The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
164 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6
20 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4b684248e8
drupal7-7.60-2.el6
13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc30 |perl-Net-UPnP-1.4.5-1.fc30
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648308
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/11/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.19-20181121git7ee2be8.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 13:48, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Przemek Klosowski:
>
> > I wonder if RedHat could be persuaded to modify their process to adopt
> > a Fedora release instead of forking it, and backport into that
> > release---let's call it "Fedora LTS a.k.a. CentOS Release
On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 at 08:46, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 11/19/2018 10:04 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Centos also ships a lot of non-Red Hat kernels and modules which
> > meet various itches that people feel (xen, upstream lts, various
> > gluster/ceph/arm32/etc)
>
> I wonder if
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50034
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 12:45 +, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:30:14PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > Just to be clear on this, unlike deltarpm, zchunked rpms shouldn't
> > require extra CPU usage on the client side as they don't go through the
> >
Hey, thanks for the detailed analysis. Comments inline.
On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 00:47 +0100, s...@gmx.com wrote:
> Based on work I've done in this area, I'm somewhat sceptical that this
> will work out well. I spent a decent amount of time comparing various
> approaches to data saving for both
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612860
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-Pcap-0.18-8.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651151
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-FFI-CheckLib-0.23-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:49 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:15:17PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > * Matthew Miller:
> >>> >
> >>> >
>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:03 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>>>
>>> > * Matthew Miller:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve
>>> >
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:57 PM Michal Novotny wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM Tomas Tomecek
> wrote:
>
>> > * Matthew Miller:
>> >
>> >
>> > Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve
>> > this would be to build directly out of Git, with synthesized
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651151
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-11-21 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-11-21 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
This is good to know. I should enable it on some of the packages that I
maintain.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:25 AM Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> I've certainly made the mistake of accidentally creating branches
> in dist-git and now being stuck with them because we can't delete
> them. Now that
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 16:43 Brian (bex) Exelbierd On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:43 PM Jiri Eischmann
> wrote:
> >
> > Gerald Henriksen píše v Čt 15. 11. 2018 v 10:22 -0500:
> > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:38:12 +0100, you wrote:
> > >
> > > > I understand this argument, but I think more and more
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:43 PM Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>
> Gerald Henriksen píše v Čt 15. 11. 2018 v 10:22 -0500:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:38:12 +0100, you wrote:
> >
> > > I understand this argument, but I think more and more desktop users
> > > are being trained that updates happen on a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612860
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 9:49 PM Frantisek Zatloukal
wrote:
> We have encountered a bug[0] which seemingly “broke” offline updates after
> systems were upgraded from an older Fedora to Fedora 29 and had some
> multilib packages installed. After the discussion at last week's Release
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644251
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
I've certainly made the mistake of accidentally creating branches
in dist-git and now being stuck with them because we can't delete
them. Now that src.fedoraproject.org (dist-git) is backed by a newer
version of pagure you can prevent creating new branches by `git push`.
For your project in the
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:43 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
> > * Matthew Miller:
> >
> >
> > Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve
> > this would be to build directly out of Git, with synthesized release
> > numbers and changelogs. This way, you can apply a lot of
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 08:30:14PM +, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Just to be clear on this, unlike deltarpm, zchunked rpms shouldn't
> require extra CPU usage on the client side as they don't go through the
> decompress-recompress cycle that deltarpms do. Re-assembling a zchunk
> file requires
On Thursday, 15 November 2018 at 15:18, Salman Siddiqui wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I've been working on Java Mission Control. It's a profiling and diagnostics
> tools for Java applications that was open-sourced by Oracle earlier this
> year (along with Java Flight Recorder). The project is now
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 12:42 Tomas Tomecek > * Matthew Miller:
> >
> >
> > Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve
> > this would be to build directly out of Git, with synthesized release
> > numbers and changelogs. This way, you can apply a lot of fixes to
> >
> * Matthew Miller:
>
>
> Make it cheap to maintain branches. I expect that one what to achieve
> this would be to build directly out of Git, with synthesized release
> numbers and changelogs. This way, you can apply a lot of fixes to
> multiple branches without encountering mandatory
Thank you Hans.
On 20/11/18 09:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 17-11-18 12:18, Antonio Trande wrote:
>> Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
>> please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
>>
>> On 15/11/18 13:22, Antonio Trande wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651494
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651494
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hi,
On 17-11-18 12:18, Antonio Trande wrote:
Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
On 15/11/18 13:22, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hello!
Please, take a look to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651494
Bug ID: 1651494
Summary: Upgrade perl-JSON-XS to 4.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-JSON-XS
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651495
Bug ID: 1651495
Summary: Upgrade perl-libintl-perl to 1.31
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libintl-perl
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651484
Bug ID: 1651484
Summary: Upgrade perl-Data-Types to 0.15
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Data-Types
Assignee: robinlee.s...@gmail.com
Reporter:
37 matches
Mail list logo
