jplesnik uploaded Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6004.tar.gz for perl-Math-BigInt-GMP

54b416fe577512691a97b9a06f8ca2ffc4ab63e0d11325f5926c42a4248b87325c2b5db0c57b2239819e863891ea40ab028b0f061ed9c8bbbf6886c467cb8d1e Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6004.tar.gz

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On 01/05/2017 11:36 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On 01/05/2017 08:19 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: Even if we had this capability, I'm not sure if we would use it in rawhide. It could considerably increase the size of the dependency information. You would remove "temporary versions" with official

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Hughes wrote: >> I believe it's referring to the use of /usr/bin/env as mentioned here: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_(draft) > > Note that this is a draft guideline that was voted down:

[Bug 1395714] perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395714 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-Server-2.008-6.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-be111c323f -- You are receiving this mail

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

Tom Hughes wrote: > I believe it's referring to the use of /usr/bin/env as mentioned here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Script_Interpreters_(draft) Note that this is a draft guideline that was voted down:

fenris02 pushed to perl-Net-Server (f25). "Bug 1395714 - perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6"

From db820ebff9915413600e60278115c7868fecde97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "d. johnson" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:50:01 -0600 Subject: Bug 1395714 - perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6 --- perl-Net-Server.spec | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6

fenris02 pushed to perl-Net-Server (f24). "Bug 1395714 - perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6"

From db820ebff9915413600e60278115c7868fecde97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "d. johnson" Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 22:50:01 -0600 Subject: Bug 1395714 - perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6 --- perl-Net-Server.spec | 7 ++- 1 file changed, 6

fenris02 pushed to perl-Net-Server (f24). "Perl 5.24 rebuild"

From 1b9932f0ace44e6744869594bcd4635fe667aa0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 04:03:28 +0200 Subject: Perl 5.24 rebuild --- perl-Net-Server.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

fenris02 pushed to perl-Net-Server (f24). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From 482cbc6fd1168bdb12cddd3fac80af54934e5d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 10:41:32 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

Hans de Goede wrote: > First the what: ever since AMD and NVIDIA started shipping > their own Linux drivers we have had multiple competing > implementations of libGL.so.1 (and friends) where the way > the linker works means that there can be only one. > This has made installing AMD or NVIDIA's

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

Hi Michael, On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Dude it looks like you have a tracking pixel in your mail: > > http://405n.mj.am/oo/AEUAHWjyTGwAAC8AAAMA > AAQnNwBYl01S75wFdcYGRwyu2D_3puuyegAD-So/0b56895f/e.gif" height="1" >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 700 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 462 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 181

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 578 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 572 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 503

[EPEL-devel] epel7 noarch rpms in a repo?

I am working with Centos7-armv7. Unfortunately there is no epel for it. At this time. For starters I need: perl-Log-Log4perl amavisd-new clamav clamd Plus whatever dependencies they need. I also now, from when I built a Redsleeve6 server a couple years ago I also need: roundcubemail

[Bug 1417503] perl-Mojolicious-7.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1417503 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1419374] New: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419374 Bug ID: 1419374 Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.6004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: question about dnf builddep with some deps missing on some arches

On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Sun, 2017-02-05 at 18:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > systemd.spec file has > > %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 aarch64 > > BuildRequires:  gnu-efi gnu-efi-devel > > %endif > > > > ... and this seems to work fine in

Re: question about dnf builddep with some deps missing on some arches

On Sun, 2017-02-05 at 18:29 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > systemd.spec file has > %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 aarch64 > BuildRequires:  gnu-efi gnu-efi-devel > %endif > > ... and this seems to work fine in mock/koji/etc. > > dnf builddep deals file with an srpm built on the

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

Dude it looks like you have a tracking pixel in your mail: http://405n.mj.am/oo/AEUAHWjyTGwAAC8AAAMA AAQnNwBYl01S75wFdcYGRwyu2D_3puuyegAD-So/0b56895f/e.gif" height="1" width="1" alt="" border="0" style="height:1px;width:1px;border:0;"/> Is that intentional? What's up with

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

On Sun, 2017-02-05 at 09:10 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > This also mostly explains the why of this change, > except for why also bring it to Fedora 25 and not > just to Fedora 26 and later? > > The main reason for this is a non-technical reason, > we (as in the Fedora project) have quite vocally

[Bug 1415825] rt package lacks dependencies on Data::Page and Data::Page:: Pageset

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

Hi, On 05-02-17 20:35, Christian Dersch wrote: Hi all, On 02/05/2017 09:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: This also mostly explains the why of this change, except for why also bring it to Fedora 25 and not just to Fedora 26 and later? The main reason for this is a non-technical reason, we (as in

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

Everybody has made some valid points, but as far as pushing to F25 stable goes, there may be an undetermined number of people who -unaware of this discussion and for whatever reason- already have libglvnd and relevant packages installed from testing. I'm not sure that someone who was advised in a

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

Hi all, On 02/05/2017 09:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > > This also mostly explains the why of this change, > except for why also bring it to Fedora 25 and not > just to Fedora 26 and later? > > The main reason for this is a non-technical reason, > we (as in the Fedora project) have quite vocally

Re: Bodhi bug

On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 11:02:40 -0700 Jerry James wrote: > I've got 3 updates where something weird happened. Is this a known > bodhi issue? First is this update: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b4d8e33d45 > > I created it to contain updates for both

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

On 02/05/2017 09:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, So a lot has been said about $subject and FESco has asked me to send a mail to the devel list describing the what and why of this change. My view: This change is way too radical to apply it to a distribution midst lifetime of its release.

question about dnf builddep with some deps missing on some arches

systemd.spec file has %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 aarch64 BuildRequires: gnu-efi gnu-efi-devel %endif ... and this seems to work fine in mock/koji/etc. dnf builddep deals file with an srpm built on the architecture: $ fedpkg clone -a systemd && cd systemd && fedpkg srpm $ sudo dnf builddep *.src.rpm

[Bug 1331520] Please update perl-Crypt-SMIME to at least 0.15 in EPEL 6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331520 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot --- Hi Steve, Bumping this again. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

Bodhi bug

I've got 3 updates where something weird happened. Is this a known bodhi issue? First is this update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-b4d8e33d45 I created it to contain updates for both F-24 and F-25 for python-BTrees. As you can see, it contains two instances of the

Re: overriding CXX_FLAGS

On Tue, 24 Jan, 2017 at 07:06:14 GMT, Mattia Verga wrote: > In the latest version of RawTherapee, developers suggest the use of > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="-std=c++11". > > I've tried to modify the .spec file with > -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -std=c++11" [1], but koji still use > "-std=c++11

Re: The glvnd + mesa update for F25

On 02/05/2017 03:10 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi All, So a lot has been said about $subject and FESco has asked me to send a mail to the devel list describing the what and why of this change. There's two issues here that are important not to conflate: whether the glvnd update should go into

Re: rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

On 05/02/17 16:05, Pranav Kant wrote: I have been trying to fix this rpmlint error in one of my package that I maintain. I can't recall this rpmlint error popping up in previous updates I pushed for this package, so this looks something new to me. See the only failed automated test results

rpmlint: wrong-script-interpreter

Hi all, I have been trying to fix this rpmlint error in one of my package that I maintain. I can't recall this rpmlint error popping up in previous updates I pushed for this package, so this looks something new to me. See the only failed automated test results here[1]. 1) How can I fix this

Fedora Rawhide-20170205.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 63/96 (x86_64), 13/17 (i386) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170204.n.0): ID: 56362 Test: x86_64

[Bug 1419322] New: perl-Term-Clui-1.71 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419322 Bug ID: 1419322 Summary: perl-Term-Clui-1.71 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Term-Clui Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1395714] perl-Net-Server should depend on perl-IO-Socket-INET6

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1395714 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Thanks for the reply. I have # rpm -q perl-Net-Server perl-Net-Server-2.008-4.fc24.noarch According to koji, there have been no builds of perl-Net-Server for F24

Re: Fedora 25 defaults to X instead of wayland

I believe there is something wrong in the recent (several months) nouveau driver. So chances are high that your machine will default to Wayland as soon as you switch off secondary videochip. There are some rhbz tickets related though. 05 фев 2017 г. 11:52 пользователь "Timothy Ward"

Broken dependencies: perl-IPTables-libiptc

perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-19.fc25.x86_64 requires libxtables.so.11()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-19.fc25.armv7hl requires libxtables.so.11 On ppc64le:

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-3.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-3.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Fedora 25 defaults to X instead of wayland

Just wanted the links to more information on what will cause gdm and session manager to default to X instead of wayland. Have a laptop and desktop with fully updated system with debug package repos active and both systems default to X and will not start on wayland. This was not he case with

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

The glvnd + mesa update for F25

Hi All, So a lot has been said about $subject and FESco has asked me to send a mail to the devel list describing the what and why of this change. First the what: ever since AMD and NVIDIA started shipping their own Linux drivers we have had multiple competing implementations of libGL.so.1 (and

Re: Is it possible to manually insert shared library deps in an RPM?

On 02/05/2017 01:32 AM, David Howells wrote: Panu Matilainen wrote: %if %{__isa_bits} == 64 Requires: libisl.so.15()(64bit) %else Requires: libisl.so.15() %endif That doesn't work. It complains about illegal characters. Sure it works. It's copy-pasted from a