I use youtube-dl a lot, so I could help as a co-maintainer.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Sun, 9 Sep 2018, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm thinking about removing some of my Python 2 subpackages (that
are no longer used). However, I'm wondering about the case where
the removed packages should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages. I
don't _think_ the removal of my packages would cause
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 9.9.2018 23:21, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7.9.2018 19:21, Raphael Groner wrote:
> >>> Does this deprecation of python2 mean requests for package review with
> >>> python2
> Thanks, Clem intends to port blueberry in the near future.
to python3
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> On 09/09/2018 06:56 AM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Since the Xfce spin uses these, I'll take em. Co-maintainers welcome.
>
> kevin
Thanks, Clem intends to port blueberry in the near future.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/10/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180909git8ff8cb8.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/09/2018 12:40 AM, Radka Janekova wrote:
> > Please whoever can fix it asap, getting production downtime here.
>
> It should be back up as of about 45min ago.
>
An awesome thanks to whoever communicated it, and to whoever resurrected it
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 276839 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276839
ID: 276849 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL:
On 9.9.2018 23:21, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 7.9.2018 19:21, Raphael Groner wrote:
Does this deprecation of python2 mean requests for package review with python2
only are now invalid?
Yes. You can always get a FPC exception from (any)
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 7.9.2018 19:21, Raphael Groner wrote:
> > Does this deprecation of python2 mean requests for package review with
> > python2 only are now invalid?
>
> Yes. You can always get a FPC exception from (any) guideline or a FPC
> exemption from
OLD: Fedora-29-20180907.n.0
NEW: Fedora-29-20180909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
On 9.9.2018 22:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 09/08/2018 02:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
the manual un-orphaning process with rel-eng tickets is wasting
maintainer and rel-eng time and is very noisy (e.g. if more than one
person requests the package at the same time). With the
On 09/09/2018 06:56 AM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have
> orphaned them.
Since the Xfce spin uses these, I'll take em. Co-maintainers welcome.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/08/2018 02:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the manual un-orphaning process with rel-eng tickets is wasting
> maintainer and rel-eng time and is very noisy (e.g. if more than one
> person requests the package at the same time). With the upcoming
> inevitable mass
On 7.9.2018 19:45, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 08/20/2018 04:41 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
Python 2 will be deprecated in Fedora. Packagers can mark any other
Python 2 packages as deprecated as well.
I didn't know there was a way to do this, but the change page does link
to a policy for it:
On 8.9.2018 10:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 09:49:40PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
I'm thinking about removing some of my Python 2 subpackages (that
are no longer used). However, I'm wondering about the case where
the removed packages should be added to
On So, 09.09.18 09:31, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Has anyone looked at supporting pam_cgfs.so in Fedora.
>
> This question was asked here.
>
> https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/1429
I am not sure what pam_cgfs.so precisely does, but do note that on
systemd systems
Still looking for sponsorship as a packager/maintainer.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> Okay, I am happy to be finally joining the effort.
>
> - Manas
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 12:52 PM, Michal Novotny wrote:
>
>> I cannot take your review right now but i just want
On 7.9.2018 19:21, Raphael Groner wrote:
Does this deprecation of python2 mean requests for package review with python2
only are now invalid?
Yes. You can always get a FPC exception from (any) guideline or a FPC
exemption from the review process, or a FESCo approved Change proposal,
or
On 09/09/2018 12:40 AM, Radka Janekova wrote:
> Please whoever can fix it asap, getting production downtime here.
It should be back up as of about 45min ago.
Note that while copr is not on our fully supported apps list, there is
work in progress to bring it to a more stable/supported state.
Hi list,
asio maintainers [1] seem to be unresponsive:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551800
I have checked the corresponding FAS accounts using fedora-active-user
and the maintainers do not appear to be very active:
- uwog: last FAS login 2017-01-05
- pocock: last FAS login
On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 3:06 PM Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Adam,
>
> What is the position on openSSL 1.1.1?
>
> The openSSL team has targeted Sept 11 as the release date, and I have
> not seen any other word on the user list. Of course there may be
> different discussion elsewhere.
>
> For all
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. We're now
in F29 Beta crunch time, so that's the main focus. There will be a
blocker review meeting at 16:00 UTC, please come to that if you can.
If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss this week,
please do reply to this
Hi folks!
We have a proposed Beta blocker bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616269
We are not sure whether to make it a blocker as we are not sure how
commonly it will affect people.
There actually seem to be a few different but similar bugs involved at
this point. It'd be
# F29 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2018-09-10
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We have 3 proposed Beta blockers and 21 proposed Beta freeze
exception to review, so let's have a review meeting tomorrow.
If you have time today, you can take a
On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 10:05 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Adam,
>
> What is the position on openSSL 1.1.1?
f29 currently has 1.1.1-0.pre9.1.fc29. There is no proposed FE for any
later build. So far as blocker/FE process goes, that is all that is
relevant.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 76/132 (x86_64), 24/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180908.n.0):
ID: 276675 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/276675
ID: 276676 Test: x86_64
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180908.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180909.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 15
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 51
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.28 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
I don't use or have the time to maintain blueberry and bluez-tools so I have
orphaned them.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Has anyone looked at supporting pam_cgfs.so in Fedora.
This question was asked here.
https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/1429
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624947
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|emman...@seyman.fr |p...@city-fan.org
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626461
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624945
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624944
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Please whoever can fix it asap, getting production downtime here.
Thanks,
Radka
--
*Radka Janeková*
.NET Engineer, Red Hat
*radka.ja...@redhat.com *
IRC: radka | Freenode: Rhea
___
devel mailing list --
35 matches
Mail list logo
