar
story with Gnome's Media Sharing feature, and I'm sure
Good day all,
Please join us today (Wednesday, September 11th) at 4PM EDT (8PM UTC)
for the Fedora ARM weekly status meeting in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
On the agenda so far..
1) Kernel Status Update
2) Aarch64 - Status Update
- Koji
3) Fedora 20 Alpha RC1
4) Weekly Status
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information,
On 09/11/2013 04:18 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
At this point, what I'd_really_ like is your help in making this work going
forward. From what you've said, I don't think we're really all that far out
of alignment, and maybe we can bring that together.
There is alot of alignment in how I see us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978233
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989486
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988805
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970567
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
Am 11.09.2013 15:05, schrieb Daniel J Walsh:
On 09/11/2013 08:56 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Although this would work for both our wifes I'd hate it myself. There need
to be some way in the interface to understand what's *really* going on
here, the ports opened, triggers etc. But not unless
Summary of changes:
48e91b9... Update to 1.005 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/11/2013 02:41 PM, drago01 wrote:
This would be a complete chaos from a users POV. We cannot equally
support 10 different workstation or server products. Claiming
otherwise is dishonest against our users.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982131
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:32 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On ons, 2013-09-11 at 12:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello,
Some time ago I've packaged Xfoil, Avl and Xrotor (which are popular
codes for foil/fluid-dynamics related computations), but I never ended
up posting a package
389-devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
Send 389-devel mailing list submissions to
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
or, via email, send a message with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:33:42 +0100
Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all. I'm the developer for PackageKit and gnome-software, the
latter being the new software center we're hopefully including as a
technical preview in Fedora 20.
snip
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:48:37 -0600
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
That's interesting - I don't see a segfault. It would seem that the
first find error comes from the strip phase (line 196 of
find-debuginfo.sh), and the second from the symlink phase (line
262).
You need to
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:00:10PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-136a237a : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-116b2278 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
Awesome. Thanks again.
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added
On 09/11/2013 05:37 PM, drago01 wrote:
Lets not discuss the word support again we have had enough threads of that.
And yes we have other desktop environments in the project but we do
not promote them equally
because we don't have the resources to support them on equal terms.
You mean Red Hat
Hi,
I know that I am off topic here, but I guess somebody here may tried to
deal with this issue. I would like to create a group on gmane.org for
jbr...@googlegroups.com list and if possible import all its messages
there (because, among reasons, it is obvious that gmane.org is much more
user
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata:
36174dd21bf9168e513c7351ef2b9f2b Module-Metadata-1.18.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2013-09-11, 15:56 GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
mc is also missing a dependency on dpkg!
Not really. If some esteemed Perl hacker here would be willing to spent
some time on /usr/libexec/mc/extfs.d/dpkg+ I think it could be possible
to get it into shape. Deb archives are nothing than else
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:46 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Any questions, either grab me on irc 'hughsie' or reply to this email.
Be sure to read [1] as a lot of common questions are answered there.
I have one question, if the data is shipped in the packages how is it
supposed to get to the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 05:22:54PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
What I see us going forward with is the core/baseOS FedoraOS that
the community delivers at large while the sub community they
themselves set the direction, their target audience and deliver
their product on top of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-136a237a : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-116b2278 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
I'm messing around a bit with the new AD support in SSSD 1.11. I've gotten
authentication working against our AD at work, but I'd like to be able to
mount the user's home folder (in our environment, it gets mapped to the
P: drive if you're logging into a Windows system that is part of the
domain)
On 09/11/2013 05:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
You want to limit the project to three official default products
I don't want to limit the project in that way.
I think these three products are reasonable starting points.
I do not and from my perspective we should only be focusing on what I
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.18-1.fc20' was created pointing
to:
7e4bd58... Update to 1.18
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7e4bd583256d802641bad5e1481c478a0eaf31e6
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Sep 11 19:41:13 2013 +0100
Update to 1.18
- New upstream release 1.18
- Re-release of de-tainting fix without unstated non-core test
dependencies
- Drop BR:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.18-1.fc21' was created pointing
to:
7e4bd58... Update to 1.18
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2013-09-11)
===
Meeting started by mmaslano at 18:00:15 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-09-11/fesco.2013-09-11-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting
Summary of changes:
c12d050... Update to 1.17 (*)
7e4bd58... Update to 1.18 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:35:34 -0400
Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com escribió:
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:46 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Any questions, either grab me on irc 'hughsie' or reply to this
email. Be sure to read [1] as a lot of
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/11/2013 05:37 PM, drago01 wrote:
Lets not discuss the word support again we have had enough threads of
that.
And yes we have other desktop environments in the project but we do
not promote them equally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:32:00 -0400
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org escribió:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:13:03PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
How shallow are Fedora contributors if a badge is what it takes to
tip them over from being non-voters to
HI
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
Can you just paste the content as the body instead of attachments in the
future? Attachments are harder to deal with for mobile devices. Thanks!
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 14:19 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
I'm messing around a bit with the new AD support in SSSD 1.11. I've
gotten authentication working against our AD at work, but I'd like to
be able to mount the user's home folder (in our environment, it gets
mapped to the P: drive if
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Almost certainly you do not want a home directory backed by a cifs
filesystem, however if you really do I suggest you configure autofs and
cifs with multi-user mounts on your machine.
It's not a question of want, I'm trying to
Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said:
- a record of who voted for what has been kept since this feature was
implemented: fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/30
http://fedorahosted.org/elections/ticket/30 in 2009. All election
software that recorded this information has kept the
Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) said:
On 09/11/2013 01:24 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Debian apt* programs have either option to always follow/not-follow
these soft-dependencies, or they will just select for installation all
packages on which the selected package(s) Depends and then nicely ask
Introduction
Based on discussions at and around Flock, the Fedora Project Board has
approved a proposal for a big change in the way we put Fedora together.
Rather than presenting one Fedora with multiple slightly-different
install options, future Fedora will be designed, developed,
Thanks to those that were able to join us for the status meeting today, for
those unable the minutes are posted below:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-09-11/fedora-meeting-1.2013-09-11-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
