Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

On 10/16/17, Dan Book wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:20:09AM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: >> > so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing >> what >> > I saw

Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

Dan Book wrote: > This is clean_requirements_on_remove being helpful as usual. Never should > have been a default setting as I've argued before, and the first thing I > disable in /etc/dnf/dnf.conf. > http://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/conf_ref.html#clean-requirements-on-remove-label +1

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: NIGHTLY #111

See -- [...truncated 4629 lines...] suites/plugins/accpol_test.py::test_glnoalt_nologin PASSED suites/plugins/accpol_test.py::test_glinact_nsact PASSED

Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:20:09AM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: > > so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing > what > > I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Cockpit depends

Re: Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:20:09AM +0200, Radka Janekova wrote: > so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing what > I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Cockpit depends on > NetworkManager, which nobody would expect and is easily overlooked. > PLEASE FIX I

Cockpit depends on NetworkManager.

Hi, so recently I managed to destroy[1] two production servers by removing what I saw as useless web-config utility. Apparently Cockpit depends on NetworkManager, which nobody would expect and is easily overlooked. PLEASE FIX [1] https://cloud.rhea-ayase.eu/s/eH6JX43kYErHJ3s Cheers, Radka

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > According to my reading today that was disabled for the beta and only > > present in the developer version to assist in the migration and porting > etc > > > > As of FF57 beta WebExtension only is

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 10/16/2017 01:56 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main > problem. > > I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work > out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess FF > maintainers may have

[Bug 1501402] perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-95 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501402 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Perl-Critic-Pulp-95-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1501270] perl-Digest-SHA-5.98 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501270 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-5.98-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1501363] perl-local-lib-2.000024 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501363 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-local-lib-2.24-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1501321] perl-Gearman-2.004.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501321 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Gearman-2.004.009-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1500805] perl-MP3-Info-1.26 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500805 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MP3-Info-1.26-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1501310] perl-Eval-WithLexicals-1.003006 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501310 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Eval-WithLexicals-1.003006-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1500804] perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.91 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500804 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Net-IPv6Addr-0.91-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1500438] perl-Code-TidyAll-0.69 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500438 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Code-TidyAll-0.69-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1500439] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9172 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500439 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-0.917.200-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1500794] perl-Term-Table-0.011 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1500794 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Term-Table-0.011-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1488159] Upgrade perl-HTTP-OAI to 4.06

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488159 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-OAI-4.06-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1494881] perl-PDF-Create-1.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494881 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PDF-Create-1.43-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 00:05 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 Oct 2017 9:57 pm, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 > >

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 16 Oct 2017 9:57 pm, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 > updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep >

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main > problem. > > I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work > out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (once every two weeks)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (once every two weeks) on 2017-10-17 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 > updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep > getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in >

Accidentally disabling units with systemd scriptlets

Hey folks, I recently did a large re-write of a specfile in order to provide a Python 3 version and to make it easier to maintain. Prior to this re-write the specfile produced a number of subpackages that each provided a service file (fedmsg-hub, fedmsg-relay, ...). In my re-write I had the

[389-devel] resent: Ticket 48006 - Missing warning for invalid replica backoff configuration

Forwarded Message Subject:[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48006 - Missing warning for invalid replica backoff configuration Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 16:48:16 -0400 From: Mark Reynolds Reply-To: 389 Directory server developer discussion.

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:04:58PM -0700, Japheth Cleaver wrote: > On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > >>But that's not the end of the fun. GCL failed the mass rebuild this > >>summer. It built successfully on every

Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171015.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171015.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171015.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

On 10/16/2017 09:04 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote: On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: But that's not the end of the fun.  GCL failed the mass rebuild this summer.  It built successfully on every architecture but s390x.  On

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

On 10/13/2017 2:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 03:07:05PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: But that's not the end of the fun. GCL failed the mass rebuild this summer. It built successfully on every architecture but s390x. On s390x, the build failed due to a failed call to

Fedora 27-20171016.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 26/137 (x86_64), 2/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171015.n.0): ID: 158613 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL:

Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171013.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171013.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 952 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 715 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 297

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 831 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 825 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 715

[389-devel] revised: Ticket 49204 - Adding a database entry with the same database name that was deleted hangs server at shutdown

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49402 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/07495973b43685a1828e7f760e135f6cefc477afff348ae2c460dcfe2c882fbd-0001-Ticket-49402-Adding-a-database-entry-with-the-same-d.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list --

Fedora Rawhide-20171016.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 83/126 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171015.n.0): ID: 158441 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

F26/F27 updates-testing and multilib problems

Are there currently bugs in composes for x86-64 for F26/F27? We had one case for F27 where the compose was demonstrably broken because it lacked a required multilib: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7071 We received a report on an issue which looks similar, this time on F26:

Re: apple swift fedora support

On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:50:01 +, you wrote: >Is there any initiative to package apple swift and other swift tools? > >https://github.com/apple/swift Attempt to package and get into Fedora can usually be found in Bugzilla, for Swift see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295115

New Package: PDC Branch already exists?

Can anyone give me a hint as to what happened here? Did the package somehow get partially created?https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/2269 Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Jenkins build is back to normal : COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #75

See ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hi

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:30:13AM -0400, Jiri Kucera wrote: > Hi all, Welcome Jiri, > > my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be > focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go > source code analysis. I am interested in both :)

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 15:03 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 October 2017 at 14:58, John Florian wrote: > > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > > people are going to notice is the improved performance and > > > cleaner interface. > > > > Yes!

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On lundi 16 octobre 2017 15:58:32 CEST John Florian wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > people are going to notice is the improved performance and cleaner > > > > interface. > > Yes! Because of this thread's original message, I pulled 57 into F26 > eager to try

Re: Hi

Hi, You're very welcome! We will work together, I think -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #74

See Changes: [tbordaz] Ticket 49394 - build warning -- [...truncated 4489 lines...] +Entry cn=mailHost,cn=default indexes, cn=config,cn=ldbm

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On 16 October 2017 at 14:58, John Florian wrote: > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > people are going to notice is the improved performance and cleaner > interface. > > > Yes! Because of this thread's original message, I pulled 57 into F26 eager >

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 09:23 -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > people are going to notice is the improved performance and cleaner > interface. Yes! Because of this thread's original message, I pulled 57 into F26 eager to try it out (on $dayjob workstation). Now I want it at $home workstation. Is

[389-devel] Re: Build failed in Jenkins: COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #72

Hi Mark, Thanks for the head up !! sorry for breaking the build. I have fixed it... crossing the fingers :) best regards thierry On 10/16/2017 02:51 PM, marey...@redhat.com wrote: See

Re: GCL and SELinux: help requested

> On Fri, 2017-10-13 at 14:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I don't know. Others have expressed frustration with selinux policy > > maintainers of late as well. It's really hard to say what the trouble > > is... are there to few of them? Overtasked with other work? Workflow too > > difficult?

Re: Hi

Welcome!! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hi

Hi Jiri, Welcome aboard! Cheers, Silvia 2017-10-16 14:30 GMT+01:00 Jiri Kucera : > Hi all, > > my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be > focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go > source code analysis. >

Re: Interdependent packages *must* go in the same update - a reminder (ref. nss and nspr)

On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:55:46AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > That's far less important. Especially the distinction between > > enhancement and newpackage, I think, barely matters. > If we had this metadata for stuff that lands in Rawhide, it'd be > useful, but since we don't, it's basically

Hi

Hi all, my name is Jiri Kucera and I am a new hire at Red Hat Czech. I will be focusing on Go packaging and development and maintenance of tooling for Go source code analysis. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

[389-devel] please review 3 : py3 compat

https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/3 https://pagure.io/lib389/issue/raw/files/351a677d39ec53c54cdfccee730f8f 40be0500e09d585dd11ca8da73235215d2-0001-Ticket-lib389-3-python-3- support.patch -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane signature.asc Description:

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < >> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is

[389-devel] Build failed in Jenkins: COMMIT_SANITY_TEST #72

See Changes: [tbordaz] Ticket 49394 - slapi_pblock_get may leave unchanged the provided -- [...truncated 185 lines...] Package

apple swift fedora support

Is there any initiative to package apple swift and other swift tools? https://github.com/apple/swift Thanks. -- -- - Radovan Sroka Associate Software Engineer | Security Technologies | Red hat, Inc.

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:00:05AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote: > Sure, out of box thinking is not expected here and Vogons could take > lessons from our council members ;-) Just wait until you see our poetry! In seriousness, out-of-the-box thinking should be *encouraged* — but please in the

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: jcapik

On 9.10.2017 09:24, Ondřej Lysoněk wrote: > I'd like to start the non-responsive maintainer process for Jaromir > Capik (jcapik). I filed a FESCO ticket: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1786 Best regards Ondřej Lysoněk ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 18:09:12 +0200, Till Hofmann wrote: > Hi all, > > if I want to downgrade a package in rawhide only (I only pushed the > update to rawhide), do I need to add an Epoch? > > background: > I updated librealsense to librealsense2 and afterwards realized that the > new library is

Re: 2017-10-16 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

Dne 16. 10. 2017 6:36 napsal uživatel "Tim Flink" <tfl...@redhat.com>: # Fedora QA Devel Meeting # Date: 2017-10-16 # Time: 14:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 16 October 2017 at 10:18, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: >> >> On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM,

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote: > On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < >> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >>> >>> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed

Re: 2017-10-16 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

00 UTC > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) > # Location: #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Qadevel-20171016 > > If you have any additional topics, please reply to this thread or add > them in the

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

On 16 October 2017 at 08:13, Till Hofmann wrote: > > > On 10/15/2017 08:08 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > > On 10/15/2017 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I would suggest that you submit librealsense1 as a separate package, > >> instead. The applications that use the older

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep getting new

Re: Updates for Firefox 57 beta

On 10/15/2017 11:04 PM, Greg Evenden wrote: Hello, Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26 updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and

[Bug 1502214] abi-compliance-checker: behavior changed within f25 release

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502214 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Version|26 |25

[Bug 1502506] perl-Config-Perl-V-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502506 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

Re: Do I need Epoch: for downgrades in rawhide?

On 10/15/2017 08:08 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 10/15/2017 12:34 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> I would suggest that you submit librealsense1 as a separate package, >> instead. The applications that use the older versions should probably >> be linked to the older one, but things should progressively

[Bug 1502506] New: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.29 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502506 Bug ID: 1502506 Summary: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.29 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Config-Perl-V Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1502498] perl-App-cpm-0.953 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502498 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Issue 49381 - Refactor numerous suite docstrings - Part 2

Fixed the issues: https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49381 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/files/b050293a47890b3527564aa336937830b0fc298a90037f972e46d49477134a24-0001-Issue-49381-Refactor-numerous-suite-docstrings-Part-.patch On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 03:27:36PM +0200, Simon Pichugin

[Bug 1502498] New: perl-App-cpm-0.953 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1502498 Bug ID: 1502498 Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.953 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-App-cpm Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1485919] Do not provide "perl(setup)"

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485919 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|maria...@tuxette.fr |jo...@x-tnd.be --

[Bug 1483762] Rebase from upstream required

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483762 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED