https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/06/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.3-20200606git05e3407.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 6/2/20 4:52 AM, Code Zombie wrote:
Is there an official branch of Fedora for WSL or a plan to create one?
The good news is that it's reasonably straightforward to install an
unpackaged distribution, you just need a tarball of the distribution.
And lots of those are available for use
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:16:02 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/6/20 10:41 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, June 6, 2020 1:15:35 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> >
> >> On 6/6/20 12:42 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On my laptop, a Lenovo X200T with Core(TM)2 Duo
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:55:42 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:00 AM Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > But let's say we also add a lower priority disk swap, then my next
> > question ...
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Also does the swap partition on disk contain compressed
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 4:18 AM David Kaufmann wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > 5GB of swap space that normally would be on disk is now taking less than 2G
> > of RAM. Instead of the usual 6G in the disk swap, now I have less than 2.
>
> What's
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:04 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:07:44PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> > This laptop with 8GiB RAM is running two VMs at the same time: Windows
> > 10 and Fedora Workstation 32. The host is Fedora Workstation 32.
>
> So this suggests another
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 10:00 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> But let's say we also add a lower priority disk swap, then my next
> question ...
>
> > > Also does the swap partition on disk contain compressed pages, or
> > > uncompressed pages, or a mix of both?
> >
> > With zram there is no
On 6/6/20 9:27 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
See, this is a clear indication that you don't understand what it is
doing and weren't listening to the various people trying to explain
it.
Not sure this is needed. The conversation so
On 6/6/20 10:41 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 1:15:35 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 6/6/20 12:42 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On my laptop, a Lenovo X200T with Core(TM)2 Duo CPU U9300; 6 GiB RAM,
enabling swap on zram led to increased CPU usage (Always above 13% where
On 6/6/20 9:04 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:07:44PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
This laptop with 8GiB RAM is running two VMs at the same time: Windows
10 and Fedora Workstation 32. The host is Fedora Workstation 32.
So this suggests another interesting question: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844743
Bug ID: 1844743
Summary: perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0501 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Test-TrailingSpace
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844743
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
An unexpected error occurred while creating the scratch build and has been
automatically reported. Sorry!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 18:11 +0100, Carlos Mogas da Silva via devel wrote:
> Well, I can just put my 2 cents in here...
> I've requested my first package not so long ago [1] and after I find the
> documentation [2] [3] it
> was rather "simple" to
> learn how to do a proper spec file. I was a
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200605.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200606.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 9
Dropped packages:10
Upgraded packages: 214
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 51.58 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 1:15:35 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/6/20 12:42 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > On my laptop, a Lenovo X200T with Core(TM)2 Duo CPU U9300; 6 GiB RAM,
> > enabling swap on zram led to increased CPU usage (Always above 13% where
> > normally idling at 6%!), and my
On Saturday, June 6, 2020 3:37:13 AM MST Igor Raits wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 02:09 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> > Igor Raits wrote:
> >
> > > The change says it will use 50% of user’s RAM size, but not more
> > > than
> > > 4G.
> >
> >
> >
> > But if the machine has only, say, 4 GiB of
Missing expected images:
Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64
Passed openQA tests: 13/13 (x86_64)
New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-33-20200605.0):
ID: 612937 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_greenboot
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/612937
Installed system changes
On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 08:54 -0700, stan via devel wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 06:40:43 -0500
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Mender
> > wrote:
> > > As someone who just recently started out with packaging and has a
> > > fresh view on the problem, I would be more
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> See, this is a clear indication that you don't understand what it is
> doing and weren't listening to the various people trying to explain
> it.
Not sure this is needed. The conversation so far has talked about
many interesting
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 04:07:44PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> This laptop with 8GiB RAM is running two VMs at the same time: Windows
> 10 and Fedora Workstation 32. The host is Fedora Workstation 32.
So this suggests another interesting question: If I have Fedora
virtual machines running on a
On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 05:55:26PM +0200, Igor Raits wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 15:11 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'm unclear: that ~50M is still in RAM? Or it's compressed on a disk
> > somewhere?
>
> IIUC, it takes some part of the RAM and just compresses it on the fly.
> For
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 06:40:43 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Mender
> wrote:
> > As someone who just recently started out with packaging and has a
> > fresh view on the problem, I would be more than happy to help out
> > with the docs :).
> >
>
> YES PLEASE.
> On 05. 06. 20 15:55, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1825456
> >
> > Proposed package name is "libvirt-test-api". Upstream name is
> > "libvirt-test-API".
> >
> > It is, very very loosely, a Python 3 API and the package includes
> > Python
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 22:49 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 06. 20 22:30, Filipe Laíns wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hey Filipe.
>
> For Fedora related Python packaging topics, would you be OK to use a
> public
> mailing list?
>
>
Le samedi 06 juin 2020 à 12:37 +0200, Igor Raits a écrit :
>
> Why is it painful? You have all dependencies packaged that follow
> semver (not like Go) and it is quite easy to build those packages.
And Go has all build dependencies in the release where they are used
(not like rust, with magic
On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 5:54 AM Andy Mender wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> As someone who is trying to get into packaging in Fedora, I would really
> really appreciate the docs being less dispersed:
> - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
> -
Hiya,
As someone who is trying to get into packaging in Fedora, I would really
really appreciate the docs being less dispersed:
- https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_a_GNU_Hello_RPM_package
-
On Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:06:28 +0200, Andy Mender wrote:
> I'm a heavy LXQt user. Does that mean that if those packages get orphaned
> for good, they will be dropped from the repositories?
It is explained here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 02:09 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Igor Raits wrote:
> > The change says it will use 50% of user’s RAM size, but not more
> > than
> > 4G.
>
> But if the machine has only, say, 4 GiB of RAM, then the amount of
> extra RAM
>
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 2020-06-06 at 02:19 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > So yes it's well suited for these cases and the proposal does
> > include
> > them. If they wish to be left out, that's up to those working
> > groups.
> > It's
Hi!
On Sat, Jun 06, 2020 at 01:15:35AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> 5GB of swap space that normally would be on disk is now taking less than 2G
> of RAM. Instead of the usual 6G in the disk swap, now I have less than 2.
What's bugging me about this thread is that quite a few people made
>
> LXQt as a general project:
> rpms/featherpad
> rpms/libfm-qt
> rpms/liblxqt
> rpms/liblxqt-mount
> rpms/light-locker
> rpms/lximage-qt
> rpms/lxmenu-data
> rpms/lxqt-about
> rpms/lxqt-admin
> rpms/lxqt-build-tools
> rpms/lxqt-common
> rpms/lxqt-config
> rpms/lxqt-config-randr
>
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> with two 3 GiB HDDs
Correction: two 3 TB HDDs. That was off by a factor 931. :-)
Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> See, this is a clear indication that you don't understand what it is
> doing and weren't listening to the various people trying to explain it.
> It is definitely not a placebo. I gave zram 5G out of the 12G I have
> and my laptop is performing way better now. It's not
John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> On my laptop, a Lenovo X200T with Core(TM)2 Duo CPU U9300; 6 GiB RAM,
> enabling swap on zram led to increased CPU usage (Always above 13% where
> normally idling at 6%!), and my entire system freezing after about 30
> minutes. In all fairness, I don't know why my system
On 6/6/20 12:42 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On my laptop, a Lenovo X200T with Core(TM)2 Duo CPU U9300; 6 GiB RAM, enabling
swap on zram led to increased CPU usage (Always above 13% where normally
idling at 6%!), and my entire system freezing after about 30 minutes. In all
fairness, I don't know
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/1 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
ID: 612744 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/612744
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
On Friday, June 5, 2020 11:57:50 PM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 6/5/20 11:43 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
>
> > Completely agreed, going about it this way would also address most of my
> > concerns with this change, as it would mean it's easy for people like
> > myself to opt out.
>
>
> If you
On 6/5/20 11:43 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
Completely agreed, going about it this way would also address most of my
concerns with this change, as it would mean it's easy for people like myself
to opt out.
If you don't want it, then disable the generator or uninstall it. I
don't understand
On Friday, June 5, 2020 5:19:55 PM MST Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> > So yes it's well suited for these cases and the proposal does include
> > them. If they wish to be left out, that's up to those working groups.
> > It's possible to make sure /etc/systemd/zram-generator is not
41 matches
Mail list logo
