No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I intend to unretire python-dockerpty, which was retired four weeks ago due to
being orphaned. It is a dependency of docker-compose, which cannot build in f32
without it, and for which I'm the maintainer. I've submitted releng issue
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9288
On 2/28/20 9:37 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
F32
$ id dnsmasq
id: ‘dnsmasq’: no such user
F31
$ id dnsmasq
uid=987(dnsmasq) gid=987(dnsmasq) groups=987(dnsmasq)
Maybe related to this?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Adopting_sysusers.d_format
Possibly, but there's definitely a bug. You
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:31 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 2/28/20 3:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >dnsmasq: unknown user or
> > group: dnsmasq
> >
> >
> > So it seems like the dnsmasq user and group should exist, but I don't
> > know what should be
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/02/29/report-389-ds-base-1.4.3.3-20200229git5fb0471.fc31.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-91512b5eee
proftpd-1.3.3g-14.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
libabigail-1.7-1.el6
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
563 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
305 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c499781e80
python-gnupg-0.4.4-1.el7
303
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1757318
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
On 2/28/20 3:52 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
dnsmasq: unknown user or
group: dnsmasq
So it seems like the dnsmasq user and group should exist, but I don't
know what should be creating it.
What does "id dnsmasq" give you?
I'm trying to figure out more about what's causing this bug
NAT (Inactive) by default, cannot create a VM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1807768
/etc/passwd on Rawhide installed some time before branch contains a
dnsmasq user. But on a Fedora 32 system installed this week (after
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 192
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 15.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 28. 02. 20 23:36, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 23:06 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I assume there's an extra "not" here. On that assumption - I understand
the problem, but if you check the history of my builds in EPEL, I'm
definitely not in that group of people :P
Cool,
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 23:06 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > I assume there's an extra "not" here. On that assumption - I understand
> > the problem, but if you check the history of my builds in EPEL, I'm
> > definitely not in that group of people :P
>
> Cool, sorry for that assumption, it
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200226.0):
ID: 529729 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/529729
Soft failed
On 28. 02. 20 22:21, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:13 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 20:42 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* ...the Shiny New Stuff does not appear to be available on EPEL *at
all* yet - not even EPEL 8. This makes it a bit of a non-starter if you
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 25/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200227.n.0):
ID: 529555 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/529555
ID: 529610 Test: x86_64
On 28. 02. 20 22:12, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 20:42 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* ...the Shiny New Stuff does not appear to be available on EPEL *at
all* yet - not even EPEL 8. This makes it a bit of a non-starter if you
want to use the same spec file bits across Fedora and
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 22/171 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 4:13 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 20:42 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > > * ...the Shiny New Stuff does not appear to be available on EPEL *at
> > > all* yet - not even EPEL 8. This makes it a bit of a non-starter if you
> > > want to use the same
On 2/28/20 1:04 PM, Scott Talbert wrote:
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can someone point me to a way to generate a list of non-retired
packages that I am a maintainer on? Thanks.
Hunting around for a "pagure cli" doesn't bring up much that seems
active.
You could probably
On Fri, 2020-02-28 at 20:42 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> > * ...the Shiny New Stuff does not appear to be available on EPEL *at
> > all* yet - not even EPEL 8. This makes it a bit of a non-starter if you
> > want to use the same spec file bits across Fedora and EPEL. I realize
> > it may be
OLD: Fedora-32-20200227.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200228.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 1
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Something like this should work:
$ curl -o result.json
'https://src.fedoraproject.org/api/0/projects?owner=orion_page=100'
$ jq :
>
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> > Can someone point me to a way to generate a list of non-retired packages
> > that
> > I am a maintainer on?
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Can someone point me to a way to generate a list of non-retired packages that
I am a maintainer on? Thanks.
Hunting around for a "pagure cli" doesn't bring up much that seems active.
You could probably scrape it from here?
Can someone point me to a way to generate a list of non-retired packages
that I am a maintainer on? Thanks.
Hunting around for a "pagure cli" doesn't bring up much that seems active.
--
Orion Poplawski
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office
On 28. 02. 20 17:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 01:29 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 13. 01. 20 22:54, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 23:24 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Please don't mention it as required or even necessarily recommended, as
it may not be. I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
The following Sources of the specfile are not valid URLs so we cannot
automatically build the new version for you. Please use URLs in your Source
declarations if possible.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655461
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|w3c-markup-validator-20.2.2
---
title: CPE Weekly status email
tags: CPE Weekly, email
---
# CPE Weekly: 2020-02-28
Background:
The Community Platform Engineering group is the Red Hat team combining
IT and release engineering from Fedora and CentOS. Our goal is to keep
core servers and services running and maintained,
Hi Daniel,
I would like to add to Ankur's point: while I understand that many of us are
doing Fedora work voluntarily and the expectations should be set accordingly, I
believe we should be open to accept help when we realise that we cannot
realistically commit enough time to the project. In
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 16:17, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:50:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:43:16AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:50:05PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:14,
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. dnf-plugins-extras — Cannot upgrade to Fedora 32: Modules blocking
the upgrade path — NEW
ACTION: QA to test dnf-plugins-extras-4.0.9-3.fc32
2. PackageKit — Cannot upgrade to Fedora 32: Modules blocking the
upgrade path —
On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 01:29 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 01. 20 22:54, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-01-12 at 23:24 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > Please don't mention it as required or even necessarily recommended, as
> > > > it may not be. I intentionally set up my projects
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808079
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:27:02AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 2/28/20 8:20 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 28.02.2020 16:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > I have already reduced the make parallelism to 1, so not sure what else
> > > I can do to avoid this other than to exclude it
On 2/28/20 8:20 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 28.02.2020 16:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have already reduced the make parallelism to 1, so not sure what else
I can do to avoid this other than to exclude it (which I'm probably
happy to do). Suggestions welcome.
You can try this:
On 28.02.2020 16:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I have already reduced the make parallelism to 1, so not sure what else
> I can do to avoid this other than to exclude it (which I'm probably
> happy to do). Suggestions welcome.
You can try this:
%global optflags %(echo %{optflags} | sed 's/-g /-g1
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 10:21:22AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > In the mean time, you can file a releng ticket when you are ready and we
> > can retag all your builds from the side-tag into candidate so you can
> > make a update from them. :( Sorry for the hassle.
>
>
On 28/2/20 12:04, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm unable to build ParaView on armv7hl:
[ 14%] Building CXX object
VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/CMakeFiles/AcceleratorsVTKm.dir/vtkmClip.cxx.o
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.8.0/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm
&& /usr/bin/c++
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 08:50:08AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:43:16AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:50:05PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:14, Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Despite earlier
I'm unable to build ParaView on armv7hl:
[ 14%] Building CXX object
VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm/CMakeFiles/AcceleratorsVTKm.dir/vtkmClip.cxx.o
cd
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.8.0/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/VTK/Accelerators/Vtkm
&& /usr/bin/c++ -DAcceleratorsVTKm_EXPORTS
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 at 15:07, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Dne 27. 02. 20 v 16:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:48:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > >>
Dne 28. 02. 20 v 15:06 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 27. 02. 20 v 16:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:48:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
For the changelog,
Hi team,
Please, review two small and one big PRs I have:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50924
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50922
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50918
Thanks!
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:31:23PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 27. 02. 20 v 16:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:48:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >> For the changelog, we believe we have a potential good solution:
> >> - The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796214
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
Link ID|
Dne 27. 02. 20 v 16:11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:48:36PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> For the changelog, we believe we have a potential good solution:
>> - The changelog will be automatically generated using an external `changelog`
>>
Please excuse me going completely offtopic here - for some reason I'm
getting this thread addressed directly to me. If someone's adding me as bcc
please don't, I have nothing to do with this.
Thanks,
Radka
--
*Radka Janeková (she/her)*
.NET Core QE Lead, Red Hat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1808079
Jan Pazdziora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In the mean time, you can file a releng ticket when you are ready and we
> can retag all your builds from the side-tag into candidate so you can
> make a update from them. :( Sorry for the hassle.
Unless this changed recently, you can actually tag your packages into
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 17:07:21 -0500, Dakota Williams via devel wrote:
> On 2/26/20 6:59 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> > >
> > > Would you like help? I'd be willing to be a co-maintainer to make the
> > > branch.
> >
> > Yes, I would welcome help with these packages
> >
> > But there is also an
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 11:43:16AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 07:50:05PM +0100, Clement Verna wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 14:14, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > > Despite earlier concerns, this does in fact appear to all be working fine.
> > >
> >
> > Yes
55 matches
Mail list logo
