Review request: battray

Hi, Would someone be willing to review a simple package for me? The BZ  is here: Bug 1573695 – Review Request: Battray - simple tray icon to show a laptop’s battery status. I have some experience with Fedora's packaging and have maintained a few packages (pdf-stapler, python-PDF2, sylfilter)

[EPEL-devel] heketi has been retired from EPEL6 and EPEL7

Heketi, an intelligent management service for Gluster with a ReST interface, has been retired from EPEL6 and EPEL7. Some of the Gluster components that were in EPEL gave conflicts with versions available in RHEL and/or Red Hat Gluster Storage. In order to prevent issues, all Gluster packages have

[EPEL-devel] ansible back available in EPEL7

Greetings. Ansible was added to the RHEL7 extras channel and removed from EPEL7 a while back. Now, ansible is no longer going to be updated in the RHEL7 extras channel per: https://access.redhat.com/articles/3359651 So, accordingly ansible is back in EPEL7. Users are welcome to install from

Re: libicu upgrade to 61.1 with soname bump in rawhide/F29

01.05.2018, 19:05, "Jonathan Wakely" : > On 26/04/18 19:49 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with >> a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds, I'll >> ask Pete Walter (who already

Re: Orphaning schroot package

I take it, as is part of debian tools , I tried to see if some trick here, rawhide version still in 1.6.5 when 1.6.10 is available since 2014-05-05 ... On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 10:37 -0700, Zach Carter wrote: > I'm orphaning the schroot package, since I no longer use it or work > with it: > >

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 21:19 +, mark preston wrote: > i remember OC being very protective of their stream and not working > well with others to get it in other distributions. I was an oC user > that switch to nC and still running V10. I've been waiting for an > update to nC and would like to

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

i remember OC being very protective of their stream and not working well with others to get it in other distributions. I was an oC user that switch to nC and still running V10. I've been waiting for an update to nC and would like to stay with it even if i have to upgrade though 11 and 12 to

[EPEL-devel] Re: updating condor

On 1 May 2018 at 15:57, Mátyás Selmeci wrote: > Hi folks, > > The versions of condor in EPEL 6 (8.4.3) and 7 (8.3.8) are out of date and > no longer supported by upstream. The current release is 8.6.10. > > Most configurations should work fine without changes between the

[EPEL-devel] updating condor

Hi folks, The versions of condor in EPEL 6 (8.4.3) and 7 (8.3.8) are out of date and no longer supported by upstream. The current release is 8.6.10. Most configurations should work fine without changes between the two versions. However, there are some admin-visible changes, most notably

Fedora 28-20180426.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 231763 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/231763 ID: 231799 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL:

Re: Should boost package install boost-python2 / boost-python3 / both or none?

On 26/04/18 23:44 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 19/04/18 19:02 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: I forgot to mention that this will break any packages using Boost.Python which currently just have BR: boost-devel but that's arguably a good thing anyway. It will be easy to fix them, and we will

Re: Working on a Dracut bug?

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:32:36PM +0200, inderau...@arcor.de wrote: > btw. just read that fedora workstation doesn't need a separate root > account anymore. there are no security concerns i should have, don't > i? You can set a root password if you like. You might find this bit I wrote a while

Re: Working on a Dracut bug?

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:30:19PM +0200, inderau...@arcor.de wrote: > now ist 1st of may. And Fedora 28 is released. I want do upgrade. But i don't > want this error messages and related start up issues anymore. > Is there any progress on fixing this long term issue? We're working on it, and

Re: libicu upgrade to 61.1 with soname bump in rawhide/F29

On 26/04/18 19:49 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi, I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds, I'll ask Pete Walter (who already did it for 60.1) to help with rebuilding the dependent packages, or another

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-05-02 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: The EPEL Steering Committee will have a weekly meeting to cover current tasks and problems needed to keep EPEL

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180426.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180425.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180426.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: Install failures on ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64 & armv7l (was: Re: Fedora 28 is officially here!)

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 08:42:53AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 16:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location > > method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the > > exact same error on

Re: Fedora 28 is officially here!

On 05/01/2018 10:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, which is officially released today. FWIW, there is a broken link to the install documentation. If you visit: https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/ and click on

Re: Install failures on ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64 & armv7l (was: Re: Fedora 28 is officially here!)

On Tue, 2018-05-01 at 16:25 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location > method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the > exact same error on ppc64{,le}, aarch64 and armv7l: > > > ** (process:1963): WARNING **:

Re: Install failures on ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64 & armv7l (was: Re: Fedora 28 is officially here!)

On Tue, May 01, 2018 at 04:25:11PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location > method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the > exact same error on ppc64{,le}, aarch64 and armv7l: > > > ** (process:1963): WARNING

Install failures on ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64 & armv7l (was: Re: Fedora 28 is officially here!)

Unfortunately the Anaconda install (using virt-install --location method) didn't work well for me on any !x86 architecture. I get the exact same error on ppc64{,le}, aarch64 and armv7l: ** (process:1963): WARNING **: 15:09:38.580: Cannot load the LVM plugin anaconda 28.22.10-1.fc28 for Fedora

Modularity Working Group IRC Meeting Minutes (2018-05-01)

Meeting started by langdon at 14:01:52 UTC. Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-05-01/modularity_wg.2018-05-01-14.01.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-3/2018-05-01/modularity_wg.2018-05-01-14.01.txt Log:

[EPEL-devel] Ansible execution errors

Hi, I upgraded my ansible control machine to to the latest centos-7-cr and ansible-2.5.2-1.el7.noarch from epel. The latest yum update installed python-urllib3-1.10.2-5.el7.noarch. When I run ansible I am getting the following errors: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/__init__.py:80:

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 28.20180425.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 28.20180425.0 Commit(x86_64): 94a9d06eef34aa6774c056356d3d2e024e57a0013b6f8048dbae392a84a137ca Commit(aarch64): 12a95314084eaa2242bdfe24197774aac163433d2405bc2813b4d89180434630 Commit(ppc64le):

Fedora 28 is officially here!

It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, which is officially released today. Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly smooth and polished release. You all are awesome. Read the official announcement at: *

Fedora 28 is officially here!

It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, which is officially released today. Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly smooth and polished release. You all are awesome. Read the official announcement at: *

[Bug 1569520] perl-Storable-3.06 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569520 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Storable-3.09-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1570273] perl-Storable-3.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570273 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Storable-3.09-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1570265] perl-Digest-SHA-6.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570265 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.02-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 4/30/18 1:16 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jason L Tibbitts III > wrote: > >>> "CW" == Colin Walters writes: > >> CW> I'd say it makes sense to revisit the default here globally in >> CW> Anaconda. > >> Maybe. Have the

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 23 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-2c81054303 remctl-3.14-1.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f51587d6d2 composer-1.6.4-1.el7 12

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

Hi, i run fedora 28 on a t450 since it was promoted to beta working with it 8-10 hours per day without any issue. System Information Manufacturer: LENOVO Product Name: 20BUS003IX Version: ThinkPad T450 # cat /sys/class/scsi_host/host*/link_power_management_policy

[Bug 1570273] perl-Storable-3.09 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570273 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Storable-3.09-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1570265] perl-Digest-SHA-6.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570265 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Digest-SHA-6.02-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are