[Bug 1341358] perl-Dancer2-0.200000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1341446] New: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0125 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341446 Bug ID: 1341446 Summary: perl-XML-LibXML-2.0125 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-XML-LibXML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341437] perl-Gearman-1.12.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341437 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1341437] perl-Gearman-1.12.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341437 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Gearman-1.12 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[Bug 1341437] perl-Gearman-1.12.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341437 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1163480 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163480=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1341437] New: perl-Gearman-1.12.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341437 Bug ID: 1341437 Summary: perl-Gearman-1.12.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Gearman Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341444] New: perl-Test2-Workflow-0.000009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341444 Bug ID: 1341444 Summary: perl-Test2-Workflow-0.09 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test2-Workflow Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1341443] New: perl-version-0.9917 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341443 Bug ID: 1341443 Summary: perl-version-0.9917 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-version Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Howard Chu wrote: > DJ Delorie wrote: >> >> >> Lennart Poettering writes: >>> >>> Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes >>> to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-31)

Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: >> smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter) >> kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires >> plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) = 0.1 >> smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires kdebase-runtime =

[Bug 1341394] New: perl-Locale-Codes-3.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341394 Bug ID: 1341394 Summary: perl-Locale-Codes-3.39 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Locale-Codes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341394] perl-Locale-Codes-3.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341394 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Locale-Codes-3.38 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[Bug 1341394] perl-Locale-Codes-3.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341394 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1341394] perl-Locale-Codes-3.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341394 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1163436 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163436=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1341393] New: perl-Pod-Checker-1.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341393 Bug ID: 1341393 Summary: perl-Pod-Checker-1.73 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Pod-Checker Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341390] New: perl-PDL-2.016 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341390 Bug ID: 1341390 Summary: perl-PDL-2.016 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PDL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1341385] perl-IO-Pty-Easy-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341385 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1163429 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163429=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1341385] perl-IO-Pty-Easy-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341385 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-IO-Pty-Easy-0.09 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[Bug 1341385] perl-IO-Pty-Easy-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341385 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Following patches has been unapplied: ['IO-Pty-Easy-0.09-Fix-a-race-in-t-read-write.t-test.patch'] -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1341385] New: perl-IO-Pty-Easy-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341385 Bug ID: 1341385 Summary: perl-IO-Pty-Easy-0.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-IO-Pty-Easy Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341383] New: perl-Moose-2.1803 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341383 Bug ID: 1341383 Summary: perl-Moose-2.1803 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Moose Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341375] New: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00014 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341375 Bug ID: 1341375 Summary: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00014 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1341374] New: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341374 Bug ID: 1341374 Summary: perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.26 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-ChangeNotify Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1341373] New: perl-Date-Manip-6.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341373 Bug ID: 1341373 Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.54 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Date-Manip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341371] New: perl-App-Cme-1.012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341371 Bug ID: 1341371 Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-Cme Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341360] New: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.42 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341360 Bug ID: 1341360 Summary: perl-Capture-Tiny-0.42 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Capture-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341362] New: perl-Carp-Clan-6.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341362 Bug ID: 1341362 Summary: perl-Carp-Clan-6.06 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Carp-Clan Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341368] New: perl-Check-ISA-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341368 Bug ID: 1341368 Summary: perl-Check-ISA-0.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Check-ISA Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341367] perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1163404 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163404=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1341367] perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.19 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[Bug 1341367] New: perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367 Bug ID: 1341367 Summary: perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-F77 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341367] perl-ExtUtils-F77-1.20 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341367 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1341366] perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.161520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.160410 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1341366] perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.161520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1163403 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163403=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1341366] New: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.161520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366 Bug ID: 1341366 Summary: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.161520 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Crypt-PBKDF2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1341366] perl-Crypt-PBKDF2-0.161520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341366 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1341358] perl-Dancer2-0.200000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1163391 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1163391=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1341358] perl-Dancer2-0.200000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1341358] perl-Dancer2-0.200000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Dancer2-0.166001 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. --

[Bug 1341358] New: perl-Dancer2-0.200000 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341358 Bug ID: 1341358 Summary: perl-Dancer2-0.20 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Dancer2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1315525] perl-Net-DNS-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315525 --- Comment #11 from Paul Wouters --- revoked, investigating -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-31)

FYI, I have taken hardlink. Co-maintainers as always welcome. kevin pgpa_wyYTa4VM.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-31)

On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter) > kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires > plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) = 0.1 > smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires kdebase-runtime = >

[389-devel] Re: Please comment: [389 Project] #48404: /usr/lib64/dirsrv/libnunc-stans.so is owned by both -libs and -devel

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 12:49 -0700, Noriko Hosoi wrote: > William raised a good point in fixing this ticket #48404. > > We have *.so and *.so.* (*.so # & *.so.#.#.#) for libraries. I assumed  > *.so should be in 389-ds-base-devel and *.so.* should be in  > 389-ds-base-libs.  But it is not needed

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On May 31, 2016 3:24 PM, "Howard Chu" wrote: > > DJ Delorie wrote: >> >> >> Lennart Poettering writes: >>> >>> Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes >>> to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a >>>

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

DJ Delorie wrote: Lennart Poettering writes: Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for user code to stick around after

Re: Package retired by was taken (by me)

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > Hello Till, > > It seems that s3ql package was retired today however I took the > package on 2016-05-16 and update it week later, see BZ #1249301 > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249301

Package retired by was taken (by me)

Hello Till, It seems that s3ql package was retired today however I took the package on 2016-05-16 and update it week later, see BZ #1249301 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249301 Best regards. - Athmane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-05-31)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-05-31)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-31)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-31)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On 05/29/2016 05:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > >> If there is a systematic >> problem of badly written code leaving orphaned code running when >> a user logs out, then that broken code should be fixed instead of >> adding

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 345 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 328 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 322

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On May 31, 2016 15:44, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > > On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:26 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: > > What if the Anaconda team changed it so the "Make this user an > > administrator" checkbox also enabled linger? > > anaconda team is (rightly) opposed to

[Bug 1323532] perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323532 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020-1.

[Bug 1323532] perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323532 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1338418] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338418 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160520-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1338418] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016

[Bug 1323532] perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323532 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1338431] perl-Thread-Queue-3.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Thread-Queue-3.11-1.fc

[Bug 1338431] perl-Thread-Queue-3.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338431 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Thread-Queue-3.11-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1338418] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338418 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160520-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1323532] perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323532 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Twitter-4.01020-1.

[Bug 1338418] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20160520 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2016

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 15:26 -0400, Eric Griffith wrote: > What if the Anaconda team changed it so the "Make this user an > administrator" checkbox also enabled linger? anaconda team is (rightly) opposed to anything like this, in terms of magic code in anaconda that changes things. All that box

Re: [Modularity] WG meeting time

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Langdon White wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately, I heard from some of the new voting members that the current > Modularity WG meeting time is not doable for them. Please use the link below > to help us figure out a new time. > >

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 3:20 PM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Lennart Poettering writes: > > Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes > > to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a > > privilieged concept. It

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

Lennart Poettering writes: > Again, as mentioned before: key here is that permitting user processes > to stick around after all sessions of the user ended needs to be a > privilieged concept. It should not be allowed for user code to stick > around after logout, unless this

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

Lennart Poettering writes: > Sorry, but systemd is pretty exactly this: a process babysitter. It's becoming a user nanny instead. I wish it would stop trying to enforce its "my way or the highway" approach to system rules. I've been playing whack-a-mole trying to keep up

Re: jwm

On 31 May 2016 at 12:39, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> They usually have a 60 hour a week job > > I hope this isn't accurate...? I don't know. I was using an old data point where people in the US software

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 11:56 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400,

Re: jwm

On Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:31:04 PM CDT Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: > > On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > >> On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 11:31 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week

Re: jwm

On 31 May 2016 18:02, "Major Hayden" wrote: > > On 05/31/2016 11:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > > I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH programmers usually work 60 hours per week? "On average", full time means 40 to 44 hours around the world.

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On 05/27/2016 01:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: It seems to me systemd should be able to know the difference between a program that's zombie or unresponsive but isn't doing anything or is unresponsive but is doing something; and if not then some way for programs to say "hey wait just a minute, I

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 01:59 PM, Rich Megginson wrote: On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't

Re: What to do with application that only works in some desktops

Matthias Clasen: > How did you determine that NotShowIn=GNOME; doesn't have any effect? > It should work fine to hide xpenguins from the places where > applications are normally listed in GNOME (the shell overview and > search). It should? Then I'll try it again; I probably made some kind of

Re: What to do with application that only works in some desktops

On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 18:54 +0200, Göran Uddeborg wrote: > Hello! > > I would like to ask for some help what to do with > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324881  I've been > pondering it for some time, but I know too little to know what to do. > > It's about the old amusement

RFC: Round 2 review of Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines

Hello all, I had previously sent out a RFC email about a month ago asking for feedback on the Fedora Docker Layered Image Guidelines[0]. I was asked by FESCo to start a new thread so that this can be discussed further on the devel mailing list before we discuss it in FESCo. Therefore if there

Re: Fedora Developer Portal as a application

Hi Owen, right now I wasn't thinking about other plans. Atm I am trying to get it working correctly with Epiphany instead of Electron, so we would be able to push the package into Fedora (this can take really long time, depends on how Epiphany developers will be willing to help me). -- Best

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 11:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: > I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH > programmers usually work 60 hours per week? "On average", full time means 40 > to 44 hours around the world. I've even seen 30 hours being called full time > in some job

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 10:42 AM, Bernardo Sulzbach wrote: On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering

[Bug 1315525] perl-Net-DNS-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315525 --- Comment #10 from Harald Reindl --- it's one hting that DNF is crap (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341282) and pulling a ton of dependencies but then conflict it one of the pulled dependencies? what

What to do with application that only works in some desktops

Hello! I would like to ask for some help what to do with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324881 I've been pondering it for some time, but I know too little to know what to do. It's about the old amusement xpenguins. (A program showing small penguins walking on the windows and

Re: jwm

On 05/31/2016 01:39 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? I didn't write about it myself, but was left wondering anyways. Do RH programmers usually work 60 hours per

Re: jwm

On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 17:17 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > They usually have a 60 hour a week job I hope this isn't accurate...? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1335443] Net::SSLeay produces a warning on EOF

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335443 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@yars.free.net

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-DNS (f23). "Remove OS_CONF from requires"

From 82dcfc45080f648ff05b9a6aede9663381e6f7b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:19:24 +0200 Subject: Remove OS_CONF from requires --- perl-Net-DNS.spec | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-DNS (f24). "Remove OS_CONF from requires"

From a14bcadb9f4cf7da2490bdfe8e1c03b869b8c056 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:19:24 +0200 Subject: Remove OS_CONF from requires --- perl-Net-DNS.spec | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Fedora 24-20160531.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/73 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 19888 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/19888 ID: 19892 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso

[Bug 1315525] perl-Net-DNS-1.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315525 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jplesnik's perl-Net-DNS-1.06-2.fc25 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=769553 -- You are receiving this mail

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-DNS (master). "Remove OS_CONF from requires"

From b2047bac7c5d29610ff61084dc8947c7aa0cf19c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 17:12:13 +0200 Subject: Remove OS_CONF from requires --- perl-Net-DNS.spec | 6 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Installation Media

On Monday, May 30, 2016 5:31:58 PM CDT Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:28:59AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Koji Generates Installation Media = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KojiInstallMedia > > > > Change owner(s): > > * Jay

Re: Fedora Developer Portal as a application

Hi Petr and Frantisek, Are there future plans for developing this further, or is the goal just to have the website running in an application-style window? - Owen - Original Message - > Hi folks, > > I am happy to announce, Frantisek Zatloukal did Fedora Developer Portal > package [1].

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160531.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-24-20160530.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160531.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:14 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 47 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.56 MiB Size of dropped packages:28.25 MiB

Fedora Rawhide-20160531.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 35/67 (x86_64), 9/16 (i386) ID: 19800 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Branched 20160531.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 24 Branched 20160531.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

eseyman pushed to perl-Search-Elasticsearch (master). "Update to 2.03"

From 854764164e2f099dcf1cf3309257b78c753e47db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 15:27:55 +0200 Subject: Update to 2.03 --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Search-Elasticsearch.spec | 7 +-- sources| 2

eseyman uploaded Search-Elasticsearch-2.03.tar.gz for perl-Search-Elasticsearch

aaeabf3d365582e630dfa4508dfee2d5 Search-Elasticsearch-2.03.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Search-Elasticsearch/Search-Elasticsearch-2.03.tar.gz/md5/aaeabf3d365582e630dfa4508dfee2d5/Search-Elasticsearch-2.03.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG

  1   2   >