On 2018-08-24 01:27 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hi design team,
>
> Today we have reached the Beta Wallpapers deadline for Fedora 29. The
> schedule[1] has until 27 August to finish packaging. The packaging
> needs to be finished before Beta Freeze of the F28 release, which is
> planned on Tue
On Mon, 27 Aug 2018, Jerry James wrote:
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 8:33 PM Scott Talbert wrote:
> I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
> build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
> from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
>
>
Hi,
I'm not the maintainer of this package (iaxclient), but I ran into this
build failure while working on a pull request. It seems to be fallout
from the -Wl,--as-needed change. Any idea why this is happening?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=29342306
Thanks,
Scott
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/08/28/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180827gitde78c49.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 22/132 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 270139 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/270139
ID: 270140 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 20/132 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180826.n.0):
ID: 270334 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/270334
ID: 270401
Suppose I am main admin of a package which I would like to orphan in
release branches, but keep maintaining the package in arbitrary [1]
branches, which are used for building modules. Would this considered
as a valid approach?
How should I handle orphaning the package in this case? I can think
Some modules are built in MBS/Koji but are never released to users.
Currently such modules can only be used as build dependencies of other
modules. In future, if solution like "ursa-major" [1] is implemented,
such modules could also be used as build dependencies for non-modular
packages.
An
So audiofile has eight current maintainers (plus all of gnome-sig) but
somehow none of those maintainers has admin privileges on the
repository. Would any of the maintainers like be made an admin so that
SDL and everything that depends on it can drop out of this report?
Just let me know and I'll
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-08-28 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar
wrote:
> Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is.
>
Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach
> - Manas
>
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49925
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
all packages required already in fedora, all you need todo is update
pgadmin4 spec and get it approved.
First, I've never used any of the online tools (e.g. koji, etc) for
building a RPM before. I would need someone to walk me through the
first one.
Second, I tried your branch RPM, but I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1620684
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 29
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:6.44 MiB
spot merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Wx` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.0
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Wx/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
swt2c commented on the pull-request: `Rebuild with wxWidgets 3.0` that you are
following:
``
As an additional data point, I did do some light testing with all of perl-Wx's
dependencies. Basic functionality worked as best as I can tell.
``
To reply, visit the link below
OLD: Fedora-29-20180826.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180827.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 32
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
On Sat, 25 Aug 2018 at 15:29, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
>
> On 08/24/2018 10:24 AM, Brian Clark wrote:
> > Are there any minutes from this meeting?
>
> Here ya go:
>
>
> https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-containers/2018-08-23/fedora_container_sig_kickoff.2018-08-23-15.00.html
We also have a
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL biweekly meeting on 2018-08-29 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the bi-weekly meeting for EPEL. Items for the meeting agenda should be
emailed to
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-08-27)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-08-27/fesco.2018-08-27-15.00.log.html
.
Meeting
I would definitely love that!
Having the ability to list all changes at a single place, comment, and even
organise them by tags seems like a way forward.
BTW I know that Pagure stores issues in git, so that could solve the
history problem, although I don't know how exactly is that implemented.
On 08/26/2018 07:11 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27.8.2018 01:03, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
>> I'd be happy to help, but I feel overwhelmed. I've never used the whole
>> stack of koji, src.fedoraproject.org, fedpkg, etc.
>>
>> I need someone to help walk me through the first one.
>
> Feel free
Dne 22.8.2018 v 22:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Can we patch rpm not to show this useless line?
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/534
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
- Original Message -
> From: "Robert-André Mauchin"
> To: gol...@lists.fedoraproject.org, devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 4:42:03 PM
> Subject: Golang SIG primary goals?
>
> Hey guys and gals,
>
> Can we start to discuss this SIG goals? What each of you
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 5:48 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> What are the possibilities for how a stream is maintained? The cases I can
> think of:
>
> * Indefinite - rolling forward with upstream - "master" "stable" etc.
> * Tied to an upstream version and it's EOL - a "2.1" stream of django
>
*
Hi,
I have corrected license of 'screen' from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+. It has been
licensed under GPLv3+ since version 4.2.0.
Regards,
Václav Doležal
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Okay, I am happy to be finally joining the effort.
- Manas
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Michal Novotny wrote:
> I cannot take your review right now but i just want to say: Welcome!
>
> Michal
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM Manas Mangaonkar <
> manasmangaon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622489
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622486
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622480
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622490
Bug ID: 1622490
Summary: perl-Test-Routine-0.027 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Routine
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622489
Bug ID: 1622489
Summary: perl-Scope-Upper-0.31 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Scope-Upper
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622486
Bug ID: 1622486
Summary: perl-Proc-Fork-0.806 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Proc-Fork
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622484
Bug ID: 1622484
Summary: Upgrade perl-MCE-Shared to 1.839
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MCE-Shared
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622483
Bug ID: 1622483
Summary: perl-MCE-1.837 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-MCE
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:44:40AM -, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> I've also done builds for F28 and F27, though I'm wondering if they
> should be pushed to updates - on one hand, there's the risk of
> breaking changes. On the other, the package has multiple issues and
> leaving it out of date
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622481
Bug ID: 1622481
Summary: Upgrade perl-IO-AIO to 4.6
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-IO-AIO
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622480
Bug ID: 1622480
Summary: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch-2.3.4 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Git-CPAN-Patch
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622479
Bug ID: 1622479
Summary: perl-Gearman-2.004.015 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Gearman
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 17:02, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > #1957 F29 Change: Liberation Fonts 2
> > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1957
> > DECISION (+6, 0, 0)
>
> Sigh!
>
> Really nothing has changed since the decision in Fedora 19 to stick with
> Liberation 1,
Thanks for the PR! I've merged it and used it to build the updated dokuwiki
package for Rawhide and F29.
I've also done builds for F28 and F27, though I'm wondering if they should be
pushed to updates - on one hand, there's the risk of breaking changes. On the
other, the package has multiple
On 2018-08-26, Mattia Verga wrote:
>> On 24.8.2018 10:04, Clement Verna wrote:
>>
>> Oh no, the press-random-arrows-to-get-badges app will be gone :D
>
> Actually, I would find tags useful for searching packages related to
> a specific field: for example, I would like to search for 'astronomy'
>
I cannot take your review right now but i just want to say: Welcome!
Michal
On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM Manas Mangaonkar
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My name is Manas,i am a Computer Engineering student at the University of
> Mumbai.
>
> i recently began packaging with my first package being this
On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 03:48:12PM +0200, Bob Mauchin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2018, 12:53 Leigh Scott
> wrote:
>
> > Besser82 hasn't answered any of my emails for months.
> >
>
> I saw him back in May for a couple of reviews, maybe he's in holidays.
>
I briefly contacted Björn, and he
On 08/24/2018 09:12 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 08/22/2018 04:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 19/132 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 269864 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/269864
ID: 269874 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 23/132 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180825.n.0):
ID: 269767 Test: x86_64 AtomicHost-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/269767
ID: 269791
49 matches
Mail list logo
