The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
513
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
27
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
14
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
513
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
32
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11198/filezilla-3.7.3-1.el6
27
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 07:18:35AM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:12:31PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
Error: Auth was requested but no way to perform auth was given.
Please set username and password or session_id before calling this
function with auth=True
Could not
On 16.09.2013 07:55, P J P wrote:
Hello Tomasz,
- Original Message -
From: Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl
Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
You seem to have missed this Fedora *18* feature:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default
firewall-cmd is supposed
On Tue, 2013-09-17 at 00:04 +0200, Christian Krause wrote:
Hi,
according to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
I'd like to announce that I want to unretire the package gpx-viewer.
The package was retired because it didn't build for multiple Fedora
commit 413aa8a8f28b9394106c9d4587cde1aeae3ebc34
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Tue Sep 17 10:14:50 2013 +0200
New version 64 (#1008403)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-NumSeq.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008407
Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1008856
--
Hi Mateusz,
- Original Message -
From: Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl
Subject: Re: About F19 Firewall
Wireless networks have unique names and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named MyHomeNet
- Original Message -
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386
This still doesn't boot. (We're working on it.)
Matt,
any news on this?
Thanks
Jaroslav
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Wireless networks have unique names and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named MyHomeNet one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
and for network CoffeShowHotSpot one assigns Public zone. You
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 01:26:55PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:34:50PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
For example if you use mutt then all you need is
On 09/17/2013 11:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote:
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Wireless networks have unique names and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named MyHomeNet one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
and for
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Alpha.
This is the second attempt to release Fedora 20 Alpha.
Thursday, September 19, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
Before each public
Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Wireless networks have unique names and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named MyHomeNet one can associate Home zone in NetworkManager
and
On 17.09.2013 12:31, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Mar 17 septembre 2013 11:33, Björn Persson a écrit :
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote:
Wireless networks have unique names and are represented as different
connections on NetworkManager (network connection != interface). For
network named MyHomeNet
On 09/16/2013 11:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
Jakub Filak jfi...@redhat.com wrote:
I wonder if someday it would make sense to customize this per user?
Possibly too much complexity...
kevin
ABRT provides per component customization.
ABRT provides per component customization.
https://github.com/abrt/abrt/wiki/FAQ#component-specific-bugzilla-bug-formatting
Excellent. Given that almost no packages are shipping these, is there
any guideline or guidance how to do so? Just add them to our packages?
Anything we need to
On 09/15/2013 08:52 PM, P J P wrote:
Why are there so many chains? Most are empty. Those which have rules, jump
from one chain to another and that jumps to yet another.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907375#c2
Multicast DNS is allowed in the internal network(chain
P J P wrote:
Hmmn, it should have been a package for user to install at will, rather
than a replacement of an understandable firewall.
+1, the fact that this is opt-out rather than opt-in (even for upgrades from
Fedora ≤ 17 – I had to go out of my way to disable that feature
immediately after
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Also please note that you are not to Retire packages for stable
Fedora's we have no way to remove them and If you retire it they will
be in a weird state where the package will be in the repos and
available to install but koji will say its blocked. It will create
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes:
[...] Also please note that you are not to Retire packages for
stable Fedora's [...]
Can this be mechanically enforced?
- FChE
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:44 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:31:22AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Other things like reading from remote sites,
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 12:24 +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 11:44 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 12:21:23PM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-14 at 10:37 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 09:31:22AM
On Sun, 2013-08-18 at 16:43 +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
You definitely need the fsync before doing the fiemap.
We saw this on certain file systems including ext4 when adding
fiemap support (efficient reading of holes) to cp.
This is a bug in the fiemap interface IMHO in that it returns
fairly
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1209703/
2. xulrunner seen 10191 times (6% of all reports)
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.012-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
d8b724a... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.012-1.fc20' was created pointing to:
d8b724a... Update to 0.012
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 05:06:00 -0400 (EDT)
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386
This still doesn't
On 17.09.2013 15:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
P J P wrote:
Hmmn, it should have been a package for user to install at will, rather
than a replacement of an understandable firewall.
+1, the fact that this is opt-out rather than opt-in (even for upgrades from
Fedora ≤ 17 – I had to go out of my
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:57:55PM +0200, Michal Toman wrote:
In last two weeks these components were crashing the most:
1. kernel seen 85925 times (52% of all reports)
https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/1174076/
Hi,
the package 'xorriso' is retired, but not yet blocked, because 'cdw'
depends on it. Therefore either 'xorriso' needs to be unretired with a
review or 'cdw' needs to be retired or drop the dependency.
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
Links to all tickets
What a mess! I sure do seem to be attracted to bundled library issues, like
insects are attracted to shiny lights. :-(
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 18:03:48 -0700, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
I adopted libeio back when Node.js
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
I'd be quite happy if someone would take perl-IO-AIO off my hands. My only
interest in it is as an (optional) backend and test dependency of
perl-AnyEvent, which I co-maintain - I picked it up when a previous
maintainer
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a
summary of what I'm doing:
While looking through the packages still needing a rebuild, I have
noticed all 3 of the following:
- ExclusiveArch:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Apache-LogFormat-Compiler:
fd04ee3f4c2164b7f7909d85f11e467a Apache-LogFormat-Compiler-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I'd like to retire the python-jinja package, containing the Jinja1
template engine, which has been superseded by Jinja2 for a very long
time. Jinja2 is packaged as python-jinja2 in Fedora.
However, there's one package left that depends on it: olpc-library.
Can anyone comment on the status of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail
The lightweight tag 'perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18' was created pointing to:
5cc9e37... Update to 0.12 (documentation fixes)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
Bug ID: 1009094
Summary: RFE: Upgrade F18's perl-Try-Tiny to = 0.12
Product: Fedora
Version: 18
Component: perl-Try-Tiny
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
There's a buildroot override in place for this too.
koji wait-repo f18-build --build=perl-Try-Tiny-0.12-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009094
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1008300
--
You
# F20 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #6
# Date: 2013-09-18
# Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Go/No-Go #2 will be on this Thursday, so it's time for what will
hopefully be the last last blocker review meeting for F20 alpha.
We'll be
In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
on the builder ?
Does the build system keep the build logs of old packages, ie that
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Till Maas wrote:
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time ago, but not yet blocked:
autotrust
They might also lack a dead.package, but I will write a separate mail
about this.
Indeed. fixed. (autotools was merged
I'll look at fixing up xorriso... Upstream seems to be active.
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi all,
RC2 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-0d256e64 : us-east-1 image for i386
ami-3f256e56 : us-east-1 image for x86_64
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to files
in the release tree
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 2:30 PM, David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au wrote:
In trying to track down when a bug began showing up, I'd like to build
an earlier version of my package eg from 9 months ago (hence earlier
upstream release and different spec/patches). How can that be achieved
on the
Hello guys,
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
the
Richard Shaw wrote:
I'll look at fixing up xorriso... Upstream seems to be active.
xorriso [1] is deprecated because now it's a subpackage of libisoburn [2].
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8737
[2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=12680
--
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:52:51PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013, Till Maas wrote:
I just blocked the following packages in koji for F20+, because they
were retired some time ago, but not yet blocked:
autotrust
They might also lack a dead.package, but I will write a
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:06:42PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote:
please orphan xorriso immediately (if not already done so). The variant of
xorriso that libisoburn ships does not contain any bundled libraries, while
the stand-alone package xorriso bundles a bunch of libraries.
It is now blocked
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23:16AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
For provenpackagers who want to pitch in with OCaml builds, here's a
summary of what I'm doing:
While looking through the packages still needing a
I am no longer able to dedicate the time that the plone and zope packages
need to be able to run on Fedora. I am orphaning these packages as of today
and hope another community member is able to pick them up.
--
Jonathan Steffan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 09/17/2013 06:15 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Hi,
the package 'xorriso' is retired, but not yet blocked, because 'cdw'
depends on it. Therefore either 'xorriso' needs to be unretired with a
review or 'cdw' needs to be retired or drop the dependency.
I just blocked the following packages in koji for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-1.el6.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-1.el6.1
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-3.fc18.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-3.fc18.1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-4.fc19.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-4.fc19.1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-5.fc20.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-5.fc20.1
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-1.el5.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-1.el5.1
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #23 from Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com ---
Created attachment 798640
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=798640action=edit
amavisd.service - without socket
This is the service unit I use for amavisd-new,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
Juan Orti Alcaine juan.o...@miceliux.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #798640|0 |1
is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #25 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com ---
That's not sufficient and I tried to start a discussion at the package list how
we should be dealing with these components but that turned out to be a waste of
my time in any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #27 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #26)
(In reply to Jóhann B. Guðmundsson from comment #25)
That's not sufficient and I tried to start a discussion at the package list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-NumSeq:
a1b7833d5da6381b1ee1ce5158e19ebf Math-NumSeq-64.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
d419de3... New version 63 (#1003380) (*)
413aa8a... New version 64 (#1008403) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Summary of changes:
993036a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
eddd49b... New version (*)
d419de3... New version 63 (#1003380) (*)
413aa8a... New version 64 (#1008403) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Summary of changes:
be2775c... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass (*)
993036a... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
eddd49b... New version (*)
d419de3... New version 63 (#1003380) (*)
413aa8a... New version 64 (#1008403) (*)
(*)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #28 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com ---
Could you point me to such FESCo ticket, where this direction was approved?
The package is still working, right? So why should be removed?
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008403
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-NumSeq-64-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-NumSeq-64-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008403
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-NumSeq-64-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-NumSeq-64-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008403
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-NumSeq-64-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-NumSeq-64-1.fc18
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #29 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Marcela Mašláňová from comment #28)
Could you point me to such FESCo ticket, where this direction was approved?
Which direction would that be? and given that you
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Fatal:
3e635215d4d9d1f40b8901b7987cadb6 Test-Fatal-0.011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #30 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net ---
(In reply to Jóhann B. Guðmundsson from comment #25)
That's not sufficient and I tried to start a discussion at the package list
how we should be dealing with these
commit a0d97cf90e1a896152e0834d047aa1c04f1732b2
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Sep 17 10:32:05 2013 +0100
Update to 0.011
- New upstream release 0.011
- More clearly (and correctly) document the way NOT to use Test::Fatal
- Try to fix $TODO not working
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Fatal-0.011-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
a0d97cf... Update to 0.011
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-1.el5.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-1.el5.2
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-1.el6.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-1.el6.2
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-3.fc18.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-3.fc18.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-4.fc19.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-4.fc19.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008491
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
libstatgrab-0.17-5.fc20.2 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libstatgrab-0.17-5.fc20.2
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992675
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|20 |rawhide
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=993353
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|20 |rawhide
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992666
Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|20 |rawhide
--- Comment
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.x86_64 requires
libswipl.so.6.2.6()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Language-Prolog-Yaswi-0.21-13.fc20.i686 requires libswipl.so.6.2.6
On armhfp:
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On i386:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3)
On armhfp:
slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On armhfp:
perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires
libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6
On armhfp:
perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=695589
--- Comment #31 from Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Nicolas Mailhot from comment #30)
(In reply to Jóhann B. Guðmundsson from comment #25)
That's not sufficient and I tried to start a discussion at the package list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992709
--- Comment #8 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org ---
Thanks you very much Paul for introducing the new dependencies into Fedora,
building the new ParseUtil::Domain, and doing the update.
It's all working, and it would have taken
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On i386:
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0)
On armhfp:
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
