On 30.07.19 00:55, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello mufti,
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 9:56 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
>> What can you do in a informal review more than sending comments with
>> found potential problems ?
> Helpful comments such as those you've made on Bugzilla are always
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Team (weekly) on 2019-07-30 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Team.
More information available at: [Modularity Team
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
349 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
124 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
90
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
40 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-12f1eb1b1f
tomcat-7.0.94-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
copr-cli-1.80-1.el6
On 7/27/19 11:53 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26-07-19 18:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On 7/26/19 4:25 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> 1) Have some automated process automatically email co-maintainers
>>> when the
>>> primary maintainer orphan the package.
>>
>> That should already be the
On 7/26/19 10:39 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Kevin Fenzi [26/07/2019 09:25] :
>>
>> That said, we could:
>> * make a bugzilla user for every package named
>> 'packagename-ow...@fedoraproject.org'
>> * assign bugs for that package to that user (no ccs)
>
> Please don't do this.
>
> The best
Hello mufti,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 9:56 PM J. Scheurich wrote:
> What can you do in a informal review more than sending comments with
> found potential problems ?
Helpful comments such as those you've made on Bugzilla are always welcome.
You may have noticed some people using a template when
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:36 PM Alexander Scheel wrote:
>
> > Question (not for Fabio specifically, but for the list) modules can have
> > (Build)Requires on other modules
> > right?
>
> Yes, if the module maintainer is willing to expose their module in the
> BUILDROOT. That was PKI's problem:
> The reason I'm confused is because AFAIK last time jpackage-utils /
> javapackages-tools also was part of the set of
> packages causingproblems and javapackages-tools was picked up by the
> Stewardship SIG (or so I believe) so I'm
> surprised to see it go away again now.
One of the SIG's 3
Hi,
On 29-07-19 16:59, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> The following packages are orphaned and will be
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50522
--
389 Directory Server Development Team
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Some of you may already be aware of the Prioritized Bugs and Issues
process[1] in Fedora. For those who aren't or have forgotten, I wanted
to bring it to your attention. This is a way to highlight important
bugs that aren't blockers, but are high-impact or high-visibility.
Anyone may nominate a
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936
>>
>>
> I wouldn't
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2019-07-29)
=
Meeting started by ignatenkobrain at 15:00:03 UTC. The full logs are
available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-07-29/fesco.2019-07-29-15.00.log.html
.
Please remove me from this mailing list! I am trying to unsubscribe using
unsubscribe option for days! But I don't think that works!
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 5:27 PM Fedora compose checker <
rawh...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating
On 7/28/19 8:55 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > What if I want to BR some of the tools from a regular Fedora build
> > in the future? Would I need to exclude i686 as well?
>
> Would you be able to do so now since Rust is in a module and
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:55:27AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 7/28/19 6:30 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 10:21:44AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733743#c0
> >
> > Someone has kindly done this now.
>
> For
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1669913
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672861
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672862
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672863
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936
>
> so long
> MUFTI
I
On Monday, 29 July 2019 17:25:56 CEST J. Scheurich wrote:
> >> Cause i can't offer a review-swap (cause i am not in the packager
> >> group), i offer a do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune fedora
> >> sponsoring.
> >
> > Posting links to the informal reviews you completed would be the best
>> Cause i can't offer a review-swap (cause i am not in the packager
>> group), i offer a do-anything-swap in exchange to white_dune fedora
>> sponsoring.
> Posting links to the informal reviews you completed would be the best
> way to attract potential sponsors, but I cannot find any.
>
Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Note that jgit is not (yet) orphaned nor retired, and its dependencies might
> be picked up by somebody. I suggest to remove the dep in rawhide temporarily
> (to make the next weeks reports more readable and shorter to calculate (the
> present one took 2 days)). Once the dust
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
>
On 29. 07. 19 16:44, Todd Zullinger wrote:
Hi,
Pavel Cahyna wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them.
Hi,
Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
>>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
>>> that the
On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
Hi,
On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
On 29. 07. 19 16:01, Petr Stodulka wrote:
Hi Miro,
thanks for notification. I am thinking about that. From the point, that
Python2 is going to be death... Mabye I would take it, but I am fan of
removing Python2 stuff from Fedora. But Mercurial (hg-git, git-remote-hg,..)
is not compatible with
Hi Miro,
thanks for notification. I am thinking about that. From the point, that
Python2 is going to be death... Mabye I would take it, but I am fan of
removing Python2 stuff from Fedora. But Mercurial (hg-git, git-remote-hg,..)
is not compatible with Python3 yet (at least not a version released
On 2019-07-29, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> In the meantime, this was filed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1732531
>
> "On Fedora Rawhide, the nest module does not have the default profile(s)
> set. Therefore, DNF will not install the module using `dnf module
> install librealsense`. It
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190728.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190729.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 53
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:11.59 MiB
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 6:46 AM, Carlos Garnacho
wrote:
Sure, can try to make it part of the release routine. My ID is
'garnacho'.
I don't think any work is required when releasing, since it should be
automatically updated by Kalev's scripts. The work will just be keeping
an eye on the bug
* Tom Hughes:
> On 29/07/2019 11:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
>> and it then goes on to fetch the peer credentials:
>>
>> 24657 getsockopt(9, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEERCRED, {pid=24656, uid=2067,
>> gid=103}, [12]) = 0
>>
>> while ppc64le fetches the socket low water mark:
>>
>> 4761 getsockopt(10,
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 21/147 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
Hey,
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:34 PM Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Hey Igor,
>
> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > I'm getting hundreds of ABRT bugs from tracker which I simply have no
> > time to go through. Would anybody like to take over that package from
> > me?
>
On 25. 07. 19 15:30, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I'm waiting for the name suggestion for python{2,34}-pip.
Is python-pip-epel fine? Or should it be 2 source RPMs?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
epel-devel mailing list --
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:37:33PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> > that the package should be retired,
On 29. 07. 19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
On 29/07/2019 11:39, Tom Hughes wrote:
and it then goes on to fetch the peer credentials:
24657 getsockopt(9, SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEERCRED, {pid=24656, uid=2067,
gid=103}, [12]) = 0
while ppc64le fetches the socket low water mark:
4761 getsockopt(10, SOL_SOCKET, SO_SNDLOWAT, [1], [12->4]) = 0
On 28/07/2019 21:08, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 28/07/2019 20:00, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 7/28/19 1:52 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
I have a number of packages which use %postgresql_tests_run to start
a postgres server in %check and they all seem to have failed during
the mass rebuild, for example:
On 29/07/2019 11:31, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 29/07/2019 11:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon
Hey Igor,
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 04:35:49PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> I'm getting hundreds of ABRT bugs from tracker which I simply have no
> time to go through. Would anybody like to take over that package from
> me?
In the worst case, I am happy to take it over because I care about some
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 11:23:32AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 29/07/2019 11:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:26:25PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 07. 19 12:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > This
Hi all,
for a while, I maintained a package for python-flickrapi.
I have not used this package in a long time, and it seems that it doesn't
build for Fedora 30.
I cannot spare the cycles to maintain it any further. If someone wants to
pick it up, feel free. If not I'll orphan it later this
On 29. 07. 19 12:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
This is the first roll-out of this gating change, and so there may
be additional
tuning and fixes
On 29/07/2019 11:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
This is the first roll-out of this gating change, and so there may
be additional
tuning and fixes
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 02:19:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 26/07/2019 14:17, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > On 23/07/2019 21:51, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > > This is the first roll-out of this gating change, and so there may
> > > be additional
> > > tuning and fixes until things are as
Hi Petr,
Thanks very much for the detailed reply. The process is a lot clearer to
me now.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 11:24:49 -, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2019-07-20, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>
> > 3. And finally: version 2.18.0 is already available in the repos (the
> > platform?). So, did I mess up
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:49:05AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 7/27/19 8:26 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 04:08:40PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >> Yes and no, robosignatory is swamped signing the builds from the
> >> mass-rebuild, which means they aren't
50 matches
Mail list logo
