On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:55 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:44:28 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 20:58, Petr Machata pisze:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183573
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:44:28 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 20:58, Petr Machata pisze:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch build is here:
commit b95de639b6795095db9a208254a92da02b82262e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 19 22:45:56 2015 +
Update to 0.64
- New upstream release 0.64
- Resolve an edge-case with DEPRECATED (CPAN RT#101555)
- Make %files list more explicit
.gitignore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183580
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 02:41:25PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 13:59:29 +0100
Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Rawhide smuxi builds seem blocked on Koji; this is my third attempt:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Load-Conditional:
13389177eac7a006917b83f8305eabe4 Module-Load-Conditional-0.64.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 14:23 -0500, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 15:39 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
There's a chance of a successful exploitation that would result
in obtaining my privileges. Sure, gaining access to my account
is bad enough, but if I run su or sudo,
Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 20:58, Petr Machata pisze:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch build is here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8665932
Can you do builds on secondary architectures as well? arm-koji for
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 23:44:28 +0100
Petr Machata pmach...@redhat.com wrote:
Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 20:58, Petr Machata pisze:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch build is here:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Eval-Closure-0.12-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
7b63739... Update to 0.12
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.64-1.fc22' was created
pointing to:
b95de63... Update to 0.64
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 01/19/2015 01:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/19/2015 01:17 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
mailto:fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote a slightly broader proposal, also covering SSE2 (for i386),
and (since today)
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 23:44, Petr Machata pisze:
Marcin Juszkiewicz mjuszkiew...@redhat.com writes:
W dniu 19.01.2015 o 20:58, Petr Machata pisze:
I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week. A scratch build is here:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8665932
Can you do builds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183231
lnie l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
--- Comment #3
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Eval-Closure:
dcde50625dd9bc22888fedb3e8cecd4b Eval-Closure-0.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 7b63739f6d0c739e0e059695e9706521d4dbe81f
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jan 19 22:27:04 2015 +
Update to 0.12
- New upstream release 0.12
- Fix tests under blead (GH#4)
perl-Eval-Closure.spec | 16 +++-
sources|
License of httpcomponents-client was changed from ASL 2.0 to
ASL 2.0 and MPL, starting with version 4.4.
This is because httpclient 4.4 includes public suffix list from
Mozilla: https://publicsuffix.org/list/effective_tld_names.dat
--
Mikolaj Izdebski
Software Engineer, Red Hat
IRC: mizdebsk
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180476
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183571
Bug ID: 1183571
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.84 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183584
Bug ID: 1183584
Summary: perl-Net-Pcap-Easy-1.4210 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Pcap-Easy
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183585
Bug ID: 1183585
Summary: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.80.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Whois-Raw
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949460
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 01/09/2015 12:16 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
at least i doubt there is a noticeable userbase with i686 running
Fedora at all *and* would notice the drop noticeable
all of the OLPC XO 1.0 and 1.5 devices are running i686 fedora, that
userbase is in the millions, but would they notice the
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote a slightly broader proposal, also covering SSE2 (for i386), and
(since today) off_t and ino_t:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modernise_GCC_Flags
Would that make it impossible to run fedora on
On 19/01/15 12:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/19/2015 01:17 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
mailto:fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote a slightly broader proposal, also covering SSE2 (for i386),
and (since today) off_t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178801
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 01/07/2015 02:30 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
We just went over something very much like this for x86_64 packages
with FESCo ticket 1113:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1113
Could you perhaps review that and elaborate on the differences between
that proposal and this one if there are any?
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 19.01.2015 um 13:17 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
mailto:fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote a slightly broader proposal, also covering SSE2
Am 19.01.2015 um 13:23 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Yes, but test coverage for those CPUs is already rather poor, so I
don't expect them to work anymore.
OK, thanks. Guess I'll have to switch my PIII and Athlon MP relics to
at least i doubt there is a noticeable userbase with i686 running
Fedora at all *and* would notice the drop noticeable
all of the OLPC XO 1.0 and 1.5 devices are running i686 fedora, that
userbase is in the millions, but would they notice the performance
drop I do not know.
As far as I
On 01/19/2015 01:41 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/19/2015 01:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
No, because you need GCC 5 for that (ok, have scratch rpms now for that),
and very recent binutils (2.25 we have in F22 is not enough).
Hi,
Would that make it impossible to run fedora on sse-only i686 CPUs?
Yes, but test coverage for those CPUs is already rather poor, so I don't
expect them to work anymore.
See other replies, people are running such machines.
Given x86_64 exists for many years and even embedded (see
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 14:35 -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On 12/08/2014 09:47 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
to be honest - the energy these old machines have wasted the last years
could have payed recent hardware and the combination of a bleeding edge
distribution and more than a decade old hardware is questionable
That
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:37:29PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/19/2015 01:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
No, because you need GCC 5 for that (ok, have scratch rpms now for that),
and very recent binutils (2.25 we have in F22 is not enough).
Ugh, this seems to suggests to defer the PIE
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:59:32PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
It
is an ABI change. IMHO very much undesirable. Just complain to people that
build their packages without it where it matters.
Some core libraries use off_t or struct stat in public header files, so we
already have the ABI
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/19/2015 03:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
at least i doubt there is a noticeable userbase with i686 running
Fedora at all *and* would notice the drop noticeable
all of the OLPC XO 1.0 and 1.5 devices are running
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:45:23PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Unfortunately it needs an updated libtool ...
Sure, one needs to build libtool too.
Error: Package: libtool-2.4.2-31.fc22.aarch64 (@rawhide)
Requires: gcc = 4.9.2
Removing:
sorry for top-post, but one more thing to consider, if caching would be
used, are secondary arches - how it would affect their ability to build
the buildroots
Dan
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 11:07:53 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:27:07AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-18 at 14:35 -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On 12/08/2014 09:47 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, Zbigniew
On 01/19/2015 03:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
at least i doubt there is a noticeable userbase with i686 running
Fedora at all *and* would notice the drop noticeable
all of the OLPC XO 1.0 and 1.5 devices are running i686 fedora, that
userbase is in the millions, but would they notice the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997645
Adam Benjamin aeben...@opentext.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--- Comment
Hi,
I've got sflphone (SIP/IAX2 compatible softphone) up for review at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180698
Not high priority, but a nice to have. Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks,
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:10:14AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Jakub:
I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 03:20:54PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 08:10:14AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com
wrote:
Am 19.01.2015 um 15:28 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
Would that make it impossible to run fedora on sse-only i686 CPUs?
Yes, but test coverage for those CPUs is already rather poor, so I don't
expect them to work anymore.
See other replies, people are running such machines.
Given x86_64 exists
On 01/19/2015 10:29 AM, Yanko Kaneti wrote:
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 10:19 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
License of httpcomponents-client was changed from ASL 2.0 to ASL
2.0 and MPL, starting with version 4.4.
This is because httpclient 4.4 includes public suffix list from
Mozilla:
On 13. 1. 2015 at 16:41:46, Colin Walters wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:06 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
== Scope ==
* Other developers:
*** Use systemd-tmpfiles instead of placing content in /var (TODO:
better docs for this)
Is this a strict dependency or a nice-to-have item?
On 01/09/2015 12:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Also, the number of relocations and
memory consumption got up.
Non-PIE cc1plus:
Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x187d30 contains 190 entries:
Relocation section '.rela.plt' at offset 0x188f00 contains 284 entries:
GNU_RELRO 0x1d14730
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183231
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment
On Mon, 2015-01-19 at 10:19 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
License of httpcomponents-client was changed from ASL 2.0 to ASL
2.0 and MPL, starting with version 4.4.
This is because httpclient 4.4 includes public suffix list from
Mozilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183581
Bug ID: 1183581
Summary: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable-0.0014 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooseX-Object-Pluggable
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183582
Bug ID: 1183582
Summary: perl-MooX-Options-4.015 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MooX-Options
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183587
Bug ID: 1183587
Summary: perl-Statistics-Descriptive-3.0608 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Statistics-Descriptive
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
- Original Message -
Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
Please note, that this proposal is absolutely not about imposing some
restrictions on who can/should maintain what. It's really just a
categorization of packages based on our WG's perception of importance to
Fedora.
Sure, but there is
On 01/19/2015 01:17 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
mailto:fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote a slightly broader proposal, also covering SSE2 (for i386),
and (since today) off_t and ino_t:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178789
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183580
Bug ID: 1183580
Summary: perl-Module-Load-Conditional-0.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-Load-Conditional
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183578
Bug ID: 1183578
Summary: perl-Math-Base36-0.13 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-Base36
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183588
Bug ID: 1183588
Summary: perl-Test-Harness-3.35 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Harness
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183590
Bug ID: 1183590
Summary: perl-Test-Spec-0.49 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Spec
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183589
Bug ID: 1183589
Summary: perl-Test-Moose-More-0.026 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Moose-More
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi everyone!
Tomorrow is the last day/chance to submit your system wide changes
for Fedora 22 [1]! Your proposed change has to be at least in ready
for Wrangler state.
For policies, check out [2]. Empty template is available at [3].
All changes approved so far are available on the ChangeSet [4]
Hi everyone!
Tomorrow is the last day/chance to submit your system wide changes
for Fedora 22 [1]! Your proposed change has to be at least in ready
for Wrangler state.
For policies, check out [2]. Empty template is available at [3].
All changes approved so far are available on the ChangeSet [4]
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 01:11:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 01/09/2015 12:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Also, the number of relocations and
memory consumption got up.
Non-PIE cc1plus:
Relocation section '.rela.dyn' at offset 0x187d30 contains 190 entries:
Relocation section
Am 19.01.2015 um 13:17 schrieb Alexander Ploumistos:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com
mailto:fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
I wrote a slightly broader proposal, also covering SSE2 (for i386),
and (since today) off_t and ino_t:
commit 4dc17e12527be52132d00db1ce8bbdd88a7ae2e4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 19 10:40:24 2015 +0100
Run-require IPC::System::Simple for fatalizing system()
perl-autodie.spec | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 10615c832543777a140f1ac31c130f7e813c2bca
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 19 10:40:24 2015 +0100
Run-require IPC::System::Simple for fatalizing system()
perl-autodie.spec | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183231
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183577
Bug ID: 1183577
Summary: perl-Getopt-Long-2.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Getopt-Long
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183575
Bug ID: 1183575
Summary: perl-File-RsyncP-0.74 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-File-RsyncP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183576
Bug ID: 1183576
Summary: perl-Filter-1.54 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Filter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183573
Bug ID: 1183573
Summary: perl-Eval-Closure-0.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Eval-Closure
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183592
Bug ID: 1183592
Summary: perl-XML-LibXSLT-1.93 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-LibXSLT
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183594
Bug ID: 1183594
Summary: perl-YAML-1.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-YAML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: psab...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183591
Bug ID: 1183591
Summary: perl-version-0.9911 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-version
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Compose started at Mon Jan 19 05:15:05 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
On 01/19/2015 01:15 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
No, because you need GCC 5 for that (ok, have scratch rpms now for that),
and very recent binutils (2.25 we have in F22 is not enough).
Ugh, this seems to suggests to defer the PIE change to Fedora 23. :-(
Would it still make sense to proceed with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183572
Bug ID: 1183572
Summary: perl-Directory-Scratch-0.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Directory-Scratch
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183574
Bug ID: 1183574
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess-0.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-CppGuess
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, but test coverage for those CPUs is already rather poor, so I don't
expect them to work anymore.
OK, thanks. Guess I'll have to switch my PIII and Athlon MP relics to
something like Gentoo or Arch.
--
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183568
Bug ID: 1183568
Summary: perl-Class-MethodMaker-2.22 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Class-MethodMaker
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183569
Bug ID: 1183569
Summary: perl-Compress-Bzip2-2.20 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Compress-Bzip2
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183231
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-autodie-2.25-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-autodie-2.25-3.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-PPPort:
080ecae5b12b86bf9ebec04d77848c18 Devel-PPPort-3.28.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d4e7a49cfc3fb8b6a565976e1acdae2a8cbe6b56
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 19 17:24:56 2015 +0100
3.28 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Devel-PPPort.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180476
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180479
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47990
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47990/0001-Ticket-47990-Add-upgrade-function-to-lib389.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Dne 19.1.2015 v 17:32 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a):
Hi!
As FESCO denied mass rebuild of F22, I've adjusted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
the current rpms are built with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98
thus will not have standard conforming std::string/std::list by default,
and
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 06:26:49 +1030
William B will...@firstyear.id.au wrote:
Right now, enabled unbound and dnssec-trigger on a laptop is an
extremely difficult experience.
Can you tell why you're trying that. Everyone I talk to always
go unbound, unbound, unbound... WHY? Unbound is plain
On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 11:22:57 +0100
Marcel Oliver m.oli...@jacobs-university.de wrote:
Are these considered bugs that I should file against the package? Is
there a policy that applies?
I think you should file. I had in the past made maintainers of gvim
(vim-X11) and evince take action to fix
Hi!
As FESCO denied mass rebuild of F22, I've adjusted
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
the current rpms are built with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98
thus will not have standard conforming std::string/std::list by default,
and I'd like to include gcc 5 in F22 anyway, just only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006931
Adam Benjamin aeben...@opentext.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--- Comment
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47989
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47989/0001-Ticket-47989-Windows-Sync-accidentally-cleared-raw_e.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:58:06 +0100
Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/07/2015 02:30 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
We just went over something very much like this for x86_64 packages
with FESCo ticket 1113:
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015, at 07:02 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
I have hard time figuring out what exactly is the purpose of including the
factory reset feature in your proposal. No offense but unless I'm missing
something, it seems to me that you are trying to solve some of ostree
problems
in the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180497
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
UTF-8 reimplementations of File::Find and Cwd were moved into a separate
distributions. File::Find::utf8 and Cwd::utf8 has to be packaged first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
7 packages were orphaned
goocanvas2 [el6] was orphaned by moezroy
A new canvas widget for GTK+ that uses cairo for drawing
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
