Yea - Does IBM have any plans on keeping, or discarding any of RH’s open source
efforts…like this one? Can we as a community still expect the same sort of, and
level of involvement post sale as we have enjoyed before hand from RH/IBM
employees?
-L0ft
> On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:12 PM, Matthew
El dom., 28 de oct. de 2018 a la(s) 21:15, John Coughlan
(johncough...@comcast.net) escribió:
>
> IBM is a cancer. How long have they been working with Watson, and what
> exactly do they have to show for it?
>
> Also as many others have said their FOSS print is a joke at best.
>
> As a community
At some point it appears that appdata files moved from
/usr/share/appdata to /usr/share/metainfo. Does the libappstream-glib
library or whatever cares about appdatafiles in RHEL7
(libappstream-glib-0.7.8-2.el7) work with /usr/share/metainfo, or does
it have to be /usr/share/appdata? I'm
On Tue, 2018-10-30 at 20:57 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I'm getting this:
>
> DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Package: cairo-1.15.12-3.el7.ppc64 (build)
> DEBUG util.py:439: Requires: libEGL.so.1()(64bit)
> DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Package: cairo-1.15.12-3.el7.ppc64 (build)
> DEBUG
I'm getting this:
DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Package: cairo-1.15.12-3.el7.ppc64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:439: Requires: libEGL.so.1()(64bit)
DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Package: cairo-1.15.12-3.el7.ppc64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:439: Requires: libGL.so.1()(64bit)
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/10/31/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.16-1.fc28.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
The following have problems in EPEL currently but I am not sure
exactly what is needed to fix/remove them
Need to be rebuilt/removed
package: airinv-1.00.1-2.el7.x86_64 from epel-base
unresolved deps: libzmq.so.4()(64bit)
package: banshee-2.6.2-11.el7.x86_64 from epel-base
unresolved
The following packages are needing to be removed from EPEL. Most of
them look to be ones which were forgotten.
===
Need to be removed:
===
package: mediawiki123-HTTP302Found-2.0.1-3.el7.noarch from epel-base
unresolved deps:
mediawiki123
package:
Doing a repoclosure against RHEL-7.6 and EPEL there are a series of
packages which need a version bump and rebuild.
==
Need to be rebuild
==
package: 1:anjuta-3.22.0-2.el7.x86_64 from epel-base
package: xfce4-vala-4.10.3-17.el7.noarch from epel-base
needs
Hi, Ricardo.
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 19:33, Ricardo J. Barberis wrote:
> I was wondering if it's possible to ask for certbot for EL6, or is it
> too much trouble to package it?
There's some work in progress towards this. Feel free to jump in and
assist:
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 16:36, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Kind reminder. Any update on this?
Jason asked you to open a ticket in the Packaging Committee tracker
and open a pull request against the guidelines. Have you done that?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion
On Tuesday, 30 October 2018 at 21:37, Ben Cotton wrote:
> As a reminder to the community, Daylight Saving Time ends in the the
> US on Sunday, 4 November. Be sure to check your recurring meetings on
> Fedocal[1] to make sure you know when you're meeting. Some meetings
> are set to a fixed time UTC
Il 10/30/18 7:13 PM, Tom Hughes ha scritto:
>
> No it protects against unintended exfiltration of data from
> the server - without it a random web page could have javascript
> that did a background XHR to a web site that required authentication
> and just wait until somebody happens to visit that
As a reminder to the community, Daylight Saving Time ends in the the
US on Sunday, 4 November. Be sure to check your recurring meetings on
Fedocal[1] to make sure you know when you're meeting. Some meetings
are set to a fixed time UTC and others are set to a particular time
zone. If a meeting is
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 07:44:12PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> It'd be nice if someone from up top would deign to come and talk to us
> directly...
Communications are pretty carefully controlled for regulatory reasons, and
the fact is even those at the top don't know everything yet. And
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644377
Pavel Raiskup changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caillon+fedoraproject@gmail
On 30/10/2018 18:13, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 30/10/2018 17:36, Mattia Verga wrote:
What type of security issue may arise with a wildcarded
`Access-Control-Allow-Headers: *` header? As I understand CORS, it's not
a server protection, rather a client protection. In fact, installing a
browser
On 30/10/2018 17:36, Mattia Verga wrote:
The problem is that the ajax request to Bugzilla fails, because BZ
doesn't provide CORS headers. I've asked BZ guys [2] to add those
headers, but I'm a bit confused about how CORS works and I would need
some help from someone who may have a deeper
Il 10/30/18 6:36 PM, Mattia Verga ha scritto:
>
> [1] https://github.com/mattiaverga/bodhi/tree/manual_bugs
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641232
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1641232#c6
>
A more precise link to the ajax call to Bugzilla:
Top item for tomorrow's meeting will be:
Rebuilding packages in EPEL for 7.6
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 13:54, wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Co on 2018-10-31 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
>At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
>
> The meeting
Hello,
I was wondering if it's possible to ask for certbot for EL6, or is it too much
trouble to package it?
Thank you,
--
Ricardo J. Barberis
Usuario Linux Nº 250625: http://counter.li.org/
Usuario LFS Nº 5121: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
Senior SysAdmin / IT Architect - www.DonWeb.com
Hi,
I'm working on a Pull Request for Bodhi web interface to allow
retrieving bugs information when we try to attach them to an update.
This way we can do some checks on the bug we're trying to attach (is it
private? is it a Fedora or Fedora EPEL bug?...) and provide some useful
information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640572
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639640
Bug 1639640 depends on bug 1401482, which changed state.
Bug 1401482 Summary: biber-2.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639640
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532636
Bug 1532636 depends on bug 1401482, which changed state.
Bug 1401482 Summary: biber-2.11 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401482
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639153
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638635
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638230
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638244
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636861
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632294
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.901 |perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.901
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635278
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632348
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635270
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635068
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-BSON-1.8.1-1.fc30 |perl-BSON-1.8.1-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635275
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632767
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Text-Bidi-2.15-1.fc30 |perl-Text-Bidi-2.15-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624362
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.14-6.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-10-31 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-10-31 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181028.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181030.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 125
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 2.69 MiB
Size of dropped packages
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 82/142 (x86_64), 22/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181028.n.0):
ID: 303244 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/303244
ID: 303248 Test: x86_64
Kind reminder. Any update on this?
Iñaki
On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 17:01, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 at 15:02, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >
> > > "IU" == Iñaki Ucar writes:
> >
> > IU> This URL format is not recommended by CRAN, but more importantly,
> > IU> the Source0
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 10:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
>
> https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/10/24/gcc-8-and-tools-now-in-beta-for-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-and-7/
>
> Can we get this beta into the epel build root? Chromium needs this to build
> again.
>
I will see what I can do later this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644248
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1644245
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644245
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644245
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1644248
Referenced Bugs:
And it's in rawhide!
libdnf, rpm-ostree and perl-BSSolv are rebuilt.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 4:04 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> It is the release towards 1.0 (yes, after more than 10 years) which is out
> for 4 days now.
>
> I'm going to investigate whether it will affect libdnf
Tomorrow is Halloween, but this week at the Fedora Project, we're
not scared of anything. Today, we officially release Fedora 29!
As always, this release is the result of the hard work of thousands
of people working in Fedora, and many times more working in all of
the upstream projects. Thank you
Tomorrow is Halloween, but this week at the Fedora Project, we're
not scared of anything. Today, we officially release Fedora 29!
As always, this release is the result of the hard work of thousands
of people working in Fedora, and many times more working in all of
the upstream projects. Thank you
https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2018/10/24/gcc-8-and-tools-now-in-beta-for-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-and-7/
Can we get this beta into the epel build root? Chromium needs this to build
again.
Thanks,
~tom
___
epel-devel mailing list --
On 10/29/2018 05:26 PM, YOUNG, MICHAEL A. wrote:
Incidentally I have now tried the example with virt-install
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Boot_Methods_Xen_Para_Virt
updated for fedora 29 and it failed with the error
ERRORinternal error: unsupported input bus usb
This should
Hi all,
The contribution guide thingamajig told me to post a short message
here. So as follows: I am Carmen from Friesland, The Netherlands. I am
currently working on GNOME to make the GNOME desktop available in
Esperanto. At the current rate, GNOME 3.32 will have its core release
(standard
On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:01 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:04:52PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > This Change is about simply adding Desktop Environment to fedora.
> > If we decide to make this a spin in the future, that will be a separate
> > Change.
>
> I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644248
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644244
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DBI-1.642-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5e2c0abcfa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644244
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
Dne 29. 10. 18 v 23:31 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On 10/28/18 8:01 AM, Scott Talbert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> What happened to the broken dependency notification emails?
> They got broken a while back by rich deps, then the script was
> re-written entirely and re-enabled, but we haven't re-enabled the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644251
Bug ID: 1644251
Summary: Upgrade perl-Template-Toolkit to 2.28
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Template-Toolkit
Assignee: tcall...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644249
Bug ID: 1644249
Summary: Upgrade perl-SNMP-Info to 3.62
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-SNMP-Info
Assignee: w...@gouldfamily.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644248
Bug ID: 1644248
Summary: Upgrade perl-Pod-Readme to 1.2.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Readme
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644247
Bug ID: 1644247
Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator to 1.118
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mail-SPF-Iterator
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644245
Bug ID: 1644245
Summary: Upgrade perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod to 0.36
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-ReadmeFromPod
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644244
Bug ID: 1644244
Summary: Upgrade perl-DBI to 1.642
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBI
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 05:04:52PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> This Change is about simply adding Desktop Environment to fedora.
> If we decide to make this a spin in the future, that will be a separate
> Change.
I'm a bit confused about the scope of this change, probably because I've
never used
Le mardi 30 octobre 2018 à 11:47 +0530, Parag Nemade a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot <
> nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+,
> > to
> > make sharing parts with go-macros
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 9:14 PM Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just FYI, I intend to relicense fontpackages from LGPL3+ to GPL3+, to
> make sharing parts with go-macros easier.
>
Can it be possible for you to explain this further? I want to understand
how license change can help
70 matches
Mail list logo
