[Bug 1655552] Upgrade perl-DBD-SQLite to 1.60

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBD-SQLite-1.60-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[Bug 1655555] Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-L-1.0.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing

[Bug 1655557] Upgrade perl-MongoDB to 2.0.2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1650041] Perl 5.28.0 in-place edit broken

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650041 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from

[Bug 1655009] Upgrade perl-BSON to 1.10.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655009 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 177 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6c663378c unrtf-0.21.9-8.el6 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-61fe7c6e70 nagios-4.4.2-3.el6 The following builds have been

[Bug 1655555] Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 1655553] Upgrade perl-ExtUtils-F77 to 1.22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=163 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1655011] Upgrade perl-threads-shared to 1.59

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655011 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

On 12/3/18 6:53 PM, Leigh Scott wrote: >> On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: >> >> Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 >> >> Is there a definitive reason why those are necessary to go in RPM fusion? >> Was >> Tom Hughes right? >> >> Dusty > > This

Re: python-xpyb

On 12/3/18 6:12 PM, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: There appears to be a python2 version of this package, but not a python3 version. If you're looking for a python3 option, I see python3-xcffib which claims to be a replacement for xpyb. ___ devel mailing

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 177 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7 128 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7

Re: python-xpyb

On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 18:12 -0800, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > There appears to be a python2 version of this package, but not a > python3 > version. > > Should there be? Seems last release is from 2012 [1] also is a FTBFS in F29 [1] https://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/ xpyb-1.3.tar.gz

python-xpyb

There appears to be a python2 version of this package, but not a python3 version. Should there be? Joseph D. Wagner ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

> On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 The packages should be in the repo by the weekend. https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=581 https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=582

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 3:56 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. > +1000 > > > > Is there a definitive reason why those are necessary to go in RPM > fusion? Was > > Tom Hughes right? > > > >

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

> On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 > > Is there a definitive reason why those are necessary to go in RPM fusion? Was > Tom Hughes right? > > Dusty This sums up the situation

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

On 12/3/18 1:42 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote: On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5089 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5090 Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 Is there a definitive reason why

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 22:03:57 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:05:58PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 13:50:58 -0700, stan wrote: > > > Isn't this kind of thing a question for legal? Is there any liability > > > for fedora that arises from

Re: Bugzilla outage/upgrade delayed until 9 December 2018

On 1/12/18 01:45, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 10:14 AM Ben Cotton wrote: >> >> The upgrade of bugzilla.redhat.com has been delayed a week. It will >> now be done on 9 December 2018 from 0:00 to 12:00 UTC. >> > > Aww, anyone know why? The release pipe line was unexpectedly

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2018-12-03)

= #fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2018-12-03) = Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2018-12-03/fesco.2018-12-03-15.00.log.html . Meeting

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:05:58PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 13:50:58 -0700, stan wrote: > > Isn't this kind of thing a question for legal? Is there any liability > > for fedora that arises from using encumbered software from FOSS? I've > > seen other people refer to

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Office Hours

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity Office Hours on 2018-12-04 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net The meeting will be about: This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to answer them)! Join us on

Re: Any plans to support .heic files in Fedora?

On 11/30/18 5:20 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: > Reviewers welcome. > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5089 > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5090 Thanks Leigh. I see those have already made progress in code review. +1000 Is there a definitive reason why those are

Re: Proposal: Faster composes by eliminating deltarpms and using zchunked rpms instead

On 16/11/18 22:07 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > The core idea behind zchunk is that a file is split into independently > compressed chunks and the checksum of each compressed chunk is stored > in the zchunk header. When downloading a new version of the file, you > download the zchunk header

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 13:50:58 -0700, stan wrote: > Isn't this kind of thing a question for legal? Is there any liability > for fedora that arises from using encumbered software from FOSS? I've > seen other people refer to running things by legal on this list. I'm > not sure how to do it,

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:39:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:56:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Christian Glombek wrote: > > > > > This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea of > > > making this available on COPR. > > > My 2 cents: > > > The

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:39:31 + Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:56:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Christian Glombek wrote: > > > > > This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea > > > of making this available on COPR. > > > My 2 cents: > > > The package

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:56:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > Christian Glombek wrote: > > > This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea of > > making this available on COPR. > > My 2 cents: > > The package *itself* complies to COPR's licensing guidelines, making it > > eligible

Re: Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 1:39 PM Clement Verna wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use OSBS to > build the fedora container base image, indeed OSBS has the capability > to build a base container image using a kickstart file. > To do this OSBS needs a

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

Christian Glombek wrote: > This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea of > making this available on COPR. > My 2 cents: > The package *itself* complies to COPR's licensing guidelines, making it > eligible for distribution via that service, while the runtime dependency > of

Proposal : Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image

Hi all, I would like to get feedbacks on the following proposal. Use OSBS to build the fedora container base image, indeed OSBS has the capability to build a base container image using a kickstart file. To do this OSBS needs a Dockerfile, a kickstart file and an image-build.conf file stored in

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea of making this available on COPR. My 2 cents: The package *itself* complies to COPR's licensing guidelines, making it eligible for distribution via that service, while the runtime dependency of MatLAB makes it an uneligible

Agenda for Tuesday's Modularity Working Group Meeting (2018-12-03)

Find below a list of topics which are planned to be discussed in the Fedora Modularity Working Group meeting on Tuesday at 15:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-3 on irc.freenode.net. To find out when this is in your local time zone, check the Fedora Calendar (if you've set it and are logged in):

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 50065 - lib389 aci parsing is too strict/rigid

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50069 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html

Fedora Rawhide-20181203.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 14/131 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181202.n.0): ID: 315298 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/315298 ID: 315314 Test:

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

Dne 01. 12. 18 v 23:17 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): > On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 14:15, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure >> that the package

Re: [HEADS UP] Rawhide buildroot now has glibc-minimal-langpack instead

On 2018-11-28, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > the removal of glibc-all-langpacks from the buildroot[0] is done. > Standard buildroot has decreased from 445 to 237 megabytes in > installed size ;) > That's nice, but Koji builders have not been reconfigured away from LANG=en_US.UTF-8 and that means that

[Bug 1655565] Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Async to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655565 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1655552] Upgrade perl-DBD-SQLite to 1.60

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBD-SQLite-1.60-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ca066fb642 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1655557] Upgrade perl-MongoDB to 2.0.2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.10.1-1.fc29 perl-MongoDB-2.0.2-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2ef1282aeb -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1655009] Upgrade perl-BSON to 1.10.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655009 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 1655557] Upgrade perl-MongoDB to 2.0.2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.10.1-1.fc29 perl-MongoDB-2.0.2-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2ef1282aeb -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1655552] Upgrade perl-DBD-SQLite to 1.60

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1655557] Upgrade perl-MongoDB to 2.0.2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1655555] Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-L-1.0.1-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bdc71bfa04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1655555] Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-L-1.0.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-19c8be118d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:41:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Since correctness is really important here, if upstream does not test > > the toolboxes against Octave, we shouldn't either > > I think that if it runs at all, we should ship it. > > Some upstreams seem pretty

[Bug 1655555] Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1655548] Upgrade perl-Carp-Clan to 6.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655548 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20181203.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181202.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181203.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 18 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

[Bug 1655574] New: Upgrade perl-Text-VimColor to 0.29

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655574 Bug ID: 1655574 Summary: Upgrade perl-Text-VimColor to 0.29 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-VimColor Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1655573] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-XML to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655573 Bug ID: 1655573 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-XML to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-XML Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1655571] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655571 Bug ID: 1655571 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-Toolchain Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1655572] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-WebCrawling to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655572 Bug ID: 1655572 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-WebCrawling to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-WebCrawling Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1655569] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-OOP to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655569 Bug ID: 1655569 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-OOP to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-OOP Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1655570] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Testing to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655570 Bug ID: 1655570 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Testing to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-Testing Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1655568] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Logging to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655568 Bug ID: 1655568 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Logging to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-Logging Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1655565] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Async to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655565 Bug ID: 1655565 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Async to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-Async Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1655567] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Exceptions to 0.40

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655567 Bug ID: 1655567 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Kensho-Exceptions to 0.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Kensho-Exceptions Assignee: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1655559] New: Upgrade perl-Socket-MsgHdr to 0.05

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169 Bug ID: 169 Summary: Upgrade perl-Socket-MsgHdr to 0.05 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Socket-MsgHdr Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1655557] New: Upgrade perl-MongoDB to 2.0.2

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167 Bug ID: 167 Summary: Upgrade perl-MongoDB to 2.0.2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MongoDB Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com

[Bug 1655556] New: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.08

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=166 Bug ID: 166 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mojolicious to 8.08 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1655555] New: Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165 Bug ID: 165 Summary: Upgrade perl-L to 1.0.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-L Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA

Orphaning jabberd

I just orphaned jabberd on all branches as I just stopped my last instance of jabberd and upstream seems to have stopped development. Adrian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1655553] New: Upgrade perl-ExtUtils-F77 to 1.22

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=163 Bug ID: 163 Summary: Upgrade perl-ExtUtils-F77 to 1.22 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-ExtUtils-F77 Assignee: or...@nwra.com Reporter:

[Bug 1655552] New: Upgrade perl-DBD-SQLite to 1.60

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162 Bug ID: 162 Summary: Upgrade perl-DBD-SQLite to 1.60 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DBD-SQLite Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

[Bug 1655549] New: Upgrade perl-Data-Dump-Color to 0.241

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655549 Bug ID: 1655549 Summary: Upgrade perl-Data-Dump-Color to 0.241 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Data-Dump-Color Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter:

[Bug 1655548] New: Upgrade perl-Carp-Clan to 6.07

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655548 Bug ID: 1655548 Summary: Upgrade perl-Carp-Clan to 6.07 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Carp-Clan Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter:

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-12-03)

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:43:33AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Any idea why > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation > still doesn't have FESCo ticket? It's been a week since it was sent to ML. Nope but I wanted to put it on the agenda anyway but apparently

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-12-03)

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 11:43:33AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Any idea why > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation > still doesn't have FESCo ticket? It's been a week since it was sent to ML. It's a week today, but FPM is based in US, and it's currently

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

Ankur Sinha wrote: > Since correctness is really important here, if upstream does not test > the toolboxes against Octave, we shouldn't either I think that if it runs at all, we should ship it. Some upstreams seem pretty conservative. E.g., SPM seems to have done a lot of work on Octave

Re: Packaging FOSS that requires MATLab at runtime

Hello, On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 00:44:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > The rule in Fedora is: If you want this to be in Fedora, this has to be > packaged for Octave with a Requires: octave, even if upstream does not > support it. Software in Fedora cannot depend on software that is not part of

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-12-03)

Any idea why https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation still doesn't have FESCo ticket? It's been a week since it was sent to ML. On Mon, Dec 3, 2018, 10:40 Petr Šabata Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Monday at

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG (weekly)

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG (weekly) on 2018-12-04 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2018-12-03)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-12-03 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:25 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dne 03. 12. 18 v 10:17 Alfredo Moralejo Alonso napsal(a): > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a): > > > > > > On

[Bug 1650041] Perl 5.28.0 in-place edit broken

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650041 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-5.28.1-427.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-55eef04b2c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

Dne 03. 12. 18 v 10:17 Alfredo Moralejo Alonso napsal(a): On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a): > > On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> The following packages

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a): > > > > On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them.

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a): On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so

[Bug 1655461] w3c-markup-validator-20150216 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|w3c-markup-validator-201502

[Bug 1655461] New: w3c-markup-validator-20150216 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461 Bug ID: 1655461 Summary: w3c-markup-validator-20150216 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: w3c-markup-validator Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged