https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1656293
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1656293
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1656293
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1656293
--
You are receiving
I am want rpm, not module.
ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 00:38, José Abílio Matos :
>
> On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 13.09.16 WET Vascom wrote:
> > What about Octave 4.4. for F29?
>
> It is already there, although hidden (in a sense). :-)
> BTW the same applies for F28.
> Octave 4.4 is available as module.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
178 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3835d39d1a
unrtf-0.21.9-8.el7
129 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It's a two-level decision: if legal says "no", then we don't have much
> choice. If legal says "ok", fesco could still say "no". But I don't
> see any reason for fesco to do this.
The software is almost certainly not illegal to distribute. The question is
On 12/4/18 2:04 PM, Andrew Bauer wrote:
> Recently I began to create a review request for netatalk, when I noticed
> there already was an open review request:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520024
>
> May 7th was the last activity by anyone other than myself. On 11/28 I offered
> "AB" == Andrew Bauer writes:
AB> In the interested of getting this review completed, am I in my right
AB> to close this request and create a new one, or is there better
AB> course of action?
If you have a package ready to go, then certainly just close the old
review ticket. If someone is
Afaik the recommendation (at least for maintainers not responding to
bugreports) is to wait at least two weeks (in case someone is on
vacation), so I'd maybe wait at least until the end of the week before
taking further action.
"Andrew Bauer" writes:
> Recently I began to create a review
Recently I began to create a review request for netatalk, when I noticed there
already was an open review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520024
May 7th was the last activity by anyone other than myself. On 11/28 I offered
assistance to help move the review along, but I
On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 13.09.16 WET Vascom wrote:
> What about Octave 4.4. for F29?
It is already there, although hidden (in a sense). :-)
BTW the same applies for F28.
Octave 4.4 is available as module.
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2018-11/msg00117.html
Hello,
it's been a long time when Mesa added meson buildsystem definitions,
but I never got time to switch Fedora's mesa build to use them.
Nowadays, mesa upstream is looking to drop autotools definitions in
19.0.0 release, so time came up.
I've prepared 18.0.0~rc5 builds with using meson
Hi,
On 11/29/18 8:57 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Linux-Hardware.org database has been divided recently into a set of
> databases, one per each Linux distro. The one for Fedora is available at:
>
> https://linux-hardware.org/?d=Fedora
>
> Everyone can contribute to the database
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2018-12-05 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the
On 12/4/18 11:40 AM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>
> I will look at the configs and see if I can figure out where things are going
> wrong.
>
I think this a a regression is some of the new yaml parsing in pungi. I opened
a bug
to see https://pagure.io/pungi/issue/1092
The updates-testing runs are
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/131 (x86_64), 5/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20181203.n.0):
ID: 315777 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/315777
ID: 315786 Test: x86_64
On 12/4/18 5:11 AM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> -
> $ cat /etc/os-release
> NAME=Fedora
> VERSION="29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
> ID=fedora
> VERSION_ID=29
> PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"
> PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655571
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
=
#fedora-meeting-3: Weekly Meeting of the Modularity Working Group
=
Meeting started by nils at 15:02:25 UTC.
Minutes:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655567
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
Hi,
Since Octave is not a core package I agree with update it for F29 .
I'd like also update opencv in F29 from 3.4.1 to 3.4.4 but due possible ABI
breakage [1].
For that I need a proven package that rebuild all dependent software
Also about math and related software we have update of vtk and
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 06:58:39AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:39:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:56:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> > Christian Glombek wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > This is an interesting
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 14:12:35 +0100, Ben Rosser wrote:
>
>
> I think this has been brought up before, and it was concluded that
> this language in the copr guidelines is much too broad and we should
> look at changing the wording. In this thread from September, for
> instance:
>
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20181203.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20181204.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 97
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 296.12 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 9:52 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:39:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:56:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > https://docs.pagure.org/copr.copr/user_documentation.html#what-i-can-build-in-copr
> > >
> > > "You
What about Octave 4.4. for F29?
пн, 12 нояб. 2018 г. в 03:51, Orion Poplawski :
>
> I've planning on building octave 4.4 soon (next day or two) in rawhide.
> I've been building dependent packages here:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/octave4.4/packages/
>
> Anyone in the
Hi Dominik,
Thank you so much trying that out. Actually, to get stats saved for a
package, the package is to be added in Transtats, 'mkvtoolnix'
So, dry run of jobs (you must have unchecked it) will not bug you, with an
error. And, to add a package, we need to be logged in.
Fedora login needs
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 07:39:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 12:56:37 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> > Christian Glombek wrote:
>> >
>> > > This is an interesting question and I would like to back the idea of
>> > > making this available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655567
Bug 1655567 depends on bug 1655909, which changed state.
Bug 1655909 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Try -
try/catch/finally syntax for perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655909
What|Removed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655570
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
-
$ cat /etc/os-release
NAME=Fedora
VERSION="29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
ID=fedora
VERSION_ID=29
PLATFORM_ID="platform:f29"
PRETTY_NAME="Fedora 29.20181129.0 (Workstation Edition)"
---
now upgrading:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655569
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655568
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655567
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1655909
Referenced Bugs:
Hi all,
I'm upstream author of the abi-compliance-checker, abi-dumper,
api-sanity-checker and pkgdiff Fedora packages, maintainer of the
https://abi-laboratory.pro/?view=tracker and developer (in the past) of the LSB
Infrastructure project and LSB Core tests.
Since 2014 I am passionate about
36 matches
Mail list logo
