[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Rebuild for gmic to latest stable release

Upstream released[0] new version of gmic nearly two months ago and bugzilla notified about the update[1]. Unfortunately I do not have proven packager privilege to do the change so is there anyone doing the update? Thanks in advance. Reference - [0] http://gmic.eu/download.shtml [1]

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Summary/Minutes from last Friday's FESCo Meeting (2017-08-11)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2017-08-04) === Meeting started by jsmith at 16:05:59 UTC. The full logs are available athttps://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2017-08-04/fesco.2017-08-04-16.05.log.html . Meeting summary

Elections July/August 2017 to FESCo, Council, FAmSCo - Voting period has started

Hi, the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections has just started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1], FAmSCo[2] and FESCo [3]. You can vote till August 14th, 2017 when the voting ends at 23:59:00 UTC. To help you to make the right decision we have published Fedora

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 3:59 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:10:23PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > I still don't see how this is going to work with a tree of Service Levels > > and Lifetimes. Any module can not give a SL greater than the

[EPEL-devel] Re: RHEL-7.4 is released (build roots updating)

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 12:04 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-08-03 16:35, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 08/02/2017 05:51 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:42 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz >>> wrote: On 2017-08-01 16:24, Stephen John

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

eseyman pushed to bugzilla (master). "Add BuildRequires and Requires"

eseyman pushed to bugzilla (master). "Add BuildRequires and Requires" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/bugzilla.git/commit/?h=master=a1ca9f922437438a006be5bd2f2b0cd92c1d312a ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-08-08 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 882 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 645 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 227

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:08 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski > > >

[Bug 1475815] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9744 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475815 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Time-HiRes-1.9744-1.fc

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski >> wrote: >> > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Well, no, you're getting cause and effect mixed up, there. RH doesn't > have btrfs developers on staff *because* RH, over time, has broadly > come to the conclusion that btrfs isn't the storage tech it wants to

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski > wrote: > > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: > > > >

Re: BTRFS dropped by RedHat

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > The release notes for RHEL 7.4 announce that RedHat gave up on btrfs: > >

Re: Arbitrary Branching and solving the "Change Checkpoint? Better hit the gas!" problem

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:34 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > Our Change process has the basic assumption that if a Change isn't > > working, we will be able to back out. But, in practice,

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:10:23PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I still don't see how this is going to work with a tree of Service Levels > and Lifetimes. Any module can not give a SL greater than the lowest SL and > the shortest lifetime that any package in it is going to agree to. [EG if

Re: i386 Xen PV support still needed?

On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, Paolo Bonzini wrote: On 01/08/2017 23:38, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 01 August 2017 at 14:19, Florian Weimer wrote: We still build a special glibc variant for Xen which avoids certain segment-relative accesses which are difficult to emulate with

spot pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate (master). "1.30"

spot pushed to perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate (master). "1.30" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate.git/commit/?h=master=d103f935bdf4d1bd076b7eddda4a86295cdb66d5 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

spot uploaded Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.30.tar.gz for perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate

5609ac77aa1f342225782c932a54714bcec714be94c70c8aaf676050f753d21bfbcabda2935a2407ce4e84f75a445a34b6f6fc46d58e3512a66c51a7d773fd86 Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.30.tar.gz

Fedora Rawhide-20170807.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 23/137 (x86_64), 3/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170806.n.0): ID: 127164 Test: x86_64 universal

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On 7 August 2017 at 07:50, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:38:44AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > That way, users and admins aren't treated to an explosion of arbitrary > > > days where action is needed to stay on a current stream. Instead, they > > >

Re: i386 Xen PV support still needed?

On 01/08/2017 23:38, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 01 August 2017 at 14:19, Florian Weimer wrote: >> We still build a special glibc variant for Xen which avoids certain >> segment-relative accesses which are difficult to emulate with >> paravirtualization.. >> >> Is this

[Bug 1473922] perl-Net-GitHub-0.89 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473922 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Mass rebuilds update

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 11:46:34AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > escribió: > > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht > > > ml > >

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On 08/05/2017 06:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 08/05/2017 11:45 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> >>> From #fedora-releng: >>> 18:11 <+nirik> sharkcz: can you clean up space on s390 koji? its very close >>> to full...

Re: Mass rebuilds update

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 16:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek escribió: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.ht > > ml > > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-fa > >

Re: Mass rebuilds update

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [3] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-failures.html > [4] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f27-binutils-failur > es.html Will the up-to-date status be tracked somehow? Zbyszek

Planned Outage - Fedora Buildsystem Server reboots - 2017-08-08 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2017-08-08 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-08-08 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

Planned Outage - Fedora Buildsystem Server reboots - 2017-08-08 21:00 UTC

There will be an outage starting at 2017-08-08 21:00UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2017-08-08 21:00 UTC' Reason for outage: We will be applying updates and

Re: Mass rebuilds update

On 08/07/2017 08:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/07/2017 04:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the >> scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one >> was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on

Re: Mass rebuilds update

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Hi All, > > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > failures

Re: Mass rebuilds update

On 08/07/2017 04:35 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > failures pages for the two rebuilds can

Re: debuginfo repository matching f27-build

On 08/07/2017 04:52 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:00 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió: >> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Florian Weimer >> wrote: >>> On 08/01/2017 08:42 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote: There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos.

Re: one concrete idea for fedora

On Sun, 2017-08-06 at 10:06 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 03:42:08AM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > I'm very sorry for my bad mood and I apologize. > > But what I want emphasize is that we are losing the concept of > > stability not just in Fedora, it is in many other

Re: Mass rebuilds update

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:50 -0400, Matthew Miller escribió: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second > > one > > was all archful

017-08-07 Fedora QA Devel Meeting Minutes

= #fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel = Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2017-08-07/fedora-qadevel.2017-08-07-14.00.html Minutes (text):

Re: debuginfo repository matching f27-build

El lun, 07-08-2017 a las 10:00 +0100, Peter Robinson escribió: > On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Florian Weimer > wrote: > > On 08/01/2017 08:42 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote: > > > There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos. > > > > Can we fix this, please? Or offer a tool

Re: Mass rebuilds update

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 09:35:46AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the > scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one > was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The > failures pages for the

Mass rebuilds update

Hi All, We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] Please quickly

Mass rebuilds update

Hi All, We have now completed two mass rebuilds, The first one was the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 27 details are here[1] the second one was all archful packages due to the binutils bug[2] on ppc64le. The failures pages for the two rebuilds can be found here[3] and here[4] Please quickly

jplesnik uploaded SNMP-Info-3.37.tar.gz for perl-SNMP-Info

d6bd1fad4fb204e1f520135282df7228f1e991b3e7e41f0d6e50ac1fcb9cef4edb3b93963039421b7b886eb5a0986d9e54a62ba097c3a68322f6440cbcee2805 SNMP-Info-3.37.tar.gz

[Bug 1467634] perl-Inline-Python-0.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467634 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Inline-Python (master). "0.56 bump"

jplesnik pushed to perl-Inline-Python (master). "0.56 bump" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Inline-Python.git/commit/?h=master=2e32db97f9702b5bdd9b2a57b5f9c2c4b7fb2d15 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

jplesnik uploaded Inline-Python-0.56.tar.gz for perl-Inline-Python

d5fffec8a377ec10c8b21ed9324e2de5a77d10304fc2a89196df89984e55869e3e4e0ef970f1aa4651068b8a6d834fa8eb18d70a052c646ddd98ef338f772e7d Inline-Python-0.56.tar.gz

[Bug 1476771] perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.99010 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476771 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-Whois-Raw (master). "2.99010 bump"

jplesnik pushed to perl-Net-Whois-Raw (master). "2.99010 bump" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Net-Whois-Raw.git/commit/?h=master=e7fc6337fdef2400bf7a92c33c7a1b0fddb688d4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

jplesnik uploaded Net-Whois-Raw-2.99010.tar.gz for perl-Net-Whois-Raw

19e30f2ceddb8e47966ae1a41a363f55866866287ea1cf1046163d10b111f334425f954f25846567752410414e693316e5a1b62a771615f70dbda4aed4c6b5c9 Net-Whois-Raw-2.99010.tar.gz

Re: Introduction/looking for a sponsorship

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 07:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:36:45AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Apparently, the way this is done in Debian [1] is that the program is > > > installed as /usr/bin/prename and provided as an alternative to the > > >

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 07:38:44AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > That way, users and admins aren't treated to an explosion of arbitrary > > days where action is needed to stay on a current stream. Instead, they > > can plan for annual upgrades as we do now. (I also expect the > > "platform" module

Re: find-debuginfo fails for fpc-compiled software on i686 and armv7hl

> It is problem of FPC, see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475223. Thank you. Very insightful. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: find-debuginfo fails for fpc-compiled software on i686 and armv7hl

>Stabs is a ancient debuginfo format that isn't supported by any/most modern >tools. Hm. But it seemed to worked fine as recently as July 25. >You should definitely see if [...] you can produce normal DWARF debuginfo. I edited the makefile to use a different compiler switch, and with DWARF

Re: Introduction/looking for a sponsorship

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:36:45AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Apparently, the way this is done in Debian [1] is that the program is > > installed as /usr/bin/prename and provided as an alternative to the > > util-linux version of /usr/bin/rename via the alternatives system.

Re: [Modularity]: Service levels and EOL expectations?

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I'm looking at: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Module:Guidelines#SLs_and_EOLs > > While not a part of the modulemd specification yet, modules will > eventually carry a Service Level (SL) value and an

Re: Arbitrary Branching and solving the "Change Checkpoint? Better hit the gas!" problem

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:57 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Our Change process has the basic assumption that if a Change isn't > working, we will be able to back out. But, in practice, when there are > problems, we often find it that it's easiest to shrug and go forward, >

Re: find-debuginfo fails for fpc-compiled software on i686 and armv7hl

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 09:42 +, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I maintain a package written in Pascal, which uses fpc for compiling. I > noticed that recently, koji builds started failing on i686 and armv7hl due to > the find-debuginfo script failing to, well, extract the debuginfo. > > Here's a link

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On 2017-08-07, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Could you make two tickets of these? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6208 https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6209 -- Petr ___ devel mailing list --

Re: find-debuginfo fails for fpc-compiled software on i686 and armv7hl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 09:42 +, Artur Iwicki wrote: > I maintain a package written in Pascal, which uses fpc for compiling. > I noticed that recently, koji builds started failing on i686 and > armv7hl due to the find-debuginfo script failing to,

dist.rpmdeplint FAILED for fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc26

dist.rpmdeplint FAILED for fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc26 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/62c41f8a-7b5c-11e7-b290-5254008e42f6/task_output/fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc26.x86_64.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

dist.rpmdeplint FAILED for fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc24

dist.rpmdeplint FAILED for fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc24 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/62b352d6-7b5c-11e7-a988-5254008e42f6/task_output/fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc24.x86_64.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

dist.rpmdeplint FAILED for fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc25

dist.rpmdeplint FAILED for fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc25 https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/4a51abc2-7b5a-11e7-b290-5254008e42f6/task_output/fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc25.x86_64.log ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 1473017] amavisd-new-2.11.0-1 has issue with DCC, can't write to /etc /dcc

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473017 Juan Orti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-a10b4719f7 -- You are

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-90a8a8bb4e -- You are receiving

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e7943f9418 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6224bba817 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1477175] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477175 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.21-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-fdccca0b40 -- You are

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild; https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Classify.git/commit/?h=f26=69e1e750244dce86e63073e7a73d06dfe605e40c ___

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "Update to 0.015 (..more)"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "Update to 0.015 (..more)" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Classify.git/commit/?h=f26=61ebb23eab3bf80df106a99f1106915cd957fafe ___ perl-devel mailing list --

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild; https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Classify.git/commit/?h=f26=58ee552eb3badd1afbbec397c16e46b1938ad81c ___

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "Perl 5.26 rebuild" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Classify.git/commit/?h=f26=7d0d58cb5a8c1cab9936a74316623f3454c024f0 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f24). "new version"

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f24). "new version" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fusioninventory-agent.git/commit/?h=f24=6398b619c344f5f3479e3f0ff65f28145dae9e9e ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "Restore compatibility with Perl 5.26.0"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (f26). "Restore compatibility with Perl 5.26.0" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Classify.git/commit/?h=f26=0fa18554ff6de06e89b8589f26a054250d6a74a8 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (el6). "new version"

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (el6). "new version" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fusioninventory-agent.git/commit/?h=el6=e1bed0266f760b0ad372a5470fc2bbfbd7f05c53 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (master). "Update to 0.015 (..more)"

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Params-Classify (master). "Update to 0.015 (..more)" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Params-Classify.git/commit/?h=master=61ebb23eab3bf80df106a99f1106915cd957fafe ___ perl-devel mailing list --

pghmcfc uploaded Params-Classify-0.015.tar.gz for perl-Params-Classify

1c41590a3f06d21d5f23e12371b0aee5d4249f773bfb0738e955fbdccdccc6e495744c50d3b91305a6b470e022475446705c8eb8e8d05ca1ed037d369a67617c Params-Classify-0.015.tar.gz

find-debuginfo fails for fpc-compiled software on i686 and armv7hl

I maintain a package written in Pascal, which uses fpc for compiling. I noticed that recently, koji builds started failing on i686 and armv7hl due to the find-debuginfo script failing to, well, extract the debuginfo. Here's a link to a failed koji build (mass-rebuild by releng):

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:19:55AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > Related thing: Since the Pagure overhaul, e-mails about pushed commits > do not contain commit body (the diff). That makes the e-mail > notificition less helpfull for me. I'm more interrested in what changed > than that something

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (epel7). "new version"

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (epel7). "new version" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fusioninventory-agent.git/commit/?h=epel7=b0dfa7f5583113353a13d5625173af0e3329c185 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f25). "new version"

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f25). "new version" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fusioninventory-agent.git/commit/?h=f25=c21a0a15a91fa17c491404ee5fd33aad76908aae ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f26). "new version"

trasher pushed to fusioninventory-agent (f26). "new version" https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/fusioninventory-agent.git/commit/?h=f26=8297c81386475b70701a7b37ab2445ac7a2bcdc2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: debuginfo repository matching f27-build

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/01/2017 08:42 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote: >> There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos. > > Can we fix this, please? Or offer a tool like “dnf debuginfo-install” > that gets the debuginfo directly from Koji,

Re: debuginfo repository matching f27-build

On 08/01/2017 08:42 AM, den...@ausil.us wrote: > There is no debug repos for the buildroot repos. Can we fix this, please? Or offer a tool like “dnf debuginfo-install” that gets the debuginfo directly from Koji, without a need for a repository? With the more fine-grained debuginfo packages,

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:19:55AM +, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > CC in Bugzilla > > -- > > > > Pagure over dist-git does not offer issue tracking. Issues for > > packages will continue to be tracked in Bugzilla. However,

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On 2017-08-03, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > CC in Bugzilla > -- > > Pagure over dist-git does not offer issue tracking. Issues for > packages will continue to be tracked in Bugzilla. However, if you > look at the watch options in a project in Pagure over dist-git,

[Bug 1469110] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469110 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

Re: Pagure over dist-git: what changes?

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:09:51AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon > wrote: > > New package and new branch request process > > -- > > > > PkgDB used to be the place where packagers

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2017-08-07 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have anything super important for the agenda, and tomorrow is a vacation day at least in Canada and I think possibly in the US as well. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week, please do reply to this

[Test-Announce] Fedora 27 Rawhide 20170804.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 27 Rawhide 20170804.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 882 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 644 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 226

[Bug 1469110] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1238804] /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1242769] perl-Algorithm-CurveFit-1.05-14.fc23 FTBFS: Failed test at t /02bad_deriv.t line 50

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242769 Bug 1242769 depends on bug 1238804, which changed state. Bug 1238804 Summary: /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 What|Removed

[Bug 1242802] perl-smartmatch-engine-core-0.02-11.fc23 FTBFS: t/ core.t test fails

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242802 Bug 1242802 depends on bug 1238804, which changed state. Bug 1238804 Summary: /usr/bin/perl is not linked with -z now and -pie, perl crashes with -pie https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804 What|Removed