Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

David Woodhouse wrote: > Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream > publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the ^ and if the upstream tarball can legally be redistributed as is > package

Re: Chromium

Tomas Popela wrote: > Why do you think that Tom has to look at the qt5-qtwebengine package > when that package reuses our stuff from Chromium packaging? Because I have additional changes that the Chromium packaging does not have, or at least did not have last I checked? I have at least: *

Re: iproute package update policy

On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 12:38:09 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Xose Vazquez Perez > wrote: > > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > >> There is no need to call this ridiculous or nonsense. There have > >> been valid reasons brought up in this very

[Bug 1317254] perl-Canary-Stability-2011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317254 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Canary-Stability-2011-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1317254] perl-Canary-Stability-2011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317254 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1318069] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318069 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.96-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1318069] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318069 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED

[Bug 1319536] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319536 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1319536] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160320 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319536 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160320-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48492: heap corruption at schema replication.

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48492 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48492/0001-Ticket-48492-heap-corruption-at-schema-replication.3.patch git patch file (master) -- revised so that the nsslapd-enquote-sup-oc info is passed to openldap parser. -- 389-devel mailing list

[Bug 1303793] perl-Tk-Text-SuperText-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303793 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1140204 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1140204=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1303793] perl-Tk-Text-SuperText-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303793 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1303793] perl-Tk-Text-SuperText-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303793 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1303793] perl-Tk-Text-SuperText-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303793 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Tk-Text-SuperText and version 0.10 FAILED. See for details -- You are receiving this mail because: You

Re: Orphaning willie, the irc bot

> My understanding is that wille was renamed to sopel. Do we have a > process for dealing with those kinds of changes? If you're talking about to keep the upgrade path intact, propably: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages -- devel mailing

Re: Orphaning willie, the irc bot

> I've orphaned willie package cause upstream is dead. … > It's suggested to use sopel instead, it's not yet packaged. > https://github.com/sopel-irc/sopel To be fully right, I decided to directly retire the package, cause upstream is definitely dead, at least with the old name willie. -- devel

Re: Orphaning willie, the irc bot

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Raphael Groner wrote: > I've orphaned willie package cause upstream is dead. > > I can not fix bug #1138618 for several reasons: > new tarball from pypi with new version 5.5.1 maybe but that tarball misses > - COPYING (was available in

Orphaning willie, the irc bot

I've orphaned willie package cause upstream is dead. I can not fix bug #1138618 for several reasons: new tarball from pypi with new version 5.5.1 maybe but that tarball misses - COPYING (was available in 4.5.0) though no idea how to handle EFL in such a case - docs (was available in 4.5.0)

qt-creator license change to GPLv3 with exceptions

Hi Starting with qt-creator 4.0.0-beta1 (landing in rawhide very soon), qt-creator will be licensed GPLv3 with exceptions. Previous releases were LGPLv2 with exceptions or LGPLv3 with exceptions. See also [1]. Sandro [1] http://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/03/23/qt-creator-4-0-beta-released/ --

[EPEL-devel] Re: using epel-rpm-macros

And I just pulled two random package with EL6 branches, changed %doc to %license in the appropriate places, and built them in mock. Everything came out as expected (no build failures, and the license files are in with the rest of the documentation). So I unfortunately have no idea what might be

Call for help contacting contributors

Dear all, Packagers, members of the fedorabugs group and people having a 'watchbugzilla' ACL in pkgdb must have a bugzilla account attached to the email they set in the Fedora Account System (FAS). This is mandatory to allow ACLs to be propagated from pkgdb to bugzilla, allowing the right person

Re: Status of XRDP in F23+

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:26 PM Timotheus Pokorra < timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com> wrote: > Hello Christopher, > > please check [1] if your bug has been reported already. > Or report new bugs at [2], and hopefully the maintainers (see list at > [3]) should reply on the bugs. > > Timotheus >

Appstream metainfo.xml for fonts

Is the recent Appstream guideline for fonts [1] applicable for Gnome Software? While reading it for preparing the metainfo.xml, I noticed these following lines: For fonts, the |%{id}|must be the name of the font or font bundle without whitespaces, and must be suffixed with |.font|. Can

[EPEL-devel] Re: using epel-rpm-macros

> "DL" == Dave Love writes: DL> How is the epel-rpm-macros package supposed to work? I have DL> epel-rpm-macros-6-4 installed, which is up-to-date against DL> epel-testing, and is supposed to make %license work like %doc but DL> doesn't seem to have any effect.

Re: Status of XRDP in F23+

Hello Christopher, please check [1] if your bug has been reported already. Or report new bugs at [2], and hopefully the maintainers (see list at [3]) should reply on the bugs. Timotheus [1]: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/xrdp/bugs [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com [3]:

Announce: blivet-2.0.0

Hi everyone, I would like to announce the release of blivet-2.0.0[1]. See the release notes[2] for information about all of the changes in this version and the documentation[3] for the public API specification. Some of the larger changes:  - full PEP8 compliance  - thread-safety  - added support

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 381 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 143 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 19

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 277 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 259 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 253

Status of XRDP in F23+

Hi, I sent a message to the users@ list[1] about XRDP, and didn't get a response. I'm curious what's the status of XRDP in Fedora. I tried to get it to work in the AWS cloud image for Fedora 23, and it didn't work (could authenticate, but it couldn't start vnc/gnome, but couldn't figure out why).

Re: iproute package split

Hello, On 03/22/2016 09:47 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:14PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: Hi, I am in the process of splitting the 'tc' utility off from iproute package. The motivation for this comes from two things: 1) Due to it's xt/ipt action, tc

[Bug 1320979] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320979 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e5a6c2a05b -- You are receiving

[Bug 1320979] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320979 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25cee5908f -- You are receiving

[Bug 1318069] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.96 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318069 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25cee5908f -- You are receiving

[Bug 1320979] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320979 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3351690e6a -- You are receiving

[Bug 1320979] perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320979 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-DateTime-TimeZone (f22). "1.97 bump"

From 0b71aadef06f115b6741f4a9c6ee86cd2fcfcd13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:05:13 +0100 Subject: 1.97 bump --- ...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:28:45AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream > > publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the > > package *must* verify those signatures as part of %prep. > >

jplesnik pushed to perl-DateTime-TimeZone (master). "1.97 bump"

From 7b493b7ec8625db63c8a4ea81f77b734a8ef369f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:05:13 +0100 Subject: 1.97 bump --- ...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --

jplesnik pushed to perl-DateTime-TimeZone (f23). "1.97 bump"

From ab15bed9d77e90cb2f8adcfc8b55871ca44fbf6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:05:13 +0100 Subject: 1.97 bump --- ...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --

jplesnik pushed to perl-DateTime-TimeZone (f24). "1.97 bump"

From 9ccba9fd28dfd2215e967591052247bea0bcbe22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:05:13 +0100 Subject: 1.97 bump --- ...etc-localtime-by-DateTime-TimeZone-Tzfile.patch | 78 --

jplesnik uploaded DateTime-TimeZone-1.97.tar.gz for perl-DateTime-TimeZone

51dacb4bcc21d4d603ab08e50a5aeb7a DateTime-TimeZone-1.97.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-TimeZone/DateTime-TimeZone-1.97.tar.gz/md5/51dacb4bcc21d4d603ab08e50a5aeb7a/DateTime-TimeZone-1.97.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 47888 - DES to AES password conversion fails if a backend is empty

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48777 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48777/0001-Ticket-47888-DES-to-AES-password-conversion-fails-if.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@%(host_name)s http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1300602] Upgrade perl-Lucy to 0.4.3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300602 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Lucy (master). "0.4.4 bump"

From 051537ef144f77dbc4aac20640ac54aff781c285 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:22:51 +0100 Subject: 0.4.4 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Lucy.spec | 9 ++--- sources| 2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4

jplesnik uploaded Lucy-0.4.4.tar.gz for perl-Lucy

f5bc66311d2a883481f984ef913fd911 Lucy-0.4.4.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Lucy/Lucy-0.4.4.tar.gz/md5/f5bc66311d2a883481f984ef913fd911/Lucy-0.4.4.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1320979] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1320979 Bug ID: 1320979 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.97 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] using epel-rpm-macros

How is the epel-rpm-macros package supposed to work? I have epel-rpm-macros-6-4 installed, which is up-to-date against epel-testing, and is supposed to make %license work like %doc but doesn't seem to have any effect. I get the same errors using %license in %files as without it installed

[Bug 1185328] perl-Encode-2.68 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185328 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1305061] perl-Encode-2.80 breaks sending email by bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061 --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- 2.83 still encodes everything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

ppisar pushed to perl-Encode (master). "2.83 bump"

From d5140be41d1b82c41d88bf9ed517b9e5a7a17692 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 12:10:20 +0100 Subject: 2.83 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Encode.spec | 11 +++ sources | 2 +- 3 files changed,

ppisar uploaded Encode-2.83.tar.gz for perl-Encode

0d3f59e8ea704497647eded665919053 Encode-2.83.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Encode/Encode-2.83.tar.gz/md5/0d3f59e8ea704497647eded665919053/Encode-2.83.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Orphaning pyicq-t package

Dear all, I'm orphaning the package pyicq-t in all branches. The last upstream release was at the end of 2009. Best wishes, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Orphaning pyicq-t package

Dear all, I'm orphaning the package pyicq-t in all branches. The last upstream release was at the end of 2009. Best wishes, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305061] perl-Encode-2.80 breaks sending email by bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305061 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|latest perl-Encode breaks |perl-Encode-2.80 breaks

[Bug 1308596] Upgrade perl-Data-Validate-IP to 0.25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308596 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Validate-IP-0.25-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-212ff719a5 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1308596] Upgrade perl-Data-Validate-IP to 0.25

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308596 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Data-Validate-IP (f24). "0.25 bump"

From 856bb16db0ae594845d52e01963a0b331fb29aee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:54:06 +0100 Subject: 0.25 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec | 15 --- sources| 2 +-

jplesnik pushed to perl-Data-Validate-IP (master). "0.25 bump"

From 21ee4fd710a3d68f69e2d4a057fe5df861a5bff3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:54:06 +0100 Subject: 0.25 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Data-Validate-IP.spec | 15 --- sources| 2 +-

jplesnik uploaded Data-Validate-IP-0.25.tar.gz for perl-Data-Validate-IP

c203de9ba205ad3f557f260b23595b14 Data-Validate-IP-0.25.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Data-Validate-IP/Data-Validate-IP-0.25.tar.gz/md5/c203de9ba205ad3f557f260b23595b14/Data-Validate-IP-0.25.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Re: [HEADS UP] libgit2 bump to 0.24.0

Ok, I will prepare libgit2 and related packages update in one week for f24. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:39 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > On 03/22/2016 01:29 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46:58PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> On 03/21/2016 07:28

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[Bug 1118240] puic4 is broken: fix provided

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118240 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Qt-0.96.0-15.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6ccdbda73a -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1118240] puic4 is broken: fix provided

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118240 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Qt-0.96.0-18.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8bce2346c2 -- You are receiving this mail

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

David Woodhouse wrote: > Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream > publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the > package *must* verify those signatures as part of %prep. I just thought of something that shouldn't be forgotten: How would this

[Bug 1118240] puic4 is broken: fix provided

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118240 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Qt-4.14.3-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8052a09647 -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (f22). "Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC (..more)"

From 481f8433d6f4df4a5143ff9957654ec6a8f18706 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:55:30 +0100 Subject: Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC It passes on ppc64le. --- perl-Qt.spec | 7

[Bug 1308595] Upgrade perl-Convert-Binary-C to 0.78

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308595 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (f23). "Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC (..more)"

From ef52ff9a8f195d4500102ddad6516ed81bde41d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:55:30 +0100 Subject: Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC It passes on ppc64le. --- perl-Qt.spec | 7

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (f24). "Remove unused patches"

From a3f5fa63b7cc81680e146cd5e89157ad5c7b5938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:00:30 +0100 Subject: Remove unused patches --- ...Fix-problems-with-puic4-x-code-generation.patch | 129 -

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (f24). "Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC (..more)"

From fefe3c0aafca4509194327c54dbabe8603d5b8c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:55:30 +0100 Subject: Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC It passes on ppc64le. --- perl-Qt.spec | 7

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC (..more)"

From fefe3c0aafca4509194327c54dbabe8603d5b8c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 09:55:30 +0100 Subject: Disable perlqt_qtcore4_handlers test failing on big-endian 64-bit PowerPC It passes on ppc64le. --- perl-Qt.spec | 7

ppisar pushed to perl-Qt (master). "Remove unused patches"

From a3f5fa63b7cc81680e146cd5e89157ad5c7b5938 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:00:30 +0100 Subject: Remove unused patches --- ...Fix-problems-with-puic4-x-code-generation.patch | 129 -

jplesnik pushed to perl-Convert-Binary-C (master). "0.78 bump"

From 36634615251392887763d2cf189836c7dd1413d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:00:36 +0100 Subject: 0.78 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Convert-Binary-C.spec | 13 +++-- sources| 2 +- 3

jplesnik uploaded Convert-Binary-C-0.78.tar.gz for perl-Convert-Binary-C

89ebf7298890c1a98098006b40c62828 Convert-Binary-C-0.78.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Convert-Binary-C/Convert-Binary-C-0.78.tar.gz/md5/89ebf7298890c1a98098006b40c62828/Convert-Binary-C-0.78.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

Broken dependencies: perl-Dumbbench

perl-Dumbbench has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Dumbbench-BoxPlot-0.10-2.fc24.noarch requires perl(SOOT) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list