Re: Unresponsive maintainer

Hello, alick9...@gmail.com wrote on 01/20/2018 12:59 PM: Hi All, As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I am posting here to see if anyone know how to contact Christoph Wickert (cwickert). The bug report is at

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 00:51 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > […] > > > I was not fully aware of this and I've personally hit this difficulty > > > not on my proposal of the remove hicolor

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 13:51 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:37:09PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > Within Fedora, those conditionals are not happening that often.. But > > I would really love to see better separation of

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sat, 2018-01-20 at 00:39 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 18:37 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 11:22 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Igor Gnatenko < > > >

Re: [Proposal] Mass change: remove executing gtk-update-icon-cache in %post/%postu/%postrans to update hicolor theme cache

Well, of course, but the issue is not the change itself or anything. It's just the implementation and the lack of information for the maintainer. The maintainer just sees a git commit without additional information other than the scriplets are obsolete, which is not a lot to be honest. I would

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

Once upon a time, Nico Kadel-Garcia said: > I don't see any modern scripting language where a leading 0 would lead > to interpreting a number as octal. I suggest you check again; I don't see any where a leading 0 does NOT lead to interpreting a number as octal Here are a few

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:01 AM, J. Randall Owens wrote: > I'm not even the best at bash, much less the scripting in spec files, > but is it possible this would be a problem because e.g. Fedora 26 would > be evaluated as 026, which would evaluate as octal, and

LLVM 6.0.0-rc1 in rawhide

Hi, I've just pushed LLVM 6.0.0-rc1 builds to rawhide. If your package depends on LLVM no action is required at this time, because dnf should automatically pull in the compatibility package llvm5.0 as a dependency. The next time you rebuild your package, if you still want to link against llvm

Unresponsive maintainer

Hi All, As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I am posting here to see if anyone know how to contact Christoph Wickert (cwickert). The bug report is at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530114 Regards, Alick

Re: make yum repo when we build things in koji

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/19/2018 10:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/koji.repo > [koji] > name=Koji Repo > baseurl=https://koji.fedoraproject.org/repos/f$releasever-build/latest/$basearch/ > enabled=0 >

make yum repo when we build things in koji

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I often build an rpm in koji to make sure it builds but in order to consume that rpm using our tools most of the time it needs to be in a yum repo somewhere. I could create a repo locally and serve it locally or even push it to somehwere to

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

Igor Gnatenko wrote: > […] >> I was not fully aware of this and I've personally hit this difficulty >> not on my proposal of the remove hicolor icon caches but on proposing, >> for example, OpenIPMI or readline changes. >> Most of my changes were by those

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 20:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on removing all this cruft from all our packages (and > creating > conditionals for all packages which have epel branch). First many thanks, if we have an wiki page is that info (conditionals for all packages which

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 20:07 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Does anybody know why we are still using %{?_isa} thing? > > To ensure arch's match between subpkgs. > > > DNF/libsolv forcefully install 64bit package

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 18:37 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 11:22 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Igor Gnatenko < > > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > > I think real problem here is that people want same spec to build > > >

[Bug 1536702] perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536702 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.30-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1536701] New: perl-MogileFS-Server-2.73 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536701 Bug ID: 1536701 Summary: perl-MogileFS-Server-2.73 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MogileFS-Server Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1536702] perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536702 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1383635 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1383635=edit [patch] Update to 2.30 (#1536702) -- You are

[Bug 1536702] New: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536702 Bug ID: 1536702 Summary: perl-MogileFS-Utils-2.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MogileFS-Utils Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1536695] New: perl-Log-Contextual-0.008001 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536695 Bug ID: 1536695 Summary: perl-Log-Contextual-0.008001 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Log-Contextual Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Using project version in soname: is it OK?

On 01/19/2018 11:07 PM, Alois Mahdal wrote: Hi Fedora! TL;DR: What do experienced C/C++ packagers think about this PR, considering potential future appearance in Fedora? https://github.com/naelstrof/slop/pull/94 Using the project version for soname is usually a bad idea, because soname

[Bug 1536694] New: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90116 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536694 Bug ID: 1536694 Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90116 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-01-22 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. It's been a couple of weeks, but I don't have anything super urgent for discussion, and at the time of the meeting I'm likely to be trying to take a shower after 16 hours of traveling from the West Coast to Czechia, so possibly not in

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-01-22 blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for Monday. There are only two proposed blockers, which doesn't seem worth running a meeting for. HOWEVER, I do suggest that folks take a look at the proposed blockers and vote in-bug, so we can move forward on them. Thanks! -- Adam

Re: F28 systemd plans?

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:36:36AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Tomasz Torcz ️ > wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > >> Taking the advantage of the fact that developers of both (fedora and > >>

Using project version in soname: is it OK?

Hi Fedora! TL;DR: What do experienced C/C++ packagers think about this PR, considering potential future appearance in Fedora? https://github.com/naelstrof/slop/pull/94 Background: I'm packaging `slop` in my COPR, as "experimental" builds. Some day I'd like to propose it to Fedora, but it's

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On Fri, 19 Jan 2018 15:32:13 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > > dnf install wine.i686 > > wine is completely brain damaged example. Maybe. Something on x86_64 is broken nevertheless. If memory serves correctly, Yum could handle it, but dnf seems to run into non-arch-specific explicit

Re: [Proposal] Mass change: remove executing gtk-update-icon-cache in %post/%postu/%postrans to update hicolor theme cache

On 19 January 2018 at 18:42, Johannes Lips wrote: > Would have been nice to get some more background information than just the > git commit message. Then one needs to do research to find this thread and > the related ticket. I don't have time to follow all the

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:37:09PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Within Fedora, those conditionals are not happening that often.. But > I would really love to see better separation of Fedora and EPEL. > Because EPEL **slows down improvements of Fedora**. As you know, I want to go the other way. I

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1047 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 810 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 392

Re: [Proposal] Mass change: remove executing gtk-update-icon-cache in %post/%postu/%postrans to update hicolor theme cache

Would have been nice to get some more background information than just the git commit message. Then one needs to do research to find this thread and the related ticket. I don't have time to follow all the discussions/tickets on devel or anywhere else, but this is even more time consuming.

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-01-19)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2018-01-19) === Meeting started by maxamillion at 16:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2018-01-19/fesco.2018-01-19-16.00.log.html . Meeting

[Bug 1532524] perl-Data-Dumper-2.161-3.fc26 breaks perl-Catalyst-Runtime tests

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532524 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Dumper-2.161-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 12:22 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> >> I think real problem here is that people want same spec to build >> everywhere. >> And we are not able to teach people to

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 11:22 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Igor Gnatenko < > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > I think real problem here is that people want same spec to build > > everywhere. > > And we

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > I think real problem here is that people want same spec to build > everywhere. > And we are not able to teach people to not do this. Only way how we can > teach > them is to make it impossible (e.g. deny

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 16:37 +, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > I think that problem is somewhere else and it is IMO fundamental problem. > > Everything hangs on one simple fact that master branch of the Fedora > packages is used now to build packages

[Bug 1389064] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-IPTables-ChainMgr-1.6-5.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-89e4f0f7f9 -- You are

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On 19 January 2018 at 15:48, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 01/19/2018 09:32 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: >> >> IMHO wine as the package is broken by design. Maintainer of the wine >> just over complicated almost everything what was possible to over >> complicate. > > > It's not

[Bug 1389064] EPEL7 branch missing (required for psad)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389064 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

I think that problem is somewhere else and it is IMO fundamental problem. Everything hangs on one simple fact that master branch of the Fedora packages is used now to build packages from the other Fedora-based distributions. It would be b*dy easy remove all icons caches updates if other

Re: F28 systemd plans?

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: >> Taking the advantage of the fact that developers of both (fedora and >> systemd) attend >> this list, let me ask: will we get systemd v237 in

Self Introduction: Anderson Sasaki

Hello all, My name is Anderson Sasaki and I recently joined the Red Hat crypto team. I have been working with cryptography and HSM's (Hardware Security Modules) for a while (8 years or so). My objective here will be to help the maintenance of PKCS#11 related packages and to contribute to

[Bug 1528845] perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator-0.192 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528845 Bug 1528845 depends on bug 1536408, which changed state. Bug 1536408 Summary: Review Request: perl-AtteanX-Compatibility-Trine - Compatibility layer between RDF::Trine and Attean https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536408

Re: F28 systemd plans?

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz ️ wrote: > Taking the advantage of the fact that developers of both (fedora and > systemd) attend > this list, let me ask: will we get systemd v237 in Fedora 28? > We have a bit over a month until branching. As WireGuard support got >

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On 01/19/2018 09:32 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: IMHO wine as the package is broken by design. Maintainer of the wine just over complicated almost everything what was possible to over complicate. It's not broken. It's just the nature of Windows binaries. Users expect "dnf install wine" to

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On 19 January 2018 at 03:16, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:07:27 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> I can >> dnf install .i686 >> >> and I see no 64bit packages pulled in. > > With F27, > > dnf install wine.i686 wine is completely brain damaged example.

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On 01/19/2018 05:22 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'm not saying that 32-bit WINE should go away nor that the 64-bit repository should not include it as a multilib package. I'm saying that installing WINE on an x86_64 system should not force you to install the 32- bit multilib version. You can use

Re: Orphaned perl-IPTables-ChainMgr and perl-IPTables-Parse

On jeudi 18 janvier 2018 23:08:50 CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Please add me as co-maintainer, they're dependencies of one of my > packages, too. > > Regards, > Dominik Hi Dominik, I've just added you as a co-admin on both packages as you requested. I intend to do an update

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:07:27 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> I can >> dnf install .i686 >> >> and I see no 64bit packages pulled in. > > With F27, > > dnf install wine.i686 > > really pulls in various x86_64 alongside their i686 builds. wine is an exception, it

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 14:01 +, J. Randall Owens wrote: > On 18/01/18 19:45, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 20:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm working on removing all this cruft from all our packages

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:01 AM, J. Randall Owens wrote: > On 18/01/18 19:45, Sérgio Basto wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 20:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I'm working on removing all this cruft from all our packages (and >>> creating >>>

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On 18/01/18 19:45, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2018-01-18 at 20:17 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working on removing all this cruft from all our packages (and >> creating >> conditionals for all packages which have epel branch). > >> Unfortunately some maintainers adding them

[Bug 1536481] New: fusioninventory-agent segfaults when running SNMP

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536481 Bug ID: 1536481 Summary: fusioninventory-agent segfaults when running SNMP Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: fusioninventory-agent Severity: medium Assignee:

[Bug 1536437] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536437 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Writing Documentation for Fedora - Docs FAD

*William Moreno Reyes* Colaborador Proyecto Fedora | Nicaragua IRC: williamjmorenor Canales: #fedora-latam ; #fedora-ni https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor 2018-01-18 12:24 GMT-06:00 Brian Exelbierd : > We are looking for interested people who are willing to

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:34 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 19 January 2018 at 11:44, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:48:52AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: >>> When you say "Core" group, what are the practical effects of removing

Fedora Elections January 2018 - Voting period is in progress

Hi, let me remind you we have Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections in progress. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1], Mindshare [2] and FESCo [3]. The Voting period ends on January 24th, 2018 at 23:59:00 UTC. You might also check a Community Blog for interviews with

Re: HEADS UP - Changes to Ghostscript package in F28

Hello guys! I wanted to let you know I have decided to create additional subpackage 'ghostscript-tools-dvipdf' after some discusssions. It is because the 'dvipdf' tool requires 'dvips' utility to work correctly, which is provided in 'texlive-dvips' subpackage. This resulted in lot of texlive

Re: Exploring the idea of CentOS/RHEL branches in dist-git [was Re: Python3 will be in next major RHEL release, please adjust %if statements accordingly]

On 17 January 2018 at 17:13, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 08:18:42AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> - Better Git frontend for CentOS >> - Possibility to submit PRs against RHEL branches >> - Easy to see changes from RHEL and Fedora (and CentOS). >> What

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

On 19 January 2018 at 11:44, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:48:52AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: >> When you say "Core" group, what are the practical effects of removing >> it? You can uninstall NetworkManager on Fedora today. Do you mean, it >> should

[Bug 1536437] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536437 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- hotness's scratch build of perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.008-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed

[Bug 1536437] perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536437 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1383375 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1383375=edit [patch] Update to 0.008 (#1536437) -- You are

[Bug 1536437] New: perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.008 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536437 Bug ID: 1536437 Summary: perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download-0.008 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Time-OlsonTZ-Download Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 11:48:52AM +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > When you say "Core" group, what are the practical effects of removing > it? You can uninstall NetworkManager on Fedora today. Do you mean, it > should not be installed by default? But you need a way to connect to > the network on a

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

David Demelier wrote: > I just think there are many network possibilities on Linux and > therefore I was proposing to not add a mandatory default in Core. > Especially for people creating extremely minimal appliance (raspberry > pi, firewall) where both network script and systemd-networkd may >

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On 01/18/2018 11:50 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, Does anybody know why we are still using %{?_isa} thing? DNF/libsolv forcefully install 64bit package for any 32bit package in transaction. So it is not possible to get 32bit package without

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Yes. Yes. There are cases where the 64-bit binary doesn't run and the > 32-bit one does. There are cases where the software is 32-bit only and no > longer supported but still needed to export data. > > Until Microsoft decides to abandon 32-bit we will still need it.

[Bug 1528845] perl-RDF-RDFa-Generator-0.192 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528845 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1536408 Referenced

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 10:02 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 07:59 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > > the message doesn't give much motivation beside "can be avoided in > > many > > cases". I would be intrested in your exact criticism. > > > > Hello, > > Don't take this

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

19.01.2018 04:54 Michael Cronenworth wrote: > [...] > Yes. Yes. There are cases where the 64-bit binary doesn't run and the 32-bit > one > does. There are cases where the software is 32-bit only and no longer > supported but > still needed to export data. > > Until Microsoft

Re: RFC: Dropping %{?_isa} hack

On Friday, 19 January 2018 at 04:16, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 20:07:27 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > > I can > > dnf install .i686 > > > > and I see no 64bit packages pulled in. > > With F27, > > dnf install wine.i686 > > really pulls in various x86_64 alongside their

[Bug 1536232] perl-Coro-Multicore-0.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536232 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Proposal to remove NetworkManager from Core group

On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 07:59 +0100, Thomas Haller wrote: > the message doesn't give much motivation beside "can be avoided in > many > cases". I would be intrested in your exact criticism. > Hello, Don't take this personally (I feel you thought some offense). I never said NetworkManager sucks

Re: LizardFS NFS Ganesha integration with no shared library available

Dominique Martinet wrote on Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:04:46AM +0100: > In principle this should be fine, VLC does that too -- libvlc (the core) > is LGPL and vlc itself with the gui is GPL. (It occured to me that VLC isn't in fedora so that doesn't help much with regards to packaging, but I guess

Re: libcdio soname bump in rawhide

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:50:16AM +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2018-01-18 22:25 GMT+01:00 Adrian Reber : > > libcdio upstream released the 2.0 version a few weeks ago and I will > > updated rawhide to the latest libcdio version. It comes with a new > > soname and I will also

Re: Please stop re-adding gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets (for Fedora)

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 8:51 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Fri, 2018-01-19 at 07:53 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: >> Should the scriptlets be removed only in rawhide, or can I apply the >> changes in F26 and F27? > > They can be removed for all supported

Re: LizardFS NFS Ganesha integration with no shared library available

Hi, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote on Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:16:35PM -0500: > The LizardFS FSAL is GPLv3. NFS-Ganesha is LGPLv3+. > > From a Fedora packaging standpoint is it acceptable to build a GPLv3 > plug-in for an otherwise LGPLv3+ binary? > > If the licenses were reversed, I'd be reasonably