EPEL epel beta report: 20140609 changes

2014-06-09 Thread EPEL Beta Report
Compose started at Mon Jun 9 08:15:02 UTC 2014 Updated Packages: perl-Net-Statsd-0.09-1.el7 -- * Sun Jun 08 2014 David Dick dd...@cpan.org - 0.09-1 - Upgrade to 0.09 * Sat Jun 07 2014 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.08-2 - Rebuilt for

EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report

2014-06-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 778 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 232 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 113

Re: rawhide report: 20140608 changes

2014-06-09 Thread Jens Petersen
This is largely my fault, but I think I have fixed all of: ... requires libHStext-0.11.3.1-ghc7.6.3.so with a new build of ghc-text and most of ... requires libHSnetwork-2.4.1.2-ghc7.6.3.so with a ghc-network build, which I believe leaves just 13 packages linked against the wrong

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 8.6.2014 19:50, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, I am in the process of tagging the mass rebuild into f21 it will land in the next rawhide which due to the size will take some time to compose, and sync out to the mirrors The tagging script

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Neil Horman
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 08:51:06AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. You can see the current list of

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote: Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. If I do so sooner rather than later, would that clear the coda FTBFS, or is it too late to remove the

Orphaning piccolo2d

2014-06-09 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
I don't have the time and energy to maintain piccolo2d and it's no longer needed by my packages - thus orphaned now. Feel free to pick it up if you want to keep it in. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

awstats license change

2014-06-09 Thread Petr Lautrbach
Hello all, awstats-7.2 upgraded license to GPLv3+. awstats-7.2-1.fc21 is being built for Rawhide right now. Regards, Petr -- Petr Lautrbach signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F21 System Wide Change: Web Assets

2014-06-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 30.5.2014 03:03, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a): On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote: Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained different/modified version of upstream JS files. AFAICT they're both fine. rubygem-uglifier

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2014-06-09 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 13 packages were orphaned - R-bigmemory [master] was orphaned by spot Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

2014-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:19:09 +0200 Matěj Cepl mc...@cepl.eu wrote: On 2014-06-08, 13:41 GMT, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: I have the same problem for quite a while already: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pingou/subsurface/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/build-17727.log Mee too

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Hi all, We merged in the side tags on May 27, and on June 6 kicked off the mass rebuild. we are currently about 1/3rd of the way through. xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly wrong in java land:

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Original Message - From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: Hi all, We merged in the side tags on May 27,

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, June 9, 2014 6:02:08 PM Subject: Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update On Sat, 2014-06-07 at 08:51

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 1.6.2014 11:24, Till Maas napsal(a): The following packages did not build for two releases (no new build since 2013-07-25) and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone successfully builds them till then. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 16:35 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: That's likely because both OpenJDK7 and OpenJDK8 both provide java-devel (based on a the repo as it stood at yesterday's compose so it doesn't include the mass rebuild packages): # repoquery --whatprovides java-devel

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not? I notice there has not been a successful build since 2013-06-12 (approximately 1 year

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Neil Horman
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 07:34:51AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 07:13:27 -0400 Neil Horman nhor...@redhat.com wrote: Dennis, I've been considering retiring the coda package here soon. If I do so sooner rather than

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM,

hdf5 updated to 1.8.13

2014-06-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
hdf5 was updated to 1.8.13 during the rebuild - sorry for not announcing this, but I forgot I had staged this. All packages that use it need to be rebuilt. I'll try to get to them but I'm on vacation at the moment and my time is limited. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager

Re: Save everybody some surprises in Fedora 22!

2014-06-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: Hello, The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they have got recently in Yum? Or even something else! We've put together a very

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On Monday, June 2, 2014, 2:53:33 PM, Till Mass wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:01:53AM +0200, Dan Horák

Re: Qt packages necessaries to develop for Android

2014-06-09 Thread Isaac Cortés González
El jun 8, 2014 10:53 PM, Eric Smith space...@gmail.com escribió: IANAL, but multiple lawyers have told me that it is generally a bad idea to go looking for patents, at least in the US. If they're brought to your attention, you should probably do whatever is necessary to avoid them, but you

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Al Dunsmuir
On Monday, June 9, 2014, 12:08:13 PM, Richard Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM

Re: Save everybody some surprises in Fedora 22!

2014-06-09 Thread drago01
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 02:46:23PM +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote: Hello, The time when DNF will take over from Yum in Fedora is nearing. We're wondering: is there stuff people are still missing from DNF that they have

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Adam Jackson
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not? I notice there has

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Jerry James
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote: xorg-x11-docs apparently fails to rebuild because something is horribly wrong in java land: Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: org/apache/avalon/framework/configuration/ConfigurationException :

Re: Qt packages necessaries to develop for Android

2014-06-09 Thread Eric Smith
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Isaac Cortés González w.isaac.cor...@gmail.com wrote: So, should I just clone the git repositories and build from those raw sources? Sounds reasonable to me. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 05:07:14PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax Just to be clear, is hfsplus-tools still at risk of being removed or not? It's required

Re: Fedora 21 Mass rebuild update

2014-06-09 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 06/09/2014 08:31 PM, Jerry James wrote: Another source of Java build failures may be that the javapackages-tools package is not self-consistent about where maven dep fragments should live; see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106919. I believe that this is a documentation bug,

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

2014-06-09 Thread Kẏra
Kẏra kxra at riseup.net writes: Martin Stransky stransky at redhat.com writes: On 03/28/2014 11:44 AM, Kẏra wrote: First off, thank you so much for this! I have been using it and it is stunning. The difference is huge. Thanks! One thing that I have been waiting for is separate

rawhide report: 20140609 changes

2014-06-09 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Rawhide has finished composing today, but the report is about 3.4MB and I'm not sure how usefull reading every package changed is to all the subscribers of this list, so I dropped it. Summary: Added Packages: 6 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 13994 Size of added packages: 4804582 (4.6 M)

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 02:18:11PM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 17:07 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 11:24:09AM +0200, Till Maas wrote: hfsplus-toolsajax, ajax Just to be clear, is

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Dennis Gilmore
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 17:08:13 +0100 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 09:18:12PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 9 Jun 2014 00:01:34 +0100 Richard W.M.

Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

2014-06-09 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:43:07PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Can we excludearch %{arm} for this one? Why? It's a bug that it doesn't build on ARM. Refusing to build it doesn't fix the bug, and then someone else will crash into the same issue when they dare to build something that needs

Self introduction: Dave Love

2014-06-09 Thread Dave Love
I've just submitted my first package, the procenv tool for showing the process environment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127 I have more to offer which are relevant to HPC or other research computing. There's a collection of specs for packages I've installed at

Nonresponsive package maintainer: crystal

2014-06-09 Thread Ben Nemec
Hi, I sent a message about this about six months ago too, and the situation hasn't changed since then: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-December/192617.html I've tried additional ways to contact the maintainer since then, as noted in

Re: COPR can't download SRPMs?

2014-06-09 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2014-06-09, 14:21 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: This issue should be fixed now. Thanks a lot. Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Nonresponsive package maintainer: crystal

2014-06-09 Thread Christopher Meng
+1 from me. Chitlesh is inactive now, we should conside orphan all of his packages. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2014-06-09 Thread Orion Poplawski
cgnslib seems to be missing in pkgdb for some reason. Original Message Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 02:43:06 + (UTC) From: mailer-dae...@fedoraproject.org (Mail Delivery System) To: or...@fedoraproject.org This is the mail system at

Re: Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

2014-06-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 08:48:23PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: cgnslib seems to be missing in pkgdb for some reason. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cgnslib/ Though search for all should have returned it, I'm fixing that bug. Pierre -- devel mailing list

Orphaning SteGUI and fprint_demo

2014-06-09 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hi, I am orphaning SteGUI and fprint_demo in rawhide. Both are currently FTBFS and both are pretty much dead-upstream afaik. SteGUI Graphical front-end to Steghide https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/SteGUI/ fprint_demo Demo of the fprint drivers

[Bug 1105958] perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1106364

[Bug 1105958] perl-CHI: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105958 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ---

[Bug 1106308] perl-re-engine-RE2: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106308 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1106092] perl-Language-Expr: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106092 Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1105812] perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.09 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105812 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1105813] perl-Test-Harness-3.31 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105813 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

File XML-Writer-0.625.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

2014-06-09 Thread Petr Pisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Writer: b9c2420c243c6a36ce45a008740fcede XML-Writer-0.625.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-XML-Writer] 0.625 bump

2014-06-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 529bfc73349a449423ff61c2e57cd3574e3d1f11 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Mon Jun 9 13:28:07 2014 +0200 0.625 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-XML-Writer.spec | 16 ++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11

[Bug 1105814] perl-XML-Writer-0.625 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105814 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug

[perl-XML-Writer/f20] 0.625 bump

2014-06-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 9d1b429d10279f2e5715067cf04545cd898ea110 Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Mon Jun 9 13:28:07 2014 +0200 0.625 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-XML-Writer.spec | 14 +- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

[perl-XML-Writer/f19] 0.625 bump

2014-06-09 Thread Petr Pisar
commit 6b1946c10cae1165f59f6de54f4d065c7868511a Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com Date: Mon Jun 9 13:28:07 2014 +0200 0.625 bump .gitignore |1 + perl-XML-Writer.spec | 14 +- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

[Bug 1105814] perl-XML-Writer-0.625 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105814 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1105814] perl-XML-Writer-0.625 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105814 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-XML-Writer-0.625-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Writer-0.625-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1105814] perl-XML-Writer-0.625 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105814 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-XML-Writer-0.625-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Writer-0.625-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1033516] Retire perl-Class-Trigger in EPEL6

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033516 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Class-Trigger-0.13-0.2.1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Trigger-0.13-0.2.1.el6 -- You are

[Bug 1106052] perl-Gtk2-Ex-PodViewer: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106052 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1106279] perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106279 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 96346 -- You are

[Bug 1106282] perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 81645 -- You are

[Bug 1106279] perl-XML-DifferenceMarkup: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106279 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1106282] perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-XML-Hash-LX-0.06.03-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Hash-LX-0.06.03-4.fc20 -- You are

[Bug 1106282] perl-XML-Hash-LX: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106282 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1106190] perl-Pod-Xhtml: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106190 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1106035] perl-File-Flock: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106035 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1106036] perl-File-MMagic-XS: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106036 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1101217] perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101217 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1087408] Parallel-Prefork-0.15 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087408 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1095263] perl-WWW-Shorten-3.05 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095263 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1087408] Parallel-Prefork-0.15 is available

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087408 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Parallel-Prefork-0.15-

[Bug 1106081] perl-IPTables-libiptc: FTBFS in rawhide

2014-06-09 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1106081 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||CPAN 96352 -- You are

[389-devel] revised: Ticket 47813 - Managed entry plugin fails to update managed entry pointer on modrdn

2014-06-09 Thread Mark Reynolds
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47813 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47813/0001-Ticket-47813-managed-entry-plugin-fails-to-update-me.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel