[Bug 1422296] perl-Test-Moose-More-0.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422296 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Intent to orphan: trac-defaultcc-plugin , trac-condfieldsgenshi-plugin

I was maintaining these packages for use with fedorahosted trac instances. Since fedorahosted is being retired, I'm really not interested in them any more, so I'm planning to orphan them soon. Anyone who wants them is welcome to them. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw |

Re: F26 System Wide Change: GCC7

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 2:28 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = System Wide Change: GCC7 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC7 > > Change owner(s): > * Jakub Jelínek > > Switch GCC in Fedora 26 to 7.x.y, rebuild all packages with it, or > optionally rebuild just some packages

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15 February 2017 at 09:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > A mockchain build of dbus-c++ libffado and sflphone works with this > patch. repoquery says nothing else depends on dbus-c++. > > Any objections to me committing the patch to dbus-c++ and rebuilding it? > > Somebody should also fork dbus-c++

Self Introduction: Nemanja Milosevic (nmilosev)

Hello everyone! My name is Nemanja and I would like to join the development team. My wiki page is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Nmilosev To keep it short: I'm currently a PhD Computer Science student, and I've been involved with Fedora for over a year now (all the details are in

New list for ResultsDB users

Hi folks! So I've been floating an idea around recently to people who are currently using ResultsDB in some sense - either sending reports to it, or consuming reports from it - or plan to do so. The idea was to have a group where we can discuss (and hopefully co-ordinate) use of ResultsDB - a

New list for ResultsDB users

Hi folks! So I've been floating an idea around recently to people who are currently using ResultsDB in some sense - either sending reports to it, or consuming reports from it - or plan to do so. The idea was to have a group where we can discuss (and hopefully co-ordinate) use of ResultsDB - a

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-02-17)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-02-17 16:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: 389-DS-NIGHTLY #165

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 08:16 -0500, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > On 02/15/2017 04:48 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (15/02/17 09:05), Jenkins wrote: > >> See > >> > >> > > Is there a reason why jenkins failures are

Re: Taskotron CI in Taskotron

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 12:59 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Adam Williamson < > adamw...@fedoraproject.org > > > wrote: > > > Are you aware of fedmsg-dg-replay? It's a fairly

Re: What if you only want to package part of upstream?

Thanks for all the input! I went with the popular option of calling it qrcode-generator and inviting comaintainers to add subpackages in the future if they desire: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422344 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 04:33:19PM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 14 February 2017 at 17:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:39:00PM +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On 14 February 2017 at 17:23, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 08:39:00PM +0100, Francisco J. Tsao Santin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> We have a problem with the hardlink package. The koji build made by Fedora >> Release Engineering failed in armv7hl and i686

[Bug 1413795] perl-Test-Routine-0.024 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413795 Bug 1413795 depends on bug 1418006, which changed state. Bug 1418006 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Abortable - Simple system for handling some exceptions in tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1418006 What

[Bug 1397023] perl-Text-VCardFast-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397023 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Text-VCardFast-0.11-1.

[Bug 1398617] perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.12-1.fc2

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

Thanks for the heads up on rsyslog. I've been using it for ages, yet I didn't know you could trigger commands directly from there. I see it has omprog, as well as :msg, regex, "hellothere" ^/usr/local/bin/hi.bash good to know. I'll see which path I take. I already have the spec file working

[Bug 1398617] perl-Net-DAVTalk-0.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398617 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1397023] perl-Text-VCardFast-0.11 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1397023 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:23:43PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > GNU89 vs. C99 inlining, that code is really old and apparently nobody > > touched it since it has been written. Yes, it seems most of the code was written a long time ago... > > > >

Re: hardlink building issue in F26 armv7hl and i686

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Dan Horák wrote: > you are welcome, please file a gcc bug in Fedora bugzilla for this issue > Yep, I'll do it :) -- Francisco Javier Tsao Santín http://gattaca.es 1024D/71CF4D62 42 F1 53 35 EF 98 98 8A FC 6C 56 B3 4C A7 7D FB___

Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild

On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 12:44:13 -0600 > El 15/2/2017 1:28 a. m., "Sérgio Basto" escribió: > I though in one more simpler plan , query koji for the fails builds > and where error is in root.log and was did by user releng, list the > packages and submit a new build in rawhide

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On 02/15/2017 11:31 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: Probably most Fedora users will use a general purpose tool like rsyslog (already in Fedora) or fluentd/logstash to read events from journald and do custom triggers.

Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild

El 15/2/2017 1:28 a. m., "Sérgio Basto" escribió: On Ter, 2017-02-14 at 19:54 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017 01:42:58 + > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > JFTR , after receive from koschei messages like opencv's builds are > > back to

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: > Probably most Fedora users will use a general purpose tool like rsyslog > (already in Fedora) or fluentd/logstash to read events from journald and do > custom triggers. thanks for the info! It seems to me that

! GSoC Ideas

Hi All, As you may know we have successfully submitted a Google Summer of Code application this year. While we won't know until 27 February if we are accepted, we still have work to do! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2017 This page needs some ideas. A good idea

[Bug 1422296] perl-Test-Moose-More-0.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422296 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora ≥ 26. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing

Re: Taskotron CI in Taskotron

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 12:59 +0100, Josef Skladanka wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > Are you aware of fedmsg-dg-replay? It's a fairly easy way to 'replay' > > fedmsgs for testing. All you need (IIRC) is the fedmsg-relay service > >

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 09:23:34AM -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote: > My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for > something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in > system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, > journal-triggerd. It is not in

[Bug 1413027] perl-ORLite-1.98-10.fc26 FTBFS: DBD::SQLite::db do failed: unknown database ANALYZE

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413027 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1422481] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422481 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6fe0bffde5 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1422481] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422481 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bf5f18e5f2 -- You are receiving this

Re: journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

On 02/15/2017 07:23 AM, Martin Langhoff wrote: My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, journal-triggerd. It is not in Fedora.

[Bug 1422481] perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422481 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

[Bug 1422190] RFE: Upgrade to Code::TidyAll

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422190 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #2) > There was bigger changes in 0.50 and I don't want to add it to Fedora 24. Yep. This change is the reason for

[Bug 1422480] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422480 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3daa965721 -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1422480] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422480 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-af414ed549 -- You are receiving this

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 587 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 581 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 471

Re: Please test Vagrant 1.9.1

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr. Why is that? It's like the fontconfig one, which was discussed in FESCo: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1635#comment-51133 and approved:

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 02/15/2017 11:21 AM, E.N. virgo wrote: Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.” The problem is that one might want to use libstdc++ (GCC) and libc++ (LLVM) along with GCC ABI and LLVM ABI, respectively. Fedora currently enables

Re: Please test Vagrant 1.9.1

Hi Colin, First of all, I am still not fond of moving the plugins.json into /usr. Nevertheless, with the proposed Vagrant 1.9.1 package, things are different then they used to be. Up to now, we were re-configuring Vagrant to search for the plugins.json in /var/lib/vagrant. But this is not easily

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 14:32 +, James Hogarth wrote: > On 14 Feb 2017 11:24, "James Hogarth" > wrote: > > > > On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: > > Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15/02/17 13:48 -, E.N. virgo wrote: So what? Why is that a problem? Does the libc++abi have better performance for exception handling? Smaller footprint for RTTI? More new features, such as C++17's std::uncaight_exceptions()? Just because there's a different low-level C++ runtime library

[Bug 1422480] perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422480 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: heads up: update of python-docker-py to 2.x in rawhide

On 14 Feb 2017 11:24, "James Hogarth" wrote: On 14 Feb 2017 09:28, "Tomas Tomecek" wrote: Quoting James Hogarth (2017-02-13 18:02:23) > On 13 February 2017 at 16:40, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 13 February 2017 at 15:36,

journal-triggerd, interest, alternatives?

My applications largely log to system loggers. Looking around for something that triggers an email when certain log entries appear in system logs (ie: python stacktraces), I got just one hit, journal-triggerd. It is not in Fedora. https://github.com/jjk-jacky/journal-triggerd Have I missed

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15/02/17 13:50 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15/02/17 12:32 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15/02/17 11:30 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15/02/17 12:32 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 15/02/17 11:30 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm error: no matching function for

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

> So what? Why is that a problem? > Does the libc++abi have better performance for exception handling? > Smaller footprint for RTTI? > More new features, such as C++17's std::uncaight_exceptions()? > Just because there's a different low-level C++ runtime library > available doesn't mean that using

[Bug 1422494] perl-YAML-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422494 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1422494] perl-YAML-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422494 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-YAML-1.22-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=859448 -- You are receiving this mail

Fedora Rawhide-20170215.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Server boot i386 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 19/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386) ID: 57041 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/57041 ID: 57042

[Bug 1422479] perl-MCE-1.812 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422479 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In

[389-devel] Please review issue 49076: To debug DB_DEADLOCK condition, allow to reset DB_TXN_NOWAIT flag on txn_begin

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49076 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/a078dfacb0f0c623412d357dd6e29b1c9987845416dd3fd5d1721fa089dd00ba-0001-Ticket-49076-To-debug-DB_DEADLOCK-condition-allow-to.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: 389-DS-NIGHTLY #165

On 02/15/2017 04:48 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (15/02/17 09:05), Jenkins wrote: >> See >> >> > Is there a reason why jenkins failures are ignored for a week? With our VERY limited resources, and other higher

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

> I'll take on the review, Thank you so much for stepping in, this is mostly appreciated. > but you really should consider becoming > involved in Fedora as a packager, as any packager can review another > packagers packages proposed for inclusion into Fedora. I am a slow learner, but there is

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15/02/17 10:21 -, E.N. virgo wrote: Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile. what actual problem is caused by that? Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.” The problem is that one might

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-4.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:21 AM, E.N. virgo wrote: >>> Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile. >> what actual problem is caused by that? > Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC > ABI to successfully

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 15/02/17 11:30 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm error: no matching function for call to ... Invalid code. I am 99% sure

[Bug 1422300] perl-String-Compare-ConstantTime-0.312 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422300 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-String-Compare-ConstantTime-0.312-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-61b28a67d8 -- You are

[Bug 1422300] perl-String-Compare-ConstantTime-0.312 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422300 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-String-Compare-ConstantTime-0.312-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-83a3f8d6e5 -- You are

[Bug 1422494] perl-YAML-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422494 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-YAML-1.22-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17884868 --

[Bug 1422494] perl-YAML-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422494 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1250571 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1250571=edit [patch] Update to 1.22 (#1422494) -- You are

[Bug 1422494] New: perl-YAML-1.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422494 Bug ID: 1422494 Summary: perl-YAML-1.22 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-YAML Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

Re: Taskotron CI in Taskotron

> So, the repo now has working PoC > https://pagure.io/taskotron/task-taskotron-ci > Readme contains example on how to run the task. > Works on my setup, and I'd be glad if somebody else tried. I tried, and it didn't eat my laptop. Also it worked. Good job. /me throws cookies at jskladan

[Bug 1422300] perl-String-Compare-ConstantTime-0.312 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422300 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1422480] New: perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422480 Bug ID: 1422480 Summary: perl-Net-CalDAVTalk-0.10 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-CalDAVTalk Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1422481] New: perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422481 Bug ID: 1422481 Summary: perl-Net-CardDAVTalk-0.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-CardDAVTalk Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1422479] New: perl-MCE-1.812 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422479 Bug ID: 1422479 Summary: perl-MCE-1.812 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MCE Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: p...@city-fan.org

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Replace Coolkey with OpenSC

On 02/10/2017 06:34 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 2017-02-02 06:49, Jan Kurik wrote: [...] == Scope == * Proposal owners: -- For Fedora 26, we want to switch all applications to OpenSC and leave Coolkey as a backup. We will unregister coolkey from NSS database and register OpenSC instead.

[Bug 1422296] perl-Test-Moose-More-0.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422296 Bug 1422296 depends on bug 1422298, which changed state. Bug 1422298 Summary: perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.009 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1422298] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422298 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Taskotron CI in Taskotron

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Are you aware of fedmsg-dg-replay? It's a fairly easy way to 'replay' > fedmsgs for testing. All you need (IIRC) is the fedmsg-relay service > running on the same system, and you can run > I am, but it has

[Bug 1422298] perl-TAP-SimpleOutput-0.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422298 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1422296 Referenced

[Bug 1422296] perl-Test-Moose-More-0.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422296 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1422298 Referenced

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On 14/02/17 21:42 -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm error: no matching function for call to ... Invalid code. I am 99% sure that these 2 errors are due to a bug in

[Bug 1422289] perl-libwww-perl-6.19 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422289 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1422190] RFE: Upgrade to Code::TidyAll

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422190 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova --- There was bigger changes in 0.50 and I don't want to add it to Fedora 24. Btw, Code-TidyAll-0.44 was official release (BZ#1325875) -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1422190] RFE: Upgrade to Code::TidyAll

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422190 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Code-TidyAll-0.56-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8d7d1201ed -- You are receiving this

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

>> Alas, clang++ now needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile. > what actual problem is caused by that? Please read instead “Alas, clang++ currently needs to link against the GCC ABI to successfully compile.” The problem is that one might want to use libstdc++ (GCC) and libc++

[Bug 1422283] perl-CPAN-2.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1422283 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: 389-DS-NIGHTLY #165

On (15/02/17 09:05), Jenkins wrote: >See > > Is there a reason why jenkins failures are ignored for a week? LS ___ 389-devel mailing list --

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2017

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 09:42:53PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On 7 February 2017 at 16:32, Marek Polacek wrote: > > libffado-2.3.0-1.fc26.src.rpm > > sflphone-1.4.1-20.fc26.src.rpm > > error: no matching function for call to ... > > Invalid code. > > I am 99% sure that these 2

Bug in reporting (was: Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild)

On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 14:56 -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > Failures can be seen > http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mass-rebuild/f26-failures.html >  > ... > > Please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > reporting. Hi, could you correct the reporting tool to write proper

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 15.02.2017 09:48, E.N. virgo wrote: >> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make >> things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure >> out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to >

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

> I'm not sure if I follow. Supporting multiple C++ ABIs would make > things more complicated for developers because they now have to figure > out which ABI their project needs and if all the libraries they want to

[Bug 1413022] perl-Test-Taint-1.06-13.fc26 FTBFS randomly: Failed test ' $ENV{TEST_ACTIVE} is tainted'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1413022 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

Re: Taskotron CI in Taskotron

> On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 14:46 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > The only problem with this kind of testing is, that we still don't really > > > have a good way to test trigger, as it is tied to external events. My > > > idea > > > here was that I could add something like wiki edit consumer, and

Re: Get LLVM's libc++abi into Fedora, BZ1332306

On 02/15/2017 08:12 AM, E.N. virgo wrote: Greetings, The LLVM project has been providing a C++ ABI for a while [1]. A naive user like I'm would presume Fedora easily ships with that, as the saying goes: “Fedora is a developer-friendly distro.” Unfortunately, that isn't the case for this

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: 389-DS-NIGHTLY #165

See -- [...truncated 5473 lines...] INFO:dirsrvtests.tests.tickets.ticket47536_test:# Extract PK12 file for master2: pk12util -o /tmp/Server-Cert2.pk12 -n "Server-Cert2"