https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195014
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9021120
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195012
Bug ID: 1195012
Summary: perl-Alien-SDL-1.446 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Alien-SDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195019
Bug ID: 1195019
Summary: perl-Tk-804.033 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Tk
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195013
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9021034
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
mjuszkiew...@redhat.com wrote:
On 18.02.2015 16:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 02/18/2015 04:12 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm running into an issue where odb
Hi,
I started rebuilding about 260 select packages for the following Fedora 23
Change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code
I only rebuilt packages that were installed on a test system and not yet
built with the harden build flags. The
Hi,
the GNU Scientific Library (GSL) contains some linear algebra routines
that need a CBLAS library to work.
GSL contains a compatibility CBLAS library (gslcblas) that provides a
version of these routines. In 2010, we started to link libgsl by a
Fedora patch to libgslcblas, so linking to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195019
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9021558
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)
On x86_64:
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)
On i386:
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)
perl-SVK has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-SVK-2.0.2-1.el5.noarch requires perl(SVN::Mirror) = 0:0.71
On x86_64:
perl-SVK-2.0.2-1.el5.noarch requires perl(SVN::Mirror) = 0:0.71
On i386:
perl-SVK-2.0.2-1.el5.noarch requires perl(SVN::Mirror) = 0:0.71
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)
On x86_64:
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)
On i386:
perl-Getopt-GUI-Long-0.91-5.el5.noarch requires perl(Gtk2)
perl-XML-Xerces has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.ppc requires libxerces-c.so.27
On x86_64:
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.x86_64 requires libxerces-c.so.27()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.i386 requires
perl-SystemC-Vregs has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
emacs-vregs-mode-1.463-1.el5.noarch requires emacs(bin) = 0:22.1
On x86_64:
emacs-vregs-mode-1.463-1.el5.noarch requires emacs(bin) = 0:22.1
On i386:
emacs-vregs-mode-1.463-1.el5.noarch requires
perl-SVK has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-SVK-2.0.2-1.el5.noarch requires perl(SVN::Mirror) = 0:0.71
On x86_64:
perl-SVK-2.0.2-1.el5.noarch requires perl(SVN::Mirror) = 0:0.71
On i386:
perl-SVK-2.0.2-1.el5.noarch requires perl(SVN::Mirror) = 0:0.71
perl-XML-Xerces has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree:
On ppc:
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.ppc requires libxerces-c.so.27
On x86_64:
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.x86_64 requires libxerces-c.so.27()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-XML-Xerces-2.7.0_0-4.el5.i386 requires
On 2/19/15, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
The package rebuild is now complete.
I've rebuilt mldonkey with 2 patches written by myself, one is against
ocaml 4.02 and the other one is again gcc5. Its code still stick at
decade ago.
By the way there are many new syntax restrictions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195013
Bug ID: 1195013
Summary: perl-B-Keywords-1.14 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-B-Keywords
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195012
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9021010
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hi,
I started rebuilding about 260 select packages for the following Fedora 23
Change:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code
I only rebuilt packages that were installed on a test system and not yet
built with the harden build flags. The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177672
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195014
Bug ID: 1195014
Summary: perl-Digest-CRC-0.21 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Digest-CRC
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Working on the ownCloud package today, it occurred to me that we
probably have quite a lot of packages carrying Apache access control
snippets around, like these:
(allow only local)
IfModule mod_authz_core.c
# Apache 2.4
Require local
/IfModule
IfModule !mod_authz_core.c
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 1:00 AM, Pete Travis li...@petetravis.com wrote:
On Feb 20, 2015 2:09 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
I wanted to give a heads-up to the wider audience about a number of
workstation changes that are landing in the f22 branch (and rawhide)
this week, in
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On i386:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On armhfp:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =
polymake has broken dependencies in the F-22 tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On i386:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.i686 requires perl = 4:5.20.1
On armhfp:
polymake-2.13-18.git20141013.fc22.armv7hl requires perl =
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 10:11 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you be more specific? What kind of systems? What didn't work?
I tested the 20150218 image in a vm and when it booted, gdm did not
display the user list and there was no way to lift the screen lock.
Also, I was unable to
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 07:28:50PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:21:59PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
How is a PDF with a binary payload any different? Sounds like we need
to be running pdf
The following packages did not build for two
releases and will be retired soon, unless someone rebuilds them.
If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Package
user: tibbs set for jehane acl: approveacls of package:
perl-Parallel-ForkManager from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Parallel-ForkManager
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: tibbs set for jehane acl: approveacls of package:
perl-Parallel-ForkManager from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Parallel-ForkManager
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: tibbs set for jehane acl: approveacls of package:
perl-Parallel-ForkManager from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Parallel-ForkManager
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
user: tibbs set for jehane acl: approveacls of package:
perl-Parallel-ForkManager from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Parallel-ForkManager
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
The following packages did not build for two
releases and will be retired soon, unless someone rebuilds them.
If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Package
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 05:12:36PM +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
Package(co)maintainers Status Change
===
bfgminer orphan, pwouters 1
user: tibbs set for jehane acl: approveacls of package:
perl-Parallel-ForkManager from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Parallel-ForkManager
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150221. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:28:09PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:55:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
1. fedup --network rawhide : failed with a missing image?
Why doesn't it work by default?
Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks good here, and
Same experience with gdm-3.15.90.1-1.fc23 here. I had to downgrade to
gdm-3.15.3.1-4.fc22.x86_64 to be able to log in again. Nevertheless, this seems
to be know issue, since there is already this [1] commit in dist-git,
unfortunately the associated sources are missing so far :/
[1]
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Vit Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Same experience with gdm-3.15.90.1-1.fc23 here. I had to downgrade to
gdm-3.15.3.1-4.fc22.x86_64 to be able to log in again. Nevertheless, this
seems to be know issue, since there is already this [1] commit in dist-git,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194975
Bug ID: 1194975
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20150220 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194975
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9015636
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Ray Strode halfl...@gmail.com wrote:
odd i thought i built that yesterday. something must have went wrong,
will built it today
I guess I got distracted and didn't upload the source tarball. building now.
In the meantime, you can workaround the bug by
Hello!
My name is Dave Melia and I am in the processes of becoming a package
maintainer for the Fedora Project.
I am a Linux Engineer for The Hut Group, and I became interested in
becoming a package maintainer after building packages for our internal
repo at work. We use Cobbler as our
Hey Bruno,
Thank you for pointing me in the right direction, I appreciate it!
Regards,
Dave
On 2015-02-21 20:38, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 20:30:47 +,
Dave Melia d...@thinklinux.co.uk wrote:
Hey,
Thank you Matthew!
I'm curious as to where I could find who
commit 7b7da7f9c9c262bf56fd0e8d08aff3a64b5bff68
Author: Till Maas opensou...@till.name
Date: Sat Feb 21 22:17:46 2015 +0100
Rebuilt for Fedora 23 Change
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code
perl.spec | 6 +-
1 file
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1036
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
490
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
254
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
100
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
18
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0610/qpid-cpp-0.30-9.el7
16
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1036
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
125
So I found that I had somehow gotten black holed on IUS emails and cleaned
that up today. In doing so I found they have an Python34u already in their
archives
http://dfw.mirror.rackspace.com/ius/stable/CentOS/7/SRPMS/
has a list of packages which they contain. I haven't looked too closely to
see
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 01:47:53PM +, Dave Melia wrote:
I have been passionate about Linux and Open Source for ~15 years and
have always wanted to contribute and give back to the community.
Unfortunately my coding skills would not be up to standard and my
technical writing is terrible...
2015-02-14 17:11 GMT-02:00 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com:
In my case, I was updating coin-or packages when one of then
started failing at link time, only on i686, like this:
undefined reference to
Summary of changes:
583dbc4... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_M (*)
ff606ee... Perl 5.20 rebuild (*)
80b0b7d... Fix local build from dist-git (*)
6c5008f... Build-require Devel::PPPort (*)
8169088... Update to version 1.19 (*)
(*) This commit already existed
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 04:33:41AM +0100, Lars Seipel wrote:
Any new package that is *not* going to be part of the install media set
is required to pass a lighter review and is permitted to carry bundled
libraries, with caveats to be listed below.
What would be the place for higher-quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188541
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
External Bug ID||CPAN 102269
--
You
Hey,
Thank you Matthew!
I'm curious as to where I could find who maintains, for example, screen;
or even vim?
Do I search Bugzilla or is there somewhere else?
Regards,
Dave
On 2015-02-21 19:25, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 01:47:53PM +, Dave Melia wrote:
I have
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 20:30:47 +,
Dave Melia d...@thinklinux.co.uk wrote:
Hey,
Thank you Matthew!
I'm curious as to where I could find who maintains, for example,
screen; or even vim?
Do I search Bugzilla or is there somewhere else?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb will tell
59 matches
Mail list logo
