OLD: Fedora-32-20200423.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200423.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 13
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/173 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-32-20200423.n.0):
ID: 585838 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/585838
ID: 585982 Test: x86_64 universal
Indeed, but they should add the provides: bundled(cubeb) in the spec
Anyway, I made a review request for anyone interested:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826034
I plan to make a pull request to Firefox later if I can get it to unbundle.
Hi,
Looking for a reviewer for this, happy to review in return:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827427
"""
Argos is a GNOME Shell extension that turns executables'
standard output into panel dropdown menus. It is inspired by, and fully
compatible with, the BitBar app for macOS.
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Committee on 2020-04-24 from 21:00:00 to 22:00:00 UTC
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting.
A general agenda is the following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic
Haha, I tried to plan! Due to a change in the infrastructure move
timeline, the Elections app will now be available during the
originally-scheduled time. Instead of delaying the elections further,
we will just pretend I never made any changes and hold to the original
timeline:
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd x86_64
Iot dvd aarch64
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200422.0):
ID: 585636 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/585636
ID: 585637
On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 18:00 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Development work has begun on the API which will give applications access
> > to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to this new AAA
> >
Am 23.04.2020 um 19:00 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
Hi,
Development work has begun on the API which will give applications access
to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to this new AAA
solution we need to identify
On 4/23/20 12:00 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
Hi,
Development work has begun on the API which will give applications access
to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to this new AAA
solution we need to identify
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2020, 18:00 +0100 schrieb Richard W.M. Jones:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Development work has begun on the API which will give applications
> > access
> > to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200422.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200423.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:7
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 138
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 683.11 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:11:25AM +0200, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to
> hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process.
>
> NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox) historically supports 2
> database formats:
The Fedora 32 Final RC1.6 compose [1] is GO and will be shipped live
on Tuesday, 28 April 2020.
For more information please check the Go/No-Go meeting minutes [2] or logs [3].
Thank you to everyone who has worked on this release and getting it out on time.
[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827355
Bug ID: 1827355
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.11.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Stephen Coady wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Development work has begun on the API which will give applications access
> to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to this new AAA
> solution we need to identify applications which consume the old FAS API
OLD: Fedora-32-20200422.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200423.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi,
Development work has begun on the API which will give applications access
to the new AAA solution. As part of our effort to migrate to this new AAA
solution we need to identify applications which consume the old FAS API in
some way.
I have compiled a list of candidates [1] and would be
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:16 AM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:16:49AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:16 AM Nick Clifton wrote:
> >
> > > *sigh* Sorry guys. Please try using annobin-9.21.1-fc33. This
> should
> > > fix the issue.
> > >
> >
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 8/8 (x86_64)
Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso
install_default@uefi:
System load changed from 0.03 to 0.18
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/584387#downloads
Current test data:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 3:41 PM Mohan Boddu wrote:
> My personal favorite is Fedora 26
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers#Fedora_26
>
> I am not an artist, but the silhouette of the calming woods with the
> reflection it on the lake is just *serene*.
>
Great share on this, adding
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:16:49AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:16 AM Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> > *sigh* Sorry guys. Please try using annobin-9.21.1-fc33. This should
> > fix the issue.
> >
>
> Just got bit by this on a local mock build for Rawhide... Can it be
On 23. 04. 20 16:28, Kamil Dudka wrote:
It really looks like my requests
were ignored until maintainer status was called into question.
Because you did not use an appropriate channel to discuss your concerns.
Bugzilla is a tool to report bugs, most frequently when something does
not work as
Kamil Dudka writes:
> On Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:08:24 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> That's not how this works.
>
> Yes and I am trying to suggest you how to make it work.
>
>> Even if your assertion were true (which it isn't), we have a closure
>> status for that. Michal (the maintainer,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 7:16 AM Nick Clifton wrote:
> *sigh* Sorry guys. Please try using annobin-9.21.1-fc33. This should
> fix the issue.
>
Just got bit by this on a local mock build for Rawhide... Can it be ignored?
Thanks,
Richard
___
devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806619
Scott Talbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
Ah. Scratch builds aren't considered real builds, so they don't show up in the
builds list and I was peeking around there. Thanks.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Thursday, April 23, 2020 4:08:24 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> That's not how this works.
Yes and I am trying to suggest you how to make it work.
> Even if your assertion were true (which it isn't), we have a closure
> status for that. Michal (the maintainer, who isn't you) even used it -
Kamil Dudka writes:
> On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:36 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
>> To make this as clear as I can, let's look at
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
>
> The above mentioned ticket is not a bug report in the first place.
That's not how this works.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks
and select the `Owner:` (your FAS name), under `State:` select `All`
On 23/04/20 15:34, Artur Iwicki wrote:
> I looked through the help / --help for the command and tried searching the
> wiki and didn't find an answer, so I'm asking here: is there any
CentOS Stream has recently been updated to include the updated
qt5-5.12.5 that will be part of RHEL 8.2. The qt5-5.12.* releases are
the LTS version of qt5, we this very good news.
The problem is that the KDE packages in EPEL were built on qt5-5.11.*,
and many of them won't install on 5.12.
I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827253
Bug ID: 1827253
Summary: perl-Date-Manip 6.81 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Date-Manip
Status: NEW
Component:
I looked through the help / --help for the command and tried searching the wiki
and didn't find an answer, so I'm asking here: is there any way to retrieve a
list of scratch builds I've submitted to koji?
___
devel mailing list --
So I was thinking about it and the unification of code for git_release
and git_version makes sense according to my best knowledge.
Below is my reasoning. It would be great if somebody could check if it
is correct.
Note that in the end, the macros should be easy and intuitive to use.
The
On 25. 11. 19 22:33, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonNoSemanticInterpositionSpeedup
Simplified version of another change proposal|This change was
originally proposed for [[Releases/32|Fedora 32]] as
[[Changes/PythonStaticSpeedup]], however based on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678623
Dridi Boukelmoune changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(dridi.boukelmoune |
|@gmail.com)
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wednesday, April 22, 2020 7:28:36 PM CEST Robbie Harwood wrote:
> To make this as clear as I can, let's look at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815163
The above mentioned ticket is not a bug report in the first place. You just
expressed your personal opinion about a package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826527
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Mojolicious-8.39 is|perl-Mojolicious-8.40 is
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 10:11:25 +0200, Daiki Ueno wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Daiki,
>
> I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to
> hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process.
>
> NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox) historically supports 2
> database
* Paul Howarth [20/04/2020 10:09] :
>
> I'll be a member.
Added. I've also taken the liberty of subscribing you to
the perl-ma...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list.
Emmanuel
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
* Petr Pisar [22/04/2020 16:20] :
>
> Thanks. I approved the subscription and added you to the list owners. I'm not
> sure if you received any confirmation by e-mail. The new Mailman is a huge
> regress in a user interface.
No confirmation but I can manage the list once I login on the web
Hi Xavier,
Since this thread has your attention, I'd like to take over
rubygem-json, if you don't mind.
Vít
Dne 22. 04. 20 v 21:03 Xavier Lamien napsal(a):
> Oh hi,
>
> Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me
> personally or my bugzilla's filter is too efficient
Le jeudi 23 avril 2020 à 06:42 +, Mattia Verga via devel a écrit :
>
> This is something I would really like to have in Fedora repos, but
> it
> requires some Golang packaging skills which I miss. Golang packaging
> guidelines follows specific rules, the specfile you provide is not
>
Il 22/04/20 00:22, Maximiliano Sandoval via devel ha scritto:
> Hi everyone, I would like to request a rpm build for
> [protonmail-bridge](https://protonmail.com/bridge/), which recently released
> its source at [github](https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge). I have
> been unable to
47 matches
Mail list logo
