On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 13:39, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 13:23 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > By the way, I can't figure out how to look inside a Flatpak and
> > review its contents. Could someone provide some pointers?
>
> On the repo all you have is
On 07/18/2017 04:07 PM, Claessen, Paul wrote:
While testing a script that installs packages, I ran into a situation
where I seem to have to (or can) install the epel package twice in a
row (and get different results).
This may actually be a package handler (rpm, yum) issue, but it only
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 14:40, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 18.7.2017 v 13:23 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> > On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 00:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler
> >> wrote:
> >>> The problem is
While testing a script that installs packages, I ran into a situation where I
seem to have to (or can) install the epel package twice in a row (and get
different results).
This may actually be a package handler (rpm, yum) issue, but it only happens
with epel-release, so maybe someone in the
pghmcfc requested branch epel7 for package rpms/perl-Authen-Radius
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Authen-Radius/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
pghmcfc requested branch epel7 for package rpms/perl-Data-HexDump
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Data-HexDump/
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472175
--- Comment #2 from Clément OUDOT ---
Yes it is useful without perl-Web-ID.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472172
--- Comment #2 from Clément OUDOT ---
Ok, not very important as WebID mechanism is not widely used.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Dne 18.7.2017 v 13:23 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 00:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler
>> wrote:
>>> The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
>>> compliant,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472301
Bug ID: 1472301
Summary: perl-Encode-2.92 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Encode
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 13:23 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> By the way, I can't figure out how to look inside a Flatpak and
> review its contents. Could someone provide some pointers?
On the repo all you have is an object store (much like Git's
.git/objects/ folder), but if you
On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 13:15, Bastien Nocera wrote:
[...]
> "Fixing the update tools" doesn't fix the breakage handled by applications
> when you change files from underneath them. Again, read the original threads
> to get a complete picture.
>
> And when you take it all into account, the fix
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 00:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler
> wrote:
> > The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
> > compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be built
> >
From f4f578c0deac3edb8c1b9bfc2d795077df83b2d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 13:19:46 +0200
Subject: Initial import
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed.spec | 66
46925bd9d9f72cb53e1d39c016792dcb1cb2f9ce780e96e55a35fbc23463e892064215fa1334475720c21ec74aacc3c1434c0695f8923773b10809cfca8395f2
Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed-1.002.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472175
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
This one looks do-able. It needs perl-Data-HexDump branching and building for
EPEL-7 first, and then the current Fedora version of perl-Authen-Radius can
build and pass its test suite in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472172
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
It looks like a lot of work to get this in EPEL-7.
Some of the dependencies (e.g. match::simple, Types::DateTime, Types::URI) are
not currently packaged in Fedora and many of the others
From 0a141fe640871d1ce70727e42bdb04d923d5c880 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2017 11:17:09 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.4.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
- New upstream release 2.4.10
-
57d797bed24ccea66307d95395bb7d5dd860c0bc41e25a7701cf5a16fdf28776dc7633a6b8bbb1bcf6684b930385da71bf2d44f777a211988a500e30bdf8e9e5
Mouse-v2.4.10.tar.gz
Kevin Kofler píše v Út 18. 07. 2017 v 03:06 +0200:
> Jiří Eischmann wrote:
> > I agree with Matt here, Fedora Project's mission (neither the old
> > one,
> > nor the new draft) doesn't say anything about RPM. RPM is just
> > means to
> > an end, not the goal. And I don't know why Fedora should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472175
Bug ID: 1472175
Summary: Please package perl-Authen-Radius for CentOS 7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Module-Build
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1472172
Bug ID: 1472172
Summary: Please package perl-Web-ID for CentOS 7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Module-Build
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 10:08:06 +0200
Florian Weimer wrote:
> It seems that the rawhide s390x builders hang in various different
> places, randomly:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=20584916=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000
> (stuck at wcsmbs)
>
>
It seems that the rawhide s390x builders hang in various different
places, randomly:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=20584916=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000
(stuck at wcsmbs)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=20592419=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000
(stuck at symlink.list)
- Mail original -
De: "Kevin Kofler"
>> Please, do leave, so you don't have to endure our apparent incompetence.
> Nicolas Mailhot has done a lot of work on font packaging and organizing the
> Fonts SIG.
Thanks a lot Kevin. However, that really should not matter. Many people here
make
On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:31:23 +0200
Jan Synacek wrote:
> I'm trying to build Emacs in Rawhide and this is what I get from the
> logs [1]:
>
> ...
> CCLD temacs
> /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/7/../../../../lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so:
> undefined reference to
I'm trying to build Emacs in Rawhide and this is what I get from the logs [1]:
...
CCLD temacs
/usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat-linux/7/../../../../lib64/libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so:
undefined reference to `std::__once_callable@GLIBCXX_3.4.11'
jplesnik changed perl-sig's 'commit' permission on
rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on
rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed (master) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchcommits' permission on
rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
jplesnik changed ppisar's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed (master) to 'Obsolete'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Locale-Utils-PlaceholderNamed/
___
perl-devel mailing list --
>> Even if it eventually succeeds crash-landing it in Fedora while half
>> the security and management tools are lacking is a great way for the
>> distribution to get an awful reputation, while others will rip the
>> fruits of this work some years later.
>I'm entirely puzzled about how you think
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Petr Stodulka wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> I am looking at the #1357438 BZ about broken links to "How to*" doc files and
> I am thinking,
> about the best solution of this. Problem is with using of %doc macro, which
> moves/copies
> doc files to
Hello,I received two spam emails, one in users and one in devs. Both
are exactly the same.If someone can take care of them, I would be
grateful.
Thanks,Sylvia
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 10:41 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 07/17/2017 10:34 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
> > Do the list admins have
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo