[Bug 1611585] perl-Log-Any-1.707 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611585 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Any-1.707-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ac05da3787 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1611585] perl-Log-Any-1.707 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1611585 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Any-1.707-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bfbac3f7d1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: [HEADS UP] Update libgit2 to 0.27

2018-08-15 Thread Amit Saha
Hi Igor, On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 4:33 PM Igor Gnatenko < ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > 0.27.x is released long time ago, but I never got time for updating it. It > obviously involves SONAME change. > > The good thing about this release is that it breaks only

Re: Provenpackager help request: ignored pull requests

2018-08-15 Thread Scott Talbert
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote: I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no response to the bugs I filed).

Re: Fedora updates-20180815.1 compose check report

2018-08-15 Thread Dusty Mabe
On 08/15/2018 07:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 19:51 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> No missing expected images. >> >> Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) >> -- >> Mail generated by check-compose: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose > > So, generating

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-08-16 - 91% PASS

2018-08-15 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/08/16/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.14-20180815git160e027.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Provenpackager help request: ignored pull requests

2018-08-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
> I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of > wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull > requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no > response to the bugs I filed). Rather than go through the

soname change - libqalculate.so.19

2018-08-15 Thread Mukundan Ragavan
libqalculate soname bump is happening with v2.6.2. The following packages are affected - plasma-workspace step cantor qalculate-kde I will rebuild these packages for rawhide and F29 before Sunday. Mukundan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Provenpackager help request: ignored pull requests

2018-08-15 Thread Scott Talbert
Hi, I'm slowly trying to move packages to wxWidgets 3.0 so we can get rid of wx 2.8 which is not maintained since 2011. I have made a bunch of pull requests but very frustratingly, many of them received no response (and no response to the bugs I filed). Rather than go through the

Re: Fedora updates-20180815.1 compose check report

2018-08-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2018-08-15 at 19:51 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > No missing expected images. > > Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) > -- > Mail generated by check-compose: > https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose So, generating updates and updates-testing via Pungi composes is a relatively

Fedora testing-20180815.1 compose check report

2018-08-15 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Bug 1616115] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616115 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1615176] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.0 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615176 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

Fedora updates-20180815.1 compose check report

2018-08-15 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1612612] perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.09 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612612 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.09-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1613088] perl-Pod-Markdown-3.101 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613088 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Pod-Markdown-3.101-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1612474] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-LicenseFromModule-0.07 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612474 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-LicenseFromModule-0.07-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1598971] perl-Log-Any-1.706 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Log-Any-1.706-1.fc27 |perl-Log-Any-1.706-1.fc27

[Bug 1612612] perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.09 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612612 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Protocol-HTTP2-1.09-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug 1612474] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-LicenseFromModule-0.07 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612474 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-LicenseFromModule-0.07-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving

[Bug 1598971] perl-Log-Any-1.706 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Rex Dieter
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Are you sure about that? Ocaml does it as well. >> >> Thanks, >> Florian > > The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but subsequent > builds are supposed to build from source. The problem is that we

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Pavel Zhukov
Michael Cronenworth writes: > On 08/15/2018 05:16 AM, Radka Janekova wrote: >> >> mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems >> unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a >> maintainer for mono? >> >> I can take a look at it within the next month or

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/15/2018 08:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. Thanks, Florian The guidelines allow an initial bootstrap from binaries, but subsequent builds are supposed to build from source. The problem is that we can't build without the binaries at all.

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 15.8.2018 15:55, Florian Weimer wrote: On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in Fedora. Are you sure about that?  Ocaml does it as well. See also:

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Florian Weimer
On 08/15/2018 03:20 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: The Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping from binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in Fedora. Are you sure about that? Ocaml does it as well. Thanks, Florian

[Bug 1613203] Upgrade perl-Math-Pari to 2.030504

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1613203 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Michael Cronenworth
On 08/15/2018 05:16 AM, Radka Janekova wrote: mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a maintainer for mono? I can take a look at it within the next month or two if there really isn't anyone else...

Re: [HEADS UP] -Wl,--as-needed is added in rawhide

2018-08-15 Thread Neal Gompa
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 8:29 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:51 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: >> >> On 08/15/2018 08:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> > It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30. >> > >> > If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you >> > can

Re: [HEADS UP] -Wl,--as-needed is added in rawhide

2018-08-15 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:51 AM Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 08/15/2018 08:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30. > > > > If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you > > can use `%undefine _ld_as_needed` to disable it. > > I still don't

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! 2018-08-15 12:16 GMT+02:00 Radka Janekova : > > Hi, > > mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems > unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a maintainer > for mono? > > I can take a look at it within the next month or two if there

Re: Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Manas Mangaonkar
Hey, incase this has been abandoned,i can take this up.I recently published my first package --> KernelHighperf and would love to work on something else and gain more experience as a packager. On Wed,

[Bug 1616198] perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.058-1.fc29 FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1: t/ core.t hangs

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616198 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This t/core.t hang is triggered by perl-Net-SSLeay patch that hides ERROR_WANT_READ/ERROR_WANT_WRITE SSL_read() errors by retrying instead of propagating them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1614884] Tests fail with OpenSSL 1.1.1

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1614884 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |29 -- You are receiving this mail

Mono - Do we have a maintainer?

2018-08-15 Thread Radka Janekova
Hi, mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a maintainer for mono? I can take a look at it within the next month or two if there really isn't anyone else... Regards, Radka --

Re: Fedora 29 Mass Branching

2018-08-15 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 15.8.2018 v 00:37 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > Hi All, > > Fedora 29 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull > --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder > rawhide/f30 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so > this means that anything you do for

[Bug 1616198] perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.058-1.fc29 FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1: t/ core.t hangs

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616198 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com

[Bug 1616198] New: perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.058-1.fc29 FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1: t/core.t hangs

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616198 Bug ID: 1616198 Summary: perl-IO-Socket-SSL-2.058-1.fc29 FTBFS with OpenSSL 1.1.1: t/core.t hangs Product: Fedora Version: 29 Component: perl-IO-Socket-SSL

[Bug 1616177] Upgrade perl-Coro to 6.52

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616177 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1616182] Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to 1.96

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616182 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1616179] perl-Text-CSV-1.96 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616179 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jples...@redhat.com --- Comment

[Bug 1616183] New: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip-0.14 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616183 Bug ID: 1616183 Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip-0.14 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize-GZip Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1616182] New: Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to 1.96

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616182 Bug ID: 1616182 Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-CSV to 1.96 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-CSV Assignee: jvrom...@squirrel.nl Reporter:

[Bug 1616179] New: perl-Text-CSV-1.96 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616179 Bug ID: 1616179 Summary: perl-Text-CSV-1.96 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-CSV Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1616177] New: Upgrade perl-Coro to 6.52

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616177 Bug ID: 1616177 Summary: Upgrade perl-Coro to 6.52 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Coro Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

Re: [HEADS UP] -Wl,--as-needed is added in rawhide

2018-08-15 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 08/15/2018 08:11 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: It's in redhat-rpm-config-118-1.fc30. If it causes any problems for you - let me know. In the meantime, you can use `%undefine _ld_as_needed` to disable it. I still don't see anything to resolve the libtool issue - namely that libtool reorders

[Bug 1615643] perl-CGI-4.39 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615643 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1615176] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.0 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1615176 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0a5e959533 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1616115] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616115 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0a5e959533 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug 1616115] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.01 is available

2018-08-15 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616115 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

Fedora 29 Mass Branching

2018-08-15 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi All, Fedora 29 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f30 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f29 you also have to do in the master branch and do a

Fedora 29 Mass Branching

2018-08-15 Thread Mohan Boddu
Hi All, Fedora 29 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder rawhide/f30 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so this means that anything you do for f29 you also have to do in the master branch and do a