F-23 Branched report: 20151028 changes

Compose started at Wed Oct 28 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Summary: Added Packages: 0 Removed Packages: 0 Modified Packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 (0 ) Size change of modified packages: 0 (0 ) Size of removed packages: 0 (0 ) Size change: 0 (0 ) Compose finished at Wed Oct 28 11:35:23 UTC

spot pushed to perl-Test-MockModule (master). "0.11"

From 431c20693006dd0d1f0d201de671961bf248f52d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 09:18:15 -0400 Subject: 0.11 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Test-MockModule.spec | 9 ++--- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed,

Re: Upgrading F24 to F25 : http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:43:26AM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm spending a bit of time getting distro upgrades using GNOME > Software working on rawhide. I've put in a lot of the lower levels of > making this work, but I'm stuck for a data source. Who is responsible > for

[Bug 1266890] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266890 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11612326 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1276020] New: perl-Net-GitHub-0.79 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276020 Bug ID: 1276020 Summary: perl-Net-GitHub-0.79 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-GitHub Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1266890] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266890 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1087229 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1087229=edit [patch] Update to 2.91 (#1266890) -- You are

spot uploaded Test-MockModule-0.11.tar.gz for perl-Test-MockModule

736fa14f2cdda27cf9df034a5b2816f1 Test-MockModule-0.11.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-MockModule/Test-MockModule-0.11.tar.gz/md5/736fa14f2cdda27cf9df034a5b2816f1/Test-MockModule-0.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Re: Upgrading F24 to F25 : http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:43:26AM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm spending a bit of time getting distro upgrades using GNOME > Software working on rawhide. I've put in a lot of the lower levels of > making this work, but I'm stuck for a data source. Who is responsible > for

[Bug 1268513] perl-PDF-Create-1.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268513 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1266890] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266890 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1268513] perl-PDF-Create-1.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268513 --- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. cmd: spectool -g /var/tmp/thn-TYy01i/perl-PDF-Create.spec return code: 22 stdout: Getting

Chromebook/Installer Crash bug fix?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135793 The comments mention that this patch ( http://repo.or.cz/syslinux.git/commit/0a2dbb3392ee710838bea6bda80d4daad6b54780) fixes the bug and has been merged into upstream, however, the installer still crashes at EDD probe for me. How can I tell if

Upgrading F24 to F25 : http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt

Hi all, I'm spending a bit of time getting distro upgrades using GNOME Software working on rawhide. I've put in a lot of the lower levels of making this work, but I'm stuck for a data source. Who is responsible for keeping http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt up to date? If this is

[Bug 1276015] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-5.041 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276015 Bug ID: 1276015 Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-5.041 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Dist-Zilla Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Upgrading F24 to F25 : http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:43:26AM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > I'm spending a bit of time getting distro upgrades using GNOME > Software working on rawhide. I've put in a lot of the lower levels of > making this work, but I'm stuck for a data source. Who is responsible > for keeping

Re: Packaging question on MPI requires

Sandro Mani writes: >> I think that depends on whether you want to enable anything other than >> C(++), Python, and Fortran MPI packages (generally, not specifically in >> relation to the dependency stuff). I know I should have raised this >> before and probably somewhere

Re: Self Introduction: Dutch Lamberson

Welcome Chris! While unfortunately I cannot do anything about sponsorship/formal review, I did leave a few notes on your Bugzilla that you can chew over. Also, I strongly suggest you use Copr[0] to continuously test your build changes. It makes it much easier to see results and do more immediate

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc2

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc23

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1262404] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262404 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 738 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893 libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 503 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 353

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc23

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

Re: Upgrading F24 to F25 : http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt

On 28 October 2015 at 13:06, Matthew Miller wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/#list_collections > From the comments on the ticket, apparently you said this would be > fine. :) Ha! Okay, thanks. Turns out I'm working on too many things at the same time

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1262404] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262404 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1262405] CVE-2015-4499 bugzilla: Email address is not properly validated during registration [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262405 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- bugzilla-4.4.10-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1272278] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9156 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272278 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.91.56-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-28)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2015-10-28 18:00 UTC' Links to all tickets

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20151028 compose check report

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 11:58 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud disk raw i386 > Cloud disk raw x86_64 > Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 > > Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151027: > > Minimal disk raw armhfp > > Images in Rawhide 20151027 but not

Re: daveisfera's odb_2.3_cern copr build of odb for epel-5-i386 finished with 'failed'

Hi, On Dom, 2015-10-25 at 20:50 -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > The links in the above email don't work. For example, the "Build log" > link says "Content Encoding Error" when I load it in Firefox: >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 233 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 129 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7 37

System V to systemd unit migration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At the FESCo meeting on October 14th, it was ​decided that the time has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init scripts. What does this mean for you as a packager? When we branch from Rawhide for Fedora 24 (currently ​scheduled

System V to systemd unit migration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At the FESCo meeting on October 14th, it was ​decided that the time has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init scripts. What does this mean for you as a packager? When we branch from Rawhide for Fedora 24 (currently ​scheduled

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 129 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 112 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 106

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-28)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCo (2015-10-28) === Meeting started by rishi at 18:01:07 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-10-28/fesco.2015-10-28-18.01.log.html . Meeting summary

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

I also sent a notice to Fedora's python list, pinged the relevant IRC channel and have generally tried to let people know about this. The actual macros are in the pagure repo but there's still more work to be done. https://pagure.io/python-macros - J< -- devel mailing list

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2015 03:54 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > At the FESCo meeting on October 14th,

BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires This is *not* required for pure Python packages, only for packages compiling native extensions: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=6908337 Can we change this guideline to say packages should: BuildRequires: python2

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

On 28/10/15 19:12, Mike Bonnet wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires This is *not* required for pure Python packages, only for packages compiling native extensions: Are you sure? Don't you need them for the RPM macros they contain? Tom -- Tom Hughes

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

Luckily I saw this. The best way to make sure the packaging committee sees this kind of thing is to open a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ However, I don't believe your assertion to be true. python*-devel is the package with the dependency on the RPM macros; if you depend only on python

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

On 10/28/15 12:21 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: Luckily I saw this. The best way to make sure the packaging committee sees this kind of thing is to open a ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ However, I don't believe your assertion to be true. python*-devel is the package with the

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

> "MB" == Mike Bonnet writes: MB> That sounds like a good plan. Is this work being tracked anywhere? As you might expect, in an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567 - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > At least ceph appears to have systemd support upstream already, Yep! We're waiting for Ceph upstream to release a stable version of the 9.x series (codenamed "Infernalis"), and then we can ship this in Rawhide. I anticipate

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > At the FESCo meeting on October 14th, it was ​decided that the time > has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init > scripts. What does this

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

On 10/28/15 12:30 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "MB" == Mike Bonnet writes: MB> That sounds like a good plan. Is this work being tracked anywhere? As you might expect, in an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567 Thanks! I'll follow along there. -- devel

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 14:12 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > At the FESCo meeting on October 14th, it was decided that the time > has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init > scripts. What does this mean for you as a packager? > > When we branch from Rawhide for Fedora 24

[Bug 1274981] perl-Test-Strict-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274981 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-10-29 16:00 UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-10-29 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-10-29 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2015-10-29 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2015-10-29

[Bug 1268518] perl-Test-Strict-0.28 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268518 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Strict-0.30-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to

Updating VTK to 6.3.0 in rawhide

I'm uppdating VTK to 6.3.0 in rawhide tomorrow. Rebuild in COPR went okay so I'm not expecting any issues: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/orion/vtk6.3/ -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380

Looking for someone to take over Asterisk and related packages

So, after almost 10 years, it's time to find someone else to take over the Asterisk packages. If you're interested, reply to the list. I'd prefer if someone with proven packaging skills would step up - Asterisk has several security-related releases a year in addition to several bug-fix releases

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

On 28/10/15 19:47, Adam Jackson wrote: As a quick audit (based on 'grep _initrddir' and 'grep _initddir' over a fairly recent checkout of the spec files in pkg git, and then some manual inspection) I think the following packages will be affected: ...and initscripts for network and netconsole

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

Am 28.10.2015 um 22:27 schrieb Tom Hughes: On 28/10/15 19:47, Adam Jackson wrote: As a quick audit (based on 'grep _initrddir' and 'grep _initddir' over a fairly recent checkout of the spec files in pkg git, and then some manual inspection) I think the following packages will be affected:

Re: System V to systemd unit migration

On Wed, 28.10.15 14:12, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > At the FESCo meeting on October 14th, it was ​decided that the time > has come to finally complete the migration away from System V init > scripts. What does this mean for

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-10-28)

Sorry for missing the meeting but as I said during the previous meeting, I'll be in Japan until 11/3 due to the OpenStack summit. It was quite late for me. I'll also miss next week meeting as I'll be flying back home. Regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

dfateyev uploaded enum-1.11.tar.gz for perl-enum

61b1a67dfaf8e16db0c3e80824797c1b enum-1.11.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-enum/enum-1.11.tar.gz/md5/61b1a67dfaf8e16db0c3e80824797c1b/enum-1.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (master). "perl-enum: 1.11 release"

From 63e5fb6e19caf04cc46c84c75e1454ed517c2bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:29:34 +0600 Subject: perl-enum: 1.11 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-enum.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

[Test-Announce] Fedora 23 Final Release Candidate 6 (RC6) Available Now!

On our modified schedule [1], Fedora 23 Final Release Candidate 6 (RC6) is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! RC6 resolves a KDE blocker that was thought fixed in RC5, but wasn't. It also pulls in FE fixes to abrt/libreport and libssh, so please test

rawhide report: 20151028 changes

Compose started at Wed Oct 28 05:15:04 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0

Re: BuildRequires: pythonN-devel unnecessary

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > > On 28/10/15 19:12, Mike Bonnet wrote: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#BuildRequires >> >> This is *not* required for pure Python packages, only for packages >> compiling native extensions: > > > Are you

[Bug 1275854] perl-enum-1.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- dfateyev's perl-enum-1.11-1.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=694902 -- You are receiving this mail

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (el5). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 0d5f980ee034b64684a362e967f2f4260cbd2db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:07:57 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-enum.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (el5). "perl-enum: 1.11 release"

From 63e5fb6e19caf04cc46c84c75e1454ed517c2bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:29:34 +0600 Subject: perl-enum: 1.11 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-enum.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (el5). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From 3f2de0415f476c8384c935241284159b0267f701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:42:18 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (el6). "perl-enum: 1.11 release"

From 63e5fb6e19caf04cc46c84c75e1454ed517c2bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:29:34 +0600 Subject: perl-enum: 1.11 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-enum.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (epel7). "perl-enum: 1.11 release"

From 63e5fb6e19caf04cc46c84c75e1454ed517c2bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:29:34 +0600 Subject: perl-enum: 1.11 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-enum.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From 3f2de0415f476c8384c935241284159b0267f701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:42:18 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (el6). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From 3f2de0415f476c8384c935241284159b0267f701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:42:18 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (epel7). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 0d5f980ee034b64684a362e967f2f4260cbd2db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:07:57 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-enum.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (el6). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 0d5f980ee034b64684a362e967f2f4260cbd2db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:07:57 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-enum.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (f22). "perl-enum: 1.11 release"

From 63e5fb6e19caf04cc46c84c75e1454ed517c2bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:29:34 +0600 Subject: perl-enum: 1.11 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-enum.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (f22). "Perl 5.22 rebuild"

From 0d5f980ee034b64684a362e967f2f4260cbd2db6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:07:57 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/perl-enum.spec

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (f22). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild"

From 3f2de0415f476c8384c935241284159b0267f701 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:42:18 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-enum.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

dfateyev pushed to perl-enum (f23). "perl-enum: 1.11 release"

From 63e5fb6e19caf04cc46c84c75e1454ed517c2bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Denis Fateyev Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:29:34 +0600 Subject: perl-enum: 1.11 release --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-enum.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3

[Bug 1275854] perl-enum-1.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-enum-1.11-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-e13b808f61 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1275854] perl-enum-1.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-enum-1.11-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-cd858d820c -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1275854] perl-enum-1.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-enum-1.11-1.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 5. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8dcbb233a2 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1275854] perl-enum-1.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1275854] perl-enum-1.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275854 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-enum-1.11-1.el5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 5. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8dcbb233a2 --- Comment #6 from Fedora