Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Anyway, I've closed NEW bugs with successful builds after the mass
> rebuild.
Can you please post an updated list with that done?
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
>> From: "Vít Ondruch"
>> 1) Apparently, there is some work which needs to be done on the
>> toolchain. Applying workarounds just hides the issues and we won't move
>> forward ever.
>
> I think it's more reasonable to do a small SPEC change in Python to
> achieve a
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/11/09/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.3-20191109git21f2a06.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 11/8/19 9:06 AM, LAHAYE Olivier wrote:
And BTW, please add more python3 package in EPEL7 (and EPEL6 before it goes
EOL).
As a developer, it's very difficult to support (EPEL6) EPEL7 and EPEL8 at the
same time. Many python3 packages are missing in EPEL7 and many python2 packages
are
On Thu, 2019-11-07 at 21:25 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 novembre 2019 à 18:32 +0100, Sheogorath via devel a écrit
> :
> > The talk is right on many points, but I think it dismisses the most
> > essential point DoH does right: DNS is a decision of the device
> > owner.
>
On 08. 11. 19 20:40, Fabio Valentini wrote:
(Side note: I wouldn't even have objected to this being a
Self-Contained Change, since it basically only affects one package -
albeit an important one (python3)
Doing this as a system wide change was my decision, Harris (Charalampos) wanted
to do
On 08. 11. 19 23:13, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
What about packages that are Python 2 and have no interest to move to Python
3? How do we keep these?
By getting the FESCo exception.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel
On 08. 11. 19 20:29, David Kaufmann wrote:
Remember to set the bugzilla to ASSIGNED when you actually work towards
fixing the build failure.
Is this meant to be done by the maintainer only may I do that, if I
intend to get the package to a fixed state?
If you do set the bugzilla to ASSIGNED,
On Friday, November 8, 2019 3:20:33 PM MST Daniel Walsh wrote:
> On 11/8/19 5:16 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 12:09:55 PM MST Martin Kolman wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 19:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> Python 3 traditionally in
On 11/8/19 5:16 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 12:09:55 PM MST Martin Kolman wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 19:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>
Python 3 traditionally in Fedora was built with a shared library
libpython3.?.so and the final binary was
On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 9:06:33 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> > Symbiotic is, I think, the best way to describe the Red Hat/Fedora
> > relationship.
>
>
> Well, a symbiosis has to go both ways. In this case, I unfortunately get the
> feeling that this
On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 12:09:55 PM MST Martin Kolman wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 19:41 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > > Python 3 traditionally in Fedora was built with a shared library
> > > libpython3.?.so and the final binary was dynamically linked against
> > > that shared library.
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 8:24:02 AM MST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
> here is a list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time) require
>
Python 2 and have not yet got a FESCo exception to do so.
> If you were bcced on this e-mail, it affects one or more of your
On Wednesday, November 6, 2019 8:48:15 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > What you call unfair, I call open source winning in the industry.
> > Does it create an imbalance between funded vs. unfunded work? Yes.
> > That is the reality of the software landscape today though, and
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:14:14PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 13:16:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > zathura-cb
> > zathura-djvu
> > zathura-pdf-mupdf
> > zathura-pdf-poppler
> > zathura-ps
>
> These are zathura plug-ins, and will break the `zathura-plugins-all`
> package
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact dwalluck. David, if you're
reading this, and are still interested in maintaining hamcrest, please
respond.
His one package (hamcrest) is pretty outdated, and this is
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact weli. Weinan, if you're
still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
Some of his packages are broken on fedora 31+ due to retired Java
dependencies,
Hi,
(repost as I forgot to cc Eric)
I'm trying to contact Eric Smith (FAS: brohaha).
I have started the nonresponsive maintainer process because I'm trying to
update the WeasyPrint package which requires updating/fixing a few other
packages maintained by Eric.
This is mostly about:
-
Hi everybody,
Following the policy for non-responsive package maintainers [0], I'm
asking here if anybody knows how to contact rfenkhuber. Roman, if
you're still interested in maintaining your packages, please respond.
Some of his packages are broken on fedora 31+ due to retired Java
Hi everyone,
Welcome to the CPE team weekly project update mail!
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained, build releases, and
On 06/11/2019 21:15, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Package (co)maintainers
Status Change
WindowMaker orphan 0
weeks ago
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770312
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting for Monday. We got
through a lot of business the last couple of weeks and I don't have
anything significant for this week, criteria changes are moving ahead
nicely. There also won't be a blocker review meeting as we don't have
enough proposed
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 6:01 PM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Vít Ondruch"
> > Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:01:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to
> > statically
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:16:21PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> vdirsyncer
I've contacted the maintainer via email, but if that does not work in
time I'd like to take up the issue.
> Remember to set the bugzilla to ASSIGNED when you actually work towards
> fixing the build failure.
Is this
Am 08.11.19 um 20:24 schrieb Ankur Sinha:
Sure, but what does one do here? Unset and reset the review flag? Can I
do that given that Petr reviewed and approved it already?
Yes. (both questions)
Felix
___
devel mailing list --
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 19:15:27 +0100, J. Scheurich wrote:
> > Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to vimiv-qt reviewed:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770278
> I could review it in exchange of a review of vcglib:
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770310
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770312
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to vimiv-qt reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770278
I could review it in exchange of a review of vcglib:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
This has been already reviewed, but the review is too old to be
On 08. 11. 19 17:15, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 08. 11. 19 16:04, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 08.11.2019 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
kf5-baloo
kf5-frameworkintegration
kf5-kactivities
kf5-kactivities-stats
kf5-kbookmarks
kf5-kcmutils
kf5-kconfigwidgets
kf5-kdeclarative
kf5-kded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770312
Bug ID: 1770312
Summary: perl-Net-OAuth for EL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-OAuth
Assignee: san...@hoentjen.eu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770310
Bug ID: 1770310
Summary: perl-Net-OpenID-Consumer for EL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-OpenID-Consumer
Assignee:
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:54 AM wrote:
>
> I agree with you in general but I don't like the `brief` wording here.
> What that means exactly?
> I would rather go with specifying a strong freeze. Meaning that the
> freeze will continue until compose is available.
>
By "brief" I mean "only as long
- Original Message -
> From: "Vít Ondruch"
> Cc: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:01:47 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Build Python 3 to
> statically link with libpython3.8.a for better
> performance
>
>
> Dne 07. 11. 19 v
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 1:17 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> python-pyopencl
Fixed, FTBFS bug closed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736526
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 07:20 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 08:43:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 07. 11. 19 18:35, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > Here's the link to the Community Blog post that looks at the
> > > schedule options:
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770291
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770291
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from Paul
On 08. 11. 19 16:04, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 08.11.2019 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
kf5-baloo
kf5-frameworkintegration
kf5-kactivities
kf5-kactivities-stats
kf5-kbookmarks
kf5-kcmutils
kf5-kconfigwidgets
kf5-kdeclarative
kf5-kded
kf5-kdelibs4support
kf5-kdesignerplugin
kf5-kdesu
Hello,
Would anyone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to vimiv-qt reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770278
It is an image viewer with Vim like key-bindings. It was recently
re-written in Qt. It obsoletes the vimiv package which was gtk based.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur
And BTW, please add more python3 package in EPEL7 (and EPEL6 before it goes
EOL).
As a developer, it's very difficult to support (EPEL6) EPEL7 and EPEL8 at the
same time. Many python3 packages are missing in EPEL7 and many python2 packages
are missing in EPEL8.
I'm for move to python3, but
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770291
Bug ID: 1770291
Summary: perl-Apache-Session-Browseable doesn't provide
perl(Apache::Session::Browseable)
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Status: NEW
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 7:02 AM Petr Viktorin wrote:
> jsmith
>asterisk
> (→ PY2)
> asterisk-* (→ asterisk → PY2)
>
Asterisk has very few dependencies on Python (just some contributed scripts
for use in debugging reference counters in the code, if I recall
correctly). That being
- Original Message -
> From: "Vitaly Zaitsev via devel"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Cc: "Vitaly Zaitsev"
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 10:04:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Will orphan packages with NEW F31FTBFS bugs tomorrow
>
> On 08.11.2019 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
~snip~
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 08:43:44PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 07. 11. 19 18:35, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Here's the link to the Community Blog post that looks at the schedule
> > options:
> > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/accommodating-flock-in-the-release-schedule/
>
> From the
On 08.11.2019 13:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> kf5-baloo
> kf5-frameworkintegration
> kf5-kactivities
> kf5-kactivities-stats
> kf5-kbookmarks
> kf5-kcmutils
> kf5-kconfigwidgets
> kf5-kdeclarative
> kf5-kded
> kf5-kdelibs4support
> kf5-kdesignerplugin
> kf5-kdesu
> kf5-kdewebkit
> kf5-kemoticons
>
I am looking to get python-rsa and python-ruamel-yaml built for EPEL-8
so I can finish building python-kubernetes and python-openshift for
EPEL-8. I've managed to get in contact with maintainers for most of the
dependencies and builds are completed, but so far with these two I have
been
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768805
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768803
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e0996c77ae has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-e0996c77ae
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1768803
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
According to the policy for packages that fail to build from source:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
I plan to orphan packages with NEW Fedora 31 Fail To Build From Source bugzillas
tomorrow.
By doing so, we notify the dependent package
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 13:16:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> zathura-cb
> zathura-djvu
> zathura-pdf-mupdf
> zathura-pdf-poppler
> zathura-ps
These are zathura plug-ins, and will break the `zathura-plugins-all`
package that requires them:
Hello EPEL packagers.
More and more of you are asking for Python packages to be added into EPEL 8.
I see that in some cases, the Python 2 subpackage is added as well, because it
is possible. While there is absolutely no policy whatsoever that would forbid
this in EPEL 8, I personally beg you
According to the policy for packages that fail to build from source:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
I plan to orphan packages with NEW Fedora 31 Fail To Build From Source bugzillas
tomorrow.
By doing so, we notify the dependent package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769775
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-GraphViz-2.24-12.el8 |perl-GraphViz-2.24-12.el8
On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 17:10 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 21:32 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Is there any good way to get notified about this sort of problems in
> > timely manner prior to the update being pushed? This is currently not
> > optimal.
>
> I'm not familiar with
> OTOH I would like to not be bothered with the EPEL branch requests.
> There used to be a way to state that I don't mind people creating EPEL
> branches for my packages, because I personally don't care. I am aware
> about option to do so.
Yes, but when that happened the person requesting the
Eric: I suspect you are still interested in participating in Fedora and I
appreciate that. May I suggest that you give full "admin" co-maintainership
much faster. That would enable me an others to resolve many of the bugs. :-)
Felix
___
devel mailing
On 11/7/19 5:24 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
Hello All,
We have a set of macros for Erlang libraries rpm building. Some of
these macros evaliated before actual build (if I understand RPM build
process correctly) and their actual value depends on a type of a
package - arch-dependent or noarch.
On 08. 11. 19 8:38, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Hey,
thunderbird-enigmail was retired in rawhide after being orphaned for more than
6 weeks. However F30+F31 still have the RPM but it does not work at all due to
Thunderbird changes.
I'm not interested in taking over the master branch but I'd like to
On 08. 11. 19 9:21, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to contact Eric Smith (FAS: brohaha).
I have started the nonresponsive maintainer process because I'm trying to
update the WeasyPrint package which requires updating/fixing a few other
packages maintained by Eric.
This is mostly about:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770139
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770139
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Adde perl-UNIVERSAL-ref to |Added perl-UNIVERSAL-ref to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769359
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769995
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769996
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Hi
34 year old Swedish national here.
I have just filed a review request for an nts client that some friends of
mine have made.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770147
I'm hoping to do my best to become a Fedora package maintainer, or at least
experience the review process.
For
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769913
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||CPAN 130885
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769996
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|perl-Log-Dispatch-Array |perl-Log-Dispatch-Array
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769995
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|perl-Devel-StackTrace-WithL |perl-Devel-StackTrace-WithL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769974
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770139
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|robinlee.s...@gmail.com |jples...@redhat.com
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769974
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1770139
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770139
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770139
Bug ID: 1770139
Summary: Adde perl-UNIVERSAL-ref to EPEL 8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-UNIVERSAL-ref
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769773
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-523d507203 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-523d507203
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
On 11/8/19 12:37 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 08/11/2019 07:38, Felix Schwarz wrote:
(Obviously I'm not too keen on applying the whole un-retirement
process which
involves a potentially very long package review.)
No it doesn't - that package has only been retired for 22 days and a
review is
I think that the basic problem is that the "broken dependencies" emails
are not sent anymore even for Rawhide. This is big loss.
Vít
Dne 06. 11. 19 v 21:32 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> it repeatedly happened to me that I'm notified by Koschei that dozens
> of my packages suddenly fail
OTOH I would like to not be bothered with the EPEL branch requests.
There used to be a way to state that I don't mind people creating EPEL
branches for my packages, because I personally don't care. I am aware
about option to do so.
Vít
Dne 07. 11. 19 v 11:12 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
>
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I find the global exclusion of packages built but not shipped in an
> enabled module baffling and makes it very hard to provide
> updates/alternatives to those packages.
[snip]
> Beyond the horrible UX above, this seems so counter to the idea that we
> are building a
Dne 07. 11. 19 v 23:08 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> * Vít Ondruch:
>
>> Dne 07. 11. 19 v 16:05 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
>>> On 07/11/2019 14:59, Victor Stinner wrote:
>>>
I cannot explain why PLT is needed when a libpython function calls a
libpython function.
>>> Because an exported symbol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769902
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 08/11/2019 07:38, Felix Schwarz wrote:
(Obviously I'm not too keen on applying the whole un-retirement process which
involves a potentially very long package review.)
No it doesn't - that package has only been retired for 22 days and a
review is only needed if it has been more than 8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769775
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #2)
> Playground build fails on an unavailable repository.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8983
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769775
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2574a6b86f has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2574a6b86f
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Hi,
I'm trying to contact Eric Smith (FAS: brohaha).
I have started the nonresponsive maintainer process because I'm trying to
update the WeasyPrint package which requires updating/fixing a few other
packages maintained by Eric.
This is mostly about:
- python-cairocffi
- python-pyphen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1769775
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
88 matches
Mail list logo
