I don’t know who runs or supports fusion.
In terms of IBM upholding the FOSS legacy that RH has been blazing in…As I said
before - IBM’s actions speak to just the opposite. They can say whatever they
want in press releases, but what they actually do is what I am worried about.
JC
L0ft1369
>
That’s a bit much, understand the concern, but the deal does state they’re
going to uphold the opposite.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:15 PM John Coughlan
wrote:
> IBM is a cancer. How long have they been working with Watson, and what
> exactly do they have to show for it?
>
> Also as many others
Who supports or backs rpmfusion? I think it's too early to do anything but
as I was thinking about who would be willing to pick up the project if we
were but loose.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 8:15 PM John Coughlan
wrote:
> IBM is a cancer. How long have they been working with Watson, and what
>
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/10/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-1.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
IBM is a cancer. How long have they been working with Watson, and what exactly
do they have to show for it?
Also as many others have said their FOSS print is a joke at best.
As a community I feel like we are in some trouble here.
IBM shelled out A TON of money for RH, and the first thing
Zach,
What good advice. Thank you. :)
Let's stick to what we know.
Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:59 PM Zach Villers wrote:
> On 10/28/18 7:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >
> > We are all astonished honestly,
> > I took to fedora-devel only because I finished reading *all*
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c402eea18b
Hi,
I submitted an update for systemd that fixes some vulnerabilities and
has a bunch of fixes for many smaller and bigger issues. Unfortunately,
the whole patchset is quite large, so I'd appreciate some additional testing.
The
On 10/28/18 7:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> We are all astonished honestly,
> I took to fedora-devel only because I finished reading *all* the
> internal emails about it that I downloaded so far (it took me a few
> hours) and ... still can't digest the news.
>
>
> I am sure it will happen at
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-10-29
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Hey testing crew!
In light of the recent decision to ship Fedora 29 Final RC 1.2 as Gold on
Tuesday, October 30, let's
I’m concerned about IBM’s sluggish organization. It is not “seems like” but
for real that IBM has a contrary leadership style comparing with Red Hat,
isn’t it?
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:30 PM Charles-Antoine Couret
> wrote:
>>
>> Le 28/10/2018 à 22:32, Neal Gompa a écrit :
>> > but the point is, IBM is not an open source company.
>>
>> Eclipse, Linux (top 5 companies in term of kernel contributions),
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 23:39:52 +0100, you wrote:
>Le 28/10/2018 à 22:32, Neal Gompa a écrit :
>> but the point is, IBM is not an open source company.
>
>Eclipse,
Not exactly a ringing endorsement given Eclipse's poor reputation.
>Linux (top 5 companies in term of kernel contributions), MQTT
On Sun, 2018-10-28 at 19:44 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It's always a wait and see approach. I'm a bit disappointed that no
> one from Red Hat has said anything yet. The only comfort is that
> apparently most RHers I know are equally surprised...
We are all astonished honestly,
I took to
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:30 PM Charles-Antoine Couret
wrote:
>
> Le 28/10/2018 à 22:32, Neal Gompa a écrit :
> > but the point is, IBM is not an open source company.
>
> Eclipse, Linux (top 5 companies in term of kernel contributions), MQTT
> (network protocol), OpenPower (hardware), etc.
>
> It
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Neal Gompa wrote:
Hi,
What happened to the broken dependency notification emails?
I rewrote spam-o-matic to use DNF, and it was finally merged ~2 months ago[1].
The releng team has since activated it without sending any mail[2],
but hopefully they'll start sending mail
I think its important in this time not to be wary but not go full on tin
foil hat. This is a sensitive time,
and reacting in a crazed manor or speculating isnt going to do ANYONE good.
Much love all, keep level heads.
Cheers,
Zach
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 4:31 PM Charles-Antoine Couret <
Chris Murphy writes:
The reported deal is $34 billion, and Red Hat's closing market cap on
Friday was ~$20 billion, that's a big price premium. I'm not a lawyer
let alone a securities lawyer, but my guess is if Red Hat management
had refused the deal, I think they'd face shareholder lawsuits.
Le 28/10/2018 à 22:32, Neal Gompa a écrit :
but the point is, IBM is not an open source company.
Eclipse, Linux (top 5 companies in term of kernel contributions), MQTT
(network protocol), OpenPower (hardware), etc.
It is not perfect but it is a lot of projects and contributions to FOSS.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, 22:22 Chris Murphy, wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Trande
> wrote:
> > "IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
> >
> >
> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
>
>
> Official press release.
>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 5:22 PM Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> > "IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
> >
> > https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
>
>
> Official press release.
>
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 21:17:50 +0100
Antonio Trande wrote:
> "IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
>
> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
>
Business as usual for Fedora?
___
devel
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
140 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
31 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6bc3a525a2
libmad-0.15.1b-26.el6
2
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> "IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
>
> https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
Official press release.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
140 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
91 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7
"IBM to acquire Red Hat in deal valued at $34 billion"
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/28/ibm-is-reportedly-nearing-deal-to-acquire-red-hat.html
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE
GPG key server:
On 28. 10. 18 20:39, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
On 10/24/18 1:49 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24.10.2018 01:47, Mukundan Ragavan wrote> I think I can just drop
python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting
me know.
That would be awesome, it would also unblock:
python-spyder-kernels
On 10/24/18 1:49 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 24.10.2018 01:47, Mukundan Ragavan wrote> I think I can just drop
> python2 version of spyder. Thank you for letting
>> me know.
>
> That would be awesome, it would also unblock:
>
> python-spyder-kernels
> python-cloudpickle
> python-rope
>
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:52 AM Scott Talbert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> What happened to the broken dependency notification emails?
>
I rewrote spam-o-matic to use DNF, and it was finally merged ~2 months ago[1].
The releng team has since activated it without sending any mail[2],
but hopefully
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 11:55 AM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> It is the release towards 1.0 (yes, after more than 10 years) which is out
> for 4 days now.
>
> I'm going to investigate whether it will affect libdnf and push into the
> rawhide within few days.
>
> Version 0.7.0
> -
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 03:57:27PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > We've got to fix this so that non-blocking deliverables like this can be
> > delivered independent of the main compose.
> Before looking at long-term solutions, we need a process to get F29 Xfce,
> LXQt and Astronomy images (with
Notification time stamped 2018-10-28 16:15:12 UTC
From b18390bf98298e76c335d3ab39deacdcd3da0a63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Oct 28 2018 16:14:34 +
Subject: Update to 0.43
- New upstream release 0.43
- Optimized compile-time operations to make Specio itself quicker
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 76/142 (x86_64), 22/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181027.n.0):
ID: 302435 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/302435
Old failures (same test
Hello, I just want to announce that I plan to retire
python-backports-csv in fedora rawhide, the python2 subpackage was
remove and there is no reason to have a python3 package since python3
already have the features available in the backport.
Regards
William Moreno
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181027.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181028.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 7
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 101
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.82 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Scott Talbert wrote:
The problem with using the bundled copy is that the bundled copy
doesn't
include the sip binary. So if we use the wxpython bundled sip module
code with the sip package's sip binary, we could end with mismatched
sip versions.
Wow, that's seems like a
Hello folks,
It is the release towards 1.0 (yes, after more than 10 years) which is out
for 4 days now.
I'm going to investigate whether it will affect libdnf and push into the
rawhide within few days.
Version 0.7.0
- soname bump to "1"
- incompatible API changes:
* bindings: Selection.flags
Hi,
What happened to the broken dependency notification emails?
Also, it seems that Anitya has not been creating bugs for new upstream
releases for several months. The problem doesn't seem to be with Anitya
as it knows about the new releases, but somewhere else in the chain. I
thought I
Matthew Miller wrote:
> We've got to fix this so that non-blocking deliverables like this can be
> delivered independent of the main compose.
Before looking at long-term solutions, we need a process to get F29 Xfce,
LXQt and Astronomy images (with official Fedora branding) signed off and
Hi all,
Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+, to
make sharing parts with go-macros easier.
Since fontpackages only contains templates and scripts and is not linked
anywhere there is no practical difference.
If you see a problem with this change, or have contributed
Sorry for the really delayed reply.
> Please take a look at my slides :
> https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf
> from last year OSSNA
> There is a description of the main idea and how does it work here :
>
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:55:10PM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > We've got to fix this so that non-blocking deliverables like this can be
> > delivered independent of the main compose.
> I think we have been saying that for multiple releases. What does it
> take to move this to the top of
On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 03:23:36PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> Maybe this is a bit radical, but perhaps we shouldn't *have* a
> super-large compose in itself? If we decouple most of the deliverable
It does seem like separating out the live ISOs is an easy step.
> %packages sections for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641959
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
43 matches
Mail list logo
