[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2019-12-04 - 95% PASS

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/12/04/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.4-20191204gitff75058.fc31.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1778463] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Float

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778463 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[389-devel] please review: PR 50765 - Port readnsstate to CLI and healthcheck

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50765 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

[EPEL-devel] Re: "python3" vs "python%{python3_pkgversion}"

On 12/2/19 4:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 12. 19 23:09, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:47 AM Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:34 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: Hi folks, In EPEL 7 we have some packages with

Subject: Self Introduction Blaise Pabon

Hi everybody, I'm a relatively new contributor, although I have been watching from the sidelines since 1993. A few years ago (as penance for 15 years in sales) I got back into an ops position doing release management and I became a pythonista... the community is wonderful. I'm a strong advocate

[Bug 1749126] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection should depend on perl-Gtk3

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749126 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com ---

[Bug 1759801] please build perl-gtk3 for epel 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759801 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1778302 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1778302] please build perl-Glib for EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778302 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1759801 Referenced Bugs:

[Bug 1759801] please build perl-gtk3 for epel 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1759801 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- I tried a scratch build on epel8-playground [1] and failed with missing packages [2] [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39426113 [2] DEBUG util.py:596: No matching

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

Peter Robinson wrote: > We already have a process for that. They reach out to the maintainer > to be a co-maintainer at which point they can request the branches and > do the builds. The process we already have is actually:

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

Lennart Poettering wrote: > The problem is that sshd's PAM implementation doesn't allow PAM > modules to ask questions in login sessions which are authenticated via > authorized_keys instead of PAM. Because if we could ask questions > then, we could simply ask the user for the passphrase to derive

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

John M. Harris Jr wrote: > however with Plasma, my desktop environment doesn't have to be loaded at > all in order for me to ssh in. This depends (even in the absence of disk encryption) on where you have told plasma-nm to store your WPA (or 802.11x etc.) credentials (unless you are using an

[Bug 1772833] Add perl-DepGen-Perl-Tests to EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1772831] Add perl-RPM2 to EPEL8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772831 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1772833] Add perl-DepGen-Perl-Tests to EPEL 8

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772833 Bug 1772833 depends on bug 1772831, which changed state. Bug 1772831 Summary: Add perl-RPM2 to EPEL8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772831 What|Removed |Added

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

Thank you for the examples and hints > 2. Adding %check section, as Jaroslav said. > Note that we do not use "bundler" ("bundle" command) and > "rake" > command in RPM *.spec file. > I have removed bundler and rake from linked-list, the test doesn't seem to run anything + pushd

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 12:05 AM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > > It's not just an issue for systemd-homed, this problem applies to any > > user home encryption implementation when the user has not first > > authenticated/unlocked their user home. e.g. if you install with /home > > encrypted in

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 2:04 PM Mat Booth wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 12:56, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> 3 months ago, Miro opened releng ticket[0] raising question whether >> non-maintainers (of some specific packages) being able to request >> branches. >> >> However, it

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404 I checked your uploaded *.spec files now a little bit. I see that you are using "rake" in your rubygem-linked-list.spec, and there is no %check section in your rubygem-hrx.spec. > Note

Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 19:34 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:18 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > > took the first of those at least. > > OK then I taking nodejs-load-grunt-tasks [1] I need a provenpackager that

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 11:58 PM John M. Harris Jr wrote: > > On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:46:30 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > It's almost 2020, and I shouldn't have to pick and choose between > > remote access and securing user data at rest by default. > > You don't have to. Data at rest would

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

Hi Leigh, Thank you for contributing the rubygem-* packages. Let me comment for your *.spec files. I recommend to compare the *.spec file generated by gem2rpm with your *.spec file, and align basically. The gem2rpm guides you. How to do it (For example in case of Fedora 30) ``` $ sudo dnf

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

Thanks, I didn't know about gem2rpm. Reviews submitted (needed for sassc tests). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779403 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779404 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Orphaned camlp4 dependencies (was: Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers)

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:42:19PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Mon, 2019-12-02 at 19:49 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:15:27PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > ocaml-bin-protorphan 2 > > > weeks ago > > >

Fedora update spam (was: [Fedora Update] [comment] nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32)

I understood the message the first time, so I didn't need to be emailed 147 times (so far) about it. Is there something I can do to stop this spam? On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:15:06PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > The following comment has been added to the nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

Hi, great to see someone taking up on some rubygems! to the packages, the rubygem-linked-list as mentioned by Fabio have binaries that will probably have name conflicts with some other packages. Secondly rubygem-hrx should not have `Requires: rubygem(linked-list)`[0] because that dependency

Fedora-Rawhide-20191203.n.1 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/161 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in

Re: Help with rubygem packaging

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 7:08 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > Hi, > > Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please? > I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes. > > https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec >

[Bug 1779326] EPEL 8 build of perl-switch?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779326 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- It is in the 8.1 package manifest. You might need to file a RHEL support ticket here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1779326] EPEL 8 build of perl-switch?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779326 --- Comment #2 from Erinn Looney-Triggs --- Tom, Can you double check that 1% cause I am having a tough time finding it: [root@localhost ~]# yum search perl-Switch Updating Subscription Management repositories. No matches found. Looking at

Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:18 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > took the first of those at least. > > Tom > > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to > > keep

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On 12/3/19 1:57 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote: On Monday, December 2, 2019 12:46:30 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: It's almost 2020, and I shouldn't have to pick and choose between remote access and securing user data at rest by default. You don't have to. Data at rest would mean that your system is

Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

On Tue, 2019-12-03 at 08:18 +, Tom Hughes wrote: > Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he > took the first of those at least. OK then I taking nodejs-load-grunt-tasks [1] [1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9077 > Tom > > On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: >

[EPEL-devel] Re: "python3" vs "python%{python3_pkgversion}"

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 07:10:48PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > We should probably consider rebuilding all the Python 3 packages in > EPEL7 no matter what so that the python3.6dist() Provides get > generated, though. The dependency generator was backported to EL7 and > is used with the Python 3

[Test-Announce] Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191203.n.1 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 32 Rawhide 20191203.n.1. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

[Bug 1779326] EPEL 8 build of perl-switch?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779326 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|---

[Bug 1779252] perltidy-20191203 is available

||perltidy-20191203-1.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2019-12-03 18:59:27 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Build done

Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

I have taken nodejs-raw-body and am pushing an updated version to rawhide now. -Jared On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 2:53 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to > keep js-jquery around: > > > nodejs-grunt-legacy-util > > nodejs-load-grunt-tasks >

[Bug 1779326] New: EPEL 8 build of perl-switch?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779326 Bug ID: 1779326 Summary: EPEL 8 build of perl-switch? Product: Fedora Version: 31 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-Switch

Help with rubygem packaging

Hi, Can someone check these specfiles before I submit review requests please? I have zero experience with packaging rubygem packaes. https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-hrx.spec https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/SPECS/rubygem-linked-list.spec Best regards Leigh

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Co

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Co on 2019-12-04 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT At freenode@fedora-meeting The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #meetingname EPEL #topic

Re: copr builders moved to F31, with more builders

On Monday, December 2, 2019 8:28:46 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > With a great help of fedora infra (Kevin) we were able to add a new set of > builders for x86_64 architecture, so the build queue processing should be > faster now. Also, the new machines should be a bit faster (while we still >

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Python 3.9

On 03. 12. 19 18:16, Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:22 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 03. 12. 19 17:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > Technically Qt5/PySide2 doesn't support Python 3.8 (even though it builds) and > don't plan to until the

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Python 3.9

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:22 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 03. 12. 19 17:04, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Technically Qt5/PySide2 doesn't support Python 3.8 (even though it > builds) and > > don't plan to until the release of 5.14. > At the same time, technically, Fedora 32 is not yet released. >

Re: Looking for a co-maintainer for timew: will sponsor + mentor

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 16:50:12 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hey, > > Add me as maintainer. I maintain taskwarrior which is very related :) Thanks---added you as co-maintainer now. I see taskwarrior has enough maintainers, but I use taskwarrior + timewarrior every day, so I can help with

Re: Looking for a co-maintainer for timew: will sponsor + mentor

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 21:03:41 +0530, Aniket Pradhan wrote: > Hello Ankur! > > timewarrior seems like an interesting tool, and would love to co-maintain it. Awesome---added you as co-maintainer. Let's discuss how to go about updating it etc. on IRC sometime. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha

Logs from Open/Public NeuroFedora team meeting: 1600 UTC on Tuesday, 3rd December

Hello, Please find the logs of the meeting below. Links to meetbot pages: - logs (HTML): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2019-12-03/neurofedora.2019-12-03-16.00.log.html - minutes (HTML): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2019-12-03/neurofedora.2019-12-03-16.00.html

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 9:07 am, Lennart Poettering wrote: Also note that on Fedora Workstation we default to suspend-on-idle these days. i.e. when you don't actually work on the laptop the laptop is suspended and not reachable via SSH at all, hence adding systemd-homed doesn't make anything

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Python 3.9

On 03. 12. 19 17:04, Richard Shaw wrote: It doesn't look like there are too many API breakages Yet :( but my only concern is that some of the upstreams for packages I maintain haven't caught up with 3.8 yet. That is a problem we will be fighting constantly. We expect Fedora to drive

[389-devel] please review: PR 50760 - Enable CLI arg completion

https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50760 -- 389 Directory Server Development Team ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Potential module for wxGTK3.1 unstable series / Audacity

CubicSDR (Ham Radio panadapter spectrum visualizer using inexpensive receivers) upstream moved to wxWidgets 3.1 over 18 months ago. While I had some success in backing out some specific changes that let it compile with wxGTK 3.0, upstream has moved on considerably since then, making extensive use

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Python 3.9

It doesn't look like there are too many API breakages but my only concern is that some of the upstreams for packages I maintain haven't caught up with 3.8 yet. Technically Qt5/PySide2 doesn't support Python 3.8 (even though it builds) and don't plan to until the release of 5.14. Thanks, Richard

Re: Looking for a co-maintainer for timew: will sponsor + mentor

Hey, Add me as maintainer. I maintain taskwarrior which is very related :) On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 16:28 Ankur Sinha wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for a co-maintainer to help maintain timew > (timewarrior[1]). The package is not very complex. There is only one bug > against timew at the

Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Python 3.9

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 Note that this is for Fedora *33* == Summary == Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.8 to Python 3.9. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]] * Email: python-ma...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == We would like to

Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Python 3.9

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.9 Note that this is for Fedora *33* == Summary == Update the Python stack in Fedora from Python 3.8 to Python 3.9. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Churchyard|Miro Hrončok]] * Email: python-ma...@redhat.com == Detailed Description == We would like to

Re: Looking for a co-maintainer for timew: will sponsor + mentor

Hello Ankur! timewarrior seems like an interesting tool, and would love to co-maintain it. On Tue, 3 Dec, 2019, 8:53 pm Ankur Sinha, wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for a co-maintainer to help maintain timew > (timewarrior[1]). The package is not very complex. There is only one bug >

Looking for a co-maintainer for timew: will sponsor + mentor

Hello, I am looking for a co-maintainer to help maintain timew (timewarrior[1]). The package is not very complex. There is only one bug against timew at the moment: 1775965 – timew-1.2.0 is available: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1775965 Since I'm focussing on Neuroscience

[Bug 1779252] New: perltidy-20191203 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779252 Bug ID: 1779252 Summary: perltidy-20191203 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perltidy Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1779252] perltidy-20191203 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779252 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Perl/Perl-Tidy-20191203.tar.gz to ./Perl-Tidy-20191203.tar.gz -- You

Re: dist-git bugzilla sync script being fixed

On 11/29/19 10:17 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone™, we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the script that syncs the default assignee and CC list from dist-git to Bugzilla. Since the script was broken for some time, we felt that it needs some

[Bug 1779180] perl-DBD-Mock-1.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779180 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1779180] perl-DBD-Mock-1.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779180 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug 1779180] perl-DBD-Mock-1.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779180 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- An HTTP error occurred downloading the package's new Source URLs: Getting https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/DBD/DBD-Mock-1.53.tar.gz to ./DBD-Mock-1.53.tar.gz -- You are

[Bug 1779180] New: perl-DBD-Mock-1.53 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779180 Bug ID: 1779180 Summary: perl-DBD-Mock-1.53 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DBD-Mock Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Firefox crashes at Rawhide

Just FYI, Firefox is recently crashing on Rawhide due to two independent issues as rawhide gets all builds automatically: 1) PGO mis-compilation/Firefox bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779082). Please use 'npgo' builds from koji. 2) glibc update

[Bug 1779106] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779106 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1779067] perl-Test-Simple-1.302170 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779067 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Fixed In Version|

[Bug 1779106] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779106 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:27:33AM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: >On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 Pierre-Yves Chibon <[1]pin...@pingoured.fr> >wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >    On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler >

[Bug 1779106] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779106 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39421629 -- You are

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019, 10:42 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > >On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <[1]kevin.kof...@chello.at> > wrote: > > > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > > * Should any other packager (not that

[Bug 1779106] New: perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779106 Bug ID: 1779106 Summary: perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Coro-Multicore Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 1779106] perl-Coro-Multicore-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779106 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1641632 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1641632=edit [patch] Update to 1.04 (#1779106) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On 03. 12. 19 10:41, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: As for the issue discussed in this thread, this sounds like a fairly easy change to add to: https://pagure.io/fedscm-admin/. Could someone open a ticket there? (Do not allow non-maintainer to request a branch on a package)

Re: Major rewrite of project

As Fabio wrote, just I add that you can opene PR in pagure, which is good way to show people the changes and get some feedback (as well, creating copr build should be done too). On 02. 12. 19 13:08, Tomas Korbar wrote: Thanks for help Fabio. On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:10 PM Fabio Valentini

Re: dist-git bugzilla sync script being fixed

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 06:26:32PM -0500, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2019 at 08:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > Good Morning Everyone™, > > > > we have recently spent some time refactoring, improving and fixing the > > script > > that syncs the default assignee and CC

[Bug 1779067] perl-Test-Simple-1.302170 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779067 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from

Re: RFC: Branch requests from non-maintainers

On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 11:25:13PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: >On Mon, Dec 2, 2019, 22:44 Kevin Kofler <[1]kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: > > Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > * Should any other packager (not that maintainer) be able to request > > new branches on that repo? > >

Re: Reproducible builds/bootstrap

On 30/11/19 23:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:20:42PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:46 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 02:43:48PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 12:18 PM Neal Gompa wrote: ...snip... I'd love to

Fedora-Cloud-31-20191203.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1778463] [RFE] EPEL-8 branch for perl-Data-Float

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1778463 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f1d32085d8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f1d32085d8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Di, 03.12.19 01:29, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote: > > The problem is that sshd's PAM implementation doesn't allow PAM > > modules to ask questions in login sessions which are authenticated via > > authorized_keys instead of PAM. Because if we could ask questions > > then, we

[Bug 1773105] perl-HTTP-Cookies-6.08 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1773105 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Tuesday, December 3, 2019 1:18:57 AM MST Lennart Poettering wrote: > systemd-homed integrates with sshd's AuthorizedKeysCommand and > supplies any SSH keys assoicated with the user account directly to SSH > without anyone needing access ~/.ssh/. i.e. integration with SSH is > actually already

[Bug 1779067] perl-Test-Simple-1.302170 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779067 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-Test-Simple-1.302170-1.fc29.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39419379 -- You

[Bug 1779067] New: perl-Test-Simple-1.302170 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779067 Bug ID: 1779067 Summary: perl-Test-Simple-1.302170 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Test-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Mo, 02.12.19 12:39, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > Basically you have to choose between user home security (or more > specifically privacy) and remote logins. However, there are some > ideas that could possibly work around this, to varying degrees of > inelegance, which I'll

[Bug 1779067] perl-Test-Simple-1.302170 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779067 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1641593 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1641593=edit [patch] Update to 1.302170 (#1779067) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

Re: js-jquery - Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February (beta)

Ben Rosser was working on sorting out grunt. In fact I believe he took the first of those at least. Tom On 03/12/2019 07:45, Vít Ondruch wrote: According to [1], these are the packages which need to be preserved to keep js-jquery around: nodejs-grunt-legacy-util nodejs-load-grunt-tasks

[Bug 1779065] New: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.137

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1779065 Bug ID: 1779065 Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.137 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Config-Model Assignee: david.hanneq...@gmail.com

Re: Fedora 32 System-Wide Change proposal: Disallow Empty Password By Default

On Mo, 02.12.19 10:44, John M. Harris Jr (joh...@splentity.com) wrote: > On Monday, December 2, 2019 9:48:05 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > > On 11/27/19 2:59 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 09:39:59AM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > > >> Mabee