[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-26 blocker review meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the blocker review meeting for Monday. There's only one proposed blocker at this time. Obviously the ongoing troubles with getting composes working are blocking, but we don't really need a blocker meeting to talk about that :) We'll keep working on it. -- Adam

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2018-02-26 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting on Monday. I don't think there are any urgent topics at this time. I won't be around to run one at that time either, as it happens. If anyone would like to have a meeting, and is willing to run it in my place, please just go ahead and send an

Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump

Jerry James wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: >> Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> >>> The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it. >> >> That's very good news, thanks! > > Are there any plans to build 7.6.4 for f28? Good

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to

Re: gc-7.6.4 to rawhide, *no* abi bump

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:18 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > >> The soname bump appears to have been a mistake; 7.6.4 reverts it. > > That's very good news, thanks! Are there any plans to build 7.6.4 for f28? I ask because polyml builds fine in Rawhide,

[Bug 1548779] New: perl-Net-SSH2-0.69 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548779 Bug ID: 1548779 Summary: perl-Net-SSH2-0.69 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-SSH2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1548609] perl-Mojolicious-7.69 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548609 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)

This should now be complete in Fedora 28 and rawhide. Note that, as an intentional side effect, libtool will no longer drop the -Wl,0z,now flag in many cases. This could issues for a few packages which depended on the (arguably broken) old libtool behavior. I added some notes to

Review swaps

Hello good folks, A developer tasked me with packaging his small CLI tools so I have a few reviews waiting. They are extremely trivial packages, often a simple Python script or single C file. Here is the list: - Review Request: googler - Google Search, Google Site Search, Google News

looking for a new maintainer for closure-compiler

Hi, closure-compiler in Fedora needs an update [1], possibly with new deps. There's also a bug which prevents it from starting in F28+ [2]. The fix is simple (and I just verified that it works), but the package doesn't build in rawhide because of changes in deps... It's is an interesting and

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1083 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 846 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 428

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 956 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 846 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 817

[EPEL-devel] Re: qt5 dependency problem

On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 17:45 +, Christopher Brown wrote: > Hi, > > In trying to install trojita, I got the following error: > > $ sudo yum install trojita > Loaded plugins: langpacks > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package trojita.x86_64 0:0.7-4.el7 will be

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Sat, 2018-02-24 at 16:40 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko project.org> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without > > having

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

I've fixed disktype, ncdu, and whowatch in rawhide. Thanks for generating the list! Regards, Rich -- Richard Fearn richardfe...@gmail.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)

On 02/24/2018 07:13 PM, Philip Kovacs wrote: A scratch build won't find bind now errors as they are discovered at run time when the dlopen occurs. I have been using:%define _hardened_ldflags "-Wl,-z,lazy"to allow the compile-time hardening, stack protection, etc to remain but filter out the -z

Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)

A scratch build won't find bind now errors as they are discovered at run time when the dlopen occurs. I have been using:%define _hardened_ldflags "-Wl,-z,lazy"to allow the compile-time hardening, stack protection, etc to remain but filter out the -z now linker flag.I assume this won't work

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

I fixed ipvsadm and keepalived. I will also fix foghorn, but I am strongly considering retiring this package. Did this need fixed in the 'f28' branch or is master (Rawhide) sufficient? Thanks. Ryan On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 02/21/2018 04:51 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: OK I understand that, but where is the cutoff. Where as a packager should I stop adding things and expect that libsolv is going to do its job? Do I need to put in BuildRequires: kernel BuildRequires: systemd BuildRequires: bash BuildRequires:

Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)

On 02/24/2018 06:32 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: We currently inject “-z now” hidden behind a -specs= option for the gcc compiler driver. libtool drops this -specs= option from the linker command line, but it preserves

Re: unresponsive maintainer 'jamatos'

On Friday, 9 February 2018 09.35.34 WET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi José, > > are you still around? You activity suddenly stops around May 28th > 2017, I hope nothing serious happened. Hi, I am alive. And I have been extremely busy, specially with classes and related work

[EPEL-devel] qt5 dependency problem

Hi, In trying to install trojita, I got the following error: $ sudo yum install trojita Loaded plugins: langpacks Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package trojita.x86_64 0:0.7-4.el7 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libQt5WebKitWidgets.so.5(Qt_5)(64bit) for

Re: Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)

On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > We currently inject “-z now” hidden behind a -specs= option for the gcc > compiler driver. libtool drops this -specs= option from the linker command > line, but it preserves -Wl,-z,relro, so I'm trying whether listing

Change to linker flags injection (#1548397)

We currently inject “-z now” hidden behind a -specs= option for the gcc compiler driver. libtool drops this -specs= option from the linker command line, but it preserves -Wl,-z,relro, so I'm trying whether listing -Wl,-z,now directly improves the linker flag injection here. I'm doing this in

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

Paul Howarth wrote: > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:04:44 + > Tom Hughes wrote: > >> On 23/02/18 14:33, Paul Howarth wrote: >>> On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:49:02 +0100 >>> Marek Polacek wrote: proftpd: timeouts in tests, but in koji it's fine >>> >>>

xboxdrv package left

Hi all. 'xboxdrv' is now an "orphaned" package. Feel free to adopt it if needed. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hi On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc > and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

fixed g2clib and pyproj. Jos On 02/18/2018 06:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having gcc and > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due to > random > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:04:44 + Tom Hughes wrote: > On 23/02/18 14:33, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:49:02 +0100 > > Marek Polacek wrote: > >> proftpd: timeouts in tests, but in koji it's fine > > > > I get this too. If I build

Re: Fedora mass rebuild 2018

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:33:58PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 04:09:26PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > libguestfs-1.37.35-2.fc28.src.rpm > > > I'm not sure about these failures, but they

Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Hey, On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 6:09 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > List of packages and respective maintainers: > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt Done: gnome-session gnome-shell-extensions(*) Cheers, Florian (*) accidentally, by

Re: Package stops supporting python 2.7 in latest version, what to do now

Hi Sergio, thanks for bringing that up :) I investigated a bit more, at least for astrometry I still need the python2 package. Therefore I suggest we go on with Option 3, I can prepare the python2-astropy package for review. Greetings, Christian On 02/21/2018 10:18 PM, Sergio Pascual wrote: >