Hey
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 5:30 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 20:09 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> > The thing is, if people do not test releases they will never be
> > stable. And even if I don't know how to access my F29 installation
> > from a chroot sometimes my testing is
Hi All,
This is a gentle reminder for package maintainers to fix security bugs
in the packages they maintain. A complete list of open security flaws
against Fedora packages is available at:
https://red.ht/2wJ8kLS
Some documentation about this is also available at:
On 09/04/2018 07:29 PM, Christian Stadelmann wrote:
> How does one mark a bug as CRITICAL or IMPORTANT?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 11:54 PM Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> I haven't dealt with modularity yet, really, so tell me if i wrong (i'm
> kind of guessing a little bit from briefly snooping around). module
> building is like so, right?
>
> 1) user
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:00 PM Owen Taylor wrote:
> Each flatpak needs to be tagged into two koji tags:
>
> f29-modular-updates (this is the destination for the module build)
> f29-flatpak (this is the destination for the Flatpak container build)
>
> The package list for each koji tag is
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/05/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180904gitc64f7fb.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The current idea
=
A Flatpak is a module. The way that the module is deployed is by creating a
Flatpak container from the module. (Other modules might be deployed by
installing by RPMs directly or creating a server container.)
Because Flatpaks are a module, they share the modules/
Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>>> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
>>> every Fedora packager has to have installed
>>
>> I don't think that's true, can you explain?
> Well, the "join the package collection
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:15 PM Ben Rosser wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> >> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
> >> every Fedora packager has to have installed
> >
> > I don't think that's true, can you explain?
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
>> every Fedora packager has to have installed
>
> I don't think that's true, can you explain?
>
> -- rex
Well, the "join the package collection maintainers" document
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
> every Fedora packager has to have installed
I don't think that's true, can you explain?
-- rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 14:12 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 08/22/2018 04:28 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffe
> > doraproject.org%2Fwiki%2FChanges%2FRemove_Group_Tagdata=02%7C0
> >
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 05:46:55PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:37:25AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
> > >
Hi everybody,
I am faced with a problem that's due to the update of mutter / GNOME to
version 3.30: The gala window manager - which is used by the Pantheon DE
(primary DE of elementaryOS) - is broken by the API bump from libmutter-2
to libmutter-3.
I reported this "issue" with the fedora mutter
Hello,
new Fedora Developer Portal update is out!
Website statistics are on the bottom of this email.
Highlights:
- New Cassandra page [1]
by Augusto Mecking Caringi(@caringi)
- Rust pages reworked [2]
by @msehnout
[1]
Kevin Kofler writes:
> Jerry James wrote:
>> If I understand correctly, the default is a library that cannot
>> tolerate multiple threads, uses 32-bit integers in the interface, and
>> does not use "a symbol name suffix", whatever that means.
>
> Hmmm, normally, the serial version is not itself
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:37:25AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
> > ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625310
Bug ID: 1625310
Summary: perl-Mail-Transport-3.003 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-Transport
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625309
Bug ID: 1625309
Summary: perl-Mail-Message-3.007 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-Message
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 20:09 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Den mån 3 sep. 2018 kl 12:56 skrev Fabio Valentini :
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 09:13 Ron Yorston wrote:
> > >
> > > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39
I'll take autodocksuite.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 10:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
> # Date: 2018-09-04 (NOTE: TUESDAY!)
> # Time: 15:00 UTC
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
> # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
>
> Greetings testers!
>
> We're
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Working Group
=
Minutes:
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:00 AM Christian Stadelmann <
genodeft...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> How does one mark a bug as CRITICAL or IMPORTANT?
>
These are CVE classifications and are usually assigned by the security
team.
___
devel mailing list --
How does one mark a bug as CRITICAL or IMPORTANT?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List
FESCo accepted [1] a new policy to handle packages with long-standing
known security bugs in a way similar to FTBFS bugs:
AGREED: If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is currently open
against a package, or a security issue of lower severity has been
open for at least 6 months, four
FESCo accepted [1] a new policy to handle packages with long-standing
known security bugs in a way similar to FTBFS bugs:
AGREED: If a CRITICAL or IMPORTANT security issue is currently open
against a package, or a security issue of lower severity has been
open for at least 6 months, four
Hi,
I am wondering what is the purpose of fedora-packager package and what
is its future? It seems to be abandoned upstream as well as in Fedora
[1, 2, 3, 4]. This is a bit unfortunate considering this is package
every Fedora packager has to have installed. Is there a chance to give
that package
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 09:37:25AM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM Michael Adam wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> >>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 01:53:50PM +0900, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew, nice to meet you at Flock.
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 5:30 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
>
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_glibc-langpacks-all_from_buildroot
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624939
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Model-TkUI-1.367-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4e287073e8
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624947
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624939
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8052ead839
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6b9a6a70b2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.58-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7116ce1772
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624943
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d2f0264871
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-221c934152
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Path-2.16-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7dbbf7d62c
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:21 AM, Igor Gnatenko <
ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM Michael Adam wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Michael
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624942
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624935
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.15-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-404b318615
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM Michael Adam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>> >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624935
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
45 matches
Mail list logo
