Re: Join the new Minimization Team

On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 9:05:31 AM MST Christian Glombek wrote: > I would be especially interested in minimizing container images. > I'd like to e.g. see purpose-built containers without an actual package > manager inside. You just have the container, mount the config, and go. > We're also

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Sunday, August 18, 2019 4:33:47 AM MST Gordan Bobic wrote: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM wrote: > > This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to > > ensure Fedora remains responsive under heavy memory pressure, > > I think this is an overwhelmingly important point,

Re: Projects in Copr @ discussion.f.o

On Friday, August 16, 2019 8:07:17 AM MST Tristan Cacqueray wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 13:31 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to soon enable embedded discussion on Copr projects pages. I created: > > https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/c/projects-in-copr > > > > There is

[Bug 1743963] ack-3.0.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743963 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring@fedoraproject.org's scratch build of ack-3.0.3-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37195412 --

[Bug 1743963] ack-3.0.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743963 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1606365 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1606365=edit [patch] Update to 3.0.3 (#1743963) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1743963] New: ack-3.0.3 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743963 Bug ID: 1743963 Summary: ack-3.0.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: ack Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Fedora-31-20190820.n.4 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 72/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 433654 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/433654 ID: 433655 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

a f31 branched compose is syncing...

Finally. Sorry for the long delay in this, but it kept hitting problem after problem. ;( It is syncing now, and expect it to sync out past the master mirror tonight. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 8:19:24 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:16 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:45:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:38 PM Solomon Peachy > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:59:44 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:37 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:35:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:35 PM John Harris > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:16 PM John Harris wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:45:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:38 PM Solomon Peachy wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:34:03AM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > > > > > > Why wouldn't

[EPEL-devel] Re: Getting packages into EPEL-8

On 8/16/19 8:16 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 8/16/19 12:16 AM, willi.feh...@t-online.de wrote: Dear EPEL developers, I would like to request a handful of packages for EPEL-8. Name of the packages and short description and a reason why the package is needed. *Fail2Ban:* Fail2Ban is an

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:45:15 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:38 PM Solomon Peachy wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:34:03AM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > > > > Why wouldn't it be appropriate for a system running on battery power? > > > > > >

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:37 PM John Harris wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:35:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:35 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I think we can all agree that shutting the system down is not the > > > appropriate > behavior,

[Bug 1743742] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-08-21 - 96% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/08/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.1.6-1.fc30.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:38 PM Solomon Peachy wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:34:03AM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Why wouldn't it be appropriate for a system running on battery power? > > I've personally had this happen to me several times, where (far more > improtantly than the

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 5:34:03 PM MST Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:43 AM John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:35:03 AM MST Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > > […] > > > > > On macOS, when full disk encryption is active, there is a

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:35:05 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:35 PM John Harris wrote: > > > > > > > I think we can all agree that shutting the system down is not the > > appropriate behavior, right? > > > I do not agree at all, even a little bit. > > -- > Chris

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 5:35 PM John Harris wrote: > > I think we can all agree that shutting the system down is not the appropriate > behavior, right? I do not agree at all, even a little bit. -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:46 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" > > under > > the "Merge" button. > > > > Am I the only one impacted? > > > > Is that deliberate or

[Bug 1743742] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

Re: gsl soname bump

I am happy to see a gsl update, but ... On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:48 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: > Triggering rebuilds of the following affected packages ... > python-cvxopt You didn't build this into the python 3.8 side tag, so now it is going to have to be built again. Any other python-using

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:34:03AM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Why wouldn't it be appropriate for a system running on battery power? I've personally had this happen to me several times, where (far more improtantly than the battery) a laptop tucked into a confined sleeve got

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:43 AM John Harris wrote: > > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:35:03 AM MST Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > […] > > On macOS, when full disk encryption is active, there is a different > > boot-time login screen. The process is described here: > >

Re: gsl soname bump

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 10:48 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: > Triggering rebuilds of the following affected packages > […] > scidavis Thank you! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Annoying Copr related emails

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 8:49:20 AM MST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 20. 08. 19 v 15:38 John Harris napsal(a): > > > What's the plan for this? How is linking it to Discourse useful? > > > People can discuss about Projects in Copr directly embedded on Copr pages. > See example in staging: >

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 2:35:03 AM MST Christophe de Dinechin wrote: > Samuel Sieb writes: > > > > On 8/20/19 1:17 AM, Benjamin Kircher wrote: > > > >>> On 20. Aug 2019, at 04:15, Chris Murphy > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm not certain it matters, but I'm curious how Windows and

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:54:40 AM MST Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 8/20/19 4:31 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >> At my work, most of the windows laptops have full disk encryption so > >> I asked a coworker for some info. She started her laptop on battery > >> and let it sit at the encryption

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 8:31:27 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > On 8/20/19 10:32 AM, John Harris wrote: > > > On Monday, August 19, 2019 2:56:58 PM MST Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > > >> the right thing to do is to suspend on inactivity in all cases. > > > > I don't think it's

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 19:27:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like some help to review a handful of Golang packages: Missed this e-mail. Sorry Robert! I'm happy to help with Golang reviews too. Are there any more reviews pending? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha

Trivial review swap: taskopen

Hello, Would anyone like to swap trivial reviews? I have "taskopen" here ready for a full review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743802 taskopen- Script for taking notes and open urls with taskwarrior. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |

Re: gsl soname bump

On 8/20/19 9:57 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:12 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: GSL 2.6 has just been released, and it comes with an soname bump. All dependent packages will need to be rebuilt in rawhide. Are you doing the rebuilds? If so, when? Triggering rebuilds of the

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 2:15 AM Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mo, 19.08.19 13:58, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > > > I'm skeptical as well. But to further explore this: > > > > 1. Does the kernel know better than to write a hibernation image (all > > or part) to a /dev/zram

Re: gsl soname bump

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:12 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: > GSL 2.6 has just been released, and it comes with an soname bump. All > dependent packages will need to be rebuilt in rawhide. Are you doing the rebuilds? If so, when? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: What does this koji error mean?

> "C" == Christopher writes: C> BuildError: package thrift is C> blocked for tag f32-updates-candidate C> (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37187038) It means that thrift has been blocked in koji. The usual reason for this is that the package has been retired, and the

What does this koji error mean?

What does this koji error mean? BuildError: package thrift is blocked for tag f32-updates-candidate (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37187038) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-08-21 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. Agenda is in the

gsl soname bump

Hi, GSL 2.6 has just been released, and it comes with an soname bump. All dependent packages will need to be rebuilt in rawhide. -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list --

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190820.0

A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190820.0 Commit(x86_64): 94e8720e9b309db27ccdb39ee053eafe738bfc58b86e34deab193e748f906fae Commit(aarch64): 9587aa49cc734d9184754f3aaa4e37025e2103616f3c392578cbe246e3d39fa8 Commit(ppc64le):

Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

I agree that subpackages for py2 and py3 seems best, but I'll have to see if mercurial can be parallel installed without too much effort. I don't expect to have time to work on this for the next 2 weeks. On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:16 PM Mads Kiilerich wrote: > > You are giving many good reasons

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and using the minor release bump

On Tue, 20 Aug 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: I've noticed that (mostly Smooge) has been using the minor release bump (e.g., the .1 after the ?dist) [.][.]%{?dist}[.] in initial EPEL8 package versions that have been branched from Fedora. I just want to understand the reasoning behind

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL8 and using the minor release bump

On Tue, 20 Aug 2019 at 12:31, Scott Talbert wrote: > > Hi, > > I've noticed that (mostly Smooge) has been using the minor release bump > (e.g., the .1 after the ?dist) > > [.][.]%{?dist}[.] > > in initial EPEL8 package versions that have been branched from Fedora. I > just want to understand the

Re: unable to branch to epel8

On 8/20/19 8:50 AM, Dave Love wrote: > Kevin Fenzi writes: > >> Hum. I see you have a lot of custom rules. Sadly the interface for doing >> rules is confusing and over detailed. Would you be willing to do the >> reset on them, then slowly re-add the filtering out of ones you don't >> want? I

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

On 8/20/19 8:19 AM, Leigh Scott wrote: >> On 8/19/19 3:31 PM, David Jeremias Vásquez Sicay wrote: > >> Please stand by. > > Is the beta freeze going to be delayed because of this? Good question. Can be brought up at the next fesco meeting if there's folks that want more time... kevin

Re: fedora-gpg-keys not updated yet again

On 8/20/19 7:37 AM, Petr Mensik wrote: > Hi! > > I could not find a safe way to upgrade also this time. I found update > F32 [1], but not corresponding F31 just adding new key. I am missing > update similar to [2], just for F31 that once was Rawhide. It should be > version 31-0.5 > > I found and

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

On 8/19/19 1:26 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 10:23:49PM +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:18:09PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On 8/19/19 1:13 PM, Adrian Reber wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 11:59:49AM -, Leigh Scott wrote:

Re: Cannot build with mock for rawhide on Fedora 30

On 8/19/19 5:17 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Hello Iñaki, > > On Monday, August 19, 2019 1:29:31 PM CEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 13:03, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >>> >>> On Saturday, August 17, 2019 1:07:04 PM CEST Iñaki Ucar wrote: The same happens in Copr. >>> >>> Copr is

Making a saved search public on Bugzilla

Hello, Would anyone know how to make a saved search public on Bugzilla? I.e., not require one to log in to view the bug list? We have a saved search for NeuroFedora bugs and would like to make it public if at all possible:

[EPEL-devel] EPEL8 and using the minor release bump

Hi, I've noticed that (mostly Smooge) has been using the minor release bump (e.g., the .1 after the ?dist) [.][.]%{?dist}[.] in initial EPEL8 package versions that have been branched from Fedora. I just want to understand the reasoning behind this. I would think the main motivation would

Re: unable to branch to epel8

Kevin Fenzi writes: > Hum. I see you have a lot of custom rules. Sadly the interface for doing > rules is confusing and over detailed. Would you be willing to do the > reset on them, then slowly re-add the filtering out of ones you don't > want? I think something in your rules is negating each

Re: Annoying Copr related emails

Dne 20. 08. 19 v 15:38 John Harris napsal(a): > What's the plan for this? How is linking it to Discourse useful? People can discuss about Projects in Copr directly embedded on Copr pages. See example in staging: https://copr-fe-dev.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/msuchy/jhlkjhlkhjlk/ --

[Bug 1743742] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-5a02c3adb0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5a02c3adb0 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---

[Bug 1743742] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-5a02c3adb0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5a02c3adb0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On 8/20/19 10:32 AM, John Harris wrote: On Monday, August 19, 2019 2:56:58 PM MST Przemek Klosowski wrote: the right thing to do is to suspend on inactivity in all cases. I don't think it's fair for one person to decide what the "right thing to do" is. This kind of thinking is what leads to

[Bug 1743742] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1743746] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190820 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743746 Bug ID: 1743746 Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20190820 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-CoreList Keywords:

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

> On 8/19/19 3:31 PM, David Jeremias Vásquez Sicay wrote: > Please stand by. Is the beta freeze going to be delayed because of this? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1743742] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743742 Bug ID: 1743742 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-4.12 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords:

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Minimization Team Meeting

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Minimization Team Meeting on 2019-08-21 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 GMT At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora Minimization Team Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9598/

Re: Annoying Copr related emails

* John Harris: > I seem to have missed your responses there, likely due to the delays in the > email gateway. I think the email gateway is restricted to 100 messages per day: So it's possible that you never

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On 8/20/19 4:31 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote: At my work, most of the windows laptops have full disk encryption so I asked a coworker for some info.  She started her laptop on battery and let it sit at the encryption password prompt for about 30 minutes and nothing happened.  She also told me that

Re: Getting .fc32 packages while trying to follow F31 branch ?

Hi Adrian, I think this redirection is cause of breakage on rawhide machines. I think we must be able to first serve separate repositories. Only then it can proceed to increase of version in new rawhide. My point is, n+1 has to be always signed by old key served in fedora and updates

Re: fedora-gpg-keys not updated yet again

Hi! I could not find a safe way to upgrade also this time. I found update F32 [1], but not corresponding F31 just adding new key. I am missing update similar to [2], just for F31 that once was Rawhide. It should be version 31-0.5 I found and reopened one old bug [3]. I do not think this is just

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Monday, August 19, 2019 2:56:58 PM MST Przemek Klosowski wrote: > the right thing to do is to suspend on inactivity > in all cases. I don't think it's fair for one person to decide what the "right thing to do" is. This kind of thinking is what leads to things like GNOME's awful defaults.

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On Monday, August 19, 2019 3:42:10 AM MST Artur Iwicki wrote: > The fact whether we're in the OS or not, whether it's a bootloader or a > pre-init script or whatever is irrelevant from the end-user perspective. > The end-user sees that the system will wait the password endlessly and I > agree with

Re: calibre updated for python3

OIC. Thank you. :) --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 9:00 AM, Zbigniew

Re: calibre updated for python3

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 01:52:06PM +, Gwyn Ciesla wrote: > This was on both f31 and f32. Oh, OK. I misunderstood. python-soupsieve and python-bs4 were built yesterday, and calibre and python-html5-parser just today. I guess they will be available in the next compose. I think that for F31 there

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 12:57 Julen Landa Alustiza wrote: > AFAIK, here are two different things, > > > On one hand, since 5.6 you must check the allow rebase checklist button to > allow the project owner to rebase your fork branch from where the PR is > created. This property had been set to

Re: calibre updated for python3

This was on both f31 and f32. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 8:47 AM, Zbigniew

Re: Annoying Copr related emails

On Monday, August 19, 2019 11:59:19 PM MST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 20. 08. 19 v 6:20 John Harris napsal(a): > > > Recently, I have noticed that there are at least 20 messages per day just > > from people viewing Copr repos being created on the "edora Discourse > > email gateway. Has anyone

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: calibre updated for python3

I can't install on f30 due to qt requirements, which is fine, but I can't install the BuildRequires either. No matching package to install: 'python3dist(html5-parser) >= 0.4.8' No matching package to install: 'python3dist(soupsieve)' --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers

Re: recode-3.7.1 in Fedora 32 will change a soname

On 2019-08-16, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm preparing an upgrade of "recode" pacakge from 3.6 to 3.7.1 version. > > Because it changes an ABI and a license (from (GPLv2+) to (GPLv3+ and > LGPLv3+ and BSD and OFSFDL); the library itself from LGPLv2+ to > LGPLv3+)), the upgrade will be performed in

calibre updated for python3

Hi, calibre in F31+ has been updated to the latest version (straight from git master actually, because of the many python3 fixes that haven't made it out into a release yet), and switched to run on python3. Upstream still considers py3 support still experimental, but some python2 dependencies

Fedora-Rawhide-20190820.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: FAILED:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190820.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190819.n.4 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190820.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:10 Upgraded packages: 23 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 131.92 KiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 1743371] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000125 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743371 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

Re: No matching package to install: 'libnbd-devel >= 0.9.6'

Filed as: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8656 -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network

[Bug 1743637] New: perl-Prima-1.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743637 Bug ID: 1743637 Summary: perl-Prima-1.56 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Prima Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

AFAIK, here are two different things, On one hand, since 5.6 you must check the allow rebase checklist button to allow the project owner to rebase your fork branch from where the PR is created. This property had been set to False on the migration from 5.5 to 5.7.4, so the previously existing PRs

RE: Self Introduction: Muneendra

Hi Mathew, My package is approved. I need a sponsor any help here would be great. Below are the details. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 Regards, Muneendra. -Original Message- From: Muneendra Kumar M [mailto:muneendra.ku...@broadcom.com] Sent: Friday,

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

Samuel Sieb writes: > On 8/20/19 1:17 AM, Benjamin Kircher wrote: >>> On 20. Aug 2019, at 04:15, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> I'm not certain it matters, but I'm curious how Windows and macOS deal >>> with this same scenario. I'd be surprised if they just wait forever, >>> in particular if power

Re: Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 11:16 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" under > the "Merge" button. > > Am I the only one impacted? > > Is that deliberate or some bug worth reporting? FWIW, the "Merge" button from the "merge popup" is also

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

> On 20. Aug 2019, at 10:20, Samuel Sieb wrote: > >>> On 20. Aug 2019, at 04:15, Chris Murphy wrote: >>> >>> I'm not certain it matters, but I'm curious how Windows and macOS deal >>> with this same scenario. I'd be surprised if they just wait forever, >>> in particular if power is

Rebase option suddenly missing from src.fo.o PRs?

I've recently noticed that src.fo.o PRs no longer let me click "Rebase" under the "Merge" button. Am I the only one impacted? Is that deliberate or some bug worth reporting? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On 8/19/19 8:46 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 8/19/19 7:15 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: I'm not certain it matters, but I'm curious how Windows and macOS deal with this same scenario. I'd be surprised if they just wait forever, in particular if power is disconnected on laptop. At my work, most of the

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

On 8/20/19 1:17 AM, Benjamin Kircher wrote: On 20. Aug 2019, at 04:15, Chris Murphy wrote: I'm not certain it matters, but I'm curious how Windows and macOS deal with this same scenario. I'd be surprised if they just wait forever, in particular if power is disconnected on laptop. As for

Re: Bug 1742953 - No Screensaver/Powerdown after Inactivity at LUKS Password Prompt [FutureFeature]

> On 20. Aug 2019, at 04:15, Chris Murphy wrote: > > I'm not certain it matters, but I'm curious how Windows and macOS deal > with this same scenario. I'd be surprised if they just wait forever, > in particular if power is disconnected on laptop. As for macOS, it will shut down the machine

Re: Better interactivity in low-memory situations

On Mo, 19.08.19 13:58, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > I'm skeptical as well. But to further explore this: > > 1. Does the kernel know better than to write a hibernation image (all > or part) to a /dev/zram device? e.g. a system with: 8GiB RAM, 8GiB > swap on ZRAM, 8GiB swap

[Bug 1740157] Upgrade perl-IO-Compress-Lzma to 2.087

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740157 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

Re: Annoying Copr related emails

Dne 20. 08. 19 v 6:20 John Harris napsal(a): > Recently, I have noticed that there are at least 20 messages per day just > from > people viewing Copr repos being created on the "edora Discourse email > gateway. > Has anyone else noticed these? Can we get this disabled, so it stops spamming >