https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795114
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795119
Bug ID: 1795119
Summary: Upgrade perl-Time-Local to 1.30
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Time-Local
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795118
Bug ID: 1795118
Summary: Upgrade perl-String-RewritePrefix to 0.008
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-String-RewritePrefix
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795114
Bug ID: 1795114
Summary: Upgrade perl-Pod-Elemental to 0.103005
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pod-Elemental
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795113
Bug ID: 1795113
Summary: Upgrade perl-Pegex to 0.74
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Pegex
Assignee: g...@zimt.uni-siegen.de
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795112
Bug ID: 1795112
Summary: Upgrade perl-Data-Perl to 0.002011
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Data-Perl
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I have chosen a delinquent Java package to work fix. But I need some help
understanding what's going on. Groovy is failing to build because it depends on
gradle-local which doesn't exist. But gradle-local did exist at one time
because groovy was successfully build with it on 2019-07-30. So,
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/01/27/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.2-20200127git9b779ed.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020 22:33:55 -, you wrote:
>> That's not really fair. DNF is pretty much only the user interface,
>> and everything it's built on top of (hawkey, librepo, libsolv) is
>> implemented in C / C++. And when I think back to using yum, dnf is
>> really fast :)
>> I don't know which
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 11:17 AM Benjamin Kircher wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2020-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > libbotan-2.so bumped its soname from libbotan-2.so.12 to
> > libbotan-2.so.13 with yesterday's update to 2.13.0. This was not
> > announced, and
> You're right. The Java SIG was not organised around an account group,
> so it does not exist. I don't know why it is that way, but that could
> easily be fixed - other language interest groups are organised this
> way, after all (python-sig, go-sig, ruby-sig, etc.).
I don't really understand
I understand it can be done. But in the past getting something to work in wine
is a guessing game. The instructions don't work. Winetricks doesn't get you to
a functioning game and PlayOnLinux was for a long time non-functional in Fedora
as the windows would not display properly. So getting a
> Well, I don't know if its indicative of what they use for development,
> but at Red Hat Summit last year, *all* the Java middleware demos were
> on macOS.
That is frustrating and I don't like it. But, I suppose it makes since if their
customers are using Macs to do development work and then
Great info. Thanks! It's always more complicated than I first imagine. :-)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Yea, I understand what you're saying.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
I will do that. Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
I hear what you're saying. But I am undeterred. :-)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
So I need to fix something that is a one-person job to get started.
On Sunday, January 26, 2020, 4:04:06 PM EST, Felix Schwarz
wrote:
Am 26.01.20 um 01:10 schrieb Bill Chatfield via devel:
> That's a very sad story. I had no idea. So it sounds like you mainly need
> maintainers for
On su, 26 tammi 2020, Fabio Valentini wrote:
Hi everybody,
Yesterday's samba update bumped the soname of a library included in
samba-client-libs, from libndr.so.0 to libndr.so.1. This was not
announced, and dependent packages were not rebuilt. This affects at
least the following packages, which
Am 26.01.20 um 01:10 schrieb Bill Chatfield via devel:
> That's a very sad story. I had no idea. So it sounds like you mainly need
> maintainers for Java packages. I have worked on building RPMs but I have
> never been a package maintainer. However I have 20 years of experience as a
> Java
On Sun, Jan 26, 2020 at 12:36 PM Tom Seewald wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel
> *snip*
> > True. Nobody cares about Java packages in fedora, not even Red Hat
> > employees. If you look at the members of the Java SIG, a lot of them
> > were (or still are) Red
Hello,
golang-github-ajstarks-svgo has been relicensed from CC-BY to MIT.
Best regards,
Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel
*snip*
> True. Nobody cares about Java packages in fedora, not even Red Hat
> employees. If you look at the members of the Java SIG, a lot of them
> were (or still are) Red Hat employees. For example, even JBoss /
> WildFly (a pretty big
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 5:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel
wrote:
>
> I'm trying to find out what's going on with Java in Fedora. Fedora 31 was
> released with a broken Eclipse. I subscribe to the java-devel mailing list
> but there is no traffic there. If I go to "Join a Group" and click on "J"
Hi Bill,
On 25/01/2020 23:06, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
In another case I tried to set up a Fedora system to run games, as that is what
kids want to do. That was an utter failure because Fedora can't run any game
that kids want to run today. The ability to run games cannot be
Unfortunately, I also experience several issues with using Eclipse in Fedora.
Actually the standard Eclipse package is not working well, and I am confused by
the regular package and modular package mixture.
See also what I wrote at:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:07 PM Bill Chatfield via devel
wrote:
Hi again,
I have a bit more time today, so I can respond to your more of your
arguments directly.
> I'm trying to find out what's going on with Java in Fedora. Fedora 31 was
> released with a broken Eclipse. I subscribe to the
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
5 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 37/158 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200125.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200126.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 7
Added packages: 10
Dropped packages:5
Upgraded packages: 33
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 20.74 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 10:10 +, Andrew Haley a écrit :
> On 1/26/20 8:43 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
>
> > Java has been in a terminal course in Fedora for a year at
> > least. You can see how much Red Hat Java leadership cares about the
> > situation by consulting next week’s
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Sun, 2020-01-26 at 00:02 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> libbotan-2.so bumped its soname from libbotan-2.so.12 to
> libbotan-2.so.13 with yesterday's update to 2.13.0. This was not
> announced, and dependent packages were not rebuilt. At least the
> following three packages
On 1/26/20 8:43 AM, Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote:
> Java has been in a terminal course in Fedora for a year at
> least. You can see how much Red Hat Java leadership cares about the
> situation by consulting next week’s Java dev room schedule. Red Hat
> is co- organisator of this dev room
>
Try
https://askbot.fedoraproject.org/en/question/71293/how-do-i-overcome-these-dnf-and-rpm-errors/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 05:25 +, Bill Chatfield via devel a
écrit :
> And if the Gnome guys actually had information like this, they'd be
> forced to deal with it.
Forcing people does not work that well in real life, and even less in
free software circles where participation is
On Sat, 2020-01-25 at 22:06 +, Bill Chatfield via devel wrote:
> You need automated tests. You need a suit of manual tests. For every package.
So to chime in on the QA aspects of this: the above is not
realistically possible, and it's also an explicit non-goal of all QA
and CI efforts.
We
* Bill Chatfield via devel [25/01/2020 23:23] :
>
> I'd be willing to work on that if I can figure out how to recreate the group.
> Can you point me in the right direction?
SIGs are rather informal and none of them have a joining procedure
that I know of. That said, this was already discussed on
Le dimanche 26 janvier 2020 à 00:10 +, Bill Chatfield via devel a
écrit :
> That's a very sad story. I had no idea. So it sounds like you mainly
> need maintainers for Java packages. I have worked on building RPMs
> but I have never been a package maintainer. However I have 20 years
> of
I got this problem with my Fedora distro 31 index and I think this can be an
issue on development team
Error is this:
[root@desk mythcat]# dnf install memtest86+.x86_64
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:53 ago on Sun 26 Jan 2020 10:19:10 AM EET.
Dependencies resolved.
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
41 matches
Mail list logo
