Fedora 29-20180911.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-11 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/132 (x86_64), 1/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 278492 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278492 ID: 278508 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-09-12 - 91% PASS

2018-09-11 Thread vashirov
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/09/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-20180911git8ff8cb8.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Fedora 29 compose report: 20180911.n.0 changes

2018-09-11 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-29-20180910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-29-20180911.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:6 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:9.05 MiB Size

Re: Hi

2018-09-11 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 11.9.2018 20:27, James Thornber wrote: Emailing to be able to post to list. Welcome, James. For future reference, you should be able to join at [0] without the need to send such e-mail. However, feel free to post an introductory e-mail as described at [1]. [0]

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

2018-09-11 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 09/11/18 11:52, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 16:48, Petr Viktorin > wrote: [..] These numbers hide an important fact: many things currently come with RPMs for both python2 and python3. More detailed statistics (based on SRPMs, not

Fedora Rawhide-20180911.n.0 compose check report

2018-09-11 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/132 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180910.n.0): ID: 278231 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/278231 ID: 278320 Test: x86_64 universal

Re: [modularity] Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

2018-09-11 Thread Langdon White
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:09 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Go ahead > > +1 On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:04 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > >> We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period >> we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd >> like

Re: Managing stream (arbitrary) branch and module lifecycles

2018-09-11 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 2:30 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:43 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > As a packager, what is your experience with lifecycles of your packages? > Do you get a specific EOL date from the upstream? If not, at what > circumstances you would retire an old version

Re: Managing stream (arbitrary) branch and module lifecycles

2018-09-11 Thread Adam Samalik
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:43 PM Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 8:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > >> >> So... any comments to the concept? Any ideas about workflows or processes >> of managing the EOL values? >> > > Looking forward to this but I would say the devil is in the details. >

Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

2018-09-11 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi folks! Around the time DNF 3 landed in Rawhide (hence F29), we had quite a few folks on these lists reporting issues, including crasher bugs. Many of these seemed somehow related to the DNF history database. They also were not easy to isolate and fix. We're now close to the F29 Beta release,

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

2018-09-11 Thread Tomasz Kłoczko
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 16:48, Petr Viktorin wrote: [..] > These numbers hide an important fact: many things currently come with > RPMs for both python2 and python3. > > More detailed statistics (based on SRPMs, not binary RPMs): > http://fedora.portingdb.xyz/ > Graph with historical data:

Re: [modularity] Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

2018-09-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Go ahead On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:04 PM Adam Samalik wrote: > We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period > we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd > like to remove them all. Any objections? > > [1]

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

2018-09-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 11:31 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > Kevin, > > Thanks for taking care of this package for so long. It's an > exceptionally-challenging package that most maintainers would not be > willing to touch, and your work was very much appreciated. +1! -- Adam Williamson

[modularity] Removing obsolete github repositories with module definitions

2018-09-11 Thread Adam Samalik
We have some obsolete github repositories [1] from the f26 and f27 period we are no longer using. I feel like it might be confusing to people. So I'd like to remove them all. Any objections? [1] https://github.com/modularity-modules/ -- Adam Šamalík --- Software Engineer

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

2018-09-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Kevin Kofler wrote: > I have to bring some bad news to you: I unfortunately have to orphan the > qt5-qtwebengine package. I thank you for all your efforts related this, very much appreciated. -- Rex ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Looking for whom to pass the vessel for maitaining youtube-dl

2018-09-11 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On samedi 8 septembre 2018 11:08:21 CEST Matěj Cepl wrote: > Hi, > > with change of my employer I don't use Fedora/RHEL for my > day-to-day work anymore and so I am loosing touch with the > actual state of packages here. Therefore, I would love to hand > over de facto maintainership of the

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180911.n.0 changes

2018-09-11 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180910.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180911.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:14 Upgraded packages: 136 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 17.33 MiB Size of dropped packages

Hi

2018-09-11 Thread James Thornber
Emailing to be able to post to list. ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List

[Bug 1624940] perl-Date-Manip-6.73 is available

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624940 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Date-Manip-6.73-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1626981] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035 is available

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626981 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2018-09-11 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 93 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6 31 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f21474267b condor-8.6.11-1.el6 The following builds have been

Re: Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

2018-09-11 Thread mcatanzaro
Kevin, Thanks for taking care of this package for so long. It's an exceptionally-challenging package that most maintainers would not be willing to touch, and your work was very much appreciated. Michael ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

2018-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On 09/11/2018 06:30 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: >> kernel packages yes. but kmods? >> >> This is the what I thought was unambiguous FAQ entry: >> >> "You agree not to use Copr to upload software code or other material >> (“Material”)

Re: Heads Up: python2 is marked as deprecated

2018-09-11 Thread Petr Viktorin
On 09/10/18 11:26, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: Just FTR current numbers about packages which requires python3 vs python2: # dnf repoquery -C --whatrequires python3| grep -cv i686; dnf repoquery -C --whatrequires python2| grep -cv i686 Last metadata expiration check: 0:59:03 ago on Mon 10 Sep 2018

[Bug 1626981] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035 is available

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626981 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1589381] perl-Cflow not actually linked to flow-tools since -17

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1589381 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: fedpkg clone doesn*t work

2018-09-11 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El lun, 10-09-2018 a las 14:58 +, Martin Gansser escribió: > every time I edit my account, the public ssh key is missing. > > the FSA public SSH-key and the key in .ssh/id_rsa.pub are the same. Can you ssh to fedorapeople.org? Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

2018-09-11 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 09:06:27AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > kernel packages yes. but kmods? > > This is the what I thought was unambiguous FAQ entry: > > "You agree not to use Copr to upload software code or other material > (“Material”) that: > ... > violates any rules or guidelines of the

Orphaning qt5-qtwebengine

2018-09-11 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, I have to bring some bad news to you: I unfortunately have to orphan the qt5-qtwebengine package. As you can see from the changelog, I have not been able to dedicate any time to this package since March. (My last change was on 2018-03-18.) Yet, this package needs a lot of care, because of

Re: Am I allowed to package this?

2018-09-11 Thread Sergio
You can pack kmods in copr , Fedora guidelines forbid kmods , I think , because they may be extremely insecure Sent from my AndroidEm 10/09/2018 7:44 da tarde, Simo Sorce escreveu: > > On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:06 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018

Re: GNOME 3.30.0 megaupdate

2018-09-11 Thread Kalev Lember
On 09/08/2018 07:43 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: OK, builds done and the 3.30.0 megaupdate is in Bodhi now and queued for updates-testing: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-85d637c544 Just as a quick heads up, this was accepted as a Freeze Exception in yesterday's blocker review

[Bug 1624940] perl-Date-Manip-6.73 is available

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624940 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1622996] perl-Git-Repository-1.322-3.fc30 FTBFS: t/ 24-errors.t fails with git 2.19.0

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622996 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 1626981] perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Git-Contributors-0.035 is available

2018-09-11 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1626981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from