The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
751
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
98
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6
83
Compose started at Tue May 13 16:07:08 UTC 2014
New package: OCE-0.15-2.el7
OpenCASCADE Community Edition
New package: conntrack-tools-1.4.2-3.el7
Manipulate netfilter connection tracking table and run High
Availability
New package: fedwatch-0.4-2.el7
Hi,
I'm playing with an idea of building lua libraries against compat-lua to
allow luajit working with them. My initial motivation for this is that
there are projects which don't work with Lua-5.2 and developers for
various reasons don't want to port it to lua-5.2 yet (for example
Prosody
On even weeks WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC, 14:00 Central Europe,
8:00 (noon) Boston, 5:00 San Francisco, 21:00 Tokyo in #fedora-meeting
on Freenode.
= Topics =
* continue with https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5894
* there might be needed changes in scl-utils
* OpenFloor
--
devel
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-05-13)
Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
As packages age sometimes build requirements chance and may not be caught
by the package maintainer. Is there a known way of determining if there are
unnecessary build requirements in a package?
I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities
of the packages that the
Hello,
Red Hat is going to take over maintainership of Ceph so I'm orphaning
it and Kaleb Keithley is taking over it. Thanks,
Josef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities
of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that against
the requires of the resultant packages.
BR's don't always
Hi,
apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within the
gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from the gcc
sources, and not packaged.
Is it feasible to build libbacktrace as a shared library and ship it in
a corresponding package? Or should I rather
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within
the gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from
the gcc sources, and not packaged.
Is it feasible to build libbacktrace as a shared library
On 13.05.2014 19:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within
the gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from
the gcc sources, and not packaged.
Is it feasible to
Can dnf be made to explain conflicts? In this case, some other package needs
libLLVM-3.4 and julia needs to be rebuilt, it still wants libLLVM-3.3. Can dnf
be made to give a better explanation?
sudo dnf install julia -v
Config time: 0.005
cachedir: /var/cache/dnf/x86_64/20
Repository
Am 13.05.2014 18:23, schrieb Ville Skyttä:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the capabilities
of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check that against
the requires of the
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would think you would need to step through the BR:'s get the
capabilities
of the packages that the -devel package pull in, and then check
Planned Outage: Upgrade to pkgdb2 - 2014-05-14 12:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2014-05-14 12:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-05-14
How do I go about contacting the workstation working group?
-
Made a mistake in my original post - the package ibus-libs was not supposed
to be included.
Here is the updated command:
sudo yum remove ibus ibus-chewing ibus-gtk2 ibus-gtk3 ibus-hangul ibus-kkc
ibus-libpinyin ibus-m17n
Could someone please build that. The blank PDF print thing is a bit
annoying with 29.
Thanks,
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 14:16:10 -0700,
quickbooks office quickbooks.off...@gmail.com wrote:
How do I go about contacting the workstation working group?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Workstation has their mailing list
(they use the desktop list) and their ticket tracker.
--
devel mailing
On 13.05.2014 19:08, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 13.05.2014 19:02, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 06:56:40PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
apitrace 5.0 bundles libbacktrace, which looks like is living within
the gcc sources. libbacktrace is not build as a shared library from
the gcc
Reposted from
http://fedoramagazine.org/five-things-in-fedora-this-week-2014-05-13/
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to
On Tue, 2014-05-13 at 14:07 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
Can dnf be made to explain conflicts? In this case, some other
package needs
libLLVM-3.4 and julia needs to be rebuilt, it still wants libLLVM-3.3.
Can dnf
be made to give a better explanation?
I always use `--best`, and I have
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for stompclt:
a750fa20be60dfef1cb607331fc53241 stompclt-1.2.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094440
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Created attachment 895124
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=895124action=edit
Part3 for 6.04 to restore behavior in F19
This patch is needed for F19 only because there is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094442
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.04-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-LWP-Protocol-https-6.04-2.fc19
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058664
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
commit 3d4715eeb84d518e25828c55aa5b73a908a5d188
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 13 15:51:53 2014 +0200
Fix format-security compiler warnings
14-Fix-format-security-compiler-warnings.patch | 53
perl-eperl.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058664
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Fedora-Rebuild:
77bd547e4ffc482434e70390de715808 Fedora-Rebuild-v0.12.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 989960177e8e6068141b35caaff7aee0f2bbefff
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 13 16:42:08 2014 +0200
0.12.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec | 11 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4
Summary of changes:
9899601... 0.12.0 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 0dd875241c84b742632ddab14074d492005fcb36
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue May 13 16:42:08 2014 +0200
0.12.0 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Fedora-Rebuild.spec | 11 ---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4
commit efadb6462e7e8c667e26990be182b03caef7e57f
Author: Alexandre Beche alexandre.be...@gmail.com
Date: Tue May 13 14:30:55 2014 +0200
update to upstream version 1.2
.gitignore|1 +
sources |2 +-
stompclt.spec |5 -
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Summary of changes:
efadb64... update to upstream version 1.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097055
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-1.2-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-1.2-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Summary of changes:
efadb64... update to upstream version 1.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097055
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-1.2-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-1.2-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Summary of changes:
efadb64... update to upstream version 1.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087336
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.15-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087336
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.15-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097055
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-1.2-1.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-1.2-1.el5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Summary of changes:
efadb64... update to upstream version 1.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097055
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
stompclt-1.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stompclt-1.2-1.el6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Summary of changes:
efadb64... update to upstream version 1.2 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c797147... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
3e56233... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
2a165d1... Patch CGI::Application to prevent information disclosure (C (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora
Summary of changes:
ba38424... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*)
832697a... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*)
825b80c... Update to 0.04006 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1097538
Bug ID: 1097538
Summary: [abrt] asciio: gtk_file_system_model_sort.part.0():
perl killed by SIGABRT
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: perl-App-Asciio
On Mon, 12 May 2014 22:00:33 -0600
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
One of the things that I've wanted for taskotron is to keep the
directive documentation inside the code for those directives - similar
to how ansible does their documentation for modules [1].
[1]
49 matches
Mail list logo
